sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Eyes on the RBA, US jobs and China's holiday activity; US durable goods order data mixed; The US Fed in a tough spot; no deal to re-open Hormuz; UST 10yr at 5.17%; gold and oil hold; NZ$1 = 56.7 USc; TWI-5 = 60.3

Economy / news
Eyes on the RBA, US jobs and China's holiday activity; US durable goods order data mixed; The US Fed in a tough spot; no deal to re-open Hormuz; UST 10yr at 5.17%; gold and oil hold; NZ$1 = 56.7 USc; TWI-5 = 60.3
breakfast

Here's our summary of key economic events over the weekend that affect New Zealand, with news nothing was resolved in the Xi-Trump talks, and nothing is resolved in the US-Iran standoff.

But first, this week will be dominated by the RBA policy rate decision on Tuesday as the next major set piece review in the midst of the global bond sell-off and inflationary pressures. They are widely expected to raise the rate +25 bps to 4.60%, widening the differential to New Zealand. Australia will also release important household spending data, its August CPI update, and building permit data this week.

In New Zealand it will be all about consumer and business sentiment updates, and the usual end of month RBNZ data dump.

The week will end with the US September non-farm payrolls report - expect +100,000, although its cred is being undermined from within. And there will be US data on personal income and spending out this week, other labour market data, and a key PMI report.

In China, the focus will be on the September PMIs, with data from both the NBS and private S&P Global ones expected to point to a modest improvement in manufacturing and services activity. August industrial profits will also be released. Meanwhile, Chinese markets will be closed from October 1 to October 7 for the National Day holidays.

Of course, the global geopolitical mess rolls on chaotically, so we will be watching for either diplomatic agreements or escalatory strikes between the US and Iran.

Over the weekend in the US, August durable goods orders were essentially unchanged from July, which was better than the expected -0.4% decline. From a year ago they are +8.4% higher although we should note that PPI inflation ran at 5.4% in the same period. Non-military capital goods orders are up +5.8% on a year-ago basis, but given the huge surge in data center buildouts this is surprisingly weak.

Late last week, US petrol prices breached the +50% rise since Trump's war on Iran started in early March. Diesel prices are now up +67% in that market.

The University of Michigan September survey of consumer sentiment tracks anxiety of the inflationary pressure these sort of cost increases are bringing and the weekend update is grim reading. Only once since this survey started in 1946 has this reading been as low as it is now - and that was in May. Year-ahead inflation expectations jumped from 4.0% in August to 4.6% this month, the highest reading since June. The current level substantially exceeds the 3.4% seen in February before the Iran conflict began, along with all 2024 levels.

Financial markets are betting that rising inflation will be more important to the Fed than falling sentiment and the US Fed will raise rates at its next meeting on October 29, which is just days ahead of their mid-term elections. This market positioning is more than 2:1 now, and is bolstered by recent Fed speakers who are clearly worried that delays could cause them to lose control of the US inflation impetus.

Over the weekend China was on holiday for Mid Autumn Festival and their central bank said it injected up to ¥1 tln of liquidity into their banking system for this holiday via reverse repos. (During the same holiday last year it injected ¥735 bln in reverse repo operations, but later it revealed another ¥500 bln in direct repo purchases.) And they have their Golden Week holiday starting this week (October 1 - 7) and much depends on their internal spending impulse during this period. Beijing economy watchers will be nervous.

The UST 10yr yield is now just on 5.17%, unchanged from Saturday but up a net +16 bps from this time last week. The 30 year yield is at 5.50%, up +1 bp and +17 bps higher for the week. The key 2-10 yield curve is now at +30 bps (down -2 bps). Their 1-5 curve is now at +53 bps (+1 bp) and the 3 mth-10yr curve is at +120 bps (down -2 bps). The China 10 year bond rate is little-changed at 1.68%. The Japanese 10 year bond yield is now at 3.07%, down -1 bp from Saturday but up +9 bps for the week and a generational 30 year high. The Australian 10 year bond yield starts today at 5.37%, down -2 bps from Saturday, up +8 bps for the week and a 16 year high. The NZ Government 10 year bond rate is now at 5.14%, unchanged and up +17 bps for the week.

The price of gold is at US$4285/oz and down a mere -US$4 from Saturday, down -US$96 from this time last week. Silver is at just over US$64.50/oz and unchanged but down -US$2 for the week.

Oil prices have held from Saturday to just on US$92.50/bbl in the US, while the international Brent price is still at US$104.50/bbl. The US has rejected Iran's plan to re-open the Strait. Hormuz transits are still low today with just eight ships exiting over the past 24 hours, of which one are tankers escorted (3 dark with transponders off) and only six entering for new loads (0 dark). The Red Sea activity is holding low at about 20 vessels in both directions at the Yemen chokepoint.

The Kiwi dollar is unchanged from Saturday, still at 56.7 USc but down -50 bps for the week. Against the Aussie we are holding at 80.6 AUc. Against the euro we are also holding at just on 49.7 euro cents. That all means our TWI-5 starts today at just on 60.3 and little-changed from Saturday, down -40 bps for the week.

The bitcoin price starts today at US$84,386 and down +0.5% from Saturday but up a net +4.1% from a week ago. Volatility over the past 24 hours has been low at just over +/-0.7%.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: CoinDesk

The easiest place to stay up with event risk is by following our Economic Calendar here ».

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

12 Comments

After Keith Woodford's sobering commentary this weekend,  Aussie lifting their OCR will further weaken the NZD:AUD exchange rate. 

Great for Aussie tourists (may the ski season extend), and NZD denominated exports but not good for import costs.

Up
4

Colin's response to Keith's report digs deeper to the hard questions. the places where a few of us have been trying to push for a while.

Up
3

Why is it that we have consistently chosen the worst options?   Why is it that between Kieth and Colin, we have a pretty fair explanation, but none of the politicians are articulating this?  None of the rating agencies, IMF / World Bank, local bureaucrats like the RB governor?  Where are the folks who get paid to create some policy?  

Up
2

'Conventional wisdom'? My inclination is that's usually structured like an ideology and once established, hard to challenge within organisations, especially government orientated ones. The other side, suggested in many quarters is that there is a control paradigm in which the banks if not driving it are at least a major player. Challenge that control and potentially bad things can happen. Power, money and influence. History is riven with that. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but the consistent choices of bad options has to lead to your question if you are capable of thinking at all. The real question is how can we step away from those choices?

Up
0

Slowlearner/Murray — methinks you've both put your finger on something important here.

"Where are the folks who get paid to create some policy?" - Indeed - and where are our supposedly independent think tanks? - which is where the curious case of NZ Initiative immediately springs to mind.

To be fair, they have criticised aspects of RBNZ governance, QE, asset inflation, fiat money and the sovereign-debt problem. But unless somebody can point me toward something I've missed, I cannot find where they seriously challenge the architecture underneath it all.

Where is the examination of commercial-bank debt-based money creation and, crucially, the destination of that newly created credit? Where is the distinction between credit financing new productive capacity and credit simply inflating existing assets?

And nktokyo's question just below rather beautifully illustrates the other elephant in the room:

"Is there no other tool available to them?"- Precisely.

Where is the serious institutional challenge to the extraordinary proposition that we should control inflation by manipulating one interest rate - thereby deliberately increasing mortgages, rents, business financing costs and eventually government financing costs, all of which themselves feed through the economy as higher costs?

Haven't we constructed a remarkably myopic 'intellectual' (sic) ecosystem in which politicians, Treasury, the RBNZ, bank economists and even supposedly independent think tanks spend endless amounts of time and energy debating how the machine should be operated, while remarkably few - Iain Parker being one notable exception - appear interested in asking whether we built a machine fit for purpose in the first place?

Perhaps that's the answer to Slowlearner's question. It's not that New Zealand lacks people paid to think about economic policy.

The real problem may be the tragic shortage of intellectual curiosity, and courage, required to think outside the policy architecture that pays them to think.

Up
0

Yes NZ inflation about to move much higher, with a weaker kiwi........

So the useless RBNZ will need to recalibrate the OCR future rising track much, much higher, as inflation again runs out of control in NZ.
THEY HAVE ONE JOB!  Failing currently!!

Up
4

Is there no other tool available to them? Going after the 1/3 of folks who have a mortgage seems like pretty tough love. 

Up
1

Shouldn't interest rates going up be part of the consideration before taking on debt? No borrower  seems to complain when the adjustment is down?

Up
4

Lol - poor mortgage holders…who for decades were rewarded with lower interest rates on their mortgages when we imported deflation and the consumer items in the CPI basket became cheaper! Ie ‘the consumer items you need to buy are getting cheaper so we will also reward you with even cheaper mortgage rates so if want you can load up with even more debt!’

I’m sure you benefited greatly from these conditions with your rentals. But which of course were always going to eventually backfire on us - but to warn against this situation was to be called a ‘doom gloom merchant’ by those benefitting financially from the stupidity. 

Lowering rates (and causing a housing debt bubble) to fight deflation caused by importing cheap consumer goods from slave labour in SE Asia was always going to end badly. As we exported our jobs offshore, decreased our manufacturing and production capacity, and increased our private debt to GDP >100% of GDP. A fools paradise. 

Up
1

NZGecko,

What will happen to the economy if the RB keeps pushing the OCR up? A big part of the current inflation rate is down to fuel prices and higher rates here won't have any effect on that, but will depress economic activity as consumers tighten their belts even further. At what point does the Bank say; operation successful, but the patient died?

Up
1

The patient was dead when we had to lower rates to to zero as we were fighting continued deflation by the importation of cheaply made consumer goods (as measured in the CPI) from Asia - while simultaneously lowering interest rates to increase ‘aggregate demand’ on those goods to keep inflation above 0%. The result being house prices worth far more than our productivity - and being extremely exposed if any inflation shocks were to ever to hit our shores as the system was completely reliant on always having lower inflation and flat or falling mortgage rates.

Extremely poor economic strategy for 2-3 decades. Short sighted and foolish in my opinion. Why create more mortgage debt to increase aggregate demand on the CPI items? Ie we were reducing our productivity by importing more cheap stuff from off shore and our best idea to balance this situation was to create more mortgage debt and increase house prices (nominally and vs incomes and debt/GDP). It was and is a very risky and foolish way to run an economy - it leaves us very exposed to risk and future stagnation.

Up
2

 Or. Maybe demand for credit will reduce, meaning less bubble blowing and a slow down in bringing tomorrow's demand forward to today, the financial industry inserting it's cut into every transaction and role in synthetically inflating demand, also meaning the hamster wheel of ever more debt creation and claims on resources that may not even exist grinds to a halt 

Up
0