sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

China is about to celebrate the 100 year anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Communist Party. They are feeling their oats. What comes next from them however will be a huge challenge for every democracy

China is about to celebrate the 100 year anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Communist Party. They are feeling their oats. What comes next from them however will be a huge challenge for every democracy

China is working up to a celebration frenzy, culminating in a very large party on July 23.

That is the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

The CCP had an exciting beginning at a founding meeting in a house in the French Quarter of Shanghai - until the French police broke it up. It completed its establishment Congress on a tourist boat on South Lake in Jiaxing, Zhejiang province.

At the time in 1921, China's life was dominated by subverting European powers, feuding warlords, was deeply mired in poverty, and powerless on the international stage.

Since then, it has gone through a century of turbulence and has come out on the other side as a rising superpower. It certainly has achievements to celebrate.

In 2021, it has a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, a nuclear arsenal and the world's second-largest economy.

And it is a unified, tightly controlled political economy that is claiming its way of solving social problems should be a model for the rest of the world. But despite its obvious success, most of the rest of the world looks at it sceptically. And this frustrates Beijing.

So we will see a concerted campaign to associate China's huge achievements with their Communist Party and the way it has adapted to dealing with its problems.

To be fair, the Party laid out some ambitious social goals years ago.

In 2012, the same year Xi Jinping was selected as party secretary, the party began heavily promoting the "centenary goal" of achieving a "moderately well-off society" by 2021.

Related goals included eliminating poverty, building China's own space station and becoming an "internet power."

Chairman Xi has often connected this centenary goal to the "Chinese dream," his signature slogan referring to achieving a modern, powerful and prosperous nation.

The pressure has been on to tick off these goals by July 2021. And many of them can be rightly celebrated.

This 100 year anniversary has provided a hard goal, focusing the minds of the Party leadership over the past decade.

There has been a very big push over the past few years to alleviate poverty, including substantial investment in China's regions away from the coast, as well as relocating some populations and forcibly putting others, including Uyghurs, to work. 'Progress' in this work allowed Xi Jinping to declare in February the end of extreme poverty in China.

Earlier this month, China successfully launched a key part of its new space station into orbit and successfully landed a rover on Mars.

And its internet and fintech sectors are among the largest and most profitable in the world.

Undeniable successes are everywhere. But China's GDP per capita remains far below that of developed countries and hovers just under the global average of around NZ$15,000 per year. Access to high-quality health care and education is still out of reach for many in China. And for many Chinese people, especially ethnic and religious minorities, a succession of ideological crackdowns carried out by Xi and his hard-line supporters has also cast a shadow over their futures.

Their rapid development pace has had environmental consequences not only for the wider population, but consequences worldwide. These range from air and ocean pollution, degradation of global fisheries, and distortions to many other economies, even the largest.

Politically, a muscular Beijing has repelled many neighbours, not the least its promotion of its dodgy "nine dashed line" ocean claims, and its ham-fisted reach into the Chinese diaspora to prosecute its interests. Sympathy and confidence in the Chinese leadership internationally is low and falling. Countries other than autocracies feel increasingly threatened by this muscular approach. But autocracy is on the rise worldwide, allowing Beijing to promote its reach. It has all the hallmarks of an adolescent and unsophisticated phase in China's political life.

New Zealand has been significantly affected by the rise of China. Not only have we reaped great rewards from its growth as an export market (not to mention a beneficiary of its inexpensive imports), China has worked hard to impose, influence and control our politics. This is not to say other large powers (from Australia, to the EU to the UK and the USA) aren't doing that too, but China's activities here are not seen as 'legitimate' influencing, rather as coercion.

It has got shameless. It is being reported that National and Labour quietly agreed last year that two Chinese MPs would retire at the same time because of growing security concerns about their relationship with the Chinese Government. National MP Jian Yang announced his retirement on July 10 and Labour MP Raymond Huo on July 21. Ho was quite open about his work with and for Beijing. Yang, being an ex spy, was more covert about it.

As Politik notes, those moves seem to be part of a cooling of the political relationship between New Zealand and China. Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta has recently made a savvy and nuanced warning that a confrontation over trade with China may be inevitable. New Zealand could find itself at the heart of a “storm” of anger from China, she warned, saying exporters needed to diversify to ensure they could survive deteriorating relations with Beijing.

There are also reports Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has made similar private warnings "to at least one major agricultural exporter" - which is likely to have been Fonterra.

None of this will be front-of-mind in Beijing. Their focus will be all on celebrating success from now until July. Distractions or views undermining that 'success' will be brushed aside. And Beijing responding to New Zealand's issues will be seen there as beneath them; they are a 'great power', New Zealand can't really move their needle. We will either only be a minor problem politically, or an economic opportunity to deal with their food security issues which are not going away. New Zealand's leverage is its influence in multilateral groupings.

China is more powerful than ever in its history. Demographics will challenge it, but it won't be dealing with that challenge alone. But raising its per capita wealth will become the party work for the next century. It needs to build a vast social security safety net, and its two-track, dual-circulation policy framework is in place to attempt this next phase. The environmental and food security roadblocks will be substantial. A lot can go spectacularly wrong with an autocratic, one-man rule system in place, and they have form with mammoth public policy mistakes (Mao). This time, the implications would be global.

China will be inward focusing from now until July 23. Then its wolf warriors will be unleashed to ensure the rest of the world understands the 'benefits' of the lessons from Chairman Xi. Watch out Taiwan.

The CCP timeline

Timeline developed by Axios

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

75 Comments

I have some to say.

Thanks for the patience as I was having an important lunch.

first and foremost, I must applaud David for writing this article. This is first of its kind among all NZ's medias. This article should be considered 'balanced' or even 'favorable' reporting of China by the mainstream western media standard. It touches on several key historical events, briefly mentions a very small part of China's undeniable achievements, as well as points out many problems in China -- real or fabricated. It takes lots of efforts to put together this article.

However, what fails to demonstrate from this article is a real understand of China, its history, its political system and its people. IT is still a article trying look China from high above and through a layer of very tinted glass.

The article (the author) still shows the unaskable belief that China is 'outcast' by the 'world' simply because of its way of governing is not the same as the western style. It makes people to believe that China will be 'accepted' by the 'world' at the very moment when China becomes a 'democracy'.

How naïve!

There was no CCP when first generation Chinese people landed in New Zealand and the Chinese people were still heavily outcast.

China is portraited as the bad in the 'world' by the US and its media outlets simply because China is now a strategic competitor or even an adversary to the US and Chinese people are not white, and even if they were white, they were not Anglo-Saxon.

The truth is that simple and cruel.

But luckily, in the day to day life, we all just mind our own business.

Happy birthday CCP and look forward for the 200th birthday celebration.

Up
0

Destroy CCP otherwise it will destroy not only democracies but whole world.

Up
0

Ummmm global surveys of the public consistently point to the US as being the greatest threat to world peace.

Up
0

Really? Point to a couple of examples. I am not saying you are wrong, but I look at a lot of surveys of this type and haven't noticed that.

Up
0

Numerous, from the Win/Gallup poll of 65 countries taken at the end of 2013 which identified US as the top threat to world peace, to the Latana Democracy Perception Index poll across 50 countries released this year where the US was seen as a greater threat to democracy than either China or Russia.

Up
0

"Whataboutism".

Up
0

Go on and say it then?

Up
0

It'll be the same old nonsense about how great China is with it's authoritarian ways, and how bad the west is with it's democratic ways.

But you never seem to answer the frequently asked question......

If it's so good in China, why on earth are you here?

Up
0

Has Xing ever claimed in be in NZ?

Up
0

I don't know. I just assumed he was.

Xingmo, are you in NZ?

Up
0

Pretty sure he's in NZ.

Up
0

He says in his comment that we had to wait as he was having lunch.

If I put my Sherlock cap on, and look at the time of his original note, then at the time of the lengthy edit, I can state dear Watson, that he was indeed lunching at the appropriate time....in New Zealand.

Up
0

And thankful as well, that others, ie us underlings, had been patient, awaiting said important missive after said more important lunch. Actually myself, could be a lot more patient than that. Another three years wouldn’t have troubled me at all.

Up
0

I sincerely hope not.

Up
0

I have said it before but, is it possible that he is an anti Chinese provocateur. He is simply far to over the top to be an effective advocate for China. I would have thought that they would be far more subtle than what we see coming from him.

Up
0

The answer is simple, for the last 200 years western nations have led in terms of technology, standard of lifestyle, income, growth and governance. People have laid down family and cultural roots based on that and those are difficult to ignore.

Up
0

Not a bad comment but I'd disagree with the second half of the paragraph that starts "China is portraited as the bad..." - it has nothing to do with skin colour. As the No2 country approaches and seems as if it might pass the No1 country then they are thought of as an adversary - that happened with France and England several times and England and Germany where it led to WW1. To the extent that a country despises people of different appearance they also see them as less of rivals. For example the English didn't think of the Ottoman empire or the Persian empire as adversaries although in many ways when first encountered they were in advance of England; they just considered them as big and rich and therefore worth trading with.

Up
0

xingmowang, with respect, China is no more communist than Nazi Germany. Nowdays it is just a fascist capialist state. The CCP sold its philosophy to Deng Xiao Ping, a capitalist roader. Xi is the new emperor. He will be the yellow dragon soon.

Up
0

Great article. The ball is in China's court. They will be welcomed back by the world if they pull back from their authoritarian transgressions. Are they too arrogant and self absorbed to make the right calls?

Up
0

I think the CCP is showing many worrying signs of arrogance and irrational belief in its powers that plagued the authoritarian regimes of the 20th century eg, German, Japan.

Up
0

Then the barometer & fuse for that is geographical. for instance Austria/Czechoslovakia for Nazi Germany and the invasion from Shandong province, by Japan of China. Of course both primarily campaigns on land. Anything by China beyond the skirmishing in Far Eastern international waters will be the sure signal that China is on the march.

Up
0

The US has surrounded China with roughly 50 major military bases, all of those bases are many thousands of miles from the US homeland but in China's backyard, who is it that has really been "on the march"?

Up
0

Yet we can not do anything, can we? Our trade is completely tied to China, we need China to buy our export to continue to fuel our high housing price. New Zealand's economic model share some similarities with China. Both are fueled by housing market, relying on "wealth effect", high volume of population, strong export. Not much innovation, productivity.

Up
0

We can start pivoting away from China. And if we don't we may not lose on trade with China but we will not maximize potential trade with the west.
But yeah, there will be significant economic costs.
I still think diplomacy is the right answer, but it takes two to tango. And China seems increasingly belligerent. Pretty stupid really, it's in their interests to pull back from the edge as much as it's in the interests of the world.
Or is it? Are they increasingly authoritarian because they fear their people? Is it all coming back to that age-old human frailty of preserving power at all costs, even if it's not in the interests of the nation of the world?

Up
0

Yep. Just a fascist capitalist state.

Up
0

Not sure about that.
Taiwan authorities’ WHA attempt a fiasco: Global Times editorial

The DPP authorities have recently been stressing that international support for Taiwan's participation in the WHA this year is historically high, making every effort to create momentum for its return to the WHA this year. What they referred to is the joint statement supporting Taiwan's attendance released by top diplomats of the G7 countries and of some members of parliament of Western countries early this month.

But who is the real international community? Since the US and several other Western powers control the world's major public opinion institutions, can they pretend to be the international community just by speaking jointly with their allies and through small clique multilateral mechanisms? They can verify it in UN institutions. In the WHA, where every country has one vote, those Western countries, plus the countries which have so-called "diplomatic relations" with Taiwan are clearly the absolute minority.

The G7 countries declared their support for Taiwan's participation in the WHA, but none of them dared to propose it to the assembly. It is because they know that the vast majority of the 194 members of the WHO support the one-China principle. They cannot break through this international consensus. The only result for their participation in the proposal is humiliating. Therefore, they only paid lip service, but none of them dare to put it into practice. They left this humiliating task to Taiwan's 13 "diplomatic allies."

Up
0

But this is would you expect the Global Times to say. It is Beijing's official mouthpiece.

Up
0

Exactly.
Audaxes needs to be more discerning.

Up
0

Is Taiwan attending the current WHA 2021 meeting?

Up
0

What's your point? Your pro China rhetoric gets tiring. What's behind it?

Up
0

I am not pro anyone. But I certainly see no need to engage in sinophobia at a potential cost to our NZ exporters.

Up
0

Sinophobia? Come on, that's a cheap shot.
Legitimate concerns are being raised about the behaviour of an authoritarian state. It's nothing to do with race.

Up
0

I have yet to see a serious critical response from NZ in respect of the claims made in this locally posted article - Israel Is Ethnically Cleansing Gaza

So far, the New Zealand Government has been remarkably silent about the Gaza-Israel conflict. Geoffrey Miller argues that Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta could be helping mediate for peace.

The growing Gaza crisis is testing Nanaia Mahuta's recent assertion that New Zealand has an independent foreign policy. Link

Up
0

That's just a 'whataboutism' - sophomoric arguing. Perfected style of Moscow and Beijing as a way to deflect.

Up
0

I just want an end to it all - I could careless, whether it's China, Russia or the West - people are dying and I'm tired of the selective criticisms attributed to butchering people..

Up
0

Pointing out examples of the hypocrisy and selective application of "western values" and "western principles" is context, not whataboutism.

Up
0

The "welcomed back by the world" comment is extremely Anglo-Euro-US-centric. The western world makes up approx 1B people, at most. You've ignored 87% of the planet.

Up
0

Ok how about 'welcomed back by the democratic, developed nations of the world that value human rights and freedom.'
I'm not saying western because of Japan, Korea, Taiwan etc

Up
0

China looked at what the west did to Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and to individuals like Julian Assange, so Beijing has a very good idea of what western "human rights" and "freedom" actually means in application.

Up
0

However to blame those conflicts on only the west influence is disingenuous. The majority of the strife comes from tribal, political, religious issues. This happened long before and will continue long after. I've worked in the Middle east and seen this intolerance for each other first hand. For example the Arabs vs Persians, sunni vs shia, hatred for theJews, tribal hatred.

Up
0

I was referring to the devastating state destroying wars and coups run by the west eg Iraq war 1 and 2, destroying the Libyan state and replacing it with slave market war lords, overthrowing a democratic Iranian government and installing the Shah, funding and exporting extremist militancy out of Saudi Arabia into Afghanistan to fight the Soviets etc. Not the general ongoing tribal conflict and honour culture rivalries run with AKs.

Up
0

What date are we celeberating being a part of them.

May be next announcement from the announcers will be to announce the date as still waiting for go ahead from the masters.

Up
0

Goodbye Chinese river dolphins. At least you got a few million years before we moved our factories to China yesterday and wiped you out.

Up
0

ditto Māui dolphins...good on you NZ

Up
0

The Maui dolphins had it coming - they didn't lift a finger as the last of the moa got finished off.

Up
0

It's a shame that New Zealand no longer has the backbone to stand up for what is right.

Our supposed principles are just another myth from yesteryear.

Up
0

Money talks in NZ, nothing else matters.

Up
0

Principles - we can't afford them.

Up
0

Or as per Grouch Marx, something like - you will enjoy doing business with me because I have principles. And if you don’t like those, well then, I have others.

Up
0

Yeah.
And even more shameful when we have a government with one of its major mantras being human rights...

Up
0

I think we are in backing up very slowly ...China needs our produce, its a 2 way street.

Up
0

Not really, they can always make milk out of Melamine, no need for us.

Up
0

China is leasing tens of thousands of hectares of farm land from Russia. It will take them a decade to develop it however. At that stage if we don't want to supply China milk they won't mind.

Up
0

NZ should adopt the Swiss and Singaporean model of being politically neutral.

There seem to be a correlation between prosperity and neutrality- nation-wise.

Up
0

Both these countries are super heavily armed and have compulsory military training.

If NZ was to become politically neutral then our military spending would need to be massive.

Up
0

Two great comments in a row.

Yes, we should be 'neutral'.

Yes, we should be armed to the teeth. David Chaston (But raising its per capita wealth will become the party work for the next century) has it totally wrong. We are going over the hump even now, have been since before 2008, arguably since the 1970's. There isn't enough planet left for China to raise it's consumption-per-head level to US ones (or ours), and the fallout is in the next decade. Century? What belief-system does that come from, David? Prove to me that global resource consumption can even carry on for 80 years at CURRENT rates, let alone GROW enough to allow China to grow. Or is it going to grow by displacement? Of whom, at what pace?

Up
0

It's nothing really to do with the regime, without the people of china there would be no need for the regime. If the regime puts itself as the savior of it's people, then I pray they are ready for monsoon season. The rains have come early, all those Dams are going to do it again like last year. Be prepared and God Speed. Look after your people before trying to say Tibet, Mongolia, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Xinjiang are China. It was heartbreaking watching the videos of all the villages getting washed away last year. And the Cities flooded, whilst dealing with the Biowarfare program they leaked to the world. So much havoc!!

Up
0
Up
0

Is xenophobia a thing?

Up
0

Don't they have some kind of character points system that big brother manages?

Fk. That.

Up
0

Yes, pay your creditors on time, don't vandalise your rented property, ship goods as described and promised, public fighting and drunkeness will be penalised. This kind of discipline is too tough for you nowadays?

Up
0

You forgot, do as you are told and don't question the State.

Up
0

You forgot forced labour and concentration camps in Xinjiang.

Up
0

21st-Century Mafia. CCP owns the world an explanation of where SARS-Cov-2 comes from.

Up
0

Certainly does.

Up
0

After its severe kicking in the 19th and 20th Centuries, China modelled (stole, if you prefer) the best of what the west had to offer in terms of education, technology, governance, political systems, business and banking, military organisation, etc.

They are now developing those systems beyond anything the west has implemented or has thought of implementing. Western nations better get their arses into gear because their lead built up over the last 200-400 years is practically gone now.

Up
0

Rubbish.
China still significantly lags the developed world (western and eastern) in innovation.

Up
0

Chinese central bank is now trialling an electronic currency which can be remitted between two phones without a wifi or cell network, and without the involvement of bank accounts, banks or bank fees. What you got?

Up
0

Cash? It doesn't even require a phone.

Up
0

Have a listen to Bernard Hickey's podcast "when the facts change". There's an excellent episode on decoupling our exports from reliance on China. Several experts argue the short-run impacts are being overstated and would would be limited in comparison to the long-term upside. https://thespinoff.co.nz/podcast-series/when-the-facts-change/

Up
0

Exactly.
After all, people thought our economy would collapse without international tourists...

Up
0

Eurasia and Africa are the only growth markets for the next one to two decades. China is huge in both. Where is NZ going to export to where China isn't?

Up
0

Australia having partly ruined it's trading relationship with China is just itching for the same thing to happen to us.
Who could ever be mistaken into think Aussie wants the best for NZ? it certainly never seems that way.
Even while Aussie happily sells about 60 billion in steel to China each year (60 billion from memory).
Also while the UK, who happily trades with Russia, and ditched us for the EU 40 odd years ago also has a go at admonishing us.
With friends like NZ has who needs enemies.

Up
0

Good God some people are weak
John Cena the WWE wrestler and actor has apologised to the Chinese Govt for having the audacity to call Taiwan its own country.Speaking in Mandarin he whole heartedly said sorry.(i wonder if that mandarin was sour)
Reminds me of a weak Le Bron James.
Money talks that is for sure.

Up
0

The CCP is bad for humanity.

Up
0