sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

New Zealand Defence Force and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will get more money in Budget 2024 due to the 'increasingly unstable world’

Public Policy / analysis
New Zealand Defence Force and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will get more money in Budget 2024 due to the 'increasingly unstable world’
New Zealand Defence Force rehearse ahead of ANZAC Day 2023
New Zealand Defence Force rehearse ahead of ANZAC Day 2023

Diplomats and soldiers are likely to be among the few public service employees not facing budget cuts and job losses in 2024, thanks to shrewd ministers and tense geopolitics. 

While most departments are being asked to cut budgets by 6.5% or 7.5%, Finance Minister Nicola Willis told AAP the Defence and Foreign Affairs “grouping” would be getting a boost. 

She said this was because it was important to have a presence in the world and that we were living in a “less benign geostrategic environment”. 

On Friday morning, Defence Minister Judith Collins announced a $571 million funding boost for the Defence Force, across four years, to pay better wages and upgrade equipment. 

“The world is increasingly unstable. We have only to look at events in the Ukraine and Middle East to see how quickly people’s lives can change,” she said in a press release. 

“This Budget announcement is a signal that New Zealand is ready to step up and play its part to protect the freedoms that so many of us take for granted”. 

It is notable that defence has been prioritised in what is expected to be a very tight budget, when voters might prefer more spending closer to home. 

But Mark Cameron, the Act Party’s defence spokesperson, said this was about using taxpayer money to ensure the basics are covered. 

“The first job of government is to keep its citizens safe, so we’re taking our national security and the wellbeing of the personnel who protect it seriously.”

Act campaigned on gradually lifting defence spending to 2% which would bring New Zealand in line with its allies and partners, such as Australia and NATO.

While this goal remains a long way off for New Zealand, many countries are going over and above this target in anticipation of future conflict.

Playing catch up 

The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute said there had been a 6.8% real term increase in global defence spending between 2023 and 2022, the largest jump since 2009. 

China’s growing military budget has prompted bigger spending in Japan and Taiwan, while Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has caused a huge uplift in European spending. 

Peter Dunne, who served in multiple Cabinets, said there had been a historical underspend in defence capabilities which dated back to the Helen Clark Government in the 2000s. 

Military spending fell out of fashion and resulted in New Zealand struggling to contribute to conflicts involving our partners in the aftermath of the 9/11 terror attacks. 

At times, combat capability was so limited that there was a question whether NZ forces were more “hindrance or help” when being deployed, said Dunne.

Putting half a billion dollars into defence in Budget 2024 would send a very strong signal to partners that we would be willing and able to contribute to future security challenges, he said. 

The money being spent was about playing “catch up” while the possible protection of MFAT’s budget was more about coalition politics than geopolitics. 

Dunne said Foreign Minister Winston Peters had likely “put his foot down” and insisted on sparing the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade from the spending cuts. 

Diplomatic incidentals

There have not been any announcements about MFAT’s budget but Willis has refused to say whether they would deliver the same cuts as other parts of the public sector. 

In 2023, the Foreign Affairs budget was about $2.2 billion and Defence was at $5.3 billion. 

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has promised to put extra energy into its international relationships and the Government will need to put some money where his mouth is. 

It has already kicked off trade negotiations with the Gulf states and launched a charm offensive in South East Asia, where it hopes to develop much deeper relationships. 

Marion Crawshaw, a senior fellow at Victoria University’s Centre for Strategic Studies, said the latter might be “the most significant shift in NZ foreign policy” since leaving ANZUS in 1984.

The Prime Minister told Interest.co.nz that prioritising South East Asia wouldn’t mean neglecting other parts of the world. Other relationships would still be developed and maintained, he said. 

But doing so requires having diplomats on the ground in those countries and other policy officers back home working through issues. 

Any budget cuts would likely require closing overseas posts or reducing the amount of money available for foreign aid — either would be unacceptable to Winston Peters.

Suits on the ground

In February, he told the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee that more people were needed on the ground if New Zealand wanted to “beef up” trade and international connections. 

He also criticised times when New Zealand’s foreign aid budget dropped to be the lowest in the OECD, which he saw as a risk to both national and economic security.

When asked how then he would handle the 6.5% budget cuts, Peters said he’d have to negotiate with his coalition partners. 

“Of course, you can always find economies but we’ve gotta start with the understanding that there are some things you cannot sacrifice,” he said. 

“But I’m not arguing from the point of view of favouring a department. It’s this country’s long-term future that’s critically dependent on this”. 

He also noted that spending overseas wasn’t inflationary, as that money didn’t go into the local economy.

Judith Collins was asked a similar question at her committee appearance. She said she had asked for Defence to look for savings in anything that wasn’t core business.

“But we are going to need to have investment in Defence, because everything it buys is expensive — it is just the nature of the beast,” she said.

On Friday, she revealed that $107 million of savings had been made by projects coming to an end, travel budgets being reduced, and consultant spending being cut.

That money was recycled into the $571 million headline being spent on salaries and new equipment, notably a new helicopter navigation system and replacement logistics trucks.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

11 Comments

On Friday morning, Defence Minister Judith Collins announced a $571 million funding boost for the Defence Force, across four years, to pay better wages and upgrade equipment. 

“The world is increasingly unstable. We have only to look at events in the Ukraine and Middle East to see how quickly people’s lives can change,” she said in a press release. 

“This Budget announcement is a signal that New Zealand is ready to step up and play its part to protect the freedoms that so many of us take for granted”. 

Hmmmm...

Up
1

"If you knew how much they steal... on soldiers' blood" Ukraine’s Western partners are shocked by the corruption appetites of local authorities, Arestovich said. According to him, officials steal from 40 to 70% of any deal. @ukr_leaks_eng    Link

Up
1

How will NZ benefit from this domestic US bonanza?

The conflict in Ukraine is incredibly profitable for the US military-industrial complex. Here is clear evidence - 132 American factories in 77 cities are producing weapons and equipment to help the United States support Ukraine. These products are ordered by the US government to replace what is being sent to Ukraine. Look at how the defence production index for 2022-2023 has increased.  Link

Up
2

The RNZAF's 'Black Falcons' aerobatic display team is the most profligate waste of government resources that I can think of. The fleet of T6C Texans, ostensibly purchased for ab initio pilot training (none of which is done within airshow display flying), each cost thousands of dollars per hour to operate, and with 5-6 aircraft per display, hundreds of hours per year of display practice, transits, and air shows, we are talking millions of dollars... All for what? Recruiting? Not to mention all the flypasts and displays of the other aircraft including 757s, every time some regional airfield decides to put on an airshow. I cannot understand how this sort of thing continues to be rationalized in the current climate (figuratively and literally).

Yes we absoluely need a modern and capable defence force, but my word there is a lot of waste going on there, especially in the RNZAF.

Up
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xUYbI64QHI

Australia knows something we dont ? 

Up
0

It has already kicked off trade negotiations with the Gulf states and launched a charm offensive in South East Asia, where it hopes to develop much deeper relationships. 

Realistically, MFAT does sweet FA for trade in the Gulf and SEA. Companies like Fonterra, Zespri, and T&G don't really rely on them, regardless of what they may think. Hiring people with specific expertise and connections in the relevant regions is a good idea, but that's not what happens. A bigger office and budget in Bangkok or Dubai is meaningless if it's not utilized properly.      

Up
0

So no money for school lunches but plenty of money so we can drop more bombs on Yemen. 

Up
0

Protip NZs military does mostly aid missions. They would be far more likely to provide supplies to earthquake or flooding victims worldwide and it has been that way for over 60 years. These aid workers are entering incredibly dangerous environments to work and not just because of the natural disasters. Even after the Greece earthquakes, 1950s we sent forces to help rebuild infrastructure and provide aid but at the time the local forces would shoot at the kiwi navy and military engineers working to restore the power plant, water systems etc (the Greeks did not distinguish aid workers who were necessary past curfew). NZ forces complained and so the Greek military handed them guns and told them to shoot back at the Greek military if they were shot at. It is also why we have preference to employing engineers in our military forces. In case you were wondering engineering training specializing in military vehicles, aid infrastructure and equipment is not cheap. It can take years more then a normal engineering degree and often requires a substantial amount of training overseas (since NZ has lost most manufacturing, infrastructure training and large scale vehicle engineering trades). So many of our engineers after the NZ training complete overseas training on other bases e.g. UK etc.

We just are kitted out for aid, not large fire fights. Hence a large portion of the budget goes into engineering, aid carrying planes and navy ships which are not cheap. We also need to ensure the maintenance of our naval ships in oceans that are now increasingly facing military risks in the Asia Pacific region.

It pays to look at the bulk of forces not just the tiny airshows that represent less then 1% of the budget.

But hey I am sure the government could abandon kiwis after a natural disaster; after all earthquake & flooding victims that are cut off and need food, power and medical support can be left to themselves right. Why bother preparing aid forces when we could just feed wealthy kids who toss the food away and buy their own or shock horror bring their own lunches. After all we must treat all these teenagers as if they are so disabled none of them can make a sandwich for themselves.

Also don't forget we still have survivors of the NZ Navy who were sent to the nuclear testing and had genetic and chromosomal damage (tested and proven with pre post DNA) to care for (not main pension benefit but a separate one).

 

Up
0

With the resumption of Austerity and the Recession. When will conscription kick in? Bootcamps come first and then...

Up
0

Joining the navy or forces is the cheapest way to get a degree for free, with additional really good pay for each year studied (as if they had been doing paid work while they were studying), and paid housing. With only a few years post degree work required, most spent in overseas experience training on peaceful bases (with families even getting off base housing accommodation in the UK!). If anything most do leave the forces for higher paying corporate work afterwards (which is available in part because of the experience they gained) but they have masses more experience and better career paths then if they stayed in NZ and tried to find a NZ job (with most not finding work in engineering fields in NZ post graduation even after a year of applications).

So yeah, don't knock the armed forces training until you too have a high cost STEM degree, flat completely funded with brighter career prospects for your family. Most kiwis don't go down this track because:

1. they cannot pass the physical minimum requirements 

2. they would rather have their parents help fund their OE & study in the Arts,

and also 3. there is a minimum education requirement to get into the required STEM courses.

Getting the experience, better living and career prospects when you cannot meet #3 is actually a boon to many.  

 

Up
0

And then you die. Especially now. Nabout to hook up officially with the empire at the same time military personnel are already on working 'holidays' in the Ukraine & UK and the middle east already. Body count doesnt register because theyre on leave from the armed services.

Up
0