By Greg Ninness
Rental yields on residential investment properties continue to be forced down, as rising property prices outpace rises in rents, according to the latest Rental Yield Indicator report.
Since interest.co.nz first began producing the report two years ago, indicative gross rental yields in the country’s biggest rental market, Auckland, have declined around 25% and are also falling steadily in most other parts of the country.
The report tracks the gross rental yield investors would receive if they purchased a property at the lower quartile selling price in 56 locations around the country where there is a high level of rental activity, and rented those properties out at the median rent for three bedroom houses in those same areas.
This provides a standardised measure of the relative attractiveness of residential investment properties in different parts of the country and how that has changed over time.
The latest report, which covers property sales and new tenancy agreements concluded in each area in the six months to June, shows steadily diminishing returns in most parts of the country.
As the accompanying tables show, the indicative gross rental yield at Beachhaven/Birkdale on Auckland’s North Shore, which has traditionally been a popular spot for both tenants and investors, has fallen from 4.9% two years ago to 3.7% in the latest report, a decline of 24.5%.
An even more dramatic fall has occurred for Henderson in Auckland’s western suburbs, where the indicative yield has fallen from 5.3% two years ago to 3.8% in the latest report, a 28.3% drop.
The lowest Auckland yield in the areas monitored by the report remains Highland Park in the eastern suburbs, where it is now just 3.3%, down from 4.6% two years ago.
The areas with the highest indicative yields in Auckland remain Papakura and Franklin on Auckland’s southern flank, where they are 4.7% and 4.5% respectively, down from 6.0% and 5.8% respectively two years ago.
Indicative yields outside Auckland are now also being squeezed
However the decline in yields is no longer mainly an Auckland phenomenon.
While the growing housing shortage may be largely an Auckland issue, the sharp increase in prices and falling yields that have occurred in Auckland has seen many investors head to the regions in search of cheaper properties that provide higher yields.
But that has been pushing up prices faster than rents in the regions, which means indicative yields outside Auckland are now also being squeezed.
In Hamilton the indicative yields in the areas monitored by the report have fallen from 5.5%-6.9% two years ago to 4.7%-5.4% in the latest report.
In Tauranga they have dropped from 5.2%-5.7% two years ago to 3.7%-4.8% in the latest report.
Similar trends are evident in most of the locations throughout the country monitored by the report and not just the major centres.
The indicative yields are also well down in smaller towns such as Cambridge, and Ashburton.
The highest indicative yield in the report is in Whanganui where it is 10.3%, and the only one of the 56 locations monitored by the report where the yield is above 10%.
But even in Whanganui it has fallen from 14.9% a year ago, when Whanganui was first included in the report, which means the yield in the city has declined by a whopping 31% in 12 months.
That could be indicative of a high level of investor activity in the city over the last year, most likely attracted by its highly affordable prices and the relatively good returns they provide.
Invercargill is another city that appears to be gaining in popularity with investors, with its indicative yields dropping from 9.0% to 8.4% in the last two years.
However even at 8.4% an investment property in Invercargill will be providing more than double the rental income return of many properties in Auckland.
Capital gain valued more than rental income
The low indicative yields evident in most parts of the country support the view that investors are placing more importance on capital gains than rental income when making purchase decisions.
Investors who borrow heavily to purchase properties with low yields could find themselves in financial difficulties if interest rates rise or if there is a market downturn that negatively affects their rental income.
That would have been one of the factors the Reserve Bank considered when it announced it was considering restricting mortgage lending to residential property investors to 60% of a property’s value.
We will have to wait and see if such a move has any effect on prices, but if does, those investors with enough equity to purchase properties at the new, lower mortgage limits, could be looking at modest rises in yields.
But time will tell.
The following table plots the indicative rental yields in all 56 locations monitored by interest.co.nz and how they have changed over the last two years.
Indicative gross rental yields for three bedroom houses in 56 selected areas with high rental activity during the previous six months. Based on REINZ lower quartile selling prices and median rents in each area.
|
|||||||||
Town/region | Yield % Jun-16 | Yield % Mar-16 | Yield % Dec-15 | Yield % Sep-15 | Yield % Jun-15 | Yield % Mar-15 | Yield % Dec-14 | Yield % Sep-14 | Yield % Jun-14 |
Whangarei - Kamo/Tikipunga/Kensington | 6.1 | 6.0 | 5.6 | 7.1 | 6.5 | 6.9 | 7.6 |
6.4
|
5.9
|
|
|
||||||||
Rodney - Orewa/Whangaparaoa | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
4.8
|
4.2
|
|
|
||||||||
North Shore: |
|
|
|||||||
Beachhaven/Birkdale | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
4.6
|
4.9
|
Torbay | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
4.5
|
4.5
|
|
|
||||||||
Waitakere: |
|
|
|||||||
Glen Eden | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.9 |
5.1
|
5.0
|
Massey/Royal Heights | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.9 |
5.1
|
5.0
|
Henderson | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.9 |
5.0
|
5.3
|
|
|
||||||||
Central Auckland: |
|
|
|||||||
Avondale | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.4 |
4.5
|
n.a
|
|
|
||||||||
Manukau: |
|
|
|||||||
Highland Park | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.1 |
4.3
|
4.6
|
Papakura/Drury/Karaka | 4.7 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.9 |
6.0
|
6.0
|
Franklin - Pukekohe/Tuakau | 4.5 | 4.9 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.6 |
5.6
|
5.8
|
|
|
||||||||
Hamilton: |
|
|
|||||||
Deanwell/Melville/Fitzroy | 5.4 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 6.2 | 6.8 | 6.9 | 6.9 |
6.9
|
6.9
|
Fairfield/Fairview Downs | 5.1 | 5.4 | 5.7 | 6.0 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 6.2 |
7.0
|
6.9
|
Te Kowhai/St Andrews/Queenswood | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.6 |
5.8
|
5.5
|
|
|
||||||||
Cambridge/Leamington | 4.8 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.6 |
5.9
|
5.9
|
Te Awamutu | 5.2 | 5.7 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 6.2 | 6.3 |
6.4
|
6.0
|
|
|
||||||||
Tauranga: |
|
|
|||||||
Tauranga Central/Greerton | 3.7 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 5.9 |
5.9
|
n.a.
|
Bethlehem/Otumoetai | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 5.3 |
5.4
|
5.2
|
Mt Maunganui | 4.4 | 4.8 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 5.4 | 5.7 | 5.6 |
5.2
|
5.2
|
Pyes Pa/Welcome Bay | 4.8 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.7 |
5.8
|
5.7
|
Kaimai/Te Puke | 5.6 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.2 |
5.7
|
5.6
|
Whakatane | 6.6 | 6.4 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 6.7 | 6.3 | 6.7 |
6.9
|
n.a.
|
Roturua: | |||||||||
Holdens Bay/Owhata/Ngapuna | 9.4 | 8.7 | 8.3 | 8.7 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Kuirau/Hillcrest/Glenholm | 6.4 | 5.9 | 6.3 | 6.6 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Ngongataha/Pleasant Heights/Koutu | 7.9 | 7.7 | 8.0 | 8.2 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Hastings - Flaxmere | 9.3 | 10.9 | 11.5 | 11.0 | 12.1 | 12.2 | 11.7 |
11.8
|
12.0
|
|
|
||||||||
Napier - Taradale | 5.5 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 6.2 | 6.3 |
6.1
|
6.1
|
Taranaki: | |||||||||
New Plymouth Central/Moturoa | 5.4 | 5.8 | 5.4 | 5.5 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Waitara/Inglewood | 7.7 | 8.8 | 8.9 | 8.0 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Whanganui | 10.3 | 9.6 | 10.0 | 14.9 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Palmerston North: | |||||||||
Kelvin Grove/Roslyn | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.2 | 7.2 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Palmerston North Central | 6.3 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 6.2 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Takaro/Cloverlea/Milson | 6.8 | 7.2 | 7.1 | 7.3 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
|
|
||||||||
Kapiti Coast: |
|
|
|||||||
Paraparaumu/Raumati | 5.7 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.1 |
5.9
|
n.a.
|
Waikanae/Otaki | 5.8 | 5.9 | 6.5 | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 5.5 |
5.4
|
6.1
|
|
|
||||||||
Upper Hutt: | |||||||||
Heretaunga/Silverstream | 5.6 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 6.1 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Totara Park/Maoribank/Te Marua | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.8 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Lower Hutt: | |||||||||
Epuni/Avalon | 5.5 | 5.8 | 5.2 | 5.1 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Taita/Naenae | 6.5 | 6.8 | 6.9 | 7.1 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Wainuiomata | 7.2 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 7.7 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Wellington: |
|
|
|||||||
Johnsonville/Newlands | 5.2 | 5.5 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 5.5 |
6.2
|
5.9
|
Vogeltown/Berhampore/Newtown | 4.9 | 5.4 | 5.2 | 5.5 | 5.1 | 5.5 | 5.2 |
5.6
|
5.8
|
|
|
||||||||
Tasman: |
|
|
|||||||
Motueka | 5.3 | 5.2 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.6 |
5.5
|
5.2
|
Richmond/Wakefield/Brightwater | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.8 |
5.9
|
6.0
|
Nelson - Stoke/Nayland/Tahunanui | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.7 |
6.0
|
6.0
|
Blenheim | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.4 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.6 |
6.5
|
6.1
|
|
|
||||||||
Christchurch: |
|
|
|||||||
Hornby/Islington/Hei Hei | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.5 |
6.3
|
6.4
|
Riccarton | 5.0 | 5.7 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 5.9 | 5.2 | 4.9 |
5.1
|
5.7
|
Woolston/Opawa | 7.4 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.8 | 7.3 | 7.2 |
8.0
|
7.9
|
Ashburton | 6.1 | 6.2 | 7.0 | 6.9 | 7.0 | 6.8 | 6.7 |
7.2
|
6.8
|
|
|
||||||||
Timaru | 6.4 | 6.5 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.6 | 6.8 | 6.7 |
6.3
|
n.a.
|
|
|
||||||||
Queenstown/Frankton/Arrowtown | 4.3 | 4.6 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 4.7 |
5.3
|
5.4
|
|
|
||||||||
Dunedin: | |||||||||
Kenmure/Mornington | 6.7 | 7.9 | 7.1 | 6.6 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Mosgiel | 5.7 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.1 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
South Dunedin/St Kilda | 7.4 | 7.2 | 8.0 | 8.2 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Invercargill | 8.4 | 8.7 | 9.1 | 9.0 | 6.7 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
9.5
|
n.a.
|
Source : REINZ / MBIE * Yield is a property's annual rent expressed as a percentage of its purchase price. The yield figures in this table are gross, and are calculated from the REINZ's lower quartile selling price for each area during the previous 6 months, and the median rent for three bedroom houses calculated from new tenancy bonds received by the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment for the same areas/period. |
You can receive all of our property articles automatically by subscribing to our free email Property Newsletter. This will deliver all of our property-related articles, including auction results and interest rate updates, directly to your in-box 3-5 times a week. We don't share your details with third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time. To subscribe just click on this link, scroll down to "Property email newsletter"and enter your email address.
43 Comments
Don't personally call a property that has rental yields of approx. 3 per cent an investment and the buyers should not be called investors at all.
With interest borrowing rates at 4 per cent then the so called investors are losing at least 1 per cent.
Would you be an investor if you put your money on term deposit with the banks at minus 1 per cent?
Pure speculation by the Auckland buyers unless they are buyers from overseas.
Christchurch rental yields are over 6 per cent if you buy right and over 10 per cent on "as is where is" property, not bad with 4 per cent interest borrowing.
Prices are guaranteed to increase as Christchurch rebuilds and more people see the advantages of living in Chch.
Lifestyle in Christchurch is also substantially better as well without the hassles.
Your comments re Christchurch are yields are bullshit. Rental vacancies growing by the day and rents falling.
"The bond figures, from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, show the decrease affects cheaper as well as dearer rental homes in the city. After jumping around over the summer average rents are back at 2013 levels, and 25 per cent higher than at the time of the February 2011 earthquake. "
THE MAN, your logic is nonsensical.
"..[Auckland] buyers should not be called investors at all."
" Prices are guaranteed to increase as Christchurch rebuilds...."
So Christchurch buyers who are buying property based on your advice above should be called investors?
"Pure speculation by the Auckland buyers unless they are buyers from overseas." - What on earth does this mean??
An investment is something that returns you positive returns I would say.
If your return is negative then hardly an investment!
Chch prices are so much lower at the moment than Auckland and as Chch gets rebuilt the commercial sector will become very popular for corporates Etc. and Chch will be the place of choice for immigrants as Auckland overpriced and too populated.
Anyone is free to choose whatever they want to put their hard earned money into.
There are good investors and then there are others who really aren't overly flash.
Pure speculation by Auckland buyers unless they are from overseas means that the returns up there are negative but the overseas buyers don't care what they spend they just want their money out of the country.
In Chch here in close proximatey to us there are 2 executive type homes that have been empty since before xmas and no attempt to rent out!
the man 2 - what are you smoking?????
Think about your bank deposits comment for one moment.....tax and inflation destruction should come to mind!!!!
Christchurch rents are falling so I wouldn't go counting your chickens just yet.....you still got to repair that "As is where is" house eventually so a couple of years higher yield will lead to lower yields down the track and this will happen at a time when you have increased costs/debt to service.........
Not smoking anything, don't believe in that shit!
Don't put any money at all in Term Deposits as no return!
Christchurch rents have come down about $30 a week max but interest costs have dropped more than that so still better off financially.
The As is can easily be rented now but we don't work like that.
Won't bore you with details but the As is is not because of major damage and not much to repair anyhow.
Whatever happens our yields on average are over double the current interest rates, and should interest rates go up it is because the world is totally stuffed or high inflation and neither worry us due to our financial situation.
I have trouble with the term investors as well. I can't see how something (or part of something) is an investment, when the money is borrowed. To me it's an investment when you own something, and getting a return from it. The borrowed portion is not an investment.
Schmucks, all of us! We are the tax payer the world over, and we are all schmucks for allowing this scam to continue. And yes, we will bail them out! Once again we will be told that the world will end otherwise, and once again we'll believe it, and quietly foot the bill. When we should be giving them the boot!
fat pat,
It's not the same thing at all. Most people with mortgages use the asset(a house) to live in,bring up a family,that sort of thing. It;s not meant as a speculative punt.
Gold, on the other hand, is exactly that. Not only can you not live in it, but you can't earn interest on it and its price is rather more volatile than the the property market.
the big problem is when you leverage for below rate of return and the market changes.
but then i am told daily auckland property only ever goes up.
one day worldwide QE will stop and credit growth will slow then we shall see who has a chair to sit on and who is left dancing around
This report purposely omitted some highest yielding suburbs in Auckland like Mangere and Manurewa. Looks like we need a updated version of Westpac investment report which covers all the suburbs. It has both rental yields and capital growth percentages which is more informative. Unfortunately it has not been updated since 2014 as far as I know.
As is where is means quake damaged and not insured but very often they are very livable houses of a standard that would have been fine pre-earthquake and are not dangerous in any way (e.g. wonky donky floors and a few cracks). Plenty of owner occupiers cashed up and paid off the mortgage and happy enought to be living in their as-is where is property 5 years on. Tenants would be very unlikely to be able to tell whether a property is as-is where is in many cases nor would/should they care unless it was dangerous.
The comments re returns above are accurate also. Stats on falling rents are misleading as the main driver is the removal of $1500+ per week short term furnished rentals paid for by insurance companies. I'm definitely not seeing any evidence of decrease in rents. Probably is a bit harder to find tenants at the moment I would expect - it always is this time of year.
There are that many as is where is property in Chch where there is barely anything wrong with them.
They would be providing a far better standard of accommodation than the villas and cold holes that Auckland has to rent and without the hassles that Auckland has to put up with.
Once repaired correctly you can get insurance for them if engineered correctly.
Personally don't take much notice of the stats that come out as they are always low.
There are so many mum and dad investors that don't look after their property or run the rentals as a business. That is as long as the tenants pay something all is good for them as they are too busy working.
We are full time and manage our own and gives a great living
All comes down to everyone else in the world doing the same thing. There is a global chase for assets that provide an income. Government Bonds yield 2.5% for 10 years-the highest in the developed world. The global equity markets yield 2.7%. Where do investors/pension funds put their money.
All a consequence of the GFC and the Quantitative Easing introduced as a result. The question is where will it end?
QE has had the effect of making the man in the street much poorer. The money in circulation has risen exponentially in most countries whilst earnings have remained subdued.
Pension funds are simultaneously facing the bulge of baby boomers drawing their pensions and extrordinarily low yield opportunities for re-investment as their bond portfolios mature. Expect them to increasingly realise paper gains and become net sellers of assets to fund their obligations. Same thing for sovereign wealth funds as governments face an eroding tax base and an increase in expenditure on ageing populations.
This selling will produce downward pressure on asset prices and with interest rates at rock bottom CBs have nowhere else to go. They have squandered their ammo on an ill-conceived experiment which has not even stirred growth from the so-called "wealth effect". They're too stubborn to admit they have screwed up but this is going to end very badly.
The government makes a move to clean up pests in NZ - but they mistakenly missed property investors and foreigner buyers off the list of vermin that includes rats, stoats and possums.
http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/govt-wants-nz-pest-free-by-2050-20160…
Given that interest rates have come down by around 1%-2% between Dec 14 and June 16 the yields presented in the tables actually look like they have stood up pretty well.
Presumably people aren't factoring in as much future capital gains into their current thinking...
Who needs decent yields when you have plenty of foreign buyers. 39% at last count if you include non-residents, temp visa workers and foreign students.
39% may not be high enough as I see RayWhite is looking for more in China
Ray White links up with China to sell more properties
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=116…
In the same week we find out we have the lowest tax of 26 countries surveyed on a house purchase. ZERO TAX actually
Economist frets on property purchase tax ranking
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/property/news/article.cfm?c_id=8&objectid=116…
A study ranking New Zealand the lowest for property purchase tax highlights a missed opportunity to make housing more affordable and boost supply, according to an economist.
The international comparison of 26 countries conducted by accounting and consultancy network UHY showed New Zealand at the bottom of the table, with purchasers here charged nothing to transfer a US$1 million property unless they are GST registered.
It is about time we applied a stamp duty these foreign buyers (39%) to cover some of the infrastructure spend Auckland so badly needs.
JOHN KEY your turn mate.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.