sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

We look ahead to how 2022 might look for your household budget, Covid-19, climate change measures and the hospitality and tourism industries

Personal Finance / news
We look ahead to how 2022 might look for your household budget, Covid-19, climate change measures and the hospitality and tourism industries
House of cards
Photo: peterjroberts. Licence: CC BY 2.0

In a statement that might well sum up 2021 for many, Hannah McQueen, founder of financial advisor enable.me, says "times of uncertainty can cause two thoughts: I don't have a plan and I need a plan!"

McQueen said uncertain times hit those without a financial plan the hardest, particularly in a climate of rising interest rates with mortgages and food accounting for about 50% to 60% of household outgoings.

"While only two categories, they have a disproportionate impact," said McQueen.

Taking out short-term, high interest debt during a year like 2021, when essential bills have become tight for many, is one way the wealth gap grows wider, she said. 

Financial author Martin Hawes said that extended periods in lockdown will have far-reaching ramifications, but doubts many peoples habits will change permanently.

"Where habits might change is towards online shopping. People ought to be much more used to buying online or click and collect. So there may be more of an acceleration of trends more than anything else."

Hawes pointed to the possibility of more redundancies once the Government's Covid subsidies are lifted, as these are propping up many businesses.

"There's not a lot of job losses because of the Government support, but if that government support was to wane or finish then we would start to see a more difficult economy."

Household balance sheets were looking reasonable, Hawes said, with savings made possible as long as employment remained consistent. For some, savings were made possible through overseas travel being off the table.

"A lot of people would be thinking this is a good time to save emergency funds and reduce our expenditure for a while, but there will be those who are the opposite, trying to fill their days crawling over Amazon. It will be different for different people but I suspect that our savings are greater and people have got their personal balance sheets in better shape while they've been in lockdown."

Hawes said individual situations varied widely, however, with those who had lost a business actually much worse off. 

Brad Olsen, Principal Economist and Director at Infometrics, expects to see continued pressure on local government rates and other household necessities along with fuel prices remaining elevated because there is constant demand for these goods and services, particularly as people continue to spend more time at home. 

"[Local] governments have had to put up substantial rates increases due to under-provision in previous years. People spending more time at home is something we haven't resourced previously. This could see a challenge for various goods and services. If you want some of your electronics, furniture etc, there could be supply chain issues."

Shamubeel Eaqab, economist at Sense Partners, agreed local government was going to be under pressure.

“Local government was thrown into disarray because of the pandemic, they didn’t raise rates and the underlying need for infrastructure didn’t go go away. Local Government will be under a lot of pressure next year.”

Covid

Eaqab expects New Zealand to have low level Covid restrictions for most of 2022 as we focus on suppression rather than elimination. 

Such restrictions are likely to be regularly tweaked as fear in the community remains, exacerbated by hospitalisations and deaths, meaning things still won't quite resemble normal pre-2020 life.

On border reopening, Eaqab said that having a bubble with Australia over the summer months would have made no sense from the perspective of the damage it would do to our tourism economy, with tourist dollars going offshore.

"When we had the Aussie bubble it was great for reuniting, but financially it was negative due to increased spending in Australia."

In mopping up the damage already done to the local economy, Eaqab pointed to the lack of international tourism over the last 18 months as a key factor, particularly in areas like Queenstown, Te Anau and the MacKenzie district which are highly dependent on international visitors and lost a lot of business.

"Other parts of the country were able to switch to domestic tourism quite quickly," said Eaqab.

Alongside this was the loss of people normally here on work or student visas, with labour shortages another challenge for the tourism sector.

Jarrod Kerr, chief economist at Kiwibank, predicts that by April or May next year, we should be open to Australia again, with other countries following incrementally and an increased feeling of normality about a travel landscape that will look very different.

"Eventually it will get to a point where we just learn to live with and roll with it, we'll be running around with vaccine passports, booster shots, a few hoops to jump [some of which] will be dictated by airlines and [overseas] countries."

Olsen, was hopeful the country would be free from further lockdowns in 2022 as we move to a highly vaccinated population, noting that the "social licence to have lockdowns the public will adhere to has dramatically fallen away."

However, he doesn't expect we will get back to pre-pandemic mode any time soon, instead occupying a more neutral space next year, with greater freedoms still interspersed with caution.

Tourism and hospitality

Olsen doesn't expect the speed of resumption to bounce back to the same level in a short time frame, despite the Government "making lots of noise around border changes."

"Flight service chains are going to be broken up with not as many direct flights and a lower level of service into the country. In 2022 it will be easier to leave New Zealand than to get back in and we could see an extended period of time with lower numbers of arrivals." 

In April 2020, with the first lockdown in full swing and the potential that it was still a short blip, Tourism New Zealand leveraged a domestic market team and the 'Do Something New New Zealand' a campaign which encouraged Kiwi's to “make their ‘NZ must do’ bucket list item a reality."

The campaign hoped to capture some of the $9 billion that New Zealanders previously spent on overseas travel per year and boost the sector's recovery.

Ultimately, it became a much more long-term strategy.

Olsen said that New Zealand is starting to fundamentally change what type of tourism we focus on and the boost from domestic tourism is "not just the hold over until international activity comes back."

"It will become a much more established piece of the tourism offering in New Zealand."

He says the challenge for tourism is "figuring out what the value proposition is for New Zealand tourists, how to convert them into sustained visitors is hard. If you're a business in Westland, once a New Zealander has seen the glaciers, will they come back and what's the rationale they can provide for repeat business." 

He also predicts the rise of more takeaway options and more Uber Eats style delivery services, perhaps encompassing different styles of food and higher level luxury food options.

McQueen said tourism and hospitality will always pick up because the hankering of Aucklanders to socialise and resume normal life never goes away.

"When you're outside Auckland it's difficult to understand what it's like. I think it will pick up and there will be opportunities for new businesses to start in those spaces. Unfortunately that's due to the fact that too many have gone under, rather than creating a new innovative experience."

Climate change

This year has also seen the Government consulting on the direction of an emissions reduction plan, including land use, transport planning, renewal energy and vehicle emissions incentives. We asked our experts if they expected to see noticeable effects in 2022 towards a more carbon neutral economy.

Kerr hoped we would be making more positive steps towards the goal, taking the stance that the more we can do now, the less we'll be forced to address later, which includes looking at ways to help people upgrade older vehicles.

"Vehicles are an obvious one for me, sharpen up those targets or pull them forward, whether they have to use subsidies or whatever. That can be done quite quickly. We've got a very old fleet, one of the oldest in the world."

Eaqab was not expecting to see visible differences in 2022, given that the first steps of the plan will be implemented quite gradually.

"I don’t think we’ll see it having a significant visible impact until we see outright bans on polluting activity."

Olsen said that we are continuing to see a significant political divide that could hold our progress back and meaningful climate change response is a balancing act

"The challenge of the next few years is how the primary sector is brought into our climate change shift, ensuring that such a key part of New Zealand's economy isn't thrown out at the same time and getting the best outcome for both sides."

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

37 Comments

"it will get to a point where we just learn to live with and roll with it (Covid19)"

Isn't that what the human race has been doing for the last 100,000 years? If it didn't work, we wouldn't be here.

Nature has a wonderful way of dealing with excess.

Up
8

I intend to travel a lot more internationally going forwards as a permanent lifestyle change. Not just "revenge" travel but a renewed appreciation for the freedom to wander. I love New Zealand but being locked in reinforced how small and parochial the country can be. Being back in Europe again has been really uplifting, appreciating the simple things like excellent food and the rich tapestry of culture seem to have new importance.

Given new jet orders are skyrocketing with Airbus and Boeing I suspect that I'm not the only one with itchy feet.

Up
5

Same here. 2020/2021 were the years for home improvements and domestic travel. 2022 is international travel. We have booked flights to Europe for September. If the bug bites, we will retire early, look at our housing needs (Auckland rates are becoming usurious) and re-orient our lives towards more overseas experiences. 

Up
3

If you think Covid suppressed travel wait until the climate changing government mandates come out.  Covid is just the warm-up and the NZ government now understands how they can lockdown a country to force their agenda.  Travel tracer app?  Carbon footprint app?  Digitized currency controlling your purchases.  One government official even recommended kids do their OE in Gore!  Better get going ASAP.  Good luck.

Up
1

Squishy does one find New Zealand terrifyingly stifling? 

Up
1

Try getting an MIQ spot!

Up
0

You do realise the UK and much of Europe had been (and are now again) in extended lockdown far longer than NZ right?!

Up
1

That's the thing, even though things will open up more, travelling, especially travelling far, will still be a hit and miss affair.

Up
1

Good to hear someone discussing local government issues. Some of their balance sheets are absolute horror stories, and there are $15.7b worth of local government bonds coming due over the next decade and a half. I would be surprised if some of these don't get defaulted on, but authorities will try to get blood out of stones in the mean time regardless, and that means raising rates at the same time as people are becoming less able to pay them.

Up
6

thats right, I would think in 2-4 years a lot will be paying in excess of 5k for rates (average), whack insurance and a huge mortgage on top..ouch

Up
4

And inflation on top of all of that... double ouch!

Up
0

Correct.  NZ has just followed the USA down the debt fueled growth model of Keynesianism.  Only problem is we have nobody to buy our debt, as we do not have the worlds reserve currency.  Simply put we cannot afford to live above our means like America can. Trade deficit's and RBNZ's bond purchases, government deficits, will only create runaway inflation.  America just export's their debt (inflation) to unsuspecting hedge funds and governments around the world under the disguise of the petro dollar and assets like a MBS.  This is why interest rates will not rise and QE will not be tightened, because the Keynesians have gone past the point of no return (getting blood out of a stone).  The fiat dollar has to collapse or we have a debt jubilee.  

Up
0

We've really loaded up on debt that others will have to pay, rather than paying a little more of our own way. Pity the children.

Up
0

I am waiting when will the government tell me that we have to pay increased taxes to pay for all the generosity in last couple of years. 

Up
6

Taxes? You don't need taxes with MMT!

We've all been told that a sovereign can issue as much debt as it likes - give it a fancy name like PPSDTRD or even the simpler QE; pay forever is required and retire the debt in dues course as a set of spreadsheet calculations.

Taxes - that's 20th Century thinking.....

Up
2

MMT does not say that we don't need taxes but it does say that they don't fund government spending. Taxes limit private demand and spending and so create the space within the economy for the government to spend into. Taxes can reduce inequality, they can promote or disincentive particular activities and they maintain the value of the currency.

Up
3

Taxes can reduce inequality?  That is an interesting concept.  We have an unequal-by-design tax regime at the moment are you talking about a flat tax?

Create space for the government to spend into?  Are you assuming hard and fast limits to resources without growth or immigration?  I don't believe for a moment the government would consider whether they need to "create space" in the economy to spend into.

The main block to government spending is their bureaucratic ineptitude, so many examples but kiwi build is a cast iron one.  

Up
2

Certainly many improvements could be made to our tax system to improve inequality, a capital gains tax or a land tax and removing GST on the necessities of life or higher income tax on higher incomes but not because the government needs the money to spend. Poverty and inequality are worsening by the day in this country and the food banks have never been busier. A flat tax would certainly NOT improve inequality but a tax free income threshold would be a better idea. 

There would not be a single member of parliament who understands how the governments finances operate or a person in treasury for that matter. There must be some in the RBNZ who understand as they have to operate the system.

Economist L. Randall Wray explains here how sovereign currencies work if you have five minutes to spare. https://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/Wray_Understanding_Modern.pdf

Up
2

OK yes I misunderstood you.  I think not penalising benefits due to working to a higher level would be my first move as well as the higher income tax free income level.  

Thanks for the link, it was a good read.  It has the same issues as others I have read and confirms my view the MMT is the most socially destructive economic model. 

The value of money is discovered when we attempt to acquire an asset here or overseas.  If we print more, the asset will be worth more.  This is a fundamental and of no real concern if you have assets as they protect you from that inflationary process.

However if you are unlucky enough to not have any assets then capital you acquire at the price of your labour in yesterdays dollars will be devalued through the depreciation of the value of money.  That labour becomes less and less valuable.  Initially this is annoying as you will not be able to acquire assets. Eventually this devaluing of money will also apply to commodities, driven by the cost of capital assets required in their production, and this will float down into the consumer price.

In this way MMT destroys the power and value of labour, extrapolates the value of assets and drives the divisions we are seeing in society right now.

Up
0

saving your MMT explanation to my notes for future distribution to the many who still love to misrepresent it.

Up
0

"MMT does not say that we don't need taxes", but we don't! That's the point. All the explanations of 'what taxes do' doesn't remove the fact that with MMT - taxes are an irrelevancy = not needed.

 

An easier question for you: "Can MMT work without levying taxes?" Not an answer of "Yes, but..." Just a simple, Yes or No.

Up
0

Only more taxes for working folk, mind, not the ones who benefited from all the money printing.

Up
0

"Vehicles are an obvious one for me, sharpen up those targets or pull them forward, whether they have to use subsidies or whatever. That can be done quite quickly. We've got a very old fleet, one of the oldest in the world."

NZ's consumption of high carbon footprint goods (in this case vehicles) must be increased with subsidies so that we can kill the planet faster and melt the polar ice caps - wonderful thinking.  Totally on par with how the government will act on Climate Change.  

Up
1

I know it pisses people off no end but people actually have to get to and from their jobs, which they need to pay for things they use to stay alive. Until the State can credibly propose and build rapid transit, that's going to be the only way we can really cut vehicle emissions, not to mention the deadweight loss that is the running costs of vehicles through petrol etc. 

Up
2

Reality is so hard lol.  Anywho, mass transit (rapid transit is the moon shot) takes a concentration of people to work at the stops on route.  So there may be some synergy there between mass transit and recently announced 3 by 3 building regs.

Up
0

Nobody is going to stop consuming, using energy.  Energy has a price whether it be solar, wind, electric.  CO2 will continue to rise with or without government mandates and the 'experts' have no idea of the outcome.  Just as the Covid debacle; leave the government out of it and let the climate adapt to our economic wishes.  Government cannot do anything other than make the situation worse.  

Up
1

Dick M,

"let the climate adapt to our economic wishes."  Fascinating comment, almost biblical in its assertion of man's dominion over nature.

Sadly for you and those who think like you, nature isn't listening. She/he/it is growing increasingly restive and we are just beginning to see what a hornet's we are poking. if however, we leave climate and the environment out of it for a moment, we find another barrier to those 'economic wishes' which i assume means business as usual indefinitely. For one thing, our store of fossil fuels, which have propelled the global economy for the past two hundred years, is NOT infinite. secondly, there is EROI-energy return for energy invested.

As these FFs become harder to reach and extract, their EROI falls and that has been happening for decades now. It is also happening to the many metals and minerals which also underpin the global economy. The trend is inexorable and as PDK keeps telling us, our 'economic wishes' will become irrelevant. 

Up
0

A deckchair article, interviewing deckchair attendants. Funny to hear a bank person advocating new-vehicle purchasing en masse. Why, I wonder.........?

Only the LA comment is valid: yes, they will be in increasing trouble. But so will central governments, and almost everyone, when the inevitable correction happens.

Up
3

Seems to me there is a great dearth of practical, transformative thinking in this country.  The Greens sent me their 'filled in' / suggested submission form for the recent consultation on the emissions reduction plan - not a new (i.e., never heard before) idea in sight. Overly verbose, same 'ol, same 'ol.  I can imagine they'll still be saying the same innocuous stuff 20 years hence.

But I thought, best not criticize their effort without providing alternatives, so, I deleted all their 'heard it all before' responses - and answered like this:

1. What ideas do you have for cutting emissions in agriculture, that you think the Minister for Agriculture should include in the final Emissions Reduction Plan?

Provide an emissions/carbon tax table per ruminant animal, by species. Explain to the farming community that when they come into the ETS in 2025, these will be the rates used and full carbon unit purchases will be charged from year 1 of their entry.  Allow for carbon credits for planting on their land to offset their obligations. Higher offsets should be paid for pasture that is retired to native bush (i.e., permanent forests) and covenanted as such.

 

2. What ideas do you have for cutting emissions in transport, that you think the Minister for Transport should include in the final Emissions Reduction Plan?

Abolish all public parking on residential roadways. Make this space a shared-use path for registered ride-share operators, cyclists and small electric 'cart' type vehicles. Make all public transport free-of-charge. 

 

3. What ideas do you have for cutting emissions in energy, that you think the Minister for Energy should include in the final Emissions Reduction Plan?

Grant carbon credits to homeowners installing grid tie-back solar.  The schedule of credits would relate to the size of the energy generated.

 

4. What other ideas do you think Government Ministers should consider in order to reduce climate pollution?

Devise a Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) Scheme.  Transition to the PES scheme and gradually phase out the Emissions Trading Scheme, replacing it with a flat tax on carbon.

 

5. What does a te Tiriti-led approach to Aotearoa New Zealand’s low carbon transition look like to you?

If we had a Te Tiriti-led approach to our constitutional system of government, we wouldn't need to consider a Te Tiriti-led approach to individual issues of governance. Decision-making on all fronts would be shared in a true model of co-governance.

 

6. What do you think are the most important features of a fair, just, and equitable transition that leaves no community, no family, and no person behind?

The ETS is totally unfair, unjust and inequitable. The biggest industrial emitters are subsidized to the tune of 90% and agricultural emitters to the tune of 100%. Large, corporate landowners make money on carbon credits. Everyone who drives a car pays in full.  How is that in any way fair, just and equitable?

 

7. What ideas do you have that would both cut climate pollution and help protect and restore our precious ecosystems such as native forests, oceans, and freshwater habitats?

Start regulating for what we want, as opposed to penalizing/taxing what we don't want. For example, scrap all welfare benefits paid per child - and instead pay caregivers of children on a per child's attendance record at school. 100% record - most money and tapering downwards from there.

 

Up
7

Another alternative bit of advice which the Government ought to take up;

The Coalition strongly favours prioritising native forestry over exotics and argues that before seeking offshore carbon forest credits, government should invest in native forests, for their myriad of benefits, at home.

https://community.scoop.co.nz/2021/11/new-coalition-demands-a-halt-to-further-large-scale-exotic-carbon-farming/ 

 

Up
3

Kate, you should make a run for office!  In regards to 1) can we start with less productive land first (hills etc)?  2. this will struggle for support until we get housing density to support mass transit.  Remote working is now a new normal which does provide some momentum for this but for blue collar work it is still impractical.  3) hopefully the increasing cost of electricity means this will not need subsidising.  (driven by the electrification of transport)  7) genius - you have my vote already :)

Up
3

Thanks!  Yes, I know 2. would be a seriously unpopular move, but hey, households would have to downsize the number of cars; they'd have to clean out the garage and (hopefully) give away all that stuff they no longer need; and lots more people would register to become ride-share operators.

And 7. thanks!, I liked it too.  If all the policy heads in CG started being told to think off-the-wall creatively, how much better for us would that be?  Incrementalism is driving me nuts.  

Up
2

"If all the policy heads in CG started being told to think off-the-wall creatively, how much better for us would that be? "

Big assumption here is that Gubmint types are capable of such mental exertion....

Giving them both free rein to do so AND put the bright ideas thus spawned into practice by central fiat is a tad - um - fraught with high probability of unintended consequences.

And them Policy Heads cannot be Unelected....

Up
1

It is an interesting question, waymad - whether or not as adults we lose the ability to imagine new/radical ideas.  Children have no problem with this. But my observation of tertiary students is that they must have been taught to conform in thought to the status quo (and at best, incremental/reform) type thinking.  Transformative (radical/utopian) thought just doesn't come naturally.  Enlightenment philosophy enforced this notion of instrumental rationality very effectively.  David Hume made the distinction between the positive (what is) and the normative (what ought to be) and he argued that human beings are unable to ground normative arguments in positive arguments, that is, they are unable to derive ought from is.  Hence the fact-values distinction and our preoccupation with 'facts' and reluctance to defend/argue our values.

Hume's theory of empiricism became so grounded in our education system.

Hence, any new/radical departure from "what is" comes up against that "unintended consequences" (positivist) argument.

 

   

Up
1

Kate,

To blame Hume for any intellectual failings in the education system seems to me to something of a stretch. Scotland had burst out of the dark ages into a blaze, a ferment, of Enlightenment thinking. Previously, all radical thinking was potentially heretical and certainly discouraged.

Along with those like Locke, Paine and others, Hume lit up the intellectual world with new, enlightened thinking across all subjects. Of course most students do not think radically; that would be a contradiction in terms and few are the teachers who can inspire their students to do so.

Up
0

Excellent suggestions

Up
1