sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

US mortgage applications fall sharply; Japanese machinery orders drop; Thailand cuts rate; Indian exports lame; British inflation drops; UST 10yr 4.01%; gold up and oil down, NZ$1 = 60.6 USc; TWI = 69.2

Economy / news
US mortgage applications fall sharply; Japanese machinery orders drop; Thailand cuts rate; Indian exports lame; British inflation drops; UST 10yr 4.01%; gold up and oil down, NZ$1 = 60.6 USc; TWI = 69.2

Here's our summary of key economic events overnight that affect New Zealand with economic data is light today and we await signals from the building Wall Street earnings season. Markets seem positive about what is ahead.

Meanwhile in the US, mortgage applications fell very sharply last week from the prior week, down -17% and the most in nine years (excluding the pandemic). And that was on top of the more than -5% drop last week. The reason is that benchmark mortgage interest rates have been rising for three weeks and are now at a 2 month high of 6.52% for the standard 30 year mortgage.

Canadian housing starts came in at a 224,000 annual rate in September, 18,806 for the month, less than expected but more than in August.

Japanese machinery orders, excluding those for ships and electric power companies, fell -3.4% in the year to August from the same period a year ago. This is a large miss because they were expected to rise +3.6% on that same basis. It was the fifth drop so far this year. Orders for those excluded items (ships and electric power companies) were quite good however, mitigating the fall.

The Bank of Thailand unexpectedly cut its key interest rate by -25 bps to 2.25% during its October meeting late yesterday, marking the first rate cut since early 2020. It was a move long advocated by the government but it was still not expected. They have a sluggish economy and inflation is now below the lower end of its target range of between 1% to 3%.

Indian exports remained quite lackluster in September at US$34.6 bln and virtually unchanged from a year ago. India is no export powerhouse yet. Imports were US$55.4 bln, so they ran yet another trade deficit and they have been doing that now since 1997 (with one exception in one month in the 2020 pandemic).

British CPI inflation fell to 1.7% in September, its lowest level since April 2021. It was down from 2.2% in August. But much of this sharply lower level came from sharply lower airline ticket prices, something that may be a bit of a one-off.

In Australia, they reported an unusually low birth rate yesterday, with a record low fertility rate. (But it is similar to New Zealand's.) High housing costs are getting the blame.

The UST 10yr yield is now at just on 4.01% and down -3 bps from yesterday. The key 2-10 yield curve is positive, but tightened to +7 bps. Their 1-5 curve inversion is still inverted by -34 bps. And their 3 mth-10yr curve inversion little-changed at -78 bps. The Australian 10 year bond yield starts today at 4.23% and down -3 bps. The China 10 year bond rate is at 2.14% and dipping -1 bp. The NZ Government 10 year bond rate is just under 4.43%, down -2 bps from this time yesterday.

Wall Street has started today with the S&P500 up +0.4% in Wednesday trade. Overnight, European markets were mixed with London up +1.0% and Paris at the other end down -0.4%. Tokyo was down -1.8% yesterday. Hong Kong fell -0.2%. And Shanghai was up a minor +0.1%. Singapore was down -0.1%. The ASX200 ended its Wednesday session down -0.4% and the NZX50 fell a rather sharp -1.6% on the day with a building afternoon slump.

The price of gold will start today at US$2670/oz and up +US$9 from this time yesterday - and a new all-time high.

Oil prices are holding lower at just on US$70.50/bbl in the US while the international Brent price is still just under US$74.50/bbl.

The Kiwi dollar starts today at 60.6 USc and down -20 bps from this time yesterday. Against the Aussie we are up +20 bps at 90.9 AUc. Against the euro we have dipped -10 bps to 55.7 euro cents. That all means our TWI-5 starts today now just under 69.2, and marginally lower that at yesterday at this time.

The bitcoin price starts today at US$67,639 and up another +0.9% from this time yesterday. Volatility over the past 24 hours has been modest at under +/- 1.7%.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: CoinDesk

The easiest place to stay up with event risk is by following our Economic Calendar here ».

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

61 Comments

The world adjusts to a new price level about 25% higher than 2019 while our PM brags that the mighty NZ Govt has tamed inflation.

At some point the media might start asking Govt why our inflation has just fallen with everyone else's, while our unemployment has risen so much more. Across the whole OECD, only Luxembourg and Estonia are stuffing this up worse than us, and we will probably move above Luxembourg in a month or so. 

Up
28

Friends son has been called into company wide meeting today. Sales are down and redundancies coming before Xmas. 

Up
10

"The world adjusts to a new price level about 25% higher than 2019..."

So this time, it's all gone according to plan. The GFC support measures failed to launch. But the Covid experience allowed massive non-productive Private Debt to be created to get the spiral of price rises, wage rises, and most importantly, asset price rises going again. Trouble is ....there are too many mouths to feed this time. Not enough jobs; in fact less....everywhere. Nature is doing its bit - birth rates plunging across the 'developed' World - but it won't be enough to balance the equation. We know what will. The time-honoured solution to extinguishing too much Debt. Destroy both the borrower and the lender - War.

Up
16

War? Given technologies developed, WMDs etc a full scale global war could only produce a pyrrhic solution.

Up
0

This website is infested with doomsday obsessed commenters. I guess it is a common human flaw, prevalent since the beginning of civilization, possibly earlier.

Up
5

Not to worry! Lots of experts are seeing the light now. Once we get this property speculation gene eradicated from our economy, the future is actually quite rosy.

"A residential portfolio investment as a quick and easy way to make money ... the foundations of that will have been shaken....New Zealanders were starting to realise that the country was not as wealthy or well-off as it might have thought previously. Infrastructure issues particularly highlighted ...“There’s a hell of a lot of work that should be done, or we want to see done, and we don’t know who or how to pay for that."

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/economists-warn-of-lasting-economic…

Up
13

A lot of people seem to want a CGT, and they are concerned about housing unaffordability at the same time. 

So how about introducing a CGT, but only on houses, including the primary residence?

This would stop over-investment in a non-productive asset class and free up capital for investment in more productive assets.  It would also constrain house price inflation.

Up
4

Just as a matter of interest if a household at the present time has owned their home for say 35 years, then on its sale from what date would the calculation start for a CGT and how would the cost of improvements undertaken, say adding a bedroom & ensuite, be considered.

Up
2

Pfft. Details. Where's your vision?

Up
3

i reckon theres also a fair few of the best landlords in the country who only want to provide housing for common folk, cheering on rates reductions so they can afford to recarpet another rental

Pity they think you can eat a house

Up
3

I guess it is a common human flaw, prevalent since the beginning of civilization, possibly earlier.

We have in built fear mechanisms. Works good when your issue is immediate, like for a predator. Problematic when trying to evaluate more complex or longer duration problems.

Up
4

Not sure about that but apparently loads here from the next generation that are "Being screwed over" just imagine how really screwed over they are going to be when they get asked to report for active duty in a worldwide conflict.

Up
0

Look at history Foxy. It is always the politicians who start the wars regardless of their personal history and claims of higher intellect. They virtually always believe that somehow their status will make them immune from the consequences. Just as those who become 'peaceniks' and insist on believing that no weapons and non-aggression will protect them from an aggressor. Deterrence is the only approach that has proven effective at avoiding war.

MAD is almost the only way to force rabid opponents to talk.

Up
2

Aye as history evidences deterrence is all important. At present Secretary of Defence Austin is playing a strong hand and effectively. However should Trump return then his tenure would be far from certain and so too then the continuing commitment to deterrence. 

Up
0

Because labour stuffed it up. Orr wanted a recession labour’s spending made it harder achieve, Nationals cost cutting effectively helped us get on with it as Orr was getting his recession no matter what. 

Up
5

National's cost-cutting sustained inflation. Like, literally, they increased prices that drove the CPI and cost of living up. The CPI yesterday would have been 1.8% instead of 2.2% if Govt hadn't increased prescription charges.  

Up
9

"The CPI yesterday would have been 1.8% instead of 2.2% if Govt hadn't increased prescription charges. "

I call Bollocks on that one

Are you saying the Govt needs to step up and shelter us from inflation?

Up
4

It's mathematically correct. The reintroduction of prescription charges added 0.401 basis points to the annual CPI. The early education savings took away -0.139.

Inflation isn't some spirit waiting to pounce on an economy - it is the weighted price of stuff. The Govt can absolutely impact on that. A big investment in hydro, for example, or a subsidised public transport service. Or, a hike of GST in 2010. Etc etc.

Up
8

Intuitively it doesnt feel accurate that somehow something pitiful like prescription charges appear to such an impact on the dial .. while Council rates (for example) barely appears to nudge it

 

 

Up
6

Yes, the wonders of CPI.

Property rates and services are 3.23% of the CPI basket and they went up 12% in the year to June 2024.

Medical products, appliances and equipment are only 0.19% of the basket but they went up 211%.

 

 

Up
7

Fair enough, although a 211% seems fairly unlikely rise across a broad category

Personally our rates went up around 16% but i understand Auckland rises were closer to 8%

Up
1

this govt should be thanking Chemist warehouse for not passing on the $5 fee given their turnover

Up
7

Jfoes view brings to mind goodharts law. ( the idea that when "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure" )

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law

Up
4

yes! don't get me started on GDP, or, even worse, labour productivity.

Up
3

There is something wrong with that math. Also the childcare changes dropped inflation by lowering the cost of childcare. Scrapping the Auckland fuel tax lowered fuel cost. 

Up
0

The childcare subsidies reduced CPI by 0.139. The presciption charges added 0.401. Local Govt Rates added 0.388. Fuel costs chopped 0.292 off. Vehicle price reductions took away 0.312! Have a look at the detail for non-tradables here... 

Up
12

Stop with your facts Jfoe, it makes the Labour=bad, Coalition=good and vice-versa look silly. 

Up
12

Jokes on you

They're both silly.

Up
7

.

Up
1

Here we go again. Listen to yourselves. Right vs Left, he said she said. It’s not working. It never has. You all get yourselves into a lather with a mass debate for 3-6 years before the other team gets another go. And on and on it has gone. It’s actually embarrassing that we put up with it. Very little is achieved, and what does get done, is never done properly.
 

Time to wipe the slate clean and begin a new system, and it just so happens I have the new system locked and loaded, safety off. Abolish central government. Create 4 states for NZ and each state take care of itself. 

Thoughts?

 

Up
6

Do we still have red team vs blue team vying for control over the states?

Up
3

No. Just a very small federal team (let’s be honest, I could do it by myself) overseeing operations and dealing with the international crap.

Up
5

Hopefully that doesn't mean that we'd get Wellington politicians applying for the mid-central state. I can't think of any I respect.

Up
0

Luxon has tamed wasteful government spending all funded by borrowing. 

Up
4

Now all we have to do is tame wasteful household spending enabled by the creation of more Private Debt? Government spending is not actually the problem. Debt in itself isn't the problem - it's what we use it for; asset speculation rather than productive endeavour, that is.

Up
12

You know you can just look the numbers up? This Govt has tried to wrestle spending down, but they have ended up spending more than the budget Labour set. The operating balance at year end (June 24) was -3.1% of GDP compared to the -2.7% of GDP in the pre-election forecast. That's what happens when you blunder around cutting stuff - your tax take tanks, welfare spending spirals, and you end up running bigger deficits than the last lot! Watch what happens this year - these fools are just getting started.

Up
20

"Watch what happens this year - these fools are just getting started" 

Excellent news

Up
5

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

Up
12

"they have ended up spending more than the budget Labour set"

Yes and Labour would have stuck to a budget!! Most definitely

Labour's policys were a whole of promises that werent funded ... Ah if only Grant had being voted in to sort out his own shambles

So Im confused, you go on about deficit spending as the path to riches and now you appear to want the Govt to cut spending harder?

Doesnt look you can make up your mind

Up
2

Lol, Govt should absolutely be deficit spending on things we need to live better lives. Look what Key and English did in their Dec 2008 budget - they purposefully invested in the economy into the downturn. Not enough I would argue, but it helped.

This Govt is giving tax breaks to rich folks and setting up stupid private finance deals that will take 1 - 2 years to negotiate and increase the flow of our financial assets offshore. They are absolutely clueless. 

The red lot wouldn't have done much different, no, neither of our main political parties have a credible economic strategy.

Up
12

Totally agree the tax breaks were a ridiculous election bribe based on nothing but ideology

But you will never get consensus over exactly what " things we need to live better lives" should entail and where it ends

Its pretty clear we have an ongoing spending problem beyond our means which is fast becoming a next generation hospital pass

 

 

Up
5

But you will never get consensus over exactly what " things we need to live better lives" should entail and where it ends

Or how it's funded.

Presumably you'd need some investments that are fiscally net positive to compensate for ones that are expenditure with no method of recovering funds.

Unless there's a new way a state can just keep spending without the chance of going bust. We should tell the Sri Lankans and Argentinians.

Up
4

We have an under-investment problem because Govt is not performing its most basic role adequately. NZ ran like 4 budget surpluses in its first 100 years of Govt. Why? Because we were building for expansion and to make sure that the needs of our people were met in teh present and the future. Did the world end?  

Up
3

I sure hope you're acting as an economic policy advisor for a political party.

It's too much work for no reward so I won't ask you to do it, but I wouldn't mind seeing your election manifesto.

Up
4

This Govt is giving tax breaks to rich folks and setting up stupid private finance deals that will take 1 - 2 years to negotiate and increase the flow of our financial assets offshore. They are absolutely clueless.

Yep.  This is what happens when you have a media fixated on interest rates.  Not even able to call out the PM's answer of "you don't tax your way out of a recession" when asked about a CG tax.  That was not and never has been the point of the CG tax, but no, media (1news - forgive me I am staying with Mum) unable to call out his pathetic deflection and put it on air.  Watch 1News at Six S2024E290 | TVNZ+ about 13min or 14min mark

 

Up
7

"If we're going to criticise people for being successful, let's be clear - I'm wealthy." - Chris Luxon

Up
2

And across the board they have universally disrespected and diminished every frontline government employee from health workers, police, fire Corrections and so on.

Up
14

i cant believe you are getting upvotes for this comment

What happened to NZers?

Up
2

What? You don't think health care workers, police, corrections staff, teachers and so on should get decent pay and conditions? Many of those choose not to be a member of a union (the unions are not worth the oxygen they consume) and are on IEAs and usually don't get to bargain for their pay and conditions. They are taken advantage of because of that.

Please explain yourself?

Up
4

Ah Murray, i think you are putting words into my mouth.

I think a statement of how every govt employee has somehow been  "universally disrespected & diminished"  is one that might need a bit of explanation.

However, you might be right - given the pain working its way through the private sector, perhaps they should put some value on actually having a job

Up
1

My comment was referring to yours about not believing I'd get upticks.

The frontline workers of the government are all in essential roles that can't or should not be privatised. the current government's demand for government departments to save money and return millions to the government has had a dramatic impact on the frontlines in every area. The net impact has diminished the value and demonstrated a fundamental disrespect to the people who do those functions. 

Don't mistake me, I agree that there are far too many people employed in third, fourth etc line positions at national (and regional) offices that contribute very little if anything to delivering the services those departments are established for. But clearly the government was neither specific enough nor cognisant enough of how the respective leaderships would dig in to preserve their empires.

And a lot of the pain they have cause will naturally flow out to the private sector. In many respects they have pulled the plug on a lot of wages and therefore spending in the economy, even if it is in the first instance driven by government spending.

Up
8

Some of the rise in unemployment to due the the Goverment axing some of the excess baggage in the public sector which was created by Labour over their 6 year term.

Up
0

Again, you know you can just look the numbers up? It's the private sector jobs that are disappearing. Good grief.

Up
17

Labour just bought PSA roles up to long-term averages - as a percentage of the population. However, that's not to say we don't have too many Departments of Funny Walks. I'd like to see a few of the business, sports, culture and arts, and picking winners related ministries wound up. Govt should concentrate on core services and fund them properly.

Up
0

25% higher than 2019 is only about 4.5% a year.

Up
0

All good,fuel prices flow through to all the economy they say when prices are rising,so expect to see a rapid decrease in everything as lower fuel costs "flow through"...(sarc)

Up
3

Just what Orr wanted, remember he said unemployment had to go up. He is a absolute disgrace, printed money like no tomorrow and then those less informed and educated borrowed that money, Labour included, and then he shifted the blame on those people and said you have to lose your jobs to pay for it. No Moral's at all.

Up
1

'High housing costs are getting the blame.'

Not tonight dear; the neighbours just sold for 4 mill...

Up
8

To follow up the link above:

"House prices blamed for Australia’s lowest birth rate on record"...and have been blamed for a collapse in the number of babies born across Australia as the nation's fertility rate tumbled to its lowest level since the early days of European settlement. "

Up
8

The classic order of events is 

  1. get married
  2. get a house
  3. get some kids

Given people can expect to be in the 40s before they get a house it's no surprise birth rates are plummeting.

Bring on net zero immigration and falling house prices.

Up
14