sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

RBNZ Governor Anna Breman hints at pause in OCR increases, but keen to prevent giving businesses the opportunity to hike prices

Economy / news
RBNZ Governor Anna Breman hints at pause in OCR increases, but keen to prevent giving businesses the opportunity to hike prices
Reserve Bank Assistant Governor Karen Silk, Governor Anna Breman and chief economist Paul Conway at a Finance and Expenditure Committee meeting following the release of the September Monetary Policy Statement. Image source: Mandy Te
Reserve Bank Assistant Governor Karen Silk, Governor Anna Breman and chief economist Paul Conway at a Finance and Expenditure Committee meeting following the release of the September Monetary Policy Statement. Image source: Mandy Te

The Governor of the Reserve Bank (RBNZ) has hinted more strongly at a possible pause when the Official Cash Rate (OCR) is next reviewed in October. 

"So if you look at the [RBNZ's] forward-looking OCR track, there is a probability of another rate hike, but we also said that now after having done two OCR increases, we can probably take some time to assess and see how this has affected the economy and whether we see stronger or less strong second-round effects from the high fuel prices," Governor Anna Breman told Parliament's Finance and Expenditure Select Committee (FEC) on Thursday morning.

This comes after the RBNZ released its September Monetary Policy Statement on Wednesday, with the Official Cash Rate (OCR) raised to 2.75% from 2.50%. In choosing to increase the OCR, the RBNZ's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) decided gradually removing monetary stimulus was necessary to reduce inflation to the RBNZ’s 2% inflation target midpoint and support growth and employment.

On Thursday Breman said the OCR at 2.75% was relatively low on a historic basis. 

“We assess that this is good to bring inflation down, but it’s still supporting growth and jobs." 

Alongside Breman at the FEC meeting was Assistant Governor Karen Silk and RBNZ chief economist Paul Conway. External MPC members Prasanna Gai, Carl Hansen and Hayley Gourley were also present.

Conway added that in terms of medium-term inflation pressures, expectations were key and price-setting behaviour was key.

He said that indicators of medium-term inflation pressure were key, calling it a; “delicate balance that monetary policy is trying to pull off at the moment between supporting growth and preventing the price shock from becoming generalised inflation.”

Concern about 'firms taking the opportunity to hike prices'

Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick put to the RBNZ that monetary policy was a blunt instrument - one that can’t open the Strait of Hormuz, decarbonise the economy or reduce NZ’s exposure to imported fossil fuel inflation.

Conway said some things were up to the choices of elected officials. Breman said the RBNZ could deal with indirect effects.

“Monetary policy is really important in terms of containing the indirect and second-round effects of things like supply-side shocks. And it does matter a lot for inflation expectations, for how core inflation evolves, and over the medium term that turns out to be headline inflation.”

“What we’re seeing right now is that there’s a risk that unless we respond with monetary policy, those inflation expectations will get out of hand and we'll see a lot of firms taking the opportunity to hike prices in this environment,” Breman said.

“We are seeing both some bad examples but some also good examples of firms showing restraint because then we will get back to inflation at a low and stable level more quickly and that would really benefit everyone … This will not happen without us doing anything.”

External members on the spot

The MPC’s external members were put on the spot with National MP Nancy Lu directing a question to them about whether they went into the monetary policy meeting with a preference to vote for a hike.

Conway, who was happy to rotate, offered Carl Hansen his seat.

Hansen said even though this was not his full-time job, he tried to keep an eye on what was going on in the economy and globally in between meetings.

“One does tend to get an inkling and start thinking about things. But I certainly find that once we get the material from the Reserve Bank which is very comprehensive, it really updates you and at that point, we go to the first day or two and we’re getting staff presentations," Hansen said.

“We get an opportunity to clarify what we’re reading and it’s really at the end of that stage that we start putting quite a bit of thought to what we think we’re going to recommend as individuals.”

Hansen said it was interesting to find out what other MPC members were thinking. 

“We talk about those things in a very structured way. We all form our own views and then we go through a structured approach of what each of us are thinking about, so that we’re keeping independence and not falling into a group think kind of way.”

Uneven recovery

Breman said they were seeing the economy recover but it was uneven.

“We are seeing some really good signs in the NZ economy right now and particularly related to exports. They’ve been considerably stronger than expected and it’s not a good environment out there, and exporters are also hit by higher fuel prices," she said.

“So clearly there is competitiveness in the agricultural sector … tourism, manufacturing. Not all, we know that, but many firms are doing rather well.”

Breman said what the RBNZ were looking for now and they’re starting to see signs from, is export-led growth is starting to spread to other parts of the economy, like business investments.

While it was uneven, Breman said the RBNZ expected it to broaden. 

“We fully understand that many households are not feeling the effects of the fact that we are starting to be in a broader recovery yet.”

Breman said the RBNZ had also been talking about what extent was this the business cycle and to what extent was this more structural.

“So for example, take youth unemployment, that we know is high, we know that’s a concern... we see this in some other countries as well - is it possibly because firms are investing more in new technologies and then it gets more difficult for younger people to come into the labour market?"

“And this is a difficult question. There’s a difference between what monetary policy can do and not do in this space. But actually, we see quite a few structural changes in the economy right now, and we find them important," she said. “But monetary policy is more effective when it comes to the business cycle.”

Dual mandate

Labour has made it no secret that it wants to bring back a dual mandate that focuses RBNZ monetary policy on inflation as well as maximum sustainable employment, rather than just inflation, officially confirming this in August.

Asked by Labour MP Megan Woods if having a mandate that allowed the RBNZ to look at other things like unemployment would have altered the decision, Conway said that was a hypothetical.

Both Conway and Assistant Governor Karen Silk said the RBNZ spent a lot of time focused on the labour market.

“It’s a matter of the degree to which you want to incorporate it into decisions in terms of the mandate. I do think normally in a demand shock, the effect is the same on inflation, on the labour market," Conway said.

“It’s a little clearer for monetary policy and the breadth of the mandate doesn’t matter so much. It does become more delicate currently when we’ve got inflation going up and growth has been lacklustre because of the shock … I think the mandate would, at the margin, have an effect.”

However, Conway couldn’t say whether or not it would have altered the OCR decision on Wednesday because the MPC did not do the process with a dual mandate in mind.

‘If NZ was less dependent on fossil fuels, then inflation would be lower’

In its September Monetary Policy Statement, the RBNZ noted that commodity prices remained elevated relative to pre-conflict levels.

“High energy and other commodity prices may increase medium-term inflation pressures,” the RBNZ said.

Woods brought up how the RBNZ had pointed to rising European and Asian natural gas prices reflecting renewed disruption to gas supply chains. She put it to the RBNZ that this flows onto the Government’s proposal of establishing a liquefied natural gas (LNG) importation terminal in New Zealand.

Asked if in terms of future decisions, whether or not the RBNZ will have to take this into account if “New Zealand has tethered itself to those international rising markets of increasing and constrained supplies of LNG”, Breman said when it came to their forecasts, they took into account things that have been formally decided on.

Woods then put to the RBNZ that if a commercial contract was signed, the forecast would need to be updated to reflect differing gas prices. Conway said the RBNZ was not in a position to comment on things like that.

“What I will say is that in an era where global fossil fuel prices are high and variable, if New Zealand was less dependent on fossil fuels, then inflation would be lower," said Conway.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

9 Comments

Inflation and excessive debt is is the society killer, bombs away. 

Up
3

“So for example, take youth unemployment, that we know is high, we know that’s a concern... we see this in some other countries as well - is it possibly because firms are investing more in new technologies and then it gets more difficult for younger people to come into the labour market?"

Comparing with the US, Scott Galloway reckons that weakening entry-level hiring - partly linked to AI -creates a dangerous loss of career on-ramps for younger workers. He cited US unemployment for 16–24-year-olds at about 10.5%, said entry-level job postings had fallen roughly 35%, and characterized youth joblessness as a possible early warning signal of recession and broader social instability. He warned that AI is likely to hit junior information-economy roles especially hard because tasks that once trained analysts, coders, and other early-career employees can be automated [https://pod.wave.co/podcast/prof-g-markets-2a0afe72-164a-4443-9f5a-558a…]

Where there is high demand for younger labor is HVAC / refrigeration; Plumbing, pipefitting, steamfitting; Industrial maintenance / mechatronics; welding / fabrication.

 https://www.bls.gov/ooh/

 

Up
1

“One does tend to get an inkling and start thinking about things. But I certainly find that once we get the material from the Reserve Bank which is very comprehensive, it really updates you and at that point, we go to the first day or two and we’re getting staff presentations,"

Wonder if this means they have introduced AI into their workflows. Given the nature of what they do, this would make much sense. 

Up
0

The Reserve Bank language sounds just the same as that uttered by the Bank of England - inflation will fall beyond the short-term, the recovery is uneven, there are many risks, demand side vs supply side shocks, global uncertainty, the path of rates will adjust as we take in new information, blah, blah. A grand exercise in equivocation that suggests a mass of knowledge, when the reality is far from that. 

The thing about fossil fuel inflation is that once, and if, the war ends, prices will fall back.  The same cannot be said for electricity prices.  

In the UK my electricity bill doubled over the ten years to 2024, meanwhile my fuel cost at the pump was...the same as in 2013!

 

Up
2

NZ faces a massive problem, because we have traditionally viewed government debt securities such as New Zealand Government Bonds or US Treasuries, as the definitive "risk-free asset." 

Neoliberal models assume that domestic policy tweaks can perpetually insulate these markets from systemic shocks. This perspective remains largely oblivious to a glaring structural reality - a massive global loss of confidence in debt-laden Western institutions could trigger a cascading failure across international sovereign bond markets.

The career trajectory of central bank governors typically spans Western pillars like the Sveriges Riksbank, the European Central Bank, and the World Bank. This background reinforces a euro-centric bias.

NZ reads from this very same playbook.

Neoliberal theory views global financial systems through a traditional lens anchored by:

  • The US Dollar (Washington)
  • The Euro (Brussels)
  • The Global Banking Hub (The City of London)

Consequently, this framework is ill-equipped to recognise the rapid shift of economic influence toward a multipolar infrastructure, led by the BRICS+ alliance and expanding Eurasian financial networks.

Neoliberalism champions "central bank independence" to separate monetary policy from political influence. However, this separation often functions as a buffer that insulates central bankers from broader geopolitical changes. 

A clear example occurred when New Zealand's political leadership publicly reminded the Governor “to stay in her New Zealand lane and stick to domestic monetary policy” -- [RNZ] following comments regarding international dynamics. This isolation limits a central bank's ability to adapt to a global economy where trade, currency corridors, and geopolitical strategy are deeply intertwined.

IMO, the actions taken by Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) Governor Dr. Anna Breman reveal a widening gap between traditional Western monetary policy and emerging global financial realities.

By continuing to focus strictly on fine-tuning the Official Cash Rate (OCR) to address domestic price shocks, central banking frameworks remain largely insulated from a critical domestic issue - New Zealand is highly indebted, with gross national debt approaching $1 trillion ($937.5 billion).

The FIRE Economy vs. The Productive Economy

The traditional central banking playbook treats money as a neutral lubricant for commerce. However, critics argue this perspective overlooks how the structural mechanics of broad money creation actively harm the productive economy.

Debt as Money Creation
 

As implicitly acknowledged in the RBNZ bulletin - commercial banks create roughly 98% of broad money in the economy, when the write up digital loans out of thin air.

This 'money' never existed in the first place. This electronic money is only generated by private commercial banks when they issue loans. It is not backed by pre-existing wealth, meaning the public uses a circulating medium that requires paying interest to private 3rd-party private monopolies just to exist.

Because private banks seek maximum return with minimal risk, they heavily favor lending against residential land over funding the productive sector. This has created a dynamic where housing debt has grown to make up 64% of all non-government debt ($388.5 billion), while business debt has shrunk to just 23%. The Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate (FIRE) economy is highly rewarded for land speculation, while agriculture, manufacturing, and innovation are starved of capital.

New Zealand's commercial banking sector is dominated by four major Australian-owned institutions. Because money is issued as a debt instrument, Kiwi households pay an estimated $41 billion in interest annually on housing debt alone. This structure serves as a massive funnel, extracting billions in unearned financial rent out of New Zealand's domestic economy and sending it to overseas institutions and shareholders.

In a public banking utility model that $41 billion would flow as a net figure from the IRD into the CSA (Crown Settlement Account), and act very simmilarly to the US example of the TGA, that the US runs at the Fed as its current (checking) account.

IOWs each $41billion or so, received in this model, is the equivalent amount of revenue that doesn't have to be levied as a tax on the economy.

Alternative Monetary Structures in a Multipolar World

While Western central banks manage debt-fueled fiat systems within isolated interest rate corridors, multipolar nations are developing alternative financial architectures. These systems are designed to bypass the traditional US Dollar, Euro, and the City of London ecosystem, presenting a structural challenge to traditional central banking models.

Real-Asset and Commodity-Backed Liquidity

The expansion of the BRICS+ alliance has shifted focus back toward tangible wealth. Rather than relying on fiat currencies backed by government decree, these networks are exploring trade settlement mechanisms tied to physical commodities like oil, gas, grains, and gold. By anchoring settlement to real-world products, these countries insulate their trade from the inflationary pressures and debt defaults affecting Western sovereign bond markets.

Decentralised Cross-Border Settlement (mBridge)

Central banks outside the Western framework are increasingly using platforms like the Project mBridge platform, developed alongside the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). This system utilizes multi-central bank digital currencies (multi-CBDCs) for direct, peer-to-peer wholesale transactions. By bypassing the SWIFT network and Western correspondent banks, it eliminates the traditional transaction fees, clearing delays, and geopolitical leverage long held by Washington and London.

Sovereign Bilateral Currency Corridors

A growing portion of global trade is shifting away from US Dollar intermediation. Nations like China, India, Russia, and the UAE frequently settle major commodity trades directly in local currencies, such as the Yuan, Rupee, and Dirham. This structural change reduces global demand for Western fiat reserves. Over time, it limits the ability of highly indebted nations to export their domestic inflation to the rest of the world.

Judging by their policy the people in charge of the NZ financial system are turning a blind eye to the one of the most monumental revamps of the global financial system, including its center of power, in recorded history.  

Up
1

Yes. And remember that RBNZ has received access to temporary USD liquidity swap lines during periods of global market stress - notably in 2008 and again in 2020. These facilities let the RBNZ obtain USD from the Fed and on-lend them into New Zealand’s financial system if dollar funding becomes strained.

The Fed’s purpose is mainly systemic: reducing stress in offshore USD funding markets so that disruption abroad does not feed back into U.S. credit markets and the global financial system. The Fed explicitly frames its swap arrangements as tools to improve dollar-liquidity conditions in the United States and abroad.

Up
0

On Thursday Breman said the OCR at 2.75% was relatively low on a historic basis. 

Depends how far back you go. Its actually pretty high for the last 16 years. Its only gone over 2.5% 3 times in that period and that never lasted long.  https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/monetary-policy/monetary-policy-decisions

Up
0

Yeah, it really gets under my skin when anyone tries to make long-run retro active comparisons. What was going on in credit markets back in 1914 has zero relevance to a 2026 economy. 

Up
0

Inflation still 4% and only OCR only 2.75%. RBNZ must be expecting inflation to drop to 2.5-3% from now to the next OCR setting. Can't see that happening.

Up
2