sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

US data flatlines despite rising factory orders. US labour market weak; Bank of Canada turns hawkish; Australian GDP expansion better than expected juicing financial benchmarks; UST 10yr at 4.79%; gold firms and oil rises again; NZ$1 = 58.5 USc

Economy / news
US data flatlines despite rising factory orders. US labour market weak; Bank of Canada turns hawkish; Australian GDP expansion better than expected juicing financial benchmarks; UST 10yr at 4.79%; gold firms and oil rises again; NZ$1 = 58.5 USc
Breakfast Briefing

Here's our summary of key economic events overnight that affect New Zealand, with news hostilities in the Persian Gulf are still ongoing and still clouding the global economy.

First in the US, the latest Fed Beige Book survey reveals an American economy where activity increased modestly since early July. Ten of the twelve Federal Reserve Districts reported modest growth; two reported no change. Consumer spending grew slightly on balance; reports reflecting both heightened price sensitivity on the one hand and solid high-end purchases on the other. Car sales were mostly subdued, dampened by downbeat consumer confidence, high fuel prices, and rising financing costs.

And that was reinforced by mortgage applications levels that were little-changed and mortgage interest rates that have stayed high and back at early 2025 levels, now 6.79%.

Further, the ADP monthly employment report for private payrolls delivered a +38,000 jobs gain in August, lower than for July and lower than the +47,000 expected. It was a seven month low. Saturday will bring the US non-farm payrolls report update for August which is expected to show a gain of +58,000 - which now may be on the high side. US payroll growth has essentially evaporated since early 2025 and the start of the Trump 2 presidency.

New factory orders however were reported to have risen +10.4% in July from a year ago. This is an impressive result, but you would have thought that activity and employment data would show that surge. However some of the largest gains are in defense aircraft and computer equipment (data centers) which don't have a lot of jobs attached to them.

US crude oil stocks fell again last week and by about double what was expected. And their Strategic Reserves fell too, and by a similar amount. These are dangerously low now.

In Canada their central bank reviewed their policy interest rate by kept it at 2.25% as expected. They seemed somewhat surprised at the resilience of the Canadian economy given the economic attacks from the US, but they also now see that resilience continuing despite the substantial adjustments they have to make. Canadian benchmark bond yields are rising, today at a two year high. But this isn't especially high given the threats. The somewhat hawkish tone wasn't expected and the chances of rate hike there have probably increased.

In Australia, it is coming to light that their central bank has downgraded the US dollar for its foreign currency holdings. In their 2024 Annual Report, Table 2.2.4 noted an 55% target allocation for US dollar holdings (page 82). The 2025 report (page 95) shows this as 45%. An unstable White House is undoubtedly the reason. That 2025 report was released on October 8, 2025, so the 2026 report is now only weeks away and this disclosure will be closely watched. (The RBA is somewhat unusual in that they have revealed that pullback. It is likely happening in many other central banks too, as IMF consolidated data suggests.)

And staying in Australia, they released their Q2-2026 economic activity data yesterday, showing a +0.4% expansion for the quarter, to be up +2.1% (real) from a year ago. That was much better than the expected +1.8% expansion. Their per capita growth was only up +0.7% however. The widely expected slowing in 2026 has been much less than observers had expected. And that has significantly boosted the AUD and Australian Government bond yields.

The UST 10yr yield is now just on 4.79%, down -1 bp from yesterday at this time. The 30 year yield is at 5.28%, up +2 bps. The key 2-10 yield curve is still at +41 bps (unchanged). Their 1-5 curve is now at +38 bps (-1 bp) and the 3 mth-10yr curve is at +106 bps (+2 bps). The China 10 year bond rate is up +11 bp at 1.69%. The Japanese 10 year bond yield is now at 3.00%, down -1 bp but still a 30 year high. The Australian 10 year bond yield starts today at 5.22%, up another +6 bps. The NZ Government 10 year bond rate is now at 4.81%, down -1 bp from yesterday.

Wall Street firmer today with the S&P500 recovering +0.5% and the Nasdaq up +0.4%. Overnight, European markets were lower between Paris's -0.3% and Frankfurt's -0.5%. Tokyo ended its Wednesday trade down a large -2.9%. Hong Kong dipped -0.1%. But Shanghai was down a full -1.0%. Singapore was rose +0.6%.The ASX ended its Wednesday down -1.0%. And the NZX50 was up +1.0%.

The price of gold is now at US$4372/oz, and up +US$37 from yesterday at this time. Silver has risen +50 USc to just under US$65/oz.

Oil prices are up +US$1.50 at just over US$91.50/bbl in the US, while the international Brent price is just under US$96/bbl. Hormuz transits have held very low with just three ships exiting over the past 24 hours, none of which are tankers (0 dark with transponders off) and only one entering for new loads (1 dark). The Red Sea activity is marginally higher than yesterday but still with less than 20 each way at the Yemen chokepoint.

The Kiwi dollar is down -40 bps from yesterday at just on 58.5 USc. Against the Aussie we are down -90 bps at 81.5 AUc. Against the euro we are also down -30 bps at 50.5 euro cents. That all means our TWI-5 starts today at just on 61.9, down -50 bps from yesterday.

The bitcoin price starts today at US$77,353 and essentially unchanged from yesterday at this time. Volatility over the past 24 hours has been low at just on +/-0.9%.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: CoinDesk

The easiest place to stay up with event risk is by following our Economic Calendar here ».

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

75 Comments

PDK raised a link yesterday about JD Vance speaking about the end times on a faith based podcast. What he actually said was "I’m trying to focus on is doing as much of God’s work as possible right now, and if that leads to the end times, okay," 

The frightening thing about that is the indication of their sheer inability to think and rationalise what they're doing. They're apparently OK to be the catalyst for the deaths of billions of people? And worse, they believe that's 'Gods work'?

Faith without thought is a requirement of the church (all of them). It is a tool of mass population control. I don't believe it is a requirement of God. He gave us all a brain with the expectation we will use it. The only way that can happen is if we keep asking "Why?"

Up
11

Those of us who contemplate sapience, have worked out why nobody has contacted us from 'somewhere else'. 

Sapience obviously grows - from simple life-forms towards more-complex; it cannot be any other way. 

At some point (the last 10,000 years in our case) a sapient species will start levering the stocks of their planet - mineral, life-supporting. They will irrupt, exponentially. Our inflection was fossil energy 200 years ago - our irruption was from 1-8 billion. It looks like the period between learning to e-communicate (Marconi in our case) to overshoot-induced collapse, will be sub-200 years. 

On that basis, a signal sent from afar, might only arrive here, after the sender's demise - or at least, after their ability to receive. Ditto anything we send out, now. So we're at best going to hear a 150-year blip of signalling, from an already-collapsed/reduced life-form. 

Carpenters - Calling Occupants of Interplanetary Craft (Long version, No DJ) - YouTube

Up
2

For me Karen Carpenter was one of the best, but her life was marked with sadness and mental health issues for which she found no resolution unfortunately. I still love their music.

Up
2

Not much journalism re Penrhyn.

An atoll with 2-300 inhabitants 

The US are doing a resource-grab (sea-bed mining).

WHY WAS NZ COMPLICIT? 

 

Up
6

"The US are doing a resource-grab (sea-bed mining)" : This agreement was to counter the agreement Brown signed in secret last year with China. 

"WHY WAS NZ COMPLICIT?": New Zealand was involved to counter Chinese influence in the Cook Islands. We weren't consulted prior to the signing of the Chinese agreement (which arguably was constitutionally required) . 

Up
3

"He gave us all a brain with the expectation we will use it." 

Well, time to turn those brains on so the masses can wake up to the ongoing deception:

What was MAGA? 

MAGA translates to sorceress or magician in Latin

MAGA in Portuguese means magician, sorceress, wizard.

MAGA in Japanese means wickedness, evil, calamity, disaster.

MAGA is a slang word in Nigeria meaning sucker, fraud victim or easily fooled idiot.

MAGA means “lies” in ZULU

MAGA means DRAGON in Sundanese.

MAGA means “Sorceress” and “Female Magicians” in Italian. (Mago for “Male Magician”)

MAGA means “Magician” in Spanish.

MAGA or Magus is the name for the highest rank in the Church of Satan

Magus means a member of an ancient Persian clan specialising in cultic activities. 

 

JD Vance is no Christian.  For he is a pretender who pretends, because all these “leaders” are merely actors on a world stage. 

JD is one of Peter Thiel’s political pawns to bring in the final phase of the New World Order of control and domination - the BEAST system

Peter Thiel has been warning about the Antichrist and an impending apocalypse to what he describes as the “end of modernity”

Probably nothing?

Up
0

Are there no number "7"'s involved in the apocalypse today?

 

 

Up
3

7 (trump)ets, 7 seals...

Up
0

While we're playing spot the acronym.....PENIS stands for Proton Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscopy, or the title of a secret cult, planning global domination by clandestine dildo sabotage. 

Up
6

Find my post about Rachel Maddow further down stream. Fitting.

Up
1

In the hard sciences we call this kind of thing 'p-hacking'.

Up
3

Be very careful holding your entire belief system to science...

Up
0

The whole point is science is you don't need a belief system, or at least the realm that requires belief shrinks over time as we replace it with knowledge. 

Up
10

Science doesn’t eliminate the need for belief, it just changes what we are asked to place our belief or trust in. 

Because no single person can replicate every experiment, so you must accept conclusions outside your personal field of expertise.  This requires trust or belief in the integrity of the researcher, validity of peer review, and the self-correcting mechanisms of the scientific apparatus. 

The father of genetics, Gregor Mendel, was among the first to be (officially) accused of falsifying his data.  Falsification and data fabrication have not been isolated to Mendel.

Because an individual cannot verify every experiment manually, distinguishing genuine scientific consensus from bad actors or propaganda requires a degree of belief.

Up
1

It requires replication to firm up knowledge. This is generally done very well in the harder sciences and very poorly in softer sciences.

Up
9

"Because an individual cannot verify every experiment manually, distinguishing genuine scientific consensus from bad actors or propaganda requires a degree of belief."

Example - The Earth's curvature is approximately 8 inches per mile; this means that for every mile you look out, the curvature will obstruct about 8 inches of an object's height. For longer distances, the drop increases.  That means when you view a horizon line on the ocean it should have a subtle curve.  It should not be perfectly flat. 

Can you replicate this with any photos of a horizon line in the ocean?

Up
0

What particular fields do you believe are being propagandised?

Up
2

Too hard. I know a chap who has a bit of a reputation for being a 'flatearther'. I got the opportunity to ask him about it. He wasn't really, more a fairly extreme cynic. He didn't trust anything put out by governments or authorities unless he could personally verify it himself. And of course he had never been in a position to personally verify that the planet was indeed round, or an 'oblate spheroid' if you want to be specific. He had toured the world a bit and I asked him about that, and his counter was being trapped cattle class in the tube of a bit of mass transit machinery doesn't provide you with the evidence of the shape of the planet. He didn't argue about the earth being flat or not, he just personally hadn't verified it.

I thought it a little unusual, and possibly a little sad.

Up
2

Why is it too hard?  It’s extremely easy to view a perfectly flat horizon line in the ocean.  

By saying it’s too hard, you’re literally handing your belief over to pseudoscience and proving my point exactly. 

No need for deflection through story telling with a pathos shift

Up
0

8 inches is about 1/8000 of a mile. Do you think your eyes can pick up deviations of 0.013%? Not really the tool for the job.

I'd love the see the flat earth model making sense of flight path durations. I guess it would look like the old geocentric solar system model with all sorts of horrible little corrections required to make the square peg fit a round hole. You could spend an hour with a globe looking up flight durations and see if they seem logically consistent if you need some evidence? 

Up
5

Regardless of whether your eyes can see it or not, if you place a straight ruler line on a wide pan ocean horizon line it should not be perfectly flat. 

I’ve suggested an example to focus on what science states as the “truth” which you believe in.  

Can you replicate this supposed truth? 

I've made no claims about the accuracy of flat earth maps.

 

Up
0

"a perfectly flat horizon line in the ocean"; are you arguing that the planet is a flat disc or round? 

I got taught years ago that the horizon is approximately 5 miles away when you're standing on the ground (on a flat plain, or at the coast). And As I am a current pilot and fly regularly, at low altitudes the curvature of the planet is not discernible. Anecdotally I've been told you have to get up to around 50,000 ft or higher to easily see it. 

Up
3

Science states that the curvature of the earth is 8 inches per mile.  

I'm making the claim that this cannot be replicated and is therefore false.

"I got taught", "I've been told".  You're further highlighting that your belief system is based on the beliefs of others.  

Up
0

Tell you what timelord. When your numbers game has been tested, verified, calculated and observed as many times as ‘the earth is round’ has, we’ll believe it. How’s that sound?

Up
4

Can you show me where it has been "tested, verified, calculated and observed"? 

Up
0

I could but I can’t be arsed. Have a great day!

Up
2

Have you ever watched a ship sail away from you out to sea? If not try is sometime.

I have. This is what you see; as the ship moves away from you it appears to sink lower. This is the result of it passing beyond the immediate horizon following the curvature of the planet. When the ship has a high superstructure or masts, if you have binoculars these too appear to sink, until the entire ship as passed beyond the horizon. That is why I believe what I was told that the horizon is about 5 miles away. What would your explanation be?

Up
1

This is the result of it passing beyond the immediate horizon following the curvature of the planet.

Are you sure about that or is it your belief?  Science tells me the horizon line from eye level is only 3 miles away.  Maybe what you're seeing is caused by the law of perspective on a plane surface and limits to the nature of vision along with marine atmospheric haze? 

I’m limited on time today sorry, but I’ll reiterate that I haven’t even claimed that the earth is flat.  I’ve simply challenged the scientific claim of earth’s curvature measurements.  The claim was made that hard science can be replicated, and that’s why it doesn’t require a belief system. 

Maybe try fixing a good telescope or super-zoom camera aimed at the horizon line on clear day.  The Nikon P1000 has 125x zoom compared with binoculars that only have 7-12x zoom.

Here’s an example of ships 12-15km away and they have not disappeared, they're mostly completely visible.  You can also see the atmospheric disturbance impeding view of the wind farms.  But they’re 70km+ away, so you should not be able to see much of them at all.  Science tells me any object at 70km must be taller than 253m for just its top section to be visible above horizon line.

https://rumble.com/v3pubzs-strange-horizons-with-the-nikon-p1000.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=f4029ec9-f494-4455-8535-0acb8f0293d8

Since you’re a pilot - if you’re flying at 500mph, do you also dip the nose of your plane down to keep it from rising in altitude due to the curvature of the earth?  At this speed wouldn't you need to constantly dip the nose downwards and descend an average of 2,777 ft per minute, otherwise, without compensation in one hour’s time the pilot would find themselves 31.5 miles higher than expected.  

Up
0

I know what I was watching and saw. it verified what I had been told. At the time I was using a low power pair binoculars. I do admit I am less certain about the distance the horizon is when you're on a flat surface. 

As for flying gravity plays a part. So at 500 mph you don't have to adjust to maintain you're altitude, just your AoA. To not be overriden by gravity you'd need to be able to accelerate to escape velocity, just under 22,000 kts. Other factors come into play; changing air density with altitude and your engine being able to run. 

On a very clear day flying on the west coast of the North Island, at 5000 ft I often can see the South Island. On the beach you can't even see the top of the alps. Why do you think that is?

Up
0

You’ve chosen to go with “I know what I saw” even after I’ve mentioned the limitations of using basic binoculars and the effects of marine atmospheric haze. 

And no comments as to the link I provide you showing a super zoom camera of ships at 15km and wind farms at 70km and marine haze impacting the view.  

“On the beach you can't even see the top of the alps. Why do you think that is?”

What a vague and unclear question to ask - no mention of your location, distance to the south island what part you’re looking at, and you expect me to explain why to you?  That is not even a scientific question - what are we even doing here

As I said I’ve very busy on this Friday, enjoy your day :) 

Up
0

That's what gravity is for, unless you don't believe in gravity. You won't have a VSI change because of air pressure. Knowing a few things about science would certainly help your scepticism. 

Up
0

Oh you from the cheap seats again, criticising while providing zero evidence of your own.  And no explanations for the video I supplied.  How very scientific of you…

Science claims that you’d have to be going Mach 23 to need to correct for the curvature of earth taking gravity into consideration.  I'm sure you’ve replicated to confirm it as truth rather than a belief, and you're able to provide your proof.

And water being held upside down due to gravity, I'm also guessing you've seen this replicated, but again you're not able to supply the proof

Up
0

Using that logic then I guess you know next to nothing in this world if all you have to operate with is belief. 

Belief means accepting something without proof. Trusting science means accepting a conclusion because it comes with a transparent method that anyone can check if they have the means.

Up
0

So you are now pivoting to a straw man fallacy with an over-generalisation of my original claim.

My original claim: 

"Because an individual cannot verify every experiment manually, distinguishing genuine scientific consensus from bad actors or propaganda requires a degree of belief."

There’s many areas of science I can replicate.  There’s also many areas of science I cannot replicate.  Many have been publicly replicated, while also many are not publicly replicated. 

Yes, I believe gravity exists.  However, just because gravity exists, that does not then by default mean every scientific law or formula relating to it also must be true.

I’m challenging areas outside of your expertise, that you cannot replicate.  You can’t even suggest a single piece of public evidence to support your side of the debate.  You won't even comment on the evidence I'm supplying.  So instead you are making an appeal to authority to dictate your truth.

Anthony Fauci told us to “trust the science”.  Interesting how he then required a presidential pardon and pleaded the fifth 111 times in July.  You are assuming there are no bad actors - which is yet another belief

Up
0

It’s extremely easy to view a perfectly flat horizon line in the ocean.

No it's not! That's one hell of a strawman there Timelord. 

Up
4

I'm referring to the horizon line from left to right in every wide angle photo of the ocean.  Not depth.

Perfectly flat when a ruler line is placed on it.

Up
0

What's your margin of error when you say 'perfectly flat'? Something to consider before drawing conclusions. You'd be talking on the order of picking up millimetres of deviation over a line that is metres long, so I hope you have very good eyes or a very large printer. 

Up
3

And have you ever replicated this curvature measurement?  Have you seen anyone within the science community replicate or prove it to be true? 

If you’re actually interested in seeing the truth, find a second hand Nikon P1000 with 125x zoom off ebay and test the horizon depth. 

Here’s a couple of people testing it on YT: 

https://youtu.be/bLY826rYAOM?si=Ek_kL07maffycoBz

https://youtube.com/shorts/_KTMWI0osYQ?si=kEWT3jR7ZgNVMV5N
https://youtu.be/XWwbfdny848?si=TGNADWbxb4p_nOTW

Up
0

Surely you've got to be taking the piss with those links? I think you need to find a different site to hang out on. 

Up
1

“It requires replication to firm up knowledge. This is generally done very well in the harder sciences and very poorly in softer sciences.”

I’ve challenged this by asking if you can replicate the hard science claim that the earth is flat?  Surely this is a very softball question for hard science to immediately prove so we can get on with our days.

Yet not a single one of you has been able to provide any evidence that it’s been replicated.  

Turns out that hard science also requires a belief system

Up
0

OK, I've had a closer look. I figure you want a wide unobstructed view of the sea from a high point, so I ran a google search for photos taken from the peak of Mount Taranaki. Still quite tricky to find one with a good view of the sea without cloud. I did find this page with a beautiful blue-bird day picture of the sea:

https://thehikinglife.com/2020/04/around-the-mountain-circuit-mount-taranaki/

Pop that into imagej or your tool of choice, run a line across the horizon, and the bulge in the middle showing the Earth's curvature is pretty clear. 

Up
1

Thats pretty good thanks mfd, I appreciate the efforts. 

However, looking at the EXIF metadata from the image, it states this was captured on a Canon DIGITAL IXUS 100 IS.  Problem being the Canon Digital IXUS 100 IS can cause a curved horizon line, particularly when shooting at its widest focal length because it shows barrel distortion at the wide-angle setting.  This is a known issue with the camera causing this effect.

Here’s a horizon line that doesn’t bend like that: 

https://freewalks.nz/auckland/rangitoto-island-track-and-summit-walk/track/?_gl=1*1qtsedm*_ga*NTkyNzM5ODYwLjE3ODg0MTI1ODc.*_ga_DPTYSLQ9Z1*czE3ODg0MTI1ODckbzEkZzAkdDE3ODg0MTI1OTQkajUzJGwwJGgw

Up
0

Yes, I figured you would change the goal posts pretty quickly. 

Rangitoto is approximately 10% of the altitude of Taranaki, so the effect will be 10 times smaller in your picture all other things being equal, which probably pushes it below a noticeable threshold. But feel free to keep looking - this effect scales with altitude so try looking overseas for large mountains that have unobstructed coastal views. 

Up
1

Obviously the photo I supplied was taken from the air above Rangitoto.  

It’s clearly not someone standing on the top of Rangitoto taking the image like yours.  Rangitoto is clearly down in the foreground. 

And so you completely disregard the camera issue causing this effect on yours?  You can literally check the EXIF metadata for yourself and see what it was taken with.  

I'm not moving goal posts here.  Do you not understand the issue with your "proof" ? 

Up
0

I'm not spending my evening on this. Suffice it to say, believing that the earth is not roughly globe shaped requires so many aspects of the world and the observations we can make it to be wrong, and such a complex and pointless conspiracy infrastructure to support it, that I truly cannot understand the psychological processes that support such a belief. 

My best guess is it's an underlying inability to truly comprehend the implications of scale. 

Up
3

Yes it would require much effort to keep such a deception alive, especially in this technological age.  I can agree with that.

But I’m challenging a very basic concept in science that many blindly accept.  Looks to be an unexamined belief that cannot be replicated

I appreciate the discussion though, enjoy your night 

Up
0

Agreed, MFD - good grief - 20 odd posts on a financial/geopolitical site arguing the toss about this shear idiocy - for anyone with an eye cue over room temperature, a cursory glance out of the window on a clear day from a jet flying at reasonable altitude, should dispel this sort of tripe once and for all.

Up
3

Colin, I enjoy these lines of debate. Most of all because they show how some people apply their version of logic, how they think and rationalise. Yes the subject can be off topic for the site, but the lesson in human psychology is valuable irrespective of whether you agree with any of the arguments presented. It's all about learning, and sometimes, necessarily, the learning has to be about people - who they are, what their perspective is and why, and most of all how they think.

Up
0

I was wondering why you'd want a high zoom camera, turns out the videos you linked are completely unrelated to the argument you have been making. 

The first one is good, you can pretty clearly see just the top part of the oil rig and surprisingly, as you zoom in it gets bigger. I mean, if this is what you think science is then I can see why you're a little suspect about the whole thing. 

Up
1

Can you provide me an image of water curving then please?

I'm the one challenging the position that no one here can seem to prove

Up
0

Please see my link above. 

Up
3

"Perfectly flat" in scientific terms? Goodluck discerning that with the naked eye and a ruler. To be able to critique science you'd at least be expected to understand some basics. 

Up
4

I thought it was "Make Adern Go Away"

Up
2

The answer as to why adolescent leaders, not fit for running a sandpit, spouting mumbo jumbo? Comments spouting mumbo jumbo from the proletariat who installed said "leaders!

Up
1

Let's see how your comment ages with time

Up
0

Like Russian gold reserves you mean?

 I'm ok with junking numerology. Considering the hundred billion galaxies and hundred billion trillion stars they contain, isn't it a bit weird to assign significance to a Hindu-Arabic numeral system that could have been, say the Roman numeral system, except for efficiency? Seems a typical case of anthropocentric delusionism to me? Dates on a calander that could have been any system, except ancients attached importance to the movement of the sun along the ecliptic? Dividing the year into 12 because the suns path arbitrarily passed through 12 constellations, although it's actually currently 13 due to precession? Dates are a synthetic human construct and of no importance beyond the human mind. If you believe in sky fairies, the occult and holy books, real world evidence is scant!

Up
5

Ever entertaining Rachel Maddow on MSN talks about mnemonics. You know, that little tool that helps us remember things in order like 'My Very Educated Mother Just Served Us Noodles' helps us to remember the planets in order; Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune. Well she points out that the mnemonic for the great lakes has historically been HOMES for Huron, Ontario, Michigan, Erie, and Superior, can no longer work if Trump succeeds in renaming Ontario to America. She does point out that SHAME works very well. You gotta laugh. Time Lord will love it.

Up
3

Mary's Virgin Explanation Made Joseph Suspect Upstairs Neighbour.

Up
6

Now that's thinking. 

I recall reading an article about chemical reactions in experiments in the NASA Skylab. It identified that the removal of gravity changed the way some reactions occurred and suggested the possible ramifications then of manufacturing in a microgravity environment. Another demonstrated the melting of a piece of metal and solidification of into a sphere, more round than a ball bearing manufactured on the planet. The microgravity environment has an effect on the physics of how things happen, and that was seen to create opportunities.

Up
6

Oh that is cool. 

Up
0

Dutch central bank just shipped all its gold out of US and put it in London. 86 tonnes.

Up
6

That must have cost a pretty penny. Security would have been impressive too. 

Up
1

Well, the USA has banned the private ownership of gold before...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102

 

Up
1

IMO, as the global financial reset looms, any Central bank on the planet, that hasn't already repatriated their gold, would have to have rocks in their heads.

This will be dead easy for NZ - any one of us who has so much as a gold tooth in their mouth, or a ring on one finger, effectively owns more gold than the NZ has in its reserves.

From a peak of 31 tons in 1961 to the final sell off, at $360-$400/oz, the last of it was sold on Don Brash's watch.

Historically, the RBNZ aims to keep the largest chunk - around 55 percent of its foreign currency assets in US dollars. The other core currency reserves  are heavily spread across Euros, Japanese Yen, and British Pound Sterling.

This cash is then reinvested in short term marketable securities allocations...

(i) USD $ the dominant allocation ~55%
(ii) Euro € 20-25%
(iii) Yen ¥ 10-15%
(iv) British £ Pound 5-10%

Unlike some central banks that tilt allocations toward the Chinese Renminbi, Canadian Dollar, or Australian Dollar, the RBNZ strictly channels its liquid holdings into these top four traditional fiat giants to prioritise instant convertible access under global market stress.

Clearly there Is ZERO Commodity/Minor Fiat Exposure within the mix - unlike some central banks that tilt allocations toward the Chinese Renminbi, Canadian Dollar, or Australian Dollar, the RBNZ strictly channels its liquid holdings into these top four traditional fiat giants to prioritise instant convertible access under global market stress.

It should be obvious to anyone with half a brain that in a the accelerating global pivot toward commodity-backed Eastern currencies, along with the profound risk of a systemic US dollar and bond crisis occurring, that the Reserve Bank of New Zealand's (RBNZ) current foreign reserves portfolio will face severe structural vulnerabilities.

From a traditional central banking perspective, the current allocation prioritises maximum short-term liquidity, however, in a macroeconomic "global reset" setting, the portfolio's reliance on Western fiat debt instruments creates massive vulnerabilities.

You could argue that the sheer liquidity of NZ's portfolio would safeguard a reset situation - however high operational liquidity does not protect a portfolio from systemic value destruction if the baseline currency units themselves collapse.

In a global reset or sovereign debt crisis scenario, the distinction between operational liquidity (how fast you can sell something) and structural solvency (what that asset is actually worth after you sell it) becomes a critical vulnerability.

Just me, but this portfolio mix looks distinctly like a disaster waiting in the wings.

 

Up
4

The RBNZ keeping the majority of its reserves in fiat currencies is not short of an upcoming catastrophe.  All of NZ is bout to become much poorer as a result :-(

Up
5

I'm afraid so, Yvil.

Yes, to me the RBNZ operates in a strictly Western-centric institutional, status quo view and a linear survival framework. 

They view their job purely as maintaining the existing piping. Because New Zealand's domestic banking system (dominated by Australian-owned banks) is fundamentally plugged into the Western wholesale funding markets (New York and London), they optimise their reserves to match that plumbing. To them, any pivot away from the USD/SWIFT matrix is a dangerous, untested risk.

The problem to me is that when you open your eyes to the novel multipolar developments, a profound trade mismatch rears its ugly head (at least for anyone who don't reside under a rock that is).

NEWSFLASH - China is New Zealand's largest trading partner by a massive margin.

Infrastructure like the Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE), China's CIPS (Cross-Border Interbank Payment System), and the expanding gold-clearing hubs in Hong Kong that provide an alternative, asset-backed ecosystem are already fully operational.

This data confirms that the alternative framework is no longer a small political protest. It is an operating, highly liquid, multitrillion-dollar alternative financial plumbing line that processes real goods, real currencies, and real physical gold completely out of reach of Western financial controls.

The Strategic Blindspot: By ignoring these mechanisms, the RBNZ assumes the Western fiat system can indefinitely print debt without a breaking point. If that breaking point arrives, the RBNZ will have optimised for a plumbing system that no longer carries water.

If a systemic reset occurs, New Zealand risks being financially stranded - locked into a decaying Western banking architecture while trying to sell milk, meat, and wood to an Eastern bloc that settles trade on a completely different, asset-backed ledger.

While New Zealand hasn't moved, other Western-aligned central banks (like those in ASEAN and parts of Europe) have quietly started accumulating RMB or increasing physical gold allocations to hedge their bets.

The RBNZ’s lack of movement highlights a common critique of Western technocrats - they are heavily trained in neo-Keynesian economics, which treats gold as a "barbarous relic" and views sovereign fiat debt as risk-free. This ideological training can make them blind to systemic shifts in how the rest of the world values real, tangible assets.

Unlike New Zealand’s single-track commitment to the Western legacy fiat matrix, advanced small-state economies like Singapore and Switzerland manage the Western-Eastern geopolitical split with vastly differing strategic foresight.

Instead of treating the Western banking infrastructure as a permanent inevitability, both nations actively play a double game. They maintain critical plumbing connections to New York and London while systematically building a massive institutional hedge in hard assets and Eastern infrastructure.

The strategic maneuvers of Singapore and Switzerland show how they are shielding themselves from the very "walking disaster" scenario facing New Zealand.

Up
1

The BOJ may have cause to question the liquidity of US debt.

Up
2

Why to London and not inside their own country?

Up
0

Trust and liquidity...no need to move physical if you trust the institution where it is secured especially if it is a trading hub.

Up
0

Blimey - I missed the London bit - I simply assumed they had shipped it all into their own juristiction.

The many twists...

(i)  When you look at the track record of "Perfidious Albion" and the Bank of England (BoE), a severe, systemic financial meltdown could absolutely trigger legal, regulatory, or physical mechanisms to freeze or commandeer foreign sovereign gold.

Historically and contemporarily, sovereign gold held in London is never fully safe from the political and financial survival instincts of the British state.

(ii) If a cascading global meltdown threatens the survival of the pound or the London banking system, Parliament can pass an emergency decree within hours. They could enforce a "temporary holiday on physical bullion repatriation" or impose massive exit taxes under the guise of stabilizing global markets. The Dutch would be left holding a piece of paper promising that their gold will be returned once the crisis passes. Historical precedents abound.

The Bank of England functions as an enforcement arm of Western geopolitical policy - if a  sovereign nation's political alignment shifts during a global crisis, its gold reserves can be instantly frozen.

The most glaring modern example is the Bank of England’s treatment of Venezuela's gold. For nearly eight years, London blocked access to 31 tonnes of Venezuelan gold ($4 billion) simply by refusing to recognise the legitimacy of its leadership. Even after a humanitarian crisis following severe earthquakes, the gold was not simply handed back; it was routed through US Treasury control and subjected to strict external political conditions before any release could occur.

The Case of Czechoslovakia (1939) - the infamous 1939 Czech gold scandal. Following the Nazi invasion of Czechoslovakia, the Bank of International Settlements (chaired by a BoE director) instructed the Bank of England to transfer £5.6 million of Czech gold to the account of the German Reichsbank. Despite knowing the gold was being stolen from a sovereign nation, the BoE quietly executed the paper transfer to appease the financial infrastructure of the time.
 

(iii) The most insidious threat in London is not physical confiscation, but the fact that the Dutch gold might only exist as a bookkeeping entry. London operates largely on unallocated gold accounts.

In a systemic meltdown, the sheer volume of "paper gold" claims issued by London bullion banks vastly exceeds the actual physical bars resting in the vaults. If a major bullion bank fails, the pool of physical gold is locked down by bankruptcy courts.

If the Dutch gold was swapped into the London market via paper transactions (as they did with 59 tonnes), they are exposed to counterparty risk. If the institutional clearinghouses default, the Netherlands becomes just another unsecured creditor fighting for physical bars in a bankrupt British legal system. 

(iv)  If the system breaks, "Perfidious Albion" will look out for its own survival first, and the Dutch will learn the hard way that if you do not hold your gold physically in your own vault, it is not truly yours.

(v) Then there is the other theory - IOWs, the Swap Mechanism, where if they only physically shipped about 27 tonnes to their home base in Zeist. For the remaining 59 tonnes, they executed a paper-and-market swap. The transfer was completed by selling gold held in New York and immediately buying gold that meets market standards in London.

This means they actively engaged with the institutional market-makers in London to "wash" the geographic location of their bars, trading one institutional counterparty risk for another.

Some reports conclude that following a complex reshuffle, the Dutch have divided their 612-tonne reserve into three distinct buckets to balance the trade-off between physical sovereignty and market liquidity:

London (BOE)  32.1% - for high velocity trading and emergency liquidity
Holland (Zeist Vault) 30.8% - absolute national sovereignty
New York and Ottawa 18.5% each - residual geographical diversification

From the perspective of a public credit advocate, this move proves that even sovereign central banks are trapped in the private monopoly's sandbox. 

The Dutch didn't bring the gold home because their operational framework assumes that the survival of their currency depends on their ability to interact with the private bullion banks of London, rather than relying purely on their own domestic sovereign credit. 

They chose the wobbly British system purely because it functions as the central clearinghouse for the global financial elite, proving just how deeply entrenched the private monopoly infrastructure remains

Up
0

"Historically and contemporarily, sovereign gold held in London is never fully safe from the political and financial survival instincts of the British state."

But the Dutch have apparently judged their gold is safer there rather than in Trumps US.

Up
2

Fair call TBH. 

Up
0

This is the breakdown, which I mentioned, Frank...

London (BOE)  32.1% - for high velocity trading and emergency liquidity
Holland (Zeist Vault) 30.8% - absolute national sovereignty
New York and Ottawa 18.5% each - residual geographical diversification

Myself, well I wouldn't trust any of them as far as I could kick them. I'm sure there is any amount of fine print ready and waiting for when push comes to shove.
 

Up
1

Ellen Brown weighs in - the planet's leading expert on the workings of "The Public Banking Solution" - AKA banking run as a public utility - or expressed another way, money creation as a credit mechanism, as opposed to being created as a debt instrument by the private monopoly billionaire club.

https://scheerpost.com/2026/09/02/the-sovereign-reset-escaping-the-interest-trap-with-greenbacks/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

The Sovereign Reset: Reclaiming Money as a Public Utility


Introduction

In her recent analysis, "The Sovereign Reset: Escaping the Interest Trap with Greenbacks," Ellen Brown offers a radical departure from mainstream monetary policy, advocating for a return to publicly issued currency.

Brown’s proposal looks through the lens of a vital systemic distinction - treating money creation not as a profit-driven debt instrument controlled by a private monopoly, but as a public utility driven by a credit mechanism. 

By examining the historical precedents and modern mechanics of sovereign public credit, we can understand how "The Public Banking Solution" serves as an essential escape hatch from the compounding interest trap that currently constricts global economies.

The Private Monopoly vs. The Public Utility

At the heart of the modern financial crisis is a fundamental design flaw - the private banking sector holds a virtual monopoly on the creation of the circulating money supply. 

As Ellen notes, the vast majority of money is birthed into existence not by governments, but by private commercial banks when they issue loans.

The core of this systemic failure, is that when money is created as a debt instrument by a private monopoly, it inherently serves the interests of a "billionaire club" rather than the public good. Every dollar created under this model carries an attached burden of interest. 

Because banks create the principal, but never the interest required to pay back the loans, the system requires continuous, infinite growth and perpetual borrowing just to avoid systemic collapse.

In contrast, re-conceptualising banking as a public utility fundamentally alters the calculus of the economy. A public utility does not seek to extract maximum rent from its users - it seeks to facilitate seamless public infrastructure. When money creation shifts to a credit mechanism run by and for the public, the primary goal transitions from private wealth extraction to public wealth generation.

The Greenback Model: Credit as an Infrastructure Tool

Ellen grounds her modern critique in a powerful historical precedent - Abraham Lincoln’s "Greenbacks." Faced with usurious interest rates from private New York banks during the Civil War, Lincoln bypassed the private monopoly entirely. The government printed sovereign fiat currency directly to fund the war effort and infrastructure.

This historical example perfectly illustrates the power of the public credit mechanism

Debt-Free Origination: The money was spent into circulation to pay for real goods, services, and labor, rather than being borrowed into existence with compounding interest hooks.

Productive Capacity Alignment: As long as the newly issued credit matches the productive capacity of the nation (building bridges, funding innovation, or maintaining services), it does not inherently cause hyperinflation. Instead, it acts as a catalyst for real economic growth.

By utilising this model, a sovereign nation effectively treats its currency as an infrastructure network—much like roads or water systems—where the value lies in its usage and utility, not in its scarcity or profitability to a third party.

Escaping the Interest Trap

The most compelling argument in Brown's thesis is the dismantling of the "interest trap." Under the private banking paradigm, public taxpayers are perpetually on the hook to pay interest to private bondholders and institutional lenders. This ensures a massive, upward transfer of wealth from the working class to the financial elite.

By implementing "The Public Banking Solution," this dynamic is inverted:

  1. Recycling Public Funds: Revenues generated by public utilities and taxes are deposited into a publicly owned bank.
  2. Eliminating the Middleman: When the state needs to fund a new hospital or transit system, it borrows from its own public bank at zero or near-zero interest.
  3. Reinvesting Profits: Any nominal interest generated by the public bank returns directly to the public treasury, lowering the overall tax burden on citizens.

This mechanism effectively defangs the private monopoly, transforming banking from an extractive force into a foundational support structure for the real, productive economy.

Conclusion

Ellen Brown’s "The Sovereign Reset" provides a vital roadmap for breaking free from an unsustainable financial paradigm.

The path forward requires an ideological shift: we must strip the private monopoly of its power to issue money as a debt instrument. 

By embracing the Public Banking Solution and treating money creation as a sovereign public credit utility, society can reclaim its financial sovereignty, eradicate the compounding interest trap, and ensure that the economy serves the collective public interest rather than a private billionaire club.

Up
2