sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Henry Thomson reports on how Arizona tried to have both work and social interactions during its official pandemic response only to find the virus took advantage of them quickly. The State is now the "hardest-hit" in the world

Henry Thomson reports on how Arizona tried to have both work and social interactions during its official pandemic response only to find the virus took advantage of them quickly. The State is now the "hardest-hit" in the world

I concluded my column two weeks ago by speculating that this week I would return to the topic of the Covid-19 crisis, and that speculation was correct. As many readers will have noted, the virus is asserting itself across areas of the southern and western US that were previously relatively sheltered. Arizona ranks among them, and last week was even singled out as one of the hardest-hit regions in the world by a Harvard epidemiologist.

So, what is going on?

There is no question that Covid-19 is currently running rampant across the Grand Canyon State. The number of confirmed cases reported daily increased exponentially from less than 550 in May to 1,400 on June 5; 2,200 on June 12; and 3,300 on June 19. The numbers start to become murkier as they are more recent, but it seems that reported cases have remained around these high levels, and they might be starting to decline as I write (I retain a tenuous optimism).

As more people are reporting Covid-19 symptoms, being tested positive for the virus and requiring treatment, our hospital bed and ventilator capacities are coming under pressure, the former reaching 88% in use in the last few days.

Less dire, thankfully, are the figures for deaths caused by Covid-19. These have increased from around 20 per day in May to around 30 in mid-June; a notable rise, to be sure, but nothing like the 600% growth in case numbers.

The surge in the spread of the virus is undoubtedly the result of the lifting of the state stay-at-home order on May 15, the reopening of bars and restaurants, and the resumption of work and social gatherings across Arizona.

This is evident, on the one hand, in the timing of the case increases, which began around two weeks after the order was lifted.

On the other hand, case increases are highly concentrated among people aged 20-44, suggesting that they are attributable to a change in this group’s behavior rather than outbreaks in aged care facilities or among the Navajo population, as we saw here early in the Covid-19 crisis.

Numerous restaurants have closed after employees reported infections, and nightclubs were shut down for not enforcing social distancing regulations. The shift in the age distribution of cases also helps solve the puzzle of stable death figures despite the virus’s rapid spread: Younger people are much less likely to be hospitalized or die of Covid-19.

Governor Doug Ducey is coming under heavy criticism, notably but far from exclusively from Democratic Senator Kirsten Sinema who generated the memorable soundbite, “I don’t think that it makes sense to design your policy based on whether or not there are enough hospital beds for people to die in.

In response, the Governor allowed cities and counties to mandate masks in public areas – which they have almost universally done – as well as making gestures to bolster contact tracing and generally encouraging people to stay home. These measures, combined with reinforced wariness of the virus among the public, might be behind the downward inflection in the infection curve in recent days.

However, Arizona’s recent experience with Covid-19 starkly illustrates the insidious nature of the virus and the difficulties inherent to containing its spread while allowing the operation of a modern economy. When lifting the stay-at-home order, Ducey stated he was turning up the economy’s dimmer switch, but it seems he also opened the floodgates for Covid-19.

Arizona had the fourth-lowest unemployment rate in the US in May, at 8.9% versus a national rate of 13.3%. This has surprised commentators and is probably partly a function of Ducey’s “later timing and lighter touch” lockdown. Of course, keeping people in work or returning them to work is a laudable goal. But without mandatory masks and with only lax enforcement of social distancing rules, the end of the stay-at-home order has been greeted with an exponential rise in Covid-19 cases.

We are hardly alone with our difficulties. Even in Germany, where virus containment has been widely regarded as a success, a large outbreak of Covid-19 in a meat works has caused two counties in North Rhine-Westphalia to be plunged back into total lockdown. Today, Texas and Florida have closed bars to patrons to try and control the virus.

These are trying times. Governments around the world are struggling to balance the competing imperatives of virus containment and economic activity, all the while buffeted by a shifting landscape of infections and outbreaks of sick individuals. Some, like Arizona, have been lucky enough to buy time to prepare by increasing hospital surge capacity and developing contact tracing while others, like Italy or New York, were struck without warning.

This process will continue, and citizens need to be prepared to change their behavior in response. We hope that by wearing masks and taking other measures while in public, we can find the setting on the economy’s dimmer switch that minimizes infections while allowing people to work and the rest of us to maintain some social interactions.


Henry Thomson is originally from Amberley, North Canterbury and is now an Assistant Professor of Political Economy at Arizona State University. His research focuses on the political economy of authoritarian rule and transitions to democracy. You can read more about his research here and follow him on Twitter @HenryRThomson. His earlier letters are here.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

31 Comments

Had Two Opion :

1: Early Lockdown and Economy affected but maybe coronavirus and death is controlled
2: Late Lockdown as a result Coronavirus and death rises and than Economy affected.

In both / any situation economy will be affected (No way out) but is it not better to go go for option one where lives are saved unlike option 2 as in both options recession / depression is inevitable.

Up
0

# 2 then as it has developed in Arizona. Not much change to normal life activity and businesses, vulnerable and elderly to stay out of harms way. A lot of contribution here submitting that was all NZ needed to do plus NZ would have on top of that, the border closed. Even if that had increased our mortality rate to only into the 100’s, not overwhelmed hospitals with CV19 at the expense of usual clinical care, how would NZ be faring then economically, past, present and future.

Up
0

To keep elderly/vulnerable out of harms way - we'd have needed some method to get kids to and from school and provide after school care and/or sick child care as a substitute for the contribution grandparents currently perform.

Up
0

Yes Kate exactly. In terms of the fabric of all of our lives, day to day, family to family, you can’t just pull some stitches out of the pattern and think it will all stay knitted together.

Up
0

If you are wanting perfect security yes but an average grandparent ought to be able to control grandchildren sufficiently well to keep reasonable social distancing - wear masks, wash hands. So most healthy grandparents will be OK. The to and fro from school is a recent phenomena - aged four and a half my mother sent me to primary school about 2km away with several road crossings. After school care and sick child care can be done with care - NZ law any under 14 child has to have an adult in the same house but not in the same room which keeps both child and adult happier.

Up
0

I trust the state govt will work hard to keep the old folk safe and keep covid out of resthomes. Effectively quarantine until this is over and have strict procedures for staff so they dont introduce the virus to the facility. That is something our govt dropped the ball on and half of the deaths occurred this way... I dont know how they miffed it so badly, well actually they are good at dropping the ball. Jacinda and David Clark like to think of themselves as warriors fighting against Natonal. They are much more like the NZ Warriors.

Up
0

Lol The Warriors.. I like that one. The delivery never meets the hype.

Up
0

On that one HW the nail has been hit fair and square.

Up
0

The aged care facilities didn't have an emergency supply of PPE. A couple of sealed wheely bins full of face shields, masks and gloves would have been a good idea in retrospect and not too expensive. I suspect that they rely on a certain level of respiratory illness to enter the facilities for patient turnover. I know that sounds shocking but think about it, under normal circumstances over 500 400-500 a year die in NZ from contagious respiratory illnesses, mostly aged folk, yet no PPE is even considered in aged care facilities and no emergency supplies are kept. It's hard to draw any other conclusion.

Up
0

Most if not all resthome inhabitants now get the annual flu jab. I am told that has made a big difference to keeping the elderly alive. Previously many would just die suddenly during winter. Not covid related I know but possibly relevant to the resthome numbers.

Up
0

Good point but who are the 400-500 that die from flu every year? Also flu shots are not a universal protection against all flu strains, far from it.
Here is an interesting graph of the changing mortality rate for influenza and pneumonia:

https://figure.nz/chart/i01a0sx5LV45oZuV-DK2aPEYpSMMUocAk

Up
0

Nice graph, thanks. Recent lock-down seems to have reduced flu as well, see here
https://www.flutracking.net/Info/Report/202025/NZ
but that is now starting to change...

Up
0

Not in my experience ..flu jab given to my dad at 75 years old nearly killed him (he surprised to wake up afterwards in hospital) . Never had one again and lived to 84.

Up
0

If I ever end up in a rest home, I would pray that a virus killed me quickly. They are places where people go to die, we really shouldn't be trying to prolong their suffering. Especially the ones with dementia. The average tenure of a patient in a rest home is 11 months - if they don't die from Covid or other flu, they'll die from something else that's probably a hundred times worse.

Up
0

Covid-19 is nature's attempt at a herd cull, that's evident by the targeted severity in older people. We won't get a reliable vaccine in any foreseeable timescale, it will simply run through each winter and kill 10% of elderly who get it. A worse version of the concentration of elderly flu deaths that we get already.

We're desperate and will pay any social and economic cost to prolong lives of low quality and longevity, yet on the other hand are trying to ram through euthanasia. Can't understand our society.

Up
0

They're not going to be able to get rid of the coronavirus unless they get rid of Trump first! It's good to see that Dr Fauci is able to stand up to him rather than down playing testing and the seriousness of the virus.

BBC Coronavirus: US has 'serious problem', says Fauci. "Health officials in the US estimate the true number of cases is likely to be 10 times higher than the reported figure." https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53200834

Up
0

The takeaway from this is that the German model is a success. Open boarders and business as usual with a strict mandate to wear masks in public enclosed spaces. Everyone follows the rules. If you're not wearing a mask then you're not welcome in the supermarket, shoe store, butcher etc.

Up
0

Why didnt we do that too ! I'm pissed with this govt forcing us all to close down simultaneously

Up
0

Indeed. I fully supported all the drastic measures in Feb & early March when the CFR looked like 5%, but we know better now. Eventually New Zealand will come to realize that the virus has to be lived with and mitigated against. In the meantime sadly, the hysteria will do a tremendous amount of damage to the NZ economy.

Up
0

The outliers on success, in my view, are Iceland.

Up
0

Sorry fp, but did you not read the article? It states that there is a total lock down reintroduced to a local area in Germany due to a community outbreak. If you click on the link it says about 628,000 people are affected and schools and creches are closed, too. Interestingly, the source of the outbreak is thought to be immigrant workers at the local meat-works being housed in crowded conditions. Didn't Singapur have the same problem?

Up
0

There is no total lock down in Germany. You're referring to a small localised issue. Very detailed information on the German epidemic is found here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Germany

Up
0

German deaths currently 22 times worse than NZ. Equivalent to 550 vs 22.
Iceland 6 times worse.
I prefer NZs fail personally.

Up
0

Too early to break out the Champagne. The economic consequences of NZ's approach hasn't become apparent yet.

Up
0

How are you proposing to separate the virus effects from the effects of stupid world economic management?

Up
0

I don’t get your question? We all want the best for NZ economically, and we all want to minimize casualties. I hope politics doesn’t get in the way of good decision making.

Up
0

Well well, seems the novel virus wasn't so novel... who would have thought ?? Been around for over 12 months

Scientists find coronavirus in Spainish wastewater collected in March 2019
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.sbs.com.au/v1/news/article/coronavirus…

Up
0

The trajectory in places like Arizona, Texas, Florida etc. strongly indicate to me that further lockdowns will be required to avoid exceeding hospital capacity. Pausing re-opening where it is will be insufficient to change that trajectory, they need to proactively take measures to control the virus.

Up
0

The US hardly afforded the last LD's, this time arround it would take 6 months of LD to knock out.
They simply can not afford to do it again and they can't afford to let it go.
The States is going to go hyperbolic in deaths with the economy falling at the same time.

Up
0

Its a result of the BLM protests, if not directly than indirectly. You cannot tell people that its ok to gather in public for a protest, then expect them to maintain social distancing in private, everyone can see just how ridiculously hypocritical that was, so once social distancing went out the window for one event, it went out for all. Secondly, the people claiming that covid wouldnt affect them because they were outdoors, completely gloss over the fact that most people probably caught public transport to the protest location. Spending time in a crowded train, bus or tram carriage with infected people was a surefire way to spread covid. Public transport use is one of the biggest indicators for outbreaks.

Up
0

Yep. Summed up. The point being if a few passengers from a few planes got New York under siege then it stands to reason that a few million or so outward bound from New York would do ditto to the rest of the USA. The enemy was within, and spreading fast, well before any border restriction measures.

Up
0