sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Investors becoming more comfortable with the long-term nature of KiwiSaver, Financial Markets Authority says

Personal Finance / news
Investors becoming more comfortable with the long-term nature of KiwiSaver, Financial Markets Authority says
The Financial Markets Authority's director of markets, investing, and reporting, John Horner.
The Financial Markets Authority's director of markets, investing, and reporting, John Horner.

KiwiSaver members withdrew $5 billion from KiwiSaver during the March 2024 financial year, an 18.8% rise from a year earlier, according to the Financial Market Authority’s annual KiwiSaver report.

While people over the age of 65 accounted for the majority of that $5 billion withdrawal figure, taking out $3 billion, first home withdrawals totaled $1.2 billion in the year.

The FMA says almost 35,700 people withdrew that $1.2 billion and first home withdrawals were up 34% compared to a year earlier. However, that's still 14% lower compared to the peak in 2022.

The average withdrawal amount has also risen in the last three years, with the average first home withdrawal rising from $29,212 in 2021 to $34,718 by March 2024.

According to the 2024 KiwiSaver report, the voluntary retirement savings scheme closed its financial year with $111.8 billion in funds under management (FUM), a 19.3% increase from last year’s $93.6 billion.

The FMA says this is the strongest growth in total funds since 2021, with total KiwiSaver funds having almost doubled since March 2019.

Total KiwiSaver contributions which includes employee, employer and government contributions came to $11.2 billion, up 6.5%.

Breaking that $11.2 billion figure down, individual KiwiSaver contributions – through salaries and wages – were up to an “all-time peak” of $5.9 billion in the March 2024 year.

Another $3.3 billion net of tax came from employers in 2024, while $990 million came from the Crown.

Lump sum contributions were up “slightly” to $839.1 million in the 2024 financial period, but have plummeted 60% compared to two years ago when $2.2 billion was contributed just from lump sums, according to the FMA.

KiwiSaver made $13.1 billion in net investment returns, a big turnaround from the net investment loss of $1.9 billion the FMA reported last year

The FMA’s Chief Economist Stuart Johnson says it was a welcome change from the prior year that KiwiSaver net investment returns in 2024 were greater than the total contributions of $11.2 billion. 

“We are taught to remember that investments can go down as well as up, but let’s be honest, it’s always nicer to see them go up,” he says. 

“Overall, 2024 shows that KiwiSaver investments are working well for New Zealanders.”

There are now 3,334,654 individual members in KiwiSaver, which the FMA says is up around 2% year on year. 

The number of non-contributing KiwiSaver members rose 3.4% or 42,000, to 1,298,270 non-contributing members over the past 12 months.

The FMA’s report found the average balance per member was up 16.5% to $33,514. This is 16% higher than the average balance of $28,778 in the 2023 financial year.

Since 2020, net total membership has grown over 10%, which is an increase of more than 300,000 members over that time.

Spiked

The number of significant hardship withdrawals soared 60%, or an extra 11,000 people, compared to a year earlier to 29,242 people.

The FMA’s report says the total amount withdrawn from KiwiSaver for financial hardship reasons was $264.3 million, working out to be an average amount of approximately $9,000 per withdrawal. 

“While this is a significant increase, the number of people making hardship withdrawal this year still represents less than 1% of the 3.3 million KiwiSaver members,” the FMA says.

The number of permanent emigration withdrawals also “spiked” and were 37% higher from 1,882 to 2,586 in 2024. 

“This number is back up after a decline from the previous peak of 2,357 permanent emigration withdrawals in 2020. The dollar numbers have also increased substantially, up 62% to $70 million year-on-year,” the FMA says.

Annual KiwiSaver fees rose 18.9%, or $125.5 million, to $789.6 million. Johnson says this increase in fees is “in line” with increases in total FUM and suggests fees haven’t increased per dollar invested – but haven’t decreased either.

“While we have seen a gradual decrease in fees as a percentage of funds under management over the last 10 years, this wasn’t continued in the 2024 data. I encourage KiwiSavers, when looking at their annual statements, to focus on total returns, or returns minus fees,” he says.

John Horner, the FMA director of markets, investing and reporting, agrees and says as KiwiSaver grows, he expects to see the benefits that come with “economies of scale” shared with members of KiwiSaver.

Growth spurt

The FMA’s report found fewer investors are selecting conservative KiwiSaver funds as a total proportion of funds and in March 2024, $19.2 billion was held in conservative funds by 766,023 investors.

This is down 10.3% from 854,098 investors who were invested in conservative funds in 2022. 

Growth funds have gone in the other direction and now represent 46% of total FUM with 1.5 million investors selecting a growth fund and $51.4 billion invested by the end of the March 2024 year. This has doubled from $24.5 billion in 2021.

“Contrasting this year’s report to previous years, we can see how investor behaviour has changed over time, together with the profile of the funds being selected. The FMA has said for some time that younger investors, saving for retirement, should consider funds with more growth assets, as these are more suited to a longer investment horizon,” Horner says.

“With KiwiSaver in its 17th year, investors have become more comfortable with the long-term nature of KiwiSaver. We believe this is why almost half of all KiwiSavers have moved towards more growth-oriented funds.”

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

25 Comments

Greater domestic savings are the only silver lining lately in the dark clouds gathering over the NZ economy. It would be better if some of this get channelised growing the local economy e.g., capital infusion for Kiwibank to compete with the big-4.

Up
7

A capital infusion will make it harder to compete. That equity will require Kiwibank to maximise shareholder value = charge as much as you can.

The whole capital raise is flawed. They just need to compete on price now and not return funds to the  government. 

Up
1

If you can pull your money out, its not a long term retirement savings vehicle.  Allowing people to withdraw money completely defeats the purpose:

A 20 year old who contributes to super for 10 years and then stops contributions completely at age 30, will still have more money after 40 years than the 30 year old who withdraws their 10 years of savings, but then continues contributing for another 40 years.  

Its like nobody in the financial system understands maths.  

Australia currently has $4 Trillion in super now - and its estimated that by the 2040's almost everyone will be self funded in retirement.  Because they don't allow people to raid their balances to buy houses.

Up
16

They don't?

https://www.australiansuper.com/superannuation/grow-your-super/first-home-super-saver

The most you can apply to release under the FHSS scheme is $15,000 of your personal super contributions from any one financial year, up to a maximum of $50,0001 in contributions per person (a combined amount of $100,000 per couple) over all financial years

It's a seperate part of their superannuation scheme, but essentially the same thing, with added tax benefits (reducing your gross taxable income). 

Up
3

Clearly you dont understand what "personal super contributions" are.  These are not the mandatory super contributions paid by your employer.

What are personal super contributions?

You can boost your super by adding your own personal contributions, which are the amounts you contribute directly to your super fund.

Personal contributions:

  • are in addition to any compulsory super contributions your employer makes on your behalf
  • do not include super contributions made through a salary-sacrifice arrangement.

 

In other words, you can choose to utilise the superannuation scheme as a Home Savings scheme to take advantage of the lower tax rate on earnings, but its not your Retirement Funds that you are withdrawing to buy a house with.  

Currently the Coalition in Opposition is proposing to allow Australians to access their Super Retirement funds to buy a house, but as they are not in Govt this is only an idea at this stage.  Hopefully common sense will prevail over vote-buying.  

...

Up
0

Australia currently has $4 Trillion in super now - and its estimated that by the 2040's almost everyone will be self funded in retirement.  Because they don't allow people to raid their balances to buy houses.

The Aussie government initiative allows eligible first-home buyers to withdraw voluntary super contributions to help with a home deposit. Individuals can contribute up to $15,000 per financial year, with a total maximum withdrawal limit of $50,000. This is beneficial as the contributions are taxed at a concessional rate of 15% instead of the higher marginal tax rates.

The funds can only be used for purchasing a home intended for personal use, not for investment properties.

https://www.money.com.au/home-loans/use-super-to-buy-property

Up
1

Again, the funds that can be withdrawn are not your compulsory super contributions, but money you have put into super from after tax income, its basically allowing you to park additional funds in your super for the purpose of saving for a home purchase.  Completely different to NZ where you can withdraw every cent in there to buy a house, including the money your employer and Govt contributed.  

If you don't understand the Australian superannuation scheme, you probably shouldnt comment on it.

Up
1

Not sure if you're referring to me, but yes you are correct that there is a difference between voluntary and compulsory contributions to Aussie super. 

Up
0

Bunk.

I know people that self manage their super and put it into property investment - there's an industry of advisors focused on this very thing. 

Up
3

In Aussie, individuals with SMSFs can directly purchase investment properties using their super funds. This requires compliance with specific regulations, including maintaining a liquidity buffer within the fund. Banks typically lend up to 70% of the property's value.

Up
2

The mortgage over the investment property is also non-recourse so if sold at a loss the bank cannot claim on other super fund assets.  Income used for servicing the mortgage includes both the rent and the 12% super contribution that is added each year, so usually no issue with being cashflow negative.  Rent is taxed at 15% and any capital gains on the property is taxed at 10% (if owned longer than one year).  Once the fund is in pension phase (ie you have retired) there is no income or capital gains tax payable (up to a $1.6M cap).  Anyone in Australia who buys an investment property outside of a SMSF is crazy, and clearly financially illiterate. 

Up
0

What's that got to do with my post?  Yes, a SMSF can invest in property.  It can't own your family home and you cant rent the investment property.   So you cant buy your own home with it.  

Up
0

Owning a house is the best thing you can have when hitting retirement.

Up
2

Can't eat the weatherboards though.

Up
1

I wouldn't say it "defeats the purpose." For those willing and able, owning a house is, in the long-term, just as important for retirement as have a bunch of cash in a scheme. Pity houses are so expensive young people can't manage both house ownership and a growing retirement fund.

 

 

Up
1

Sad that $1.2 Billion was pumped into the housing ponzi. If this had not happened the young would still git their homes, but at a lower price and with retirement funds preserved.

Talk about screw the future generations, what a contrast to my generations fathers who were prepared to die to save the next generation.

Up
16

KiwiSaver members withdrew $5 billion from KiwiSaver during the March 2024 financial year, an 18.8% rise from a year earlier, according to the Financial Market Authority’s annual KiwiSaver report.

Why do we assume that people are not capable of making their own decisions that work in their own self interest? 

 

Up
0

The abundance of historical evidence that shows short term thinking from the human race?

Up
6

The abundance of historical evidence that shows short term thinking from the human race?

Data shows that growth in the S&P 500 (ex technology) is growing at a rate lower than expansion of the M2 money supply since 2009.

Where is your evidence that extrapolating the past into the future is the best allocation of an individual's capital?

Up
1

Well doh. Every three years the majority vote either blue or red . End of.

Up
0

Some KiwiSaver providers are starting to incorporate cryptocurrencies into their investment portfolios. For instance, NZ Funds Management has recently allocated 5% of its KiwiSaver Growth Fund to Bitcoin.

However we're still behind Aussie. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) permits SMSFs to invest in cryptocurrencies, classifying them as capital gains tax (CGT) assets. This means that any profits made from crypto investments are taxed at a rate of 15% for SMSFs, which is generally lower than personal income tax rates.

Younger Kiwis may see crypto as a better way to growth their wealth and protect the value of their labor and savings. Whether they're right or wrong is somewhat beside the point.  

Up
0

The tax rate for capital gains tax within a super fund is 10% on assets held longer than a year.  And if the fund is in pension phase (ie. you're retired) its zero as up to $1.6M a year in earnings are tax free (both income and capital gains tax exempt).

Up
0

Which is quite compelling for crypto assets 

Up
0

Its quite compelling for any asset!  Something that the Left in NZ doesnt understand when they try to raise taxes on the wealthy.  Wealthy people are far better off in Australia.

Up
1

Australian employers contribute 11.5% to all workers super accounts

NZ employers contribute 3% only to about 75% of employees who actually contribute to kiwisaver

Just saying

Up
0