
Departure of Governor Adrian Orr from the Reserve Bank may signal that the Official Cash Rate (OCR) now has "less downside" than would otherwise be the case, according to BNZ economists.
Orr left the RBNZ suddenly without explanation last week and a new governor will now be sought. At what turned out to be his last OCR decision media briefing on February 19 Orr strongly suggested the OCR would be cut by 25 basis points at each of the next two reviews on April 9 and May 28. The OCR's currently 3.75%, so, cuts as suggested would take it to 3.25%.
Economists at the country's major banks have proffered views on the departure of Orr, what it might mean and who might replace him.
ASB's economists note that the RBNZ is now "Orrless but not rudderless", while the Kiwibank economics team note "Adrian is out, with an Orr-fully abrupt exit".
BNZ head of research Stephen Toplis says the BNZ economists won’t be changing their rate cut expectations solely on the back of the "current ructions" down at the Reserve Bank, "but we warn strongly that the direction of risk to those forecasts is clearly upward".
Toplis says a potential "deal breaker" is NZ bank capital ratios, with higher ratios introduced by the RBNZ in 2022.
If Banks have to hold more capital, then lending rates will tend to be higher meaning that, all other things being equal, the cash rate needs to be lower to achieve any given lending rate, Toplis says.
"This is where it gets interesting. The current government is currently focussed on growth and sees the RBNZ’s current approach to bank capital as being overly restrictive to lending. Orr and Finance Minister [Nicola] Willis have been battling over this for some time and many speculate that their inability to resolve their differences was a major factor behind Orr’s departure.
"Willis has been 'taking advice on the amount of capital banks hold' and was putting a lot of pressure on Orr to change his mind. When Orr is replaced the RBNZ Board recommends a new Governor to the Minister of Finance who then approves (or not) the candidate. One can only assume the Board would be reluctant to suggest a replacement who had the same views as Orr on banking sector capital requirements.
"So, if the current proposed path of capital raising is moderated then, at face value, monetary conditions would become more stimulatory as lending rates would not be as high as would otherwise be the case, and the quantity of money available for lending would rise. This being the case, the cash rate would not need to fall as much," Toplis said.
Also talking about the capital requirements, ASB chief economist Nick Tuffley, says Orr was a strong proponent for lifting capital requirements "to a much stricter level than international norms".
"That added stability (and reduced economic and social damage from crises) comes at a cost of slower growth, so there is a trade-off to weigh up. Furthermore, the Depositor Compensation Scheme is due to come into effect this year, which would reduce the economic and social costs of any bank failure. The Government, in its Going for Growth agenda, appears set on reducing regulations that are in its view unnecessarily stifling growth and innovation. In the fullness of time we may hear more, but at this point we are merely a fly on the wall in a completely different building."
On a possible replacement for Orr, Tuffley said there are a couple of internal candidates, and several easy external names to reel off, though mainly quite orthodox candidates.
"The context for NZ (and the RBNZ) is an unstable world experiencing some huge shifts," Tuffley says.
"There is a case for the RBNZ Board to recommend someone with global experience and connections that will not only deliver on optimal monetary policy and prudential outcomes but also help burnish NZ’s reputation and connections with the rest of the world."
Tuffley says "someone with global clout would bring new perspectives".
He comments that being Governor of the RBNZ is a tough job.
"You make decisions, in a constant state of uncertainty, that can impact people considerably over the cycle. I hope Adrian gets some time to relax and enjoy some fishing."
Kiwibank's economics team of chief economist Jarrod Kerr, senior economist Mary Jo Vergara and economist Sabrina Delgado say in their weekly review that they were were "fiercely opposed" to many of the RBNZ’s actions in recent years, "from the near implementation of negative rates (which would not have worked), to the over stimulation and then heavy-handed hikes. Too much both ways. We’re moving on."
The economists say no one can deny that it has been an incredibly difficult and unprecedented time for the RBNZ.
"But perhaps the real kicker was the decline in communication and transparency from the Reserve Bank over Orr’s tenure. We look forward to a new governor as an opportunity for the Reserve Bank to improve its communication and transparency. We think it was fair to say the RBNZ was one of the most transparent in the world, and leaders in monetary policy… not today," they say.
The economists say RBNZ Deputy Governor Christian Hawkesby, Acting Governor until the end of the month, "should be in the running for the big role, and is a safe pair of hands".
"When thinking of who might come through as the next Governor a couple of names seem to be floating around the ring. Internally, Hawkesby and Assistant Governor Karen Silk are both seen as options. While externally, Dominick Stephens, who currently serves as the Chief Economic Advisor at the NZ Treasury, as well as John McDermott, the current Executive Director of Motu Economic and Public Policy Research, appear to be likely front runners. All great options."
6 Comments
That's an interesting take on neutral....
From Croaking Cassandra:
I’m not going offer my thoughts on the pros and cons of any of these individuals [i.e. Silk, Hawkesby etc.]. Suffice to repeat that, and especially given the broad role as it is currently specified, there doesn’t seem to be a compelling candidate in any of the lists.
When Orr is replaced the RBNZ Board recommends a new Governor to the Minister of Finance who then approves (or not) the candidate. One can only assume the Board would be reluctant to suggest a replacement who had the same views as Orr on banking sector capital requirements.
Thus removes the cloak of independence and reveals the pressure applied by the government to an entity supposedly independent from them. While I'm sure we all knew there were screws being put to the RBNZ 2020-2022 from the government of the time, the stench and exposure of cronyism is becoming a bit overbearing form the current lot also. The wealthy wish to keep the status quo and push for what benefit them most, the poor get underrepresented, and the middle get squeezed ever-further by the wealthy.
IMO, Fitzgerald is yet another eCONomist, which is precisely what you would expect from someone who spent 9 years working for the City of London-based Bank of England, including a stint as Deputy Governor.
His background explains this utterly delusional comment... "I'm delighted that Adrian's been able to finish on that high.”
Please don't be under the illusion that any of the Western-centric central banks are independent. NZ dances to the tune of the BIS, just like its other 63 member/owner banks, apart from China which runs a public utility CB model. Their entire policy has been very much about financialisation of economies - ie the rentier' system of unearned rent, ruling at the expense of the real economy.
This model drives the productive sector into the clutches of the commercial banks that create more than 90% (usually ~97% of MS) when they create loans out of thin air and subsequently they pay more and more of their income out as unearned rent.
The West lost the industrial capitalism model long ago, as it transitioned insidiously into financial capitalism, where credit is created for the City of London, FIRE (Finance Insurance Real Estate) style economy, shrinking the real economy in the process, and loading the productive sector down with odious debt.
This is where the GDP figures become farcically misleading, and why the more financialised an economy becomes, the more misleading the official GDP numbers are. The FIRE sector garbage should be removed from the numbers altogether so that GDP only reflects the production of real goods and services.
If the FIRE sector was removed from the calculation, depending on how financialised an economy is, that could reduce the gross figure by up to 40-50% in highly financialised economies like the U$ and France, and perhaps around 20-25% in economies like NZ and Australia.
This would have the effect of providing a much more meaningful (read alarming) DEBT:GDP ratio, and explain much more vividly why NZ is technically insolvent, and effectively entering a global debt-death spiral and the demise of ALL fiat currencies.
This was always inevitable after 1971 when all currencies became fiat - the petrodollar scam filled the gap for close to 50 years, but now that too is going up in smoke, as the global system moves into a multipolar reality. IMO, King Dollar will be the last ever national currency that doubles as a power-wielding global reserve currency.
That was likely another reason why Orr chose to flee the system, to move into a lucrative fatcat role and out of the limelight, as the broken global central banking system is exposed as another Emporer with no clothes - ugh... perish that mental image.
Maybe he could be employed by Otago Uni on a massive salaly package alongside Mr Robertson - it's all unravelling as we speak, and King Donald's "move fast and break things" 'policy', as well as declaring a trade war on the entire planet, will undoubtedly hasten the demise of an already broken system.
This could well be King Donald's legacy to humanity - IOW, his #47 regime became a major catalyst in hastening the global financial system's move into a new BRICS/BRI-centric multipolar non-predatory reality - one where all members have a seat at the table with equal voting rights and where there no power of veto.
Trump of course burbles on that he has already single-handedly slain the BRICS dragon, when he has no clue of who the member nations are, let alone that on a population basis, ~90% of the planet desperately wants to join up.
There is an entire manifold list of reasons for CB govs to be jumping ship - I expect there to be many more by year's end - just wait until the planned Great Taking becomes exposed and the pitchforks come out.
Regards
Col
Agreed.
Loading a burden of ever greater debt only works with the promise of future greater individual wealth for the risk. Is it a promise or a con... Momentum is maintained as each successive asset buyer/debt slave generation steps up. Surges in inflation help in shrouding the truth to maintain the game. Eventually balance is lost, usually as a period of stagnation destabilizes the game and the con is up. At that point the shroud is pulled, leaving those groaning under the weight of impossible bank debt no options but to implode.
rentier' system of unearned rent, ruling at the expense of the real economy.
The real kicker is the fact that central banks are not as omnipotent as implied...and why would they be in a world of 8 billion conflicting needs/opinions
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.