sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Climate adaptation not happening on the scale or at the pace needed, the Climate Change Commission says

Public Policy / news
Climate adaptation not happening on the scale or at the pace needed, the Climate Change Commission says
Climate Change Commission chair Rod Carr

Climate adaptation in New Zealand isn’t currently happening at the scale or pace that’s needed to meet the country’s climate goals, according to the Climate Change Commission.

And according to the Commission’s Chairman, the window of opportunity is narrowing.

A monitoring report from the Commission – the first in a series of two-yearly progress assessments against the government’s national adaptation plan – was released on Thursday.

The report assessed NZ’s first national climate adaptation plan from 2022 and found climate change risks were rising and being “insufficiently addressed” by NZ’s adaptation action. 

"The Commission finds limited evidence that the first national adaptation plan is driving adaptation at the scale or pace needed," the report said.

Commission Chairman Rod Carr said "urgent action" was needed and time was of the essence.

"Climate change is making severe weather events like those felt across the motu in recent years more frequent and intense. The impacts can be widespread and long lasting, and as they occur more frequently, the costs - economic and otherwise - will rise too," Carr said.

The Commission’s report identified six areas where it said action is urgently needed, including clarifying roles, responsibilities and processes for planning and decision-making, providing clarity on how adaptation-related costs and climate-related losses will be shared and paid for.

"Clarifying who funds which parts of adaptation efforts, and making sure the costs and impacts don’t fall unfairly, will be critical so that people can make informed decisions," Carr said.

"Time is of the essence here, as in many cases the results of action will take years to play out. There is a window of opportunity to reduce the cost and hurt that climate change can cause - but it will take time to build the foundations that are needed so that window is narrowing. The impacts of climate change are happening, will keep happening and we need to act."

Carr said in the report that over the course of 2023, authorities had declared a record 17 weather-related states of emergency and as the intensity of climate impacts rose, the costs "economic and otherwise" would rise as well.

"Currently, the country largely has a ‘pay as you go’ model, where insurance and government compensation pick up the tab for damages. However, that is unsustainable, as highlighted by The Treasury’s estimate that the total cost of damage to physical assets from the Auckland Anniversary weekend floods and Cyclone Gabrielle was in the range of $9 billion to $14.5 billion – and this figure does not include ongoing costs from these events," he wrote.

The Commission’s Chief Executive Jo Hendy said while climate adaptation was playing out through decisions made locally by councils, iwi/Māori, communities, financial institutions, property owners and individuals, “big questions” remained unanswered.

"[...] such as how to ensure adaptation action is effective; who pays the costs; how the costs will be paid for; how to reduce the risk that some people, communities, sectors and regions will be impacted more than others; and how to leverage potential opportunities," she said.

The Commission has laid out nine recommendations in its assessment report. Seven of the recommendations are around helping NZ shift from the "current reactive approach to a more proactive one" and two recommendations are on improving national adaptation planning and monitoring. 

The nine recommendations in full are:

  • Enable effective local planning and action
  • Provide clarity on how costs will be shared and paid for
  • Ensure iwi/Māori can plan and act
  • Improve the science and research system
  • Work to ensure costs and impacts do not fall unfairly on particular communities and groups
  • Prepare a workforce development strategy and plan
  • Facilitate sharing of expertise and information
  • Make the direction, scale and pace of change required clear
  • Make changes to improve the plan’s effectiveness and monitoring of it

The Commission said its report was relevant to Parliament’s cross-party inquiry on an adaptation framework, which is due to release its findings in September.

In May, the Finance and Expenditure Committee was given the role of working out how NZ copes with the costs and risks from future climate change events.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

25 Comments

Climate adaptation in New Zealand isn’t currently happening at the scale or pace that’s needed to meet the country’s climate goals, according to the Climate Change Commission.

The Climate Change Commission seems to have forgotten something, there is no spare cash to pay for this.

Very few businesses will borrow cash to pay for cutting edge technology.

The Climate Change Commission need to wake up.

Up
4

The other option

Is we consume and do less stuff.

Has our overall rate of consumption dropped at all while we've been trying to reduce emissions?

Up
6

Our  emissions have been flat for over a decade, and have dropped relative to our consumption (and gdp generally). Degrowth is stupid. It’s never happening.

Up
0

Stephen06 fully agree

Always  easy to tell others they should be doing more or spending more. 

Up
3

The climate is quite normal where I live. Dozens of civil servants living high on the hog on your hard-earned taxes. 

And going to COP's in Middle East oil-producing countries  in hundreds of private jets. 

 

Up
9

agree - and the recommendations look like a UN list designed by a committee to ensure there are plenty more meetings to discuss the next report

Up
7

Wingman - and his similarly named mate Flying High - choose to ignore, choose to slander, choose to spout drivel. 

You I suspect, are more a farmer? But I rate you intellectually better than their chosen-ignorance-because-of-vested-interest stance. 

The problem(s) for farming are existential - you cannot bat them away by denigration. 

Make the time to watch the link I put up (first post, Friday Breakfast Briefings). Seriously, take the time (if you've offspring, or offspring of offspring, all the more imperative. 

Up
2

Nah feck off, you cant handle that i ask pertinent questions about your walking the talk and about what your viable solutions are. You're full of rhetoric using chicken little scare tactics

Up
5

You been sniffing  the av gas again.

Up
3

if our economic models, GDP, debt agreements are all predicated on "more, more more", then what does a pivot to a degrowth, climate positive, ecology positive alternative look like? Without that, the climate problem is eclipsed by the urgency of the resource allocation problem.

The prevailing economic mental model is: flagrant past consumption and current living standards expectations -> debt -> more spend required in future to keep up with debt -> more energy required to generate GDP -> energy demand increase -> price signals to energy / fuel producers -> increase production to form new market price equilibrium -> more consumption etc etc

Same with resources and materials.

What are the replacements, and killswitches?

Degrowth? Debt jubilees? Limits-to-growth or reserve-bank induced hyperinflation of existing debt to zero? Closed markets and controlled FX to mitigate financial shocks? Outlawing derivatives?

Sure, this is bigger than any one party, country or even continental bloc, but what has been done and what is possible?

Up
5

You seem to have a reasonable grip on the the situation. And yet, you seem to think there’s the chance of a fix?

Up
1

I'm not betting whether there's a silver bullet. I'm betting on people who believe it's worth attempting.

"Whether you think you can, or you cannot, you are both right." Henry Ford

Is it difficult? Yes.

VUCA? Yes.

Built-in immunity to change? Perhaps

Intractable? No.

Worth attempting, even if you fail? Absolutely, like all the best things in life

Up
1

We can't keep kicking the can down the road saying we can't afford to adapt and plan for climate change.I agree we need to start being proactive. Either way it is going to be expensive.

Up
3

Watching Paddy Gower,s show on climate change, I was far from impressed with Carr.

He had all the appearances of a lazy Wellington bureaucrat going through the motions with out a care in the world. 

Up
4

That’s because it is exactly the case. He has no idea about what he is doing. Hopefully the CCC will be disbanded, and soon.

Up
5

I think it's more Carr feels it doesn't matter what he says, or does, the govt won't take any notice anyway. He has no power, can only make recommendations. 

The resignation of the scientists in that docio was frightening,  same thing, they are giving the info, and watching it been ignored, or even worst, the govt taking opposite actions. 

Up
4

Climate Commission is never going to say nothing needs doing.  Would put themselves out of a job!

Up
4

Yes, they've all got their hands out. 

Up
2

So not at all like landlords, banks, fuel companies and gentailers then?

Up
2

Absolute bollocks. 

They're terrified. Worried. Parents and grandparents - and with a reasonable grasp of the science, and its implications. 

Unlike wittering others (or is it the echo from away down a rabbit-hole... ?)

Up
3

Close to nothing needs doing: just cap emissions via the ETS. Problem solved. 

Up
0

Seems to be working well so far. 

Not. 

And it can't. We will see everyone who requires compact energy, following Air NZ out the door. Our 'economy' has not been able to afford itself, for some time now. And it's heading deeper down the hole.

The ETS was an attempt to fudge, it could never works, and didn't. 

Up
2

The risk remains of climate action getting forced on NZ in the form of border taxes like the CBAM.

Up
3

'Climate action' ?

What is need is climate inaction. We need to de-grow by some orders of magnitude. Nothing to lose there; mother nature will do that regardless - but less angst if we front-run it. 

Up
2

I don't think it will happen as it would make imports we rely on too expensive.

Up
0