sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Banks say many of their borrowers are ahead of schedule on home loan repayments but tougher times are ahead

Personal Finance / news
Banks say many of their borrowers are ahead of schedule on home loan repayments but tougher times are ahead
%
Source: 123rf.com. Copyright: hywards.

As mortgage rates sank to record lows during 2020 and 2021 banks battled to keep up with borrower demand. In February 2021 ANZ Banking Group CEO Shayne Elliott remarked that record volumes in ANZ's New Zealand home loans business meant staff were "really run off our feet in terms of supporting Kiwis into homes."

It's no wonder bank staff were busy. During those heady days monthly mortgage volumes were going through the roof, peaking at $10.487 billion worth of new lending in March 2021, according to Reserve Bank data.

Real Estate Institute of New Zealand (REINZ) figures show national median prices peaked at $925,000 in November 2021, when the median number of days to sell was 29. 

Now, 18 months later the picture looks very different. The latest REINZ figures show median prices down $150,000, or 16%, to $775,000, and the median number of days to sell has pushed out to 45. The latest Reserve Bank residential mortgage borrowing figures show $3.836 billion worth of new lending during February, well down from the heights of 2020-2021.

Those 18 months, of course, have seen inflation surge to its highest level since 1990, reaching 7.3% before reducing to 6.7% in the latest Statistics NZ quarterly figures. The Reserve Bank, tasked with keeping inflation between 1% and 3%, has responded by pushing NZ's benchmark interest rate, its Official Cash Rate, up 500 basis points to 5.25%. 

Against that backdrop mortgage interest rates have jumped. The average popular two-year fixed bank rate, for example, bottomed out at 2.524% in June 2021, and is now at 6.497%. 

However, as times have got tougher there've been few mortgagee sales so far. Mortgagee sales are when a borrower can't pay back money they owe their bank and the bank sells the property to get back what it's owed. At the start of this week, there were 37 properties being advertised as residential mortgagee sales nationwide. During 2009, during the Global Financial Crisis, there were 3,024 mortgagee sales.

So just how are borrowers coping with those significantly higher interest rates? Not too badly, according to their lenders. Albeit, given the NZ penchant for fixed-term mortgages, some of us are yet to feel the full impact of significantly higher mortgage rates. 

A third of ANZ borrowers ahead on their mortgages by at least six months

An ANZ NZ spokeswoman told interest.co.nz about 35% of ANZ's customers are on an interest rate lower than 4%.

"However, we know that many of our customers will roll off fixed home loans onto higher rates over the coming year. When that happens some will be under financial pressure," she said.

Nonetheless at this stage the spokeswoman for the country's biggest bank says about 33% of accounts are ahead on their home loan repayments by six months or more.

"At the moment, the vast majority of our customers are in a sound financial position. People have kept up their savings habits and many took the opportunity while interest rates were low to pay down debt, so are ahead on their mortgages," the ANZ spokeswoman said.

But, if things get more difficult the spokeswoman says finances can be restructured, including by "extending their home loan term or moving part of their loan to interest only."

A longer home loan term or paying interest but not loan principal, could mean borrowers ultimately pay more.

More than two-thirds of Westpac customers ahead on repayments

In comments attributed to Mike Norfolk, its General Manager of Consumer Banking and Wealth, Westpac NZ said at March 31, 67.7% of its home loan customers were ahead on their mortgage repayments. That's down slightly from 68.4% a year earlier.

"Those customers were ahead of their scheduled mortgage repayments by a median amount of $12,480 or 10.8 months. Our home lending team has not seen an increase in applications for interest-only lending or extensions of mortgage terms," Norfolk said.

In comments attributed to Nicole Pervan, its General Manager for Home Lending, Kiwibank said a significant number of home loan customers took advantage of the low interest rate climate to accelerate home loan repayments.

"From about 2012 to 2020/21 we had customers who kept their payments the same, or even increased payments, despite interest rates falling, in order to reduce the length of their mortgage...Our figures indicate just over half of our entire book, which is around 170,000 accounts, were choosing to pay off their mortgages faster," Pervan said.

"Even over the past year as customers have been rolling off historic low rates onto higher interest rates, the majority of our customers are still choosing to pay above their required repayments where they can. We do expect this to decrease over the next few months as more of those low home loans interest rates reset onto the higher current rates as that will be higher than some of these customers have been paying previously."

Pervan said Kiwibank saw "a good proportion" of customers reduce 25 year mortgages down to 20 or 17 years by aggressively paying down their loans in the previous low interest rate environment. Now she says about 1% of customers have switched to paying interest-only "temporarily" due to increased interest rates.

"We are also seeing some households, a smaller number, who were managing to increase payments and shorten the length of the mortgage, request to go back to the original length of the loan in order to reduce repayments further," said Pervan.

"So far, we have seen most households able to adjust payments to meet the new repayment rates and still stay on track to repay their loans as scheduled, but we are getting more feedback indicating how challenging that will be given other cost increases they are facing currently."

Increased hardship

Pervan said Kiwibank's also seeing an increase in customer hardship through a change of circumstance.

"This could be a loss of job, a significant health event, or a marital separation. These figures have increased threefold, from a previously very low level of roughly 0.02% prior to the pandemic. We think this is probably people emerging from the trauma of the last few years, experiencing big life events and having to adjust their financial circumstance accordingly."

Bank staff are also keeping a close eye on customers whose interest rates haven’t changed yet, but are due for a reset and who are already struggling or are in arrears either with Kiwibank or other lenders.

Mark Wilkshire, CEO of The Co-operative Bank, told interest.co.nz nearly one third of the bank's customers are paying above their minimum payment. 

"That has only marginally changed since rates began rising in October 2021, with 36% paying above the minimum then, to 31% today, dropping just 5%. Customers are therefore choosing to still keep their repayments above their minimum which helps reduce their total interest cost and must be cutting back in other areas of spending," said Wilkshire.  

"Customers who have been paying above their minimum have bought themselves flexibility as rates rise, as they can more easily adjust their loan term. That is a useful option to have in their back pocket."

The Co-operative Bank isn't seeing an increase in interest-only borrowers, which comprise less than 5% of its total. 

"We also continue to see people keep up to date with their repayments which is the benefit of testing people at higher rates. Even when the Official Cash Rate was 0.25% we tested people on rates above 6%, which is around where our popular one or two year fixed rates are now," Wilkshire said.

As interest.co.nz recently reported, the major banks' mortgage serviceability test rates for wannabe borrowers now start at 8.5%.

"Coming up in the next six months based on what we know today, over 80% of customers could expect an increase in their minimum fixed mortgage repayments of between 1% to 25%...For The Co-operative Bank one of our top priorities is helping customers adjust to the higher rate environment," said Wilkshire.

'A challenging year for many'

A BNZ spokesman said the bank hasn't seen any material change in the way customers structure their repayments.

"The impact of additional repayments on the life of a home loan depends on each customer's unique circumstances, such as the size of their loan, the term length, interest rate, loan structure, and frequency of additional payments. For customers in a position to do so, making extra repayments, whether through small regular payments or one-off lump sums, can significantly reduce the interest paid over the life of a home loan and help them become mortgage-free sooner," the BNZ spokesman said.

"We have seen a small increase in customers requesting to temporarily switch their home loan to interest-only, including customers affected by Cyclone Gabrielle and the Anniversary Weekend floods in Auckland."

Meanwhile, an ASB spokeswoman said the bank's not seeing an overall increase in customers moving to interest-only payments, but acknowledges this will be a challenging year for many home loan customers.

"For many Kiwis it will be the first time they’ve experienced the impact of interest rate increases and we are proactively reaching out to customers we believe may face financial challenges to help them understand the options available to them," the ASB spokeswoman said.

In February the Reserve Bank suggested mortgage holders on average could be paying about 22% of their disposable income to service the interest payments on their mortgages by the end of this year.

*This article was first published in our email for paying subscribers. See here for more details and how to subscribe.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

97 Comments

All those sub 4% will be sneezing every dollar into their repayment,  before they are hit by the oncoming storm...

Up
9

Yes probably very true of the insightful ones. What about the others who carry on as normal, they will get a sudden and rude awakening 🤏

Up
10

Absolutely they should, and have been doing exactly that. Smashing principal, vs buying another house and or jetskis etc.

Some did, some didn't.

Up
8

The number of utes and classic cars for sale has increased dramatically since the start of the year

Up
14

50% more for sale?

Up
0

Or they could have sneezed every dollar into their mortgage when rates were 2.5% and be mortgage free now???

Up
9

With coming higher repayments they should not be smashing the principal, but keeping cash on hand so they can keep up with monthly payments.

Up
3

I’m smashing it at 4000 bucks a month. 80% of   my repayments are principal.  When rates were low I fixed on different terms so that the fixed portions would rollover when I have the offset funds to cover them. Last one rolls over in 2026. All sub 4% some low 3%. Last year paid off 120k. I’ll be using the low rates all the way to paying everything off.

Up
7

Good work, $1000 a week is a goodly amount and the same for me. It's about the most I can afford and still pay for other things. But you chomp away at the principle pretty quick 

Up
5

I'm curious on the maths - I haven't done it yet. But, for example, would it be better to save and invest (even in term deposits) in the meantime instead of raising repayments and pay off a lump sum at rollover, or increase repayments while rates are low. Or possibly dependent on whether savings can earn more?

Up
1

If possible, do both? I'm paying the max allowable which takes a bit more off the principal each fortnight, and also trying to put away a bit each month for when my loan rolls over in a year. If things are looking ok, I'll pay off a bit of the loan before re-fixing, if things are looking rough I'll use some of the saved amount to make my regular repayments more comfortable. 

Up
1

Why are 1/3 of ANZ customers ahead on mortgages yet 2/3 of Westpac customers are. Expecting similar figures, I'm just curious as to why there is such a huge difference between banks. Its certainly a questionable and timing convenient "nothing to see here" media release spin. Lets see what the picture looks like after a another year of equity erosion. I'm sure the many who bought into the "never lose from housing" narrative are questioning the meaning of "good debt".

Up
13

The ANZ figure is 1/3 at least six months ahead on payments, the Westpac figure is 2/3 ahead in total. It seems likely 1/4 to 1/3 of ANZ borrowers are less than six months ahead making the figures actually very similar.

Up
8

Agreed, - cheers. It would be interesting to see "those ahead on repayments" given a $$ total then what it represents as a percentage of the banks total $$ exposure to mortgages. Me thinks the percentage of those ahead are probably a lot lower. 

Up
4

2/3 of westpac customers are ahead by a median of 10 months which is surprisingly good given our poor financial literacy in this country 

Up
7

Anybody know if this number of people ahead includes offset accounts? My non-banker guess is those are excluded, so there are possibly even more people effectively ahead on payments than these figures show. Also, how are the figures calculated with respect to reset of fixed terms. For example, I take a 25 year mortgage, when my two year fix resets I make a lump sum payment of say $20,000 to reduce principal prior to signing onto a new two year fix. Am I now considered ahead of schedule based on the original term of the loan, or based on the newly set fixed rate and associated payment schedule, perhaps I am exactly on schedule for a mortgage which is now listed with a (say) 22 year term?

Up
4

An answer to my own first question. Money in offset accounts is not counted as a pre-payment, at least in Australia as of 2015.

https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/smp/2015/aug/box-e-offset-account-b…

Up
0

People will have to start selling all their toys and downgrading the cars to keep up the repayments. Expect to see people living on beans on toast before they are prepared to sell the house, you can do without a lot of unnecessary stuff but basically you need a house to live in.

Up
9

My yardstick for discretionary spend are those Chinese massage places in malls. Most of them have looked very quiet over the past few months.

I have certainly cut back a lot on my $20 - oops sorry, inflation $35 - 20 minute neck and shoulders massages

Up
7

Its a big jump in price. Could also have been undercutting themselves possibly.

Up
2

Or inflation biting and discretionary spend dying.

Up
3

Optional extras for the higher priced massage?

Up
0

The 1/3 of your book with only the last 10 years could be ahead...... while those recent drawdowns could be in trouble,   meaningless statements.    Our local toyota dealership says people are selling 40k cars and buying 20k cars to eliminate car payments.    Very tight market smaller cars right now.   9% stress tests - all you need to know, we are open just not lending much.

Up
9

This is the important distinction.  The majority of mortgages on a Banks books would be customers who bought pre-2020, and were approved when interest rates were in the 4% to 5% range.  When rates dropped during covid and these borrowers rolled off their fixed term, by default payments are kept the same, thus reducing the term and getting "ahead" on payments.

These aren't the borrowers everyone should be concerned about and its misleading for the Banks to focus on them.  

Its the people who bought their first home, upgraded or bought additional investment properties, when rates were sub 3% and LVR's were removed, that are in a more precarious financial situation.  Its no surprise the banks didn't provide similar stats for customers who purchased mid 2020 onwards, as it would be a very different picture.

Volume of house sales is already very low, as the current interest rates have drastically reduced the pool of people who can afford to borrow enough to pay current prices.  It would only take a small percentage of current mortgage holders being forced to sell to drastically throw out the balance of sellers to buyers and put a lot of downwards pressure on prices.

Up
26

Insightful as always.

Up
6

Indeed. The Kaaaark moment is very near

 

Up
9

Spot on.  Thanks for another excellent comment 

Up
2

3 Massive used car dealerships in USA gone under and 2 major floor financing outfits have stopped lending to car dealers - the calm before the storm. NZ has 44,000 active credit accounts in arrears per Centrix and we have low unemployment and mostly lowish mortgage rates, what could possibly go wrong??

Up
0

Isn't debt being repaid faster than required the last thing the banks need? For them more Debt, for longer at the maximum level of affordability is how they make their money.

In 1933 Fisher argued that... repayment in aggregate causes a contraction in the money supply and price level deflation.

Up
1

Our whole economy and business plans are based on growth, you don't grow you wither and die, banks included.

I'd use the p word but don't wish to trigger anyone.

Up
2

Some  analysts have sell ratings  on mentioned banks.

Up
1

And they will prove correct - just timing.

Up
0

Yes, we are getting deflationary debt repayment. So while inflation is high from overseas inflation (import shock) and rate of change in the labour market as well as labour market tightness, the money supply is contracting.

The appropriate move is to slowly expand government spending on infrastructure projects to catch the soon to be unemployed construction workers and put them to work on national infrastructure projects. The pipes pissing down my street and the potholes that munt the bottom of my car seem worthwhile stimulus spending targets.

Up
8

When I look at these charts, my view is that the probability of the Fed (and other global central banks) being able to achieve a 'soft landing' is small (less than 50% chance). 

It would appear that in the past 100 + years, money supply has never been reduced in such a manner/fashion. We're walking an unchartered path right now and the outcomes could be highly unpredictable. Those who think 'oh well they'll just cut rates and everything will be a repeat of recent decades' (price stability and asset price appreciation) might (and I say might as I don't know for sure) be in for a surprise.

Then again....stranger things have happened, and the Fed (and co) pull a rabbit out of the hat. 

Up
7

Additional thoughts....

As Zoltan Pozsar noted about a year ago, its possible that the Fed may need to keep rates where they are for a few years (which keeps money supply growth negative for a few years) just to keep inflation in check. I can see where he is coming from when I view the chart (linked above).

The excess money supply from 2020-2021 may require a few years of opposite policy positions to undo this (inflation mess). You can see the correlation in the chart between excess money supply growth, followed by periods of high inflation (and the subsequent impact on interest rates). 

That would have very bad ramifications for asset prices (depending if a bull or a bear)

Up
9

Also note that the previous occasions that US money supply has gone negative, such as it has, it has triggered panics, depressions and unemployment of >10% on each occasion (without exception - but happy if anyone wishes to correct this - I'm here to learn so if anyone has a counter argument it would be good to try and triangulate my thinking with you). 

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsuaPI1WAAImqLj?format=jpg&name=medium

Up
7

To quote an under used saying - you aint seen anything - yet!

Up
0

It would appear that ultimately, if we wished to achieve financial and price stability, mechanisms need to be in place to prevent excess money supply creation (central banks carrying out QE programs are creating financial instability, when their mandate is the opposite! They are the arsonist and the fireman...).

It would prevent debt/asset bubbles from forming and the subsequent financial and social issues they create (with central banks forcing recessions and depressions to remove the excess money supply from the system).  

Up
1

Yup - the ultimate fix is to remove monetary policy, ie. remove govt/central bank control of money supply.  Govts corrupt currencies to buy votes.

The only way I think we can get there is another cycle of currency collapse.  What is different this time is we have technology change (eg. BTC or whatever is next) to emerge as alternatives during a period of chaos (now beginning).  I hope this is the beginning of the end of state control of money.

Up
1

It is going to be a new great depression IMO. It is not going to go well.

Up
13

I doubt it will be anywhere near that bad. But probably a pretty bad recession, I think worse than what we saw after the GFC. When the GFC hit inflation was much lower than now, so there was more scope to cut the OCR and pump lots of money into the economy.

Up
5

This is looking to me like a 1 in a 100 year event that is unfolding around us. Could be the big one that is talked about for generations to come (may not be of course but when you look at the data, there are many very unusual things happening right now that have never happened before in our lifetimes - money supply shrinking is something we have never seen before so there may be little benefit comparing this to the GFC where even then we had money supply growth - I'm not sure). 

Severity is very uncertain in my view as it may take a lot of pain to remove the excess demand (from the excess money creation) out of the economy. Dropping the OCR to 'stimulate' may make it worse, not better. 

Up
7

Absolutely wrong. Unless you mean what is already 

Up
2

I admire your optimism and hope you are right.

Up
0

No, the last thing the banks need is people defaulting on their loans.  Debt being repaid faster merely reduces the profitability of a given loan, although they still make money out of it.  It also allows them to reloan the money sooner than expected, opening up further profit potential 

Up
1

This sounds like the banks are trying to claim they are stable and their customers are sound on the basis of rapid repayment by their customers.

This is very suspicious, a close eye is needed on the books for these loans. I suspect many of them are going to default on payment in the soon to be higher unemployment environment. I was interviewing the other day and talking to a guy working for one of the big 4, he seemed to think the books were worse than they appeared, he worked as a developer on the core home loan processing system. But that doesn't mean he had a good view of the book performance.

Up
10

Before I forget... Happy ANZAC day. I hope you've had a good morning so far

Up
6

Excellent dawn service in my area.

Up
4

I woke up early but stupid me forgot about dawn service (faceplant)

Up
3

So many killed in wars but no lessons learnt. 

Why do humans have a brain? 

Up
6

“To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women!”

Up
2

Frank takes “what is best in life?” For $100

Up
2

Nice - what young Conan learned from seeing his parents killed, village decimated, taken as a child slave and mercilessly worked until he was the last to drop.  Deep wisdom at great cost.

Up
1

He did end up with a pretty incredible physique and combat skills, so wasn’t all downside 

Up
3

Is ANZAC day supposed to be happy?

Up
0

I dont know, what do you think

Up
2

Up to the individual I guess.

I've never heard/seen "happy ANZAC day" before though. Looks/feels weird to me

Up
5

I may have been wrong, in saying that. Though we missed the dawn service we went to a cafe and I certainly saw and heard a lot of happy people this morning. Thanks to the armed forces service people.

My mate was telling me about the oppressive culture in North Korea, and just how bad it is. We're lucky to not be there 

Up
2

On ANZAC day I'm happy that conscript armies are a thing of the past.  

But it wasn't sacrifices at Gallipoli that brought that about - it was making warfare a high tech affair.

Up
2

I guess most people are ahead and banks are in good Shape. But why is the inventory of houses in trademe keeps on increasing and buyers are waiting and not buying? 

I am perplexed with this situation.

What is the real truth? 

Up
1

Depends on the area, its pretty much constant here and back to pre pandemic numbers in total. If the total numbers are up then it has to be main centres like Auckland and Wellington that had the silly gains that are getting stressed sellers first.

Up
0

The reason is because average age of banks’ mortgages prob something like 7-8 yrs, originating from when house prices were cheaper and therefore still affordable at today’s higher rates (note this is average….more recent loans will typically be larger and much less affordable).  Whereas to buy today larger than average existing loans are required as house prices now much higher, fewer can afford them so fewer sales.

The conclusion of course is that prices are still far too high and will continue correcting until an equilibrium is reached - likely to be closer to 2017 prices

Up
1

...."In February the Reserve Bank suggested mortgage holders on average could be paying about 22% of their disposable income to service the interest payments on their mortgages by the end of this year."

Big deal, if that's the case! Try talking to renters on struggle street. They'd love to have 22pa go out in rent each week.

Up
4

Err that's just the interest component you need to add to that the principle repayment if you ever intend paying it off. I guess it makes it pretty clear why buying is better than renting however for those that don't get it.

Up
4

Is it any wonder the govt has to pay out over $2 bn per year in landlord subsidy?

Should be the first benefit on the bonfire post-election

Up
9

The article tells most people take the 2 year fixed which 18 months ago was 2.5% over the next few months billions of dollars will be refinanced at 6.5% so on the 10 billion borrowed in March 2021 a extra 400 million on interest payments for that month alone. When people go from paying 25k interest to 65k on each million borrowed per year just on interest the crap will hit the fan.

Up
10

What happens if the bank valuation of your property now puts you under 20% equity, do they take you off special rates and put you on standard rates when refixing?

Up
3

What happens indeed. Do the Banks risk downgrades and prop the ponzi via more interest only/payment deferment, or do they start to shoot the speculative...?

Lock n load.

Up
3

At what point does their accumulated risk become too vast I wonder

Up
2

Think you'll find you'll stay on those special rates, banks don't require new valuations for refixes...

Up
1

The banks update their valuation on that property as well though, a colleague gets regular updates (every rate change) as the entire mortgage is variable.

I wonder about those that are now in the negative equity, I suppose for now it's not in the interest of the banks to cause any more financial stress but their books will soon become loaded with more high-risk loans in the months to come.

Up
2

No this has been answered by the banks previously. Refinancing is another story however.

Up
1

Average mortgage in NZ approx 400K so a refix from 3 to 6% equates to $12,000 pa in increased interest cost - dominoes will fall - questions which ones/how soon/how many - answers when my crystal ball is fixed.

Up
0

Would all those who promoted that maximum borrowing, interest only, was the way to happiness please raise your hands.

Up
11

In February 2021 ANZ Banking Group CEO Shayne Elliott remarked that record volumes in ANZ's New Zealand home loans business meant staff were "really run off our feet in terms of supporting Kiwis into homes."

That's one way of looking at it. Another way would be herding sheeple into the fiat plantation. 

Up
7

The former Citigroup chief executive infamously said in July 2007, referring to the firm's leveraged lending practices: “When the music stops, in terms of liquidity, things will be complicated. But as long as the music is playing, you've got to get up and dance. We're still dancing.”

Up
5

Then you hear property experts complaining about banks not lending and causing prices to drop.

Up
1

These bank responses remind me of the

This is fine meme

I'd rather they bit a bit more pessimistic at this stage of the game.

 

Up
3

It will be the 1% that can't pay that will cause the big acceleration in price reductions. Looking at these numbers I expect about 20k listings, in the next 6 months, that will be nearing a fire sale level.

Once mortgagee listings get to 100 expect a quick acceleration.

It's the highest risk 5% of mortgages (100k+ houses) that will dictate how low the crash goes.

Up
11

it take time for the rat to move through the snake, many of these maybe a 2024 story

Up
7

The real question will be at what point those that are still cashed up (and there are a lot of those) will step in and buy worthwhile distressed assets (mortgagee sale houses and cheap businesses).

At that point the return would need to start to reasonably outweigh the borrowed cost.. which will be the bottom of the crash (everyone behaving logically)

My pick is house prices at 50% of peak...  maybe median price of a reasonable 3 bedder in aucks would be maybe $525 to 600k prob was just over $1m in 2022.  Prob would be a good investment over 10 years 

 

Up
5

Also depends on alternative use of funds.  If the wheels are off and govts/banks have panicked rates to zero then things like real estate might be one of the only ways to go despite negative returns.  Personally, I'm more interested in precious metals and BTC to sit out the shit storm.

Up
2

Not many in a market the size of NZ property need zero mortgage, and those that do tend to be buying upper quartile properties....    so as things go worse lending standards tighten, higher deposit, better job security is considered, the worst crashes occur because banks stop lending.........     after the GFC in the US things where about as bad as you could get much like the 80s in the US, we in NZ hav never seen such bad recessions, but if you current acc deficiet does not get better we will see one and it will be ugly.... in AKL prices bounced along a flatish line from about 2016-2018   we "may" find support here.     It's not an investors market it maybe a  FHBers market.

Up
5

Frank will be purchasing middle of next year - he sees a lot further to fall in prices until they stabilise around 35-40% down from peak. Then they will sit flat for a long time and very slowly make minor gains sometime from 2026 onwards

Up
5

You hope. 

 

Up
2

KAAAAAAARRRRRRRKKKKKKK        I missed this one    https://www.oneroof.co.nz/news/43444?fbclid=IwAR0f2769vwB-DkEvUqkwKSyDk…      you need to alert me to these HW2   in another article (seems to be more and more and more....)    and that yucky sale in Sandrigham a clean mill under last sale... thats what about 80 weeks for a 1mil loss or 12.5k a week....          Everything seems TIP-TOP for the 50% of Auckland property that is 80% plus land value...................

A “change in circumstances” also forced the owners of a 1940s bungalow on King Street in Papatoetoe to sell in March at auction for $1.465m - almost $1m less than the windfall they had been expecting.

Records show the owner of the three-bedroom home on King Street had sold the property at auction in November 2021 for $2.404m. However, the deal appears to have collapsed, leaving the original owner to sell it again, but this time getting a much lower price.

South Auckland Harcourts business owner Harsimran Singh told OneRoof last week that some sellers who had purchased development land in 2021 were now suffering and were reselling at major losses.

Analysis by OneRoof’s data partner Valocity show individual properties that were bought in 2021 were now selling for anything from a few hundred thousand dollars to half a million dollars below what they got back then.

“The developers have basically gone with capital growth off the table, [building] costs going up, interest rates going up, they're not playing ball anymore,” Valocity head of valuations James Wilson said.

Up
7

Some really stupid money was paid at the peak of this bubble. *Really* stupid. And it was often for ‘development sites’ in places like Papatotoe.

‘Twas a really irrationally exuberant frenzy.

Up
8

next RV going to be 2017 levels  in AKL, land is so much of our housing stocks value and ITS GOING DOWN

Up
5

Yes. I suspect land values are already down circa 30% from peak on average in Auckland.

Up
4

I do think it's the 'development sites' that will be hit hardest, because the numbers don't stack up on building townhouses like they did at the peak, where you could ask $1m for a townhouse in Botany or whatever. I think a lot of ageing villas on large sections were bought for c.$1m more than they can possibly return in their current state. The distribution of a crash is never even but I think the biggest % drops will be on those places - not desirable enough for OO to buy due to location/age and no longer viable as development sites (unless maybe construction prices take a big tumble).

Up
1

Only $1.4 for an old clapped house in Papatoetoe.

someone tell me why the market doesn’t have another fifty percent to fall!

Up
5

Top pals House smouse and IT KAI have to stop thinking about what things WERE and start thinking what things ARE. They spend their days looking back, and thinking about knives. These are "interest"ing days. IF there was a recession it was  consummated in Q1, we are in Q2 now.

There again I could be wrong, so I'm happy to look at more facts. Such as lots of peoples eyes looking across the tasman sea, but is it actually a golden land of opportunity and wealth for those who will be renting in the cities. Buying in the cities, isn't so appealing as here since their house prices only dropped 5 percent and their interest rates like ours are higher than they were. Take care /sarc

Up
2

New paradigm you mean HW?

 

Up
1

Love the way the banks use numbers.  35% of customers etc etc.  Why do reporters not ask real questions?  What is the dollar value of your loans where customers are ahead on repayments?  What is the dollar value of your loans where customers are behind on repayments?  That way people can really assess the material impacts.  With bank lending collapsing (if only graphs could be posted here as it tells the story) and borrowers about to come under real stress there really is only one outlet valve so when the steam blows and the mortgagee sales flow that is when the RBNZ is going to have to rethink the approach.  The option of more borrowing as a country won't be palatable to offshore lenders or taxpayers.  Buckle up as the roller coaster is only just about to leave the station.  

Up
6

I would far prefer to see the Reserve bank reporting on these things so there is less 'spin' and 'cherry picking'.

Up
2

I'd think its more important to see how many are behind in their mortgage payments. The RBNZ only requested banks to report on those 45 or 60 days behind. Don't recall the exact figure but at the time if thought it was far too long. If you have missed a payment for after than two weeks, RBNZ should know about it. It should be shown as > x weeks but <y weeks for at least three repeats of differing periods.

Up
3