sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Inflation is 2022’s boogeyman. How can we address rising living costs, while helping bring it down?

Personal Finance / opinion
Inflation is 2022’s boogeyman. How can we address rising living costs, while helping bring it down?
s
Getty Images.

By Stephen Hickson*

An entire generation has never experienced life with high inflation. But that is set to change. Countries like Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and others are reporting rising inflation. In New Zealand, inflation has climbed to its highest rate in 32 years. Our collective inexperience with the scourge of inflation, and how to solve it, could be a real problem.

For those experiencing high inflation for the first time, it is helpful to understand just what economists and politicians are talking about.

Inflation is a sustained increase in overall prices. Not everything goes up by the same amount but when people are having to pay more each week, month or year for the same basket of goods and services then that’s inflation.

Inflation is harmful in many ways. It works like rust – slowly eating away at the value of your money. Inflation affects all of us. It doesn’t matter what the face value of your money is – what matters is the quantity of goods and services you can buy with it.

The real value of money

One easy way to understand inflation is to look at what you can buy for the money you have.

Suppose at the start of the year your $100 note bought you 20 cups of coffee. However, inflation pushes coffee from $5 to $6 a cup. By the end of the year, your same $100 only buys you 16 cups of coffee. The face value of your money is the same but its real value (in terms of the number of coffees you can buy) has gone down. Your money is worth less now than a year ago.

This rise in costs hurts wage earners who have limited opportunity to renegotiate their wages.

Inflation also hurts those on fixed incomes such as beneficiaries and superannuitants who only receive periodic adjustments.

Rising inflation hurts savers who find the real value of their savings going down if returns on savings don’t keep up with inflation – which they currently aren’t.

Inflation can benefit borrowers who have the same debt at the end of the year but the value of that debt is lower in real terms. Providing there is at least some inflation adjustment to their income, borrowers have to sacrifice less to repay their debt.

While this sounds good, it’s not. It encourages poor borrowing decisions and discourages savings.

Young woman looking at a grocery receipt.
Inflation has risen to levels not seen for three decades. Consumers will feel the squeeze as their purchasing power drops. Getty Images.

The all-encompassing impact of inflation

In a progressive tax system, inflation hurts salary and wage earners who get pushed into higher tax brackets as they receive inflation adjustments to their pay.

Inflation can also cause issues at a national level.

If one country’s inflation rate is higher than their trading partners then its currency falls in value. In the early 1970s, the NZ dollar was worth almost US$1.50. Our higher inflation rates of the 70s and 80s saw it fall to around US$0.50 by the mid 80s.

This drop in value limits what we can buy from overseas – things like life-saving drugs will become more expensive for us if we don’t get inflation down and others do.

The causes of inflation can come from good intentions

Inflation is too much money chasing too few goods.

If central banks push more money into circulation, there is a real risk of inflation. A big increase in demand for goods from, for example, an increase in government spending can also trigger inflation. So can supply chain disruptions that reduce the goods available (meaning the same amount of money chasing fewer goods).

Unfortunately, all these triggers are currently in play as countries respond to a series of global crises.

The invasion of Ukraine and ongoing COVID-19 supply chain disruptions have reduced the goods available. Governments globally have boosted spending to support their economies. But this latter factor has been put on steroids by central banks being willing to purchase government debt.

Man with mask pushing supermarket trolly.
Russia’s war in Ukraine and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has caused a cost-of-living crisis. Getty Images.

Unintended consequences

The RBNZ bought billions of government bonds to keep interest rates low as part of its “large scale asset purchases” programme.

In New Zealand, the average money growth between 1995 and 2019 was about 8% per year. This accommodates a growing population, a growing economy and a little bit of inflation (a little bit is OK). In the last two years money supply has grown by around 30% per year.

Of course it’s easy to look back with the benefit of hindsight. Those who made the decisions at the time don’t have that luxury.

The RBNZ is now they are having to wind back their asset purchases and raise interest rates to rein in inflation.

Some argue the RBNZ has been distracted and has dropped the ball on their key job and we are now facing the risk the inflation genie is out of the bottle.

Whether that criticism is justified or not, the RBNZ will now have to act decisively to reduce inflation. But getting inflation down is never painless.

Households with mortgages will find their weekly budgets squeezed as interest rates rise. Firms will face falling demand from consumers with less to spend. Job growth will dry up – though New Zealand is in the fortunate position of starting with very low unemployment.

Regardless, the RBNZ must do the job they got back in 1989 with the passing of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act. New Zealand’s central bank is the only one that can control monetary conditions; it’s the only one that can get inflation under control.

The same could be said for many of the countries facing growing inflation.

If central banks don’t take decisive action, we could get a sharp reminder of just how bad inflation can be.The Conversation


*Stephen Hickson, Economics Lecturer and Director Business Taught Masters Programme, University of Canterbury

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

26 Comments

When the Interest Rates go to 7% and Up even the Wealthy will be on a Diet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU1CiyOHOvA

 

Up
2

The smart wealthy already are, in preparation for the buyer's market next year.

Up
2

Surely the smart wealthy just repeat their interest rate expectations?

Up
0

The real boogeyman is economic collapse, which will occur if the official cash rate is increased further. Inflation, after years of money printing and now supply chain constraints, cannot be successfully contained without triggering economic depression.

Nobody can "bring living costs down" as the headline of this article tries to suggest. After years of cheap money, with a government throwing freebies around, the best we could hope for now is a period of inflation. Any monetary attempts to tame this will collapse the house of cards that our economy in fact is. 

Up
0

Jeez, this is awful. I mean where do you even start?

"Inflation is too much money chasing too few goods" - a sentence that makes no sense really. inflation is a broad and sustained increase in the price level. In modern times, inflation is generally caused by an increase in the cost of a good or service that is an input cost to lots of other goods and services - like, errrrm, oil (or US dollars). This is not always a supply and demand mismatch issue - 'too much demand chasing too little supply'. For example, oil prices are high at the moment because the futures price of oil is high as traders are nervous about continuity of supply, Saudi Arabia are using the crisis to set the price, and oil companies are scared of investing in expanding supply because their shareholders like the high prices, and they know that the Saudis can crash the price at any time.

"Central banks push more money into circulation, there is a real risk of inflation". Central banks cannot push more money into circulation (other than hard currency)! Central banks can create new money to buy bonds that Treasury have already sold - but this is basically a refund. Govt spending can add money into the economy, but Govt taxes take it back out again. However, net Govt spending into the economy tends to be dwarfed by commercial bank credit creation, which is the dominant source of increases in 'money in circulation'.

  

 

 

 

Up
0

So you think inflation is not too much money chasing too few goods? Your explanation on this doesn't make sense to me. You are taking Saudi Arabia using crisis to set the price as example, I guess you are talking about oil monopoly here? But when there is monopoly, the industry will be less productive as companies which have monopoly in that industry will be controlling the production and pricing. Then when you have 30% more money supply in a year, you get inflation. Isn't your example proving that inflation is too much money chasing too few goods?

"Govt spending can add money into the economy, but Govt taxes take it back out again. However, net Govt spending into the economy tends to be dwarfed by commercial bank credit creation, which is the dominant source of increases in 'money in circulation'." Guess you are a believer of MMT? 

Up
1

Saudis / OPEC literally control the 'production and pricing' of a significant chunk of the oil market - and with Russia only able to sell to a few places at the moment, OPEC's market power is especially strong. Crucially OPEC can still make decent profits at $50 / barrel - a price that would shut down a lot of wells in the US. This is why US companies are reticent to invest in increasing supply, but sure, it's all about the money supply blah blah.    

I am not sure what a 'believer in MMT' is. If you are asking whether I believe that commercial banks create new money when they lend (rather than lend out savers' money), and that this new money increases the money supply, then of course I believe that. Anyone who doesn't has neglected their education.  

Up
0

If they raise the OCR by 1% increments from now on, they have a chance to keep it under 10%. Else, we're going to 15%. Least regrets.

Up
2

What are you basing this on? Wages are barely shifting, most of the items in the CPI basket are static or even reducing in price, and consumer demand is already plummeting as more people give more money to the bank in interest payments. What prices - specifically - do you think are going to drag the overall CPI up?   

Up
0

most of the items in the CPI basket are static or even reducing in price

What are you basing this on?  CPI is running at 7.3%

In the June 2022 quarter compared with the June 2021 quarter, the CPI inflation rate was 7.3 percent.

  • Housing and household utilities increased 9.1 percent, influenced by home ownership (up 18 percent) and actual rentals for housing (up 4.3 percent).
  • Transport increased 14 percent, influenced by private transport supplies and services (up 25 percent) and purchase of vehicles (up 4.0 percent).
  • Food increased 6.5 percent, influenced by grocery food (up 7.1 percent) and restaurant meals and ready-to-eat food (up 5.8 percent).
  • Miscellaneous goods and services increased 5.5 percent influenced by other miscellaneous services (up 11 percent) and personal care (up 7.3 percent).

https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/consumers-price-index-ju…

 

Up
2

You are using the level 1 categories, which hide the detail. Go to the 108 prices at level 3 and you will see that the average price increase across the 108 categories is just 1%!! How can CPI go up by 7.3% if the average increase across all prices is 1%? Because increases in CPI are being driven almost completely by a handful of the 108 prices - petrol, diesel, cost of getting a house built, grocery food, restaurants, and rent.

Up
0

So are you saying inflation is only worth targeting when it is affecting all prices equally? 

Up
1

If CPI is being drive upwards by a handful of prices (e.g. a doubling in the price of diesel in 15 months), then this would suggest that the most appropriate tools for targeting inflation are sector / product specific - NOT hiking interest rates to slow the whole economy down.

Up
0

Right... So what sector specific action would you suggest the RBNZ take that would be immediately effective in those the 5 sectors you list?  And noting that transport and housing has been quite consistent, the others in the top5 tend to move around allot. So you'll need sector specific action for each sector ready to go. 

Up
0

That's not how CPI get calculated, if you are saying it hides the details, I can say lets includes housing price in CPI, then for the past years, inflation would be 20%. We can not just selectively choose the way how the data be put in to fit certain narratives...

Up
1

I am not sure you understand. CPI with all its flaws is made up of lots of different prices, with weightings attached. It doesn't include house prices for good reason - although it is fair to debate that.. 

Up
0

Of course CPI has its flaws, but you'll have to convince stats New Zealand and RBNZ on what data should be included. Again, taming the inflation is the priority for RBNZ as it's their mandate and failing to do so will be a disaster for New Zealand's economy.

Up
2

"Wages are barely shifting".  Really ? Where did you get that from ? Anecdotal I know, and has to be as NZ StS is sloow, but from people I know and a customer I gave a long ride to several weeks ago who is "run off my legs charging all over NZ" doing his job as a wage negotiator, unions and other groups he is working with are getting a minimum of 10% ", otherwise it is an exercise in futility."

Up
0

You don't need anecdotes. Weekly earnings data is available here: https://www.stats.govt.nz/experimental/covid-19-data-portal - look under economic and choose 'weekly median earnings'. Earnings have been flat since the beginning of January. Low earners have seen reductions in earnings.   

Up
0

"wages are barely shifting". What wages are referring to? In my industry people are walking out the door with $30-40k+ higher offers! There's a fierce battle for labour going on out there and the shortages are dire. Fuelled by government spending

Up
1

The Labour government's stated intention is to force up wages by limiting immigration .  Then they double down by increasing the minimum wage and benefits to match the resulting high inflation.  They are obviously clueless about the wage-price spiral that created the stagflation of the 1970s.  The only way to get out the spiral is to increase the minimum wage, public sector salaries and benefits by significantly less than the rate of inflation.

Up
1

They are obviously clueless about the wage-price spiral that created the stagflation of the 1970s

No surprise when the Prime Minister wasn't even a twinkle in her fathers eye in the 70's... and Grant Robertson was still in nappies.

Up
0

HS - funny how the neoliberal argument is always is to cut back government services and wages, and also to cut  taxes on the wealthy. Result - the rich get richer while the poor get poorer and the middle gets hollowed out. 

Up
1

Inflation hurts the poor more than it does the rich for the simple reason that the inflated money gets into the hands of the rich first and is devalued by the time the poor get it.

Up
0

And then you see things like this from Wired, where there are excess stocks of goods that are being sold at reduced prices.

Up
0

If central banks don’t take decisive action, we could get a sharp reminder of just how bad inflation can be.

A little late for decisive action, the best they have offered is a fighting retreat so far. Inflation is winning.

Up
1