sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Dairy prices slip; US retail mixed but industrial production up; China's wealthy leaving; EU sentiment better; NZ ranked for creative thinking & competitiveness; UST 10yr 4.22%; gold and oil up; NZ$1 = 61.5 USc; TWI-5 = 70.9

Economy / news
Dairy prices slip; US retail mixed but industrial production up; China's wealthy leaving; EU sentiment better; NZ ranked for creative thinking & competitiveness; UST 10yr 4.22%; gold and oil up; NZ$1 = 61.5 USc; TWI-5 = 70.9

Here's our summary of key economic events overnight that affect New Zealand with news expectations for a rate cut any time soon in Australia have faded significantly after the RBA's MPS yesterday.

But first, the overnight dairy auction brought slightly lower prices overall, down -0.5% although they were unchanged in NZD terms. WMP was sold in to weakish demand and ended down -2.5%. SMP fared better, rising a minor +0.7%. But the star of the show was demand for butter, up +6.2% to a new all-time record high in both USD and NZD. Volumes offered and sold at this event were quite low at 16,800 tonnes; in fact a four year low.

Moving on, in the US last week's retail sales at physical stores rose to be up +5.9% from year-ago levels, a rise from the prior week. But that was overshadowed by the May official retail sales data that was only up +2.3% from a year ago, up only +0.1% from April. And if it wasn't for good car sales it would have been less.

On the other hand, US industrial production rose more than expected in May, up +0.9% from April to end two months of weaker results.

US business inventory levels were reported for April, and while they rose slightly, they actually fell in relation to current sales to remain at unconcerning levels.

Today's relatively small but still well supported US Treasury 20 year bond auction brought a lower median yield, down to just under 4.40%, -19 bps lower than the prior equivalent event a month ago.

In China, the wealthy are shipping out, it seems. China saw the world's biggest outflow of high-net-worth individuals last year and is expected to see a record exodus of 15,200 in 2024, dealing a further blow to its economy.

And homeowners with mortgages in China are prioritising paying them off faster as values sink. Owning your own home is now perceived as a liability, not an asset.

In the EU, CPI for May was confirmed at +2.7%. However, we should note that the ZEW Indicator of Economic Sentiment for the Euro Area surged in June to its highest since July 2021, and firmly above what was expected. That has built into nine consecutive months of rising EU business sentiment.

Yesterday's RBA monetary policy review indicated that rate cuts are further away than anticipated. Markets no longer have any cut priced in until mid 2025 now.

And the OECD says high school students in Singapore, Korea, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Estonia and Finland were in the highest-performing education systems in the first-ever creative thinking assessment under the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Results of the global 2022 assessment, to understand the skills of 15-year-old students in 64 countries and economies worldwide, show that students in high-performing education systems are not only succeeding in standardised mathematics, reading and science tests, but also in new creative thinking tests.

On the other hand we should note that New Zealand doesn't rank highly in the latest World Competitive Rankings, slipping one place in 2024 to 32nd (out of 67 in the survey).

The UST 10yr yield is now at 4.22% and down -6 bps from this time yesterday. The key 2-10 yield curve inversion is still at -49 bps. Their 1-5 curve is more inverted by -85 bps. But their 3 mth-10yr curve inversion is little-changed at -108 bps. The Australian 10 year bond yield is up +2 bps at 4.20%. The China 10 year bond rate is still down at 2.27%. The NZ Government 10 year bond rate is now at 4.66% and again unchanged from yesterday.

Wall Street's Tuesday trade has the S&P500 up +0.2%. Overnight, European markets were about +0.5% higher on average across all markets. Yesterday Tokyo ended its Tuesday session up +1.0%. Hong Kong was little-changed and down -0.1% but Shanghai rose +0.5%. Singapore was up +0.1%. The ASX200 ended +1.0% higher and the NZX50 rose +0.6%.

The price of gold will start today up +US$11 at US$2328/oz.

Oil prices are up +US$1 at US$80.50/bbl in the US while the international Brent price is now just under US$84.50/bbl.

The Kiwi dollar starts today a little firmer at just under 61.5 USc. Against the Aussie we are -¼c softer at 92.4 AUc. Against the euro we are marginally firmer at 57.2 euro cents. That all means our TWI-5 starts today essentially unchanged at just on 70.9.

The bitcoin price starts today at US$64,612 and down -2.6% from this time yesterday. Volatility over the past 24 hours has again been moderate at just on +/- 2.3%.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
End of day UTC
Source: CoinDesk

The easiest place to stay up with event risk is by following our Economic Calendar here ».

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

86 Comments

"Owning your own home is now perceived as a liability, not an asset." Weird sort of comment? Home ownership will always be an asset, the issue is how much you paid for it. If it was bought as an investment, then that is to all intents a business decision. It should be well understood when making investment decisions that one shouldn't buy at the peak of the market, nor sell in the trough. 

While I feel for some FHBs, the reason for getting into owning a home needs to be well understood. With the attitude of the current government and Housing Minister any advice to FHB's should be DO NOT RUSH INTO IT! Desperation to get on the train has never led to good outcomes, when you have to borrow large to buy the ticket.

Up
12

'Perceived '.... owning an asset is all about sentiment,  at the moment that sentiment is absolutely low when it comes to home ownership 

Up
7

“Desperation to get on the train has never led to good outcomes, ” - I’d say a lot of people have benefited from rushing it in the past, anyone who waited just paid more or never got anything. It all depends on whether prices are going up or down. 

Up
3

Timing is important but you also have to be able to time the sell. Would you buy Nvidia shares at the moment? But buying a family home to live in is to my mind, too important a decision to be treated like that.

Up
4

The average age of FHBs indicates they definitely aren't rushing.

Although some of that's due to so many of them having their earning life deferred 3-5+ years going to Uni.

Up
0

Funny you mention Nvidia stocks - mine are up 70% even though I was fairly late buying in. They're almost becoming a meme stock at this level but I'll ride that train the same way I did the BTC ETF IPO (TLAs FTW!).

It feels like with the ease of investment (specuvestment?) these days shares are becoming decoupled from fundamentals in much the same way housing did - if everyone else is buying something and it's in the news a lot then it must be a sure thing...right?

FWIW I have a modest but diverse portfolio overall, I'm not pinning my hopes on a handful of hype-driven bull runs.

Up
2

I completely missed the boat with Nvidia. Looked at it a couple of years ago but the variability put me off at the time, plus too limited in funds. Some of my buys have done well though with a 1000% + gains. And then there are the others........

Up
0

It's all about population demographics in the long term. Home ownership matters less if there will be fewer people in the future, and China will have far fewer people in the future. 

Up
4

Agree, if supply ever exceeds demand the value of property would plummet 

Up
0

And the Chinese have potentially overbuilt 10s of millions of dwellings, while over counting their population by 100 million people or so.

Up
4

Until recently you wouldn't count an Apartment as a "dwelling".  I think the Chinese issue is now ownership of "houses"-its Apartments, and the issue with Apartments is that there is little rarity in the land value--instead one tower after another is constructed, and each new one depreciating the value of the many of the others-unless you have above average population growth.

Up
0

Not to mention these apartments are almost solely on leasehold land.

Up
2

Maybe they are getting out while they can because if China attempts to invade Taiwan, the Chinese, rich or otherwise will not be welcome anywhere.

Up
0

Pa1nter: "Not to mention these apartments are almost solely on leasehold land."

Please do explain more ...

Up
0

How about for a change you tell me what you think land ownership looks like in China.

Up
0

My wife is Chinese and we visit her family regularly. And I've done work there and, with locals, set up businesses there. And I've a few legal eagles in the family that have worked in China's legal system around property ownership. I know a fair bit about it.

However, your comment ...

Pa1nter: "Not to mention these apartments are almost solely on leasehold land."

... is so authoritative I thought you could elaborate on it.

Many of us are keen to learn more.

Up
1

Well now, given you're a proven expert on this, elighten me. What percentage of urban residential Chinese property is akin to our freehold/fee simple titles?

You can set the record straight, and dispel all the rumors. Or do you only give requests instead of take them?

LOL, did your Asian matrimonial relatives help bankroll your housing empire?

Up
4

"LOL, did your Asian matrimonial relatives help bankroll your housing empire?"

No.

But to set the record straight - My immediate Chinese relatives are well educated but lowly paid public servants that have scrimped and saved all their lives and are now living on state pensions. They love their daughter and we feel honored when the send us $5,000 from time to time that they claim they don't need to help us. 

You really are a nasty piece of work, aren't you Pa1nter.

 

Up
0

Cool story.

You still haven't remotely addressed the topic though. Funny that.

Up
0

houses have a life, they get to a point where the cost of a renovation is more than knocking it down and starting again, the land is obviously part of the equation, but WHERE that land is, is a very important part of the equation, and I suggest that this principle  holds anywhere in the world , 

houses on flood prone land will gradually become worthless, houses too far from places of well paid work, will drift back to where they should be, houses where there are natural hazards like EQ in Wellington and insurance is an issue, will drift back

But, if the location is desirable and the land is not subject to natural hazards, property will always be in demand, Where are all the millionaires going to Switzerland going to live?, and Australia, and NZ, when you realise this is a record year for wealthy migration , and next year will be the same and so on, plus our week currency, I cant see NZ house prices on good land dropping at all.

Up
0

And Houses on that good land like the close in areas of Auckland -don't depreciate--instead they get renovated, expanded  and enhanced. Ton's of 100 + year old Houses in Auckland on good land worth millions.

Up
2

A house can last indefinitely if it's regularly maintained.

Up
4

True to a point. Although if its on piles on a steep clay site and they keep capsizing and the floors are up and down... Sooner or later it will need proper foundations. Which may rule out just "maintenance".

Up
1

Old houses are hard to heat, and when I talk about the economics of knocking something down and rebuilding it, I was factoring in heating costs over the life of the house  in the South Island, perhaps it might be worth renovating old houses in Auckland  but not down here

Up
0

You can make a 60/70 year old house more easily heatable for $20k. It's far more expensive to knock something down and put something new up, for nominal thermal improvements.

SI dweller here.

Up
0

"You can make a 60/70 year old house more easily heatable for $20k."

A shed? Probably.

But a 60/70 year old 4 bed house? Only if your goal is meet what will be an untested minimum standard while collecting government subsidies.

 

Up
0

For that amount you'd be insulating, overkilling on the heating, and having some form of air circulation/heat transfer. Spend more again for double glazing.

Both way cheaper than the efficiencies gained from knocking down and starting again.

Up
0

Agreed.

But even in Auckland renovating old houses to meet modern standards is expensive - and often when I've spent the money doing this I've regretted doing it. (No one ever checks whther the money spent actually delivers anything either. I have. 80/20 results.)

Why do I do it?

Simply because some people will pay a fortune for a traditional house that's expensive to heat for 3-6 months of the year. This isn't a criticism of the buyers either. I live in one too. 

Up
0

It’s not an asset if you owe more on it than it’s worth. But in a sense you’re right, ‘home ownership is an asset’ makes no sense, surely the asset refers to the asset not the act of owning the asset

Up
2

'Rate cuts fade '... yup CB's clearly are intent on resetting the asset bubbles...

Higher For Longer is well and truly here..

Up
9

Generated recessions aren't about resetting asset prices, they're to cast off the most marginal lenders.

Which creates a vicious circle, if your survivors are the ones with the best ability to service credit, they're just going to buy up more assets in the aftermath.

Up
3

"Generated recessions aren't about resetting asset prices, they're to cast off the most marginal lenders."

Oddly - the RBNZ would disagree.

Up
0

And on the menu board, a Big Mac looks succulent, tall and delicious.

Up
3
Up
2

Rich Chinese departing match’s the word on the ground over the last 6 months 

Up
3

Whose word and which ground?

Up
3

Chinese in Auckland , first got their kids out now parents here.  

Up
3

The Hosk wants us to open up the borders for the rich to buy , complaining the 20 million $ homes around his neighborhood aren't selling. I don't know why he is still lives in NZ, ...although he and the Wifey would struggle to get work anywhere else.

Up
4

He might be assassinated if he is elsewhere 

Up
1

Really...? I suppose he wants to see his team really get NZ economy rocking over the next 2 and half years as promised (so he can trumpet the success on Mikes Minutes in a flash $2k coat)

Up
0

And yet still look like a homeless person.

Up
2

The disheveled, windswept and interesting look is in.

Up
1

Asshole comment

Up
0

Lighten up?

Up
0

Maybe they aren't million dollar homes after all?

Up
3

He "works" here?

Up
1

Good point...

Up
0

"....And homeowners with mortgages in China are prioritising paying them off faster as values sink. Owning your own home is now perceived as a liability, not an asset......"

My take on this was different.  Folk have suddenly realised the obvious.  Having debt makes your position fragile.

Up
5

Do you own your own home when you have a mortgage on it? I thought the bank owned it. You own your own home when you have no mortgage on it. Surely. We are paying down our mortgage quickly so there is no other party involved in us keeping it. Maybe we are doing it wrong.

Up
0

I've always argued that you're in partnership with the bank. The ratio of ownership is the level of mortgage owed v the property value. Some recent buyers are becoming seriously in hock to the banks as their mortgage exceeds the property value.

Up
0

I wish that things were like in the US: jingle mail...

If that was the case banks would be a bit more careful.

Up
0

It certainly sounds like there are aspects of the US system that are better than ours...

Up
0

You own the home, but you have pledged it as security for any loans that the finance provider has extended to you.  The mortgage is the legal instrument recording that pledge. You can still have a mortgage on a property with no money owing (eg. line of credit that is undrawn). 

Up
4

Thank you for explaining that. 

Up
0

When you live in a country with a social credit system that bars you from society, or you can go to jail for not paying your debts, then definitely a house is a liability.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6851279/Being-blacklisted-Chin…

Up
1

And the OECD says high school students in Singapore, Korea, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Estonia and Finland were in the highest-performing education systems in the first-ever creative thinking assessment under the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). 

There is a typo, New Zealand on the list with the likes of Singapore and Korea? Someone must be having a laugh.

Up
3

Not a very creative comment Frank?

Up
2

Academic excellence is not a pre-requisite for excellence in creative thinking

Participating in school activities such as art, drama, creative writing or programming classes regularly

The methodology appears a bit flawed at a closer look. Singapore and SK have education systems that promote cutthroat competition from an early age, not exactly priming kids for creativity.

How do you measure creative thinking in school-age children anyways?

Up
1

Creative thinking should be generally innate in children anyway, it's only the transition to hard logic and common sense that narrows down people's thought processes. 

Up
0

By that logic you'd be most creative person around these parts.

Up
3

Perhaps if you gaslight me for an extra 9 months or so

We can determine that at least one of us has some sort of personality disorder.

Up
2

Cut-throat competition and creativity are not mutually incompatible. 

Up
1

True, but in this instance cut-throat includes a maniacal approach to studying to get the highest grades. Some of the school days in East Asia are 12hrs+ long.

Up
2

Yes, to be creative you would need a bit of time off to just think about things.

Up
0

Or maybe just be presented with interesting problems to solve?

Up
0

I think you mean some parents in East Asia make their kids schooling last 12+ hours through purchased, additional schooling.

Up
1

If you want to extrapolate it out to that, sure. We can quibble whether it's the parents or the culture.

Up
0

Technical competence and creativity are not in competition with each other.

If you have one of those, it makes you better at the other.

Up
1

Creative thinking shows up early it's so easy to spot, you just give a kid a pile of Lego bricks. Someone with creativity or engineering skills will build something and then move through Lego to other hobbies that involve building things and also repairing and then modifying things. What also shows up is the destructive kids and all they want to do is smash what you have built. Always remember that when I was like 6, had a "Friend" that I ended up in a fist fight with after 10 minutes together as all he wanted to do was wreck everything.

Up
1

He's probably ram raid royalty now...

Up
1

Or a politician

Up
0

TPM?

Up
0

All parties - choose one to blame based on your own beliefs/prejudices

Up
0

Do you know what happened to them?

Up
0

I'd believe that.  NZ is a nation of people who write PR releases for a living and call it Govt policy and journalism.

Up
1

"Higher for longer?"

Why does this come as some sort of surprise? Firing up the global economy with cheaper money has enormous geopolitical ramifications. In case commentators haven't noticed, there's a major war going on, the outcome of which will determine everyone on the planets future. Lower interest rates equals greater demand for energy, which pays for Vlad's war and results in a rapid escalation of prices and...... inflation! 

The West can't admit Putin holds an enormous energy card with his reserves, and with global oil depletion about to really give energy blind economies a kick in the teeth, pigeons mustn't be scattered just yet 

Up
2

The China 10 year bond rate is still down at 2.27%.

Demand for China govt bonds continues to be strong driving yields lower and lower. PBOC is stepping its warnings telling investors they better not bet against Xi and his genius "stimulus" plans. Chinese are buying bonds anyway for obvious reasons. Link

Up
0

If owning your own home is now not bring seen as an asset, is someone paying $30k plus per annum for their accommodation seen as being the way to go?

It just depends on circumstances, and decisions made!

Up
1

And after China, the UK is seeing a record number of millionaires departing.  As people move out due to higher taxes, and incoming Labour Govt with wealth tax proposals. 

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/18/millionaires-are-abandoning-the-uk-in-t…

A record number of millionaires is expected to leave the United Kingdom this year, according to new research, with this year’s general election expected to further exacerbate the exodus.

The Henley Private Wealth Migration Report indicates that Britain will experience a net loss of 9,500 high-net-worth individuals in 2024 — more than double last year’s figure of 4,200 (which in itself was a record-high figure).

Dont worry, none of them will come here.  What with not being able to buy a house or the threat of The Maori Party hanging over them.

 

Up
0

Typical of the uber wealthy. Crap up their surroundings and once living conditions become untenable look to the next place to slash and burn. Only Mars left now though.

Up
0

From one perspective yes, but from another is is a sign that the politicians can not create an environment that encourages them to invest in their own country?

Take for example a suggestion i have made in the past for NZ; people get a tax break to set up companies in the regions (not major centres), another tax break for the number of people they hire, and one for the higher median wage in their company, and another if they create or generate exports etc. Build a package where a company can be essentially tax free but delivers a solid economic return for the economy. Political vision and will is required. (See Chris Trotter's article)

Up
0

Probably nothing. 

Veteran hedge fund manager Philip King has taken a short position in shares of Commonwealth Bank of Australia, citing one of the world’s most expensive valuations.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-06-17/hedge-fund-regal-tak…

Up
1