sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

US data positive; eyes on BofJ; China FDI terrible; steel rebar dives; EU GDP growth up; eyes on Aussie CPI; UST 10yr 4.14%; gold up and oil down; NZ$1 = 59 USc; TWI-5 = 68.1

Economy / news
US data positive; eyes on BofJ; China FDI terrible; steel rebar dives; EU GDP growth up; eyes on Aussie CPI; UST 10yr 4.14%; gold up and oil down; NZ$1 = 59 USc; TWI-5 = 68.1

Here's our summary of key economic events overnight that affect New Zealand with news the Bank of Japan will grab the headlines later today.

But first up today, there was another dairy auction event overnight, the shorter Pulse event of SMP and WMP only. This one delivered results very little-changed from the prior event last week, essentially locking in those earlier price dips.

In the US retail sales at physical stores rose +4.5% last week from a year ago, the smallest rise since late March. But at least it is still well better than inflation.

Meanwhile, job openings in June were little-changed from the prior month - but that is better than it sounds because May was revised higher. Both levels are better than analysts had expected. And their quit rate fell to its lowest since November 2020.

Remember, we get the July non-farm payrolls data on Saturday (NZT) this week and markets now expect a +175,000 gain. There is nothing in the JOLTS data to suggest this is at risk - if anything perhaps an upside chance.

Perhaps supporting that is that the widely-watched Conference Board survey of consumer sentiment rose in July and by more than expected. However, this survey shows that consumers are less upbeat about the present than they are about the future. Election jitters are at play now. (But despite the overall gains, the levels in this survey are still quite low.)

And there was a follow-up from the US oil patch. The Dallas Fed services sector survey came in much less negative in July than June, and much less negative than their factory survey.

Later today we will get the Bank of Japan monetary policy decisions. Most analysts see them holding with a +0.1% policy rate. But a growing cohort see a rise to +0.25% today as wages and inflation rise there. Also of interest is what they do with their bond buying program. It would not be a surprise if they signal they will be reducing it from about NZ$65 bln per month to about half that.

And now we can report the June foreign direct investment data for China. And no wonder they held it back. It was terrible. They attracted only a net +¥1.6 mln in the June month from May. That is their worst level almost ever. In June 2023 it was a worryingly low +¥13.6 bln. In June 2022 it was ¥24.2 bln. In NZD the June inflow was virtually nothing - NZ$350,000 ! Even for New Zealand that would be very low. For the second largest economy in the world, it is a stunningly negative result. Beijing will be worried that these flows have dried up. Now their worry is that a net outflow by foreign investors beckons.

We have noted this recently, but it is worth updating again. The fall in Chinese steel rebar prices is turning into a rout with sharp daily drops now. They are now at eight-year lows. It is hard to know where tis will end.

In Europe, their Q2-2024 GDP expansion came in low again, but a +0.7% gain from the same period a year ago, similar to Q1-2024 but slightly better than expected. Expansions in Spain and France drove this result, but it was lagging in Germany.

Meanwhile German CPI inflation rose a very modest 2.3% in July (2.6% on an EU harmonised basis). This was little-changed from June.

In Australia, they are waiting for the Q2-2024 CPI data to be released later today (1:30 pm NZT). Markets expect that to come in at 3.8% and up from 3.6% in Q1. And they will release the June month inflation indicator at the same time where a 3.8% rate is expected, down from 4.0% in May. This data will go a long way to setting the RBA stance expectations for their Tuesday, August 6 MPS review.

Meanwhile, Australian building consent levels for June came in weak, led by low apartment and townhouse construction intentions. In fact, the levels for these dwellings that are not stand-alone houses are now down at levels last seen in 2011. Over the past 12 months, there have been a total of 162,892 dwellings approved, compared to 177,936 in the 12 months prior, representing a -8.5% decrease. This is the lowest number of dwellings approved on a June year basis since 2011/12.

The UST 10yr yield is now at just on 4.14% and down another -3 bps from yesterday. The key 2-10 yield curve inversion is still at -21 bps. Their 1-5 curve is still at -76 bps. But their 3 mth-10yr curve inversion is a little deeper at -124 bps. The Australian 10 year bond yield starts today at just under 4.29% and down -2 bps. The China 10 year bond rate is holding at its lows at 2.15%. The NZ Government 10 year bond rate is now just over 4.43%, and up +4 bps from yesterday.

Wall Street in Tuesday trade on the S&P500 is down -0.6%. Overnight European markets were mixed between a -0.2% dip in London and a +0.5% rise in Frankfurt. Yesterday Tokyo ended its Tuesday trade up a minor +0.1%. Hong Kong fell -1.4%. And Shanghai fell -0.4. Singapore dipped -0.1%. The ASX200 fell -0.5% but the NZX50 rose +0.6% and the best of the markets we follow.

The price of gold will start today up +US$28 from yesterday at US$2406/oz.

Oil prices are almost -US$1 lower at just over US$74.50/bbl in the US while the international Brent price is just under US$78.50/bbl.

The Kiwi dollar starts today +20 bps firmer at just on 59 USc. Against the Aussie we are +40 bps higher at 90.2 AUc. Against the euro we are up +30 bps at 54.6 euro cents. That all means our TWI-5 starts today at 68.1 and up +30 bps from yesterday.

The bitcoin price starts today at US$65,882 and down -US$1046 or -1.6% from this time yesterday. Volatility over the past 24 hours has been modest, at +/- 1.5%.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
End of day UTC
Source: CoinDesk

The easiest place to stay up with event risk is by following our Economic Calendar here ».

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

59 Comments

That Chinese investment flow turnaround is stunning,   its obvious that people are trying to diversify supply chains away from them.   Not sure how this impacts NZ Trade flows, but I imagine they may struggle to grow.  I assume some growth to whoever is currently benefiting from the missing China flow, if anyone is here.

Up
6

Terrible, I tell 'ee.

Worrying...

Don't worry though, the antidote is to keep 'consumers' in the dark, then survey them;

Call it concrete data, and away we go. 

Up
2

I think it dispels a few myths about China:

  1. They don't fudge their data. If they did, now would have been the time to do so.
  2. They didn't deliberately create Covid. Or if they did, it really backfired on them. 

 

Up
4

They could have created COVID, but not release it intentionally.

Up
8

True, I misworded that.

Up
1

1. They don't fudge their data, the USA fudges their data. You only need to see the scale and how they do things to realise this. Their success is in full view for anyone who wants to see it.

2. They did create Covid, the only question is how did it get out ?

Up
2

Covid - Very slack safety standards.   Chinese biolabs have a history of lax safety and virus escape.

Up
3

What exactly do you mean when you say 'they created Covid'?

Up
0

It was engineered in a lab. That came out just weeks after it started to spread. There is no direct link for it in nature, they made it in the Wuhan lab, what do you think they are doing there ? baking cookies ?

Up
0

They all fudge their data (including us), just in different ways.

Up
0

They do fudge their data - and everything else when it suits them - remember Tianamin square massacre didnt happen

So todays drivers of info are what?

Up
5

"We spent hours talking about Hong Kong’s 16 percent tax rate, business-friendly regulatory environment, lack of state subsidies, tariff-free trade relations with the rest of the world and other policies he promoted while Financial Secretary. Of all the policies that we discussed, one stands out in my mind — if for no other reason than because it is so thoroughly counterintuitive. I asked him to name the one reform that he was most proud of. “I abolished the collection of statistics,” he replied. Sir John believed that statistics are dangerous, because they enable social engineers of all stripes to justify state intervention in the economy."

https://32d4fe53ef.nxcli.io/47447_sir-john-cowperthwaite-personal-tribu…

Up
1

Well hopefully China are happy aligning with Russia, seems to be working out nicely for them? 

Up
11

I wonder which market is more lucrative, Russia, or most everyone else.

Up
7

I suspect it is not about the market but rather what is in it for the CCP (Xi) and Putin.

they'l be feeding each others egos and aspirations for absolute power.

Up
1

Absolute power cannot be shared. What’s in it for the former is the more telling though isn’t it. Russia through its expedition into Ukraine, and the resultant sanctions imposed on Russia, any way you look at it p, has been weakened, militarily,  economically, socially and has now a burgeoning dependence on Chinese support. The two nations have not always been on good terms. China is becoming more and more the dominant partner. As such the “partnership” is well out of balance. Things and matters that are out of balance have a tendency to fall over.

Up
4

Don't disagree, but "absolute power" is always defined within limits. In this case their own back yards. Their partnership is one of expediency. Russia has always considered China to be a threat and vice versa, and in this case they are keeping their enemies closest. But i think you are more right, in that Xi may be playing a complex hand with his eyes on Siberia if Russia weakens sufficiently. Lots of resources there, and if you can handle the winters, possibly more accessible and less 'public' than the South China Sea.

Up
2

Appreciate I tend to dwell on history but the recent “agreement” between the two resonates remarkably well with the sort of deal accomplished by Ribbentrop & Molotov, the Non Aggression Pact, and  designed by the former to cover their backs and to facilitate this, half of Poland was part of  the prize along with purchasing of, and providing  transit, for all the needs of a war machine. 

Up
0

Putin is fairly short of friends, and this gives the Chinese additional leverage over him.

He's also a good distraction.

Up
0

They have certainly taken a wrong turn, in many respects. I guess they see it as the best turn strategically- not sure about that!

Yet the West has aligned itself with some pretty dodgy regimes too, both in past and present 

Up
1

Aligned? 

In many cases, it orchestrated them.

Pigeons often come home to roost - we fondly imagine the rest of the world sees us as we do, but we ignore what we ride upon. And otherise others, as everyone does. There be dragons.....

Up
3

Exactly. I have certainly demonstrated western arrogance and hypocrisy in my past,  I hope my views have moderated and become more fair and balanced 

Up
2

Encapsulated by an old one that still stands perhaps. “He may be a son of a bitch but he’s our son of a bitch.”

Up
4

You'd have to be fairly optimistic to think the West will fall gracefully from the #1 spot to #2.

In India, there's whole palaces and temples with walls and ceilings full of empty holes, where gold and jewels used to be. Systematically chiselled out by the poms.

Up
6

What about once the West has been taken over by the East from within?  You don't need to invade a country when it invites you in and allows you to vote.

Up
6

The comments thus far on China's FDI made me chuckle. No understanding of the 'why'. Nor of 'what' the current and future implications are. "I keep six honest, serving men; they taught me all I know ..."

Up
0

Make sure to restrict your comments to opinions on others, while keeping the answers to yourself, oh tortured genius.

Up
7

not sure if you have read their trade numbers yet, 99Bln surplus, almost highest ever. If the west, by the west I meant US, are diverting their supply chains away from China, why would you see those trade numbers as is?  

the reality is, China is having too much capital already, and desperately need to export those capital, not taken in more.  

Up
0

David, I think you have interpreted the wrong data or maybe calculation mistake. No wonder I have not seen such date making a big international noise. Please see link below: A net increase of 86 billion Yuan which is 20 billian NZD

The link you sent was Jan to June total of 498 billion https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/xwfb/sjfzrfb/art/2024/art_de077e9f8ff54ad68ee90d09b5cc05cb.html and the Jan-May release shows 412 billion https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202406/content_6958803.htm an net increase of 86 billion Chinese Yuan in June. 

Up
1

Yes, the link to China's data only shows year-to-date. They never isolate the month's result. We derived it simply subtracting YTD May from YTD June. Here is a link to a chart of the ytd data. You can easily see that the change for June was tiny from May. Click on the 5Y tab to get a fuller perspective. (But note this chart is mislabeled as USD; it isn't, it is yuan which you can confirm from the MofCom press release.)

Up
2

I c how you get there Thanks

Up
1

Based on our much-improved empirical model, we show, with greater power than previously, that FDI has no significant positive effect on economic growth.  Link

Up
2

Extremely telling clip of how the US sees its "allies", which I am sure will go down well with the Dutch... This is Eric Schmidt (former CEO of Google and currently on an advisory board for the Department of Defense) congratulating Alan F. Estevez (U.S. Under Secretary of Industry and Security), telling him the "genius of your strategy [to ban semiconductors to China] is that you found a monopoly that exists in one company in the world that we had control over, which is ASML" ASML is a Dutch company... Link

Up
4

I see Rex airlines in Australia has gone into administration. I have a couple of Aussie clients based out in the more remote areas of NSW who use their service regularly to travel to Sydney (as the alternative is hours of driving. I recall once flying from Chch to Sydney and catching the train out west to Penrith where their warehouse is based in less time than it took them to drive from some rural NSW where they actually have the HQ. I was at the office waiting with a tray of takeaway coffees before they arrived).

It seems like trying to take on the bigger airlines on main routes using jets - as opposed to sticking to their knitting of flying regional routes or regional to main centres using smaller aircraft - may have been a contributing factor. 

Up
2

Accurate assessment I would think. It’s all about market share. Competitors can reasonably comfortably share the market provided that each share stays more or less pro rata to their capacities. Another entrant capsizes the arrangement and usually invites a price war. Same sort of thing for instance in the NZ  meat industry when Fortex outgrew itself and got stamped on by the big processors.

Up
1

Funny thing about airlines, they don't seem to be able to collaborate to support each other while keeping it affordable for their customers. Air NZ is just as bad. They don't provide much service, if any to many regional towns and cities, but don't seem to want to tolerate some upstart to do it. An example being AirNZ would rather people from Whanganui spend an hour driving to Palmy to use their service from there, than fly Air Chathams from Whanganui. Stupid big city mentality imposed on the regions.

Up
1

Politicians point finger at Qantas over regional carrier Rex Airlines' troubles

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-07-30/lambie-mckenzie-aim-at-qantas-ov…

 

Up
2

Sagely advice from the Desert 

https://youtu.be/1YblZUCzabQ?si=96AYPq21uxfklVES

Up
2

Tight Monetary Policy until late '26? Looks about right.

 

Up
1

Is that you Pa1nter?

Congratulation's to the first NZ first gold of the games - awesome Wahine in form under pressure.

Up
0

Only on weekends and random Tuesdays.

Nah, Hugh's an ex fund manager. The guys from The Big Short got a lot of profile, but he was one of the only other people to predict and monetise the GFC.

Up
6

"Sagely advice from the Desert"

I watched the video, but I'm still puzzled as to what the advice is ?

Up
0

'tis mostly highlighting risks.

Up
0

Meanwhile German CPI inflation rose a very modest 2.3% in July (2.6% on an EU harmonised basis). This was little-changed from June.

Good morning from #Italy, where growth deteriorated slightly in Q2. Real GDP growth eased to 0.2% QoQ, down from 0.3% in 1Q. Net exports acted as a drag. Private investments slowed following the expiry of superbonus (tax incentives for housing renovations that have boosted residential spending in recent years). Consumer spending may have expanded at a similar pace as in 1Q. Despite the slowdown, Italy has grown significantly faster than #Germany, which shrank at 0.1% in Q2. Italy has outperformed Germany in terms of economic growth in 4 consecutive quarters. Link

Up
0

When things are turning to shit, the best option is to try and compromise 

Up
0

I wonder if the CCP really is worried about the pitifully low levels of foreign investment?

Up
2

Calculation mistake by David lol, the CPP will not release a net 350,000 NZD, that's humiliation for sure

Up
1

"Microsoft plunges as Big Tech sell-off deepens... Shares in the company fell by more than 7pc in after-hours trading, wiping more than $200bn off the company’s value "

That's what happens when revaluations happen. That US$200,000,000,000 was never real, unless those who owned the shares had borrowed or spent against the market valuation. Hmmm.....sounds familiar....

Up
5

Lol... its a mess at the mo. All big tech seems to have been riding the AI wave and investors valuing businesses with a heavy AI focus at multiples of their real valuation.

Now we realise that not only is AI not really delivering much but that the real valuations were already high in a downturn.

Tesla, MS, NVIDIA etc may lead a massive drop in the share market and that will  spill over to the wider markets for sure 

Up
2

The S&P 500's value has been greatly propped up by these entities.

In the 1920s, private individuals were suckered in by advertisements in the paper declaring big returns, only to get wiped out.

In the 2020s, it's sharesies and Robinhood.

Up
3

MSTR heads above those tech stocks...

Up
0

I don't think you can upload images here, but this meme from Reddit just about sums it up:

https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Ftmjm4zfqwied…

Up
1

Its real if you sold at the top, went short at the top, hedged or took a put position.

Paper wealth is real and needs to be protected by trailing stop loss or hedging.

Up
1

Not sure if this was raised, Air nz has reversed its 2030 carbon targets... pollies will take the train in protest /sarc

Up
0

OK. But they still have a 2050 target?

Yes. However, a 2050 target and no 2030 target is classic greenwashing. It’s like wanting to fly to the other side of the world and scrapping the midway refueling stop. Don’t worry, they’re deeply committed to reaching their final destination, because they said so. Even though it’s impossible without that crucial checkpoint along the way. Earth’s temperature doesn’t respond to strategies, it responds to meaningful climate action. Those setting 2050 targets without a 2030 target won’t be around professionally or politically to dance the accountability waltz. Following through on your commitment matters, especially on a planet that had its hottest day on record last week.  

Up
1

Morning David, I think you have interpreted the wrong data or maybe calculation mistake. No wonder I have not seen such date making a big international noise. Please see link below: A net increase of 86 billion Yuan which is 20 billian NZD

The link you sent was Jan to June total of 498 billion https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/xwfb/sjfzrfb/art/2024/art_de077e9f8ff54ad68ee90d09b5cc05cb.html and the Jan-May release shows 412 billion https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202406/content_6958803.htm an net increase of 86 billion Chinese Yuan in June. 

Up
0

see my response to this above. I am pointing out the one month result. MofCom only ever refers to the YTD result. Check the data link I provided above. 

Up
2

Cheers! Got it

 

Up
1