sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Paul Mazzola & Mitchell Goroch look at FTX's demise from the perspective of retail investors noting they're largely on their own

Personal Finance / opinion
Paul Mazzola & Mitchell Goroch look at FTX's demise from the perspective of retail investors noting they're largely on their own
ftx
Shutterstock.

By Paul Mazzola & Mitchell Goroch*

Anthony* (a friend) called a few weeks ago, deeply worried.

A deputy principal of a high school in Queensland, over the past year he spent hundreds of thousands of dollars buying cryptocurrencies, borrowing money using his home as equity.

But now all his assets, valued at A$600,000, were stuck in an account he couldn’t access.

He’d bought through FTX, the world’s third-biggest cryptocurrency exchange, endorsed by celebrities such as Seinfeld co-creator Larry David, basketball champions Steph Curry and Shaquille O’Neal, and tennis ace Naomi Osaka.

Tennis player Naomi Osaka advertises FTX while playing at the Miami Open tennis tournament in April 2022 in Florida. Wilfredo Lee/AP.

With FTX’s spectacular collapse, he’s now awaiting the outcome of the liquidation process that is likely to see him, 30,000 other Australians and more than 1.2 million customers worldwide lose everything.

“I thought these exchanges were safe,” Anthony said.

He was wrong.

Not like stock exchanges

Cryptocurrency exchanges are sometimes described as being like stock exchanges. But they are very different to the likes of the London or New York stock exchanges, institutions that have weathered multiple financial crises.

Stock exchanges are both highly regulated and help regulate share trading. Cryptocurrency exchanges, on the other hand, are virtually unregulated and serve no regulatory function.

They’re just private businesses that make money by helping “mum and dad” investors to get into crypto trading, profiting from the commission charged on each transaction.

Indeed, the crypto exchanges that have grown to dominate the market – such as Binance, Coinbase and FTX – arguably undermine the whole vision that drove the creation of Bitcoin and blockchains – because they centralise control in a system meant to decentralise and liberate finance from the power of governments, banks and other intermediaries.

These centralised exchanges are not needed to trade cryptocurrency, and are pretty much the least safe way to buy and hold crypto assets.

Trading before exchanges

In the early days of Bitcoin (all the way back in 2008) the only way to acquire it was to “mine” it – earning new coins by performing the complex computations required to verify and record transactions on a digital ledger (called a blockchain).

The coins would be stored in a digital “wallet”, an application similar to a private bank account, accessible only by a password or “private key”.

A wallet can be virtual or physical, on a small portable device similar in appearance to a USB stick or small phone. Physical wallets are the safest because they can be unplugged from the internet when not being used, minimising the risk of being hacked.

A physical digital wallet is the safest way to store your cryptocurrency.
A physical digital wallet is the safest way to store your cryptocurrency. Shutterstock

Before exchanges emerged, trading involved owners selling directly to buyers via online forums, transferring coins from one wallet to another like any electronic funds transfer.

Decentralised vs centralised

All this, however, required some technical knowledge.

Cryptocurrency exchanges reduced the need for such knowledge. They made it easy for less tech-savvy investors to get into the market, in the same way web browsers have made it easy to navigate the Internet.

Two types of exchanges emerged: decentralised (DEX) and centralised (CEX).

Decentralised exchanges are essentially online platforms to connect the orders of buyers and sellers of cryptocurrencies. They are just there to facilitate trading. You still need to hold cryptocurrencies in your own wallet (known as “self-custody”).

Centralised exchanges go much further, eliminating wallets by offering a one-stop-shop service. They aren’t just an intermediary between buyers and sellers. Rather than self-custody, they act as custodian, holding cryptocurrency on customers’ behalf.

Exchange, broker, bank

Centralised exchanges have proven most popular. Seven of the world’s ten biggest crypto exchanges by trading volume are centralised.

But what customers gain in simplicity they lose in control.

You don’t give your money to a stock exchange, for example. You trade through a broker, who uses your trading account when you buy and deposits money back into your account when you sell.

A CEX, on the other hand, acts as an exchange, a brokerage (taking customers’ fiat money and converting it into crypto or vice versa), and as a bank (holding customer’s crypto assets as custodian).

This is why FTX was holding cash and crypto assets worth US$10-50 billion. It also acted like a bank by borrowing and lending cryptocurrencies – though without customers’ knowledge or agreement, and without any of the regulatory accountability imposed on banks.

Holding both wallets and keys, founder-owner Sam Bankman-Fried “borrowed” his customers’ funds to prop up his other businesses. Customers realised too late they had little control. When it ran into trouble, FTX simply stopped letting customers withdraw their assets.

The power of marketing

Like stockbrokers, crypto exchanges make their money by charging a commission on every trade. They are therefore motivated to increase trading volumes.

FTX did this most through celebrity and sports marketing. Since it was founded in 2019 it has spent an estimated US$375 million on advertising and endorsements, including buying the naming rights to the stadium used by the Miami Heat basketball team.

FTX Arena in Miami.
FTX Arena in Miami. Lynne Sladky/AP

Such marketing has helped to create the illusion that FTX and other exchanges were as safe as mainstream institutions. Without such marketing, it’s debatable the value of the cryptocurrency market would have risen from US$10 billion in 2014 to US$876 billion in 2022.

Not your key, not your coins

There’s an adage among crypto investors: “Not your key, not your coins, it’s that simple.”

What this means is that your crypto isn’t safe unless you have self-custody, storing your own coins in your own wallet to which you alone control the private key.

The bottom line: crypto exchanges are not like stock exchanges, and CEXs are not safe. If the worst eventuates, whether it be an exchange collapse or cyber attack, you risk losing everything.

All investments carry risks, and the unregulated crypto market carries more risk than most. So follow three golden rules.

First, do some homework. Understand the process of trading crypto. Learn how to use a self-custody wallet. Until governments regulate crypto markets, especially exchanges, you’re largely on your own.

Second, if you’re going to use an exchange, a DEX is more secure. There is no evidence to date that any DEX has been hacked.

Lastly, in this world of volatility, only risk what you can afford to lose.


*Name has been changed.The Conversation

*Paul Mazzola, Lecturer Banking and Finance, Faculty of Business and Law, University of Wollongong and Mitchell Goroch, Cryptocurrency Trader and Researcher, University of Wollongong. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

33 Comments

Look, it's all good. All you have to do with this digital, non-physical currency is store it on physical media and hide it in the kitchen pantry in an old biscuit tin, then she's perfectly secure.

Up
1

That is the issue with any form of encryption, you still have to store the secret key somewhere safe. Where can you store your Crypto secret that is both secure and guaranteed to be accessible at all times? 

Up
2

If you read up on it for hundreds of hours you'd probably work it out.

That's what the market demanded, a new form of money with a high learning curve and less functionality.

Up
3

I use a Ledger Nano X that I carry with me everywhere. As for the 24-word recovery phrase, I've stored that in my head and on a Cryptosteel that's very well hidden.

Up
0

Your family will take some comfort that your wealth is locked up so securely. Even they couldn't get to it if you were to die suddenly!

Up
0

A fool and his money .......

These guys just reinforce the stereotype by calling these people investors instead of gamblers

If you treated this process as gambling you might get better regulation or none at all as the appropriate way forward

Up
2

I agree that it's not an investment.

Gambler seems too harsh though.

I would use 'speculator' - it walks the line between the two.

Up
0

Over 98% of FOREX transactions are gambling. What makes crypto different?

Up
0

Kevin O"leary (Mr Wonderful ) has lost all credibility.

Up
0

Anyone who leaves their wallet and keys lying around at "someone else's party" deserves everything they get. How ridiculously naïve.

Up
1

Agreed.  DEX us the way to go for crypto and DRS (direct registration of shares with a transfer agent) for shares.  

Up
0

I guess it depends on your definition of "Safe". As far as I'm concerned your Crypto is never safe because its backed by zilch, here today and gone tomorrow. Not sure what's going to happen to it if it stays at $17K for years, surely it will quickly lose its appeal to those into it only to make money.

Up
2

The bottom line: crypto exchanges are not like stock exchanges, and CEXs are not safe. If the worst eventuates, whether it be an exchange collapse or cyber attack, you risk losing everything

Wrong. Cryptocurrency assets deposited by customers on exchanges in Japan must be held in "cold storage" -- wallets not connected to the internet. Customers are given preferential rights to recover their money if an exchange collapses.

 

Up
0

Japan aye.

Sounds convenient.

What's the costs to have an overseas third party cold store your crypto?

As a non-Japanese citizen, what are ones recourse rights and abilities should there be an issue?

Up
0

Don't think you can blame Japan for their regulation while NZ has none. 3rd party cold storage is unnecessary. 

Up
0

Top 2 reasons people had (before the market crashed) for getting into crypto: 

1) Safer than in the Evil Traditional Banks 

2) Get Rich Quick 

so um yeah.....

Up
4

Lastly, in this world of volatility, only risk what you can afford to lose.

Exactly. 70% of NZers have <than $10,000 in cash savings. Very unlikely they will ever own a whole Bitcoin.  NZD equivalent of $100-200 is a good target. 

Up
0

But it's supposed to be currency. If regular money had those same rules, you wouldn't have a functioning economy.

Up
2

People's lack of desire to own BTC is not a "rule." Many people also don't see gold as currency. Others do. 

Up
0

The original sales pitch was as crypto as the evolution of money. It's inherent in its name and design.

Gold is a naturally occuring element people ascribe value to and trade.

Up
1

Sure. It can be the evolution of money. Just like fiat being unpegged from gold is an evolution for good or for bad. Gold is also perceived as money. Maybe not by you. But that's beside the point. As financier and investment banker J.P. Morgan said, “Gold is money. Everything else is credit.”

F'more, money is not currency. 

Up
0

Currency is money, and money is a medium of exchange.

If we were moving somewhere from fiat, it'd need to be easier and quicker. Currently crypto is the opposite.

Up
0

If we were moving somewhere from fiat

We're not moving away from fiat. The existence of BTC doesn't explain that we are. The vast majority of people do not own (any never own) BTC. 

Up
0

Yeah, so as I said, the original value proposition was that BTC/Crypto supplants the use of fiat. That was the prime mover for people to buy in.

That's changed now, to be a gold alternative or whatever. Digital baseball cards. It'll struggle to attract new buyers to give it critical mass (you're probably going to follow that up with stating there's still new entrants, however they're at much lower value).

Up
0

That's changed now, to be a gold alternative or whatever.

It's not a gold alternative. It shares some properties with gold. Even the most ardent BTC (which as nothing to do with digital baseball cards) supporter still uses fiat. Similarly, goldbugs also use fiat. 

Up
0

A digital baseball card is the closest analogy, i.e. a collectable with little to no value outside of its limited fanbase.

Maybe you should tell me what you think it is, rather than telling me what it's not.

Up
1

An NFT might share some properties with baseball cards. All depends. But NFTs have nothing to do with BTC. Not even the same protocol.  

Up
0

I'm talking about function. How about trying to complete this sentence:

"Bitcoin is worth _______, because it's good to be used for _______"

Because outside of collecting them with the hopes of trading them at some point in time, I can't see what the current use or ownership case is.

Up
3

"Bitcoin is worth _______, because it's good to be used for _______"

It's a meaningless question. But let's take a single property: Store of Value. What is that worth in fiat terms? That depends on the individual. The mkt price of BTD is more or less thea aggregate of those participating in the mkt.    

Up
0

I keep my BTC on a Ledger Nano cold storage wallet. Nice and safe. 

*/
Up
2

Ledger Nano was my first device. LCD display faltered in less than 2 years. Moved to Nano X. Going to multisig.  

Up
0

NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR CRYPTO. Unfortunately, most people seem to think that buying and holding crypto on an exchange equals ownership.

While it will be a painful lesson for many, I do hope this crash leads to better awareness of owning your own crypto and the innovation of more user-friendly hardware wallets and decentralized exchanges.

Up
0

Crypto

The very thing it was thought to replace..Fiat...it relies on for its value and existence.. i.e 1 bitcoin is worth 20k fiat... what unit of value would it have without fiat?

 

I believe it's possible that it is backed by the software and its decentralized nature, but in its infancy it relies on fiat to exist..

It does have everything for the needs..

Portable

Means of exchange

Store of value 

Divisible 

Also decentralized.....

What do you guys think. 

 

Up
0