With BNZ having set a specific target to reduce its financed emissions in the dairy sector, have any of the other major rural lenders done the same, and if not will they?
Last week Interest.co.nz's Of Interest podcast featured Rebekah Cain, BNZ's Chief Sustainability Officer, discussing the bank's membership of the Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA). Whilst BNZ's the only New Zealand bank that's a member of the NZBA, the other key rural lenders' parent banks are members.
The industry-led, United Nations convened NZBA is a group of banks aiming to transition their lending and investment portfolios to net-zero emissions by 2050. It has 133 bank members from 43 countries holding a combined US$74 trillion in total assets, which is estimated to be 41% of global banking assets. Membership of the NZBA comes with emissions reduction targets.
One of BNZ's initial targets is a dairy farming sector emissions target of an 11% reduction in financed biological emissions intensity by 2030 against a 2022 baseline. This aligns to 2030 emissions intensity assumptions in the Climate Change Commission's recommendations to the Government for NZ's emissions budgets.
BNZ notes the dairy farming sector accounts for about 23% of NZ's annual export earnings, and contributes about 22% of the country's gross emissions.
Sector targets required
NZBA members are required to set sector level targets for agriculture, aluminium, cement, coal, commercial and residential real estate, iron and steel, oil and gas, power generation, and transport. They're meant to prioritise sectors based on greenhouse gas emissions, greenhouse gas emissions intensities and/or financial exposure in their portfolio in their first round of target setting within 18 months of signing. Subsequently the remaining sectors must be included in target setting within 36 months of signing.
In the podcast Cain said one of the reasons why BNZ decided to individually sign up for the NZBA is because the emissions profile of NZ is significantly different from the emissions profile of Australia. This means the BNZ financial portfolio is significantly different from that of its parent National Australia Bank (NAB).
"Part of the Net-Zero Global Banking Alliance requires you to identify which portfolios are your most material to decarbonise. For NAB that is very much looking at fossil fuels. And while that is important for us to say that we are making commitments in the fossil fuel area, and are supporting our customers to decarbonise, the dairy sector is really where things hit the pointy end in New Zealand," Cain said.
Finance, she noted, is "a key lever to pull in order to shift the real economy."
"Part of the reason for this is because if something is funded it happens. And if it isn't funded it doesn't happen," Cain said.
So where are the other banks at?
So what of the other major rural lenders, - ANZ NZ, Rabobank, ASB and Westpac? As noted, all their parent banks have signed up to the NZBA.
A spokeswoman for ANZ NZ said the ANZ Group is initially focused on emissions reduction targets in the power generation, oil and gas, aluminium, steel, cement, and large commercial property sectors. ANZ NZ's lending exposure in these sectors is included in the group targets where relevant, the spokeswoman said.
"We have not set financed emissions targets in NZ for agri. The ANZ Group’s commitment to the Net Zero Banking Alliance includes examining the feasibility of setting a sectoral pathway for food, beverages and agribusiness, and we expect this will include New Zealand lending."
"One of our key focus areas this year in New Zealand has been to gain a deeper understanding of climate risk in our agriculture portfolio. Our immediate focus is to support our customers with decisions on managing and mitigating environmental risk, and to support the shift to more sustainable practices by removing some of the cost barriers businesses face," the ANZ NZ spokeswoman said.
The ANZ Group signed up to the NZBA in October 2021, meaning it's required to have emissions reduction targets in place for the agriculture sector by October 2024.
A Rabobank spokesman said the bank has "emissions intensity" rather than “absolute emissions” reduction targets for its global portfolio. In terms of its NZ dairy portfolio, Rabobank has set a preliminary 12% emissions intensity reduction target.
"This means that for the sector to achieve this it would need to become 12% more emissions efficient per kg of dairy production by 2030. The target for the sector is not to reduce absolute emissions by 12% or to reduce New Zealand dairy by 12%," the Rabobank spokesman said.
He said the world needs to produce more food to feed a growing population, and Rabobank will continue supporting and encouraging the NZ primary sector to grow, as NZ is one of the most carbon efficient dairy producers in the world.
An ASB spokeswoman said the bank is committed to accelerating New Zealand’s transition to a low carbon economy and has started preliminary work to define emissions pathways and targets for key sectors in our lending portfolio, including dairy.
"This work is in its initial stages and we fully expect targets will evolve as climate models change and better quality data becomes available over time," the ASB spokeswoman said.
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, ASB's parent, signed up to the NZBA in January 2022. That means it must have targets in place for the agriculture sector by January 2025.
And a Westpac spokeswoman said the bank's proud to be a part of the NZBA and is working closely with rural customers to help them manage climate-related risk.
"We don’t have any targets to announce at this stage, however we expect to set targets in the future in-line with our NZBA commitments," the Westpac spokeswoman said.
The Westpac group signed up to the NZBA in July 2022, meaning it must have targets in place for the agriculture sector by July 2025.
BNZ signed up in October 2021, ahead of NAB in December 2021, and the Rabobank group signed in November 2021.
*This article was first published in our email for paying subscribers early on Monday morning. See here for more details and how to subscribe.
22 Comments
Since this is a financial website, and in the interests of balance, can we have an article on how to profit from this? I am quite short NZ$ so that’s been doing well. We are about to see a generational fall in our standard of living so let’s at least try and profit from it.
Given the long cold /muddy winter/falling product prices and increased farm running and finance costs...
any banker coming up the driveway to espouse the virtues of reducing carbon is likely to have the dogs set on them.
best they do it over the phone..
The major lending agi banks (anz/rabo ) will be more concerned about farm survival than any climate targets.
We won’t need to ration - if the developing world keeps chopping down trees to fill the Agri gap - shame this more than compensates for any reductions in the developed world - but hey whoever thought this was all about saving the planet anyway …
https://files.wri.org/d8/s3fs-public/2023-07/the-global-land-squeeze-re…
Who would want to be a BNZ dairy farmer: Key target assumptions include a dairy cattle reduction of 13% between 2019 and 2030, a 4% milk production decrease from 2019 levels by 2030, and a 20% reduction in nitrogen fertiliser use from 2019 levels by 2030.
This is at odds with Fonterra, Synlait and Olam who are basing their reductions on 'emissions intensity" rather than “absolute emissions” reduction targets for its global portfolio.
International companies such as Cargill, Glanbia, Kerry Group and Tyson Foods have also adopted an “intensity” target, and it is used by local companies such as Synlait Milk and Olam Food Ingredients.
It (Fonterra) is seeking accreditation with the Science Based Target initiative, a globally recognised organisation that defines and promotes best practice in science-based target setting.
https://www.thepost.co.nz/a/rural/350053307/fonterra-getting-ready-tack…
It is understandable why other banks are taking a more cautious approach. Rabobank is taking the 'emissions intensity' pathway.
Considering that the majority of First Home Buyers are now foreign immigrants with newly issued residency visas, then arguably housing is actually very high emissions, as we keep importing tons of new carbon emitters. Soon we will replace farming cows as our main industry, with farming people. If we're not there already.
Soon we will replace farming cows as our main industry, with farming people
IMO, people are 'high emission' though. If you take the lifetime of a representative individual, their contributions would be high.
Unless of course we all live like the Buddha Boy who was sitting under the tree meditating without food and water.
Don't BNZ realise our dairy herd is already at net zero? If they vain gloriously want to try and change the weather shouldn't they focus on something that adds to the runaway global warming hypothesis?
"Even more strikingly, if an individual herd’s methane emissions are falling by one third of one percent per year (that’s 7/2100, so the two terms cancel out) – which the farmers I met seemed confident could be achieved with a combination of good husbandry, feed additives and perhaps vaccines in the longer term – then that herd is no longer adding to global warming."
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/ideasroom/a-climate-neutral-nz-yes-its-possi…
We are already ~$2bill down on agricultural exports and now we have a bank playing the E of ESG.
Are we going to end up with a Coutts/NatWest scenario with banks cancelling farmers accounts? This will likely be with the tacit support by Labour/Greens if it happens.
There'll be enough farm failures for other reasons without this happening.
The RBNZ is complicit in this as well.
If you can't get finance then dairy farm prices should fall to land value for pine conversion. How the mighty have fallen, why is there not more uproar over this? I'm triggered and I actually profit from this nonsense, I couldn't imaging having my lifes hardwork going down the plug hole.
It will only fall if people are forced to sell. Less than 5years ago banks basically closed off their books for new dairy farm lending. Then around 2years ago suddenly with increasing payouts they became favourites again. One intergenerational farmer was heard to say in reference to their bank manager 'we will still be here long after they have gone'. It's a reflection of agri-culture.
Doesn't everyone sell sooner or later? Yes of course they may be commercially viable, but the value of the farm has to decline. Imagine house prices without mortgage credit.
I just looked online, there are an enormous number of lifestyle blocks on the market in Central Otago.
Lots of Southern farms are multigenerational. Also needs to be remembered that Fonterra will be doing a capital repayment to it's shareholders plus the dividend could be quite good. That will help farm owners but not so much contract milkers and 50/50 sharemilkers. I was talking to an OCD supplier who has fixed milk price contracts for a significant part of their production around the mid$8. There is always a bank somewhere that will fund your mortgage. I have spoken to people who have switched to Rabo.
re Lifestyle blocks in CO If you are looking in Alexandra area with irrigation, it would be wise to do a deep dive with due diligence on water quota/consents. ORC aren't issuing water consents for more than 6years, unless exceptional circumstances, and that includes many irrigation scheme renewals. So banks are understandably shy off lending to anyone that doesn't have a long term consent, or up for renewal in the next few years. If however you have sold up in Auckland or Wellington, as the last 3 new neighbours to us, did, they usually have the cash to give the middle finger to banks.
Yes - that’s exactly how it works. The muppets in charge think that by restricting access to capital this will magic away the relationship between animal productivity and CH4 cycling. The intensity race is much easier to win - you just dial up the grain component of the feed (if you can afford it) and lower the grass component (which happens to be our competitive advantage) - although absolute GHGs will actually go up in pursuit of higher efficiency, (which should perplex the BNZ), Rabo will be able to pat themselves on the back while having completely undermined the purpose of BNZ’s goals and vice versa. You couldn’t make this stuff up ( no pun intended).
Was talking to a horticulturalist. Said their bank won't lend to a hort sector, where planted areas are less than 10ha. Around here you have to wonder if all the cherry orchards for sale which have no homes on them, some of which have been on market for a while, are now, in effect an illiquid asset, given the majority of them have less than 10ha planted. The owners may be better to rip out their orchard/infrastructure and sell them off as a lifestyle block.
Not a lot of export receipts generated from lifestyle blocks.
The whole export sector is on shaky ground at present.
If we are not careful we will become a country of pine trees /windmills and solar panels.
Another 3rd world Pacific island surviving on a bit of tourism and hand outs from the rest of the world.
But at least we will be carbon zero..
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.