sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Budget 2023 will include over a billion dollars to rebuild roads, rail and schools

Public Policy / news
Budget 2023 will include over a billion dollars to rebuild roads, rail and schools
cyclone gabrielle

The government will spend $1.1 billion in Budget 2023 on flood and cyclone recovery initiatives, in addition to the $890 million announced prior to the budget. 

Prime Minister Chris Hipkins said this money would cover the basics such as rebuilding roads, rail, and schools — as well as setting aside $100 million for future flood protection measures.

These investments would help get communities back to normal, with the same infrastructure as before the extreme weather had hit. 

“Cyclone Recovery is a core focus of this year’s Budget, and today’s package adds to the $890 million already provided in a rolling maul of repair works and business support”.

It is only a start on the rebuild, which is expected to cost New Zealand between $9 billion and $14.5 billion. Local and central government assets make up between $5 billion and $7.5 billion of these costs. 

Finance Minister Grant Robertson said these costs relate only to damage and does not include the full cost of providing support to affected communities.

“Cyclone Gabrielle hit the country when the Budget 2023 process was relatively advanced. As a result we made the call that the response would be prioritised over other initiatives which were in the draft Budget package at the time,” he said.

Approximately $4 billion of cost savings were found for Budget 2023, largely by canning job vacancies and clawing back unspent funds from the prior budget. 

The government will have to provide more support to the rebuild effort, Robertson said, but some would have to wait until recovery plans and land-use decisions were made. 

Some of the largest line items in this package are a $275m top up to the National Land Transport Fund, a $160m contingency for damaged rail lines, and a $100m contingency to invest with local councils in flood prevention.

Flood protection money will be spent on stopbanks and future land-use decisions. 

There will be $31m available to cover the cost of urgent repairs to the more than 500 damaged schools in the North Island, with another $85m allocated to bring them back to pre-cyclone conditions. 

The plurality of damaged schools are in Auckland and another 166 are in Hawkes Bay and Te Tai Tokerau. 

A total of $10 million will be spent on providing additional support for community-led mental wellbeing initiatives.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

33 Comments

Can we make sure it's actually spent on real work and not consultants.

Up
28

Surely the FM via Treasury could restrict this spending to capital items only, which would reduce wastage on consultants and bureaucrats. That is if there is the political intent to do so.

No CFO would get to keep their job for 6 years after setting aside huge chunks of the company's retained earnings/borrowings with the promise of shiny new assets, only to later admit that most of it was spent on consultants and new hires.

Up
7

They should stick to easy things like tax cuts and selling all our assets.

Up
1

running trade deficits by definition ensures we are selling off our assets one way or another

Up
0

I'm sure if we pay a consultant enough they'll be able to sort this problem out. 

Up
0

... or just buy a new tesla, retire early and write some nice recommendations for more consulting work needing to be copleted before any spades touch the ground -> presented in a expensive looking folder... and all with no responsibility for outcomes of course.

Up
1

You don’t want consultants to design this stuff?  Just give Dave a hammer and shovel and build it back how it was?

Up
2

The new 3-waters entity recently released some figures under OIA request from Herald that included paying an executive assistant $70/hour and a JD writer $130/hour.

There are water engineers on public payroll making much less than that designing complex water conveyance structures.

Such are the state of affairs in this country as taxpayer money is being wasted without a second thought and accountability.

Up
9

That'll kick inflation in the guts.

Up
17

Don't want to appear negative, but looking ahead this could turn into an annual problem. We suddenly have weather patterns not experienced before so it is likely to continue or get even worse. The cost could be crippling in the long term.

Up
10

For sure.

The next think big for NZ would be planning retreat from certain areas rather than just trying to replace like for like.

Up
5

"Flood protection money will be spent on ... future land-use decisions"

The thin end of the wedge for covering the uninsurable/uninsured risk.

Up
0

@$3M a kilometer = 330 km of road.

 

FFS is this a 1% deposit.

 

1 billion bucks is about what school lunches cost PA or social welfare for a week 

Or consultants and spin doctors for a week. 

Tight arse Robbo has blown the kitty

Up
5

I feel sorry for the Cat.

Up
3

This announcement seems to be aimed at the soft-headed Labour voter.

Television ratings are so garbage they're seldom released. I doubt anyone is paying attention to this, let alone Thursday's budget.

Labour's credibility is shot, yet those addicted to TV will still tune in for their daily programming.

What's wonderful is that Mr Luxon only targets voters that watch these low rated TV shows - it gives smaller parties a HUGE advantage.

The National Party (aka Labour Lite) really might be in its' sunset years.. it really could be a 20% - 25% party within the next 3 years.. perhaps lower if/when ACT pulls ahead.

Up
3

Ideally ACT close to 20% this election, National 30% and then level pegged in 2026 to ensure that their promises are kept.

Up
0

ACT are at 15%, that's pretty impressive really, 1 in 6 voters will be going ACT in 2023. Its looking like a National/ACT lead government only to me.

Up
1

No compensation for the innocent, who's financial livelihoods have have been unrecoverabily destroyed.  Council's "dereliction of duty" ostensibly allowed forestry logs to smash open holes in the stop-banks.  Yet Rehette Stoltz (Gisborne Mayor), has come out as pine forestry's apparent Excuser. Like Nash.  I wonder how many goodies have been put in her lunch box over the years, by the forestry industry?  

Up
2

Just remind me why we Need foresty?

 

To ruin our roads

To ruin our rivers

To ruin our land

TO POLLUTE OUR AIR  ( TRUCK EMMISIONS)

To ruin our seas

to ruin our  wine, food growers economy

To keep a lot more trucks clogging our strèets

CLOSE THE INDUSTRY DOWN

Up
3

Sure, strip the land bare of trees. It just means the metre of silt that has buried everything will be 2 metres of silt in the next event. No problem though since it won't have the topping of woody debris anymore.

Just coz the silt sinks, while the wood stays obvious floating on top doesn't make the wood the primary problem, just the more visible symptom.

Up
2

Yep… trees slow down runoff in downpours and hold soil together…. 

problem in Gisborne east coast apart from massive long-run hill-country and friable soil…it’s the distance from CNI pulp mills that make pulpwood cartage unprofitable… here is what the foresters should be focusing on to find an alternative cashflow for pulp logs.

Up
1

Biomass for fuel seems the obvious answer to me.

Up
0

And if there's insufficient demand for that & any other economic uses just go back to burning the slash insitu piles as they used to for years before the tunnel vision Greens stopped them

Up
0

Whatever, there is no law to stop the burning of slash , just another lie the rednecks like to spread. 

There is plenty of demand for biomass , sustainably produced biomass could be one of our big exports, once our own demand is full.  

Up
0

Less smart arse sloganeering - ‘rolling maul’ - and better delivery, please.

Up
0

Isn't this a definition of insanity: "These investments would help get communities back to normal, with the same infrastructure as before the extreme weather had hit."?

Up
5

The problem is they are possibly going to get smashed again before they even get back to normal. Time to make so changes and think about the future, the sea level is rising and the storms will get worse. Some low lying areas need to be abandoned.

Up
1

Problem is, 30 - 50 % of NZ lives works or plays that would be effected, if similar storms hit other areas.

Up
0

Would be better off investing here https://tradingeconomics.com/argentina/deposit-interest-rate

For 80+% return, and returning the $860m annual return  to the people...

 

It would be safer 🙄🤣

Up
0

He means the new normal. But having been hit twice,( farm and business), I can see the need for people to feel like things are remotely normal.

Up
0

I wonder if there's a new bridge over the Ngaruroro River on the Hastings to Napier Expressway planned for in that allocation.

The existing bridge approaches narrow the flood channel 28%, because they extend into the river channel by some 40 metres on each side. All the stopbank breaches in the Ngaruroro River were upstream of that bridge.

Up
1

Great chance to save $160M and close the useless rail lines. Would make a wonderful cycle trail. Plus save the endless subsidy of this loss making waste of time.

Up
0

That would add twice as much needed for road maintenance, so an overall loss. They need to invest more so it can take freight off the roads, and provide faster passenger service.

Up
0