![](/sites/default/files/styles/full_width/public/feature_images/trump-cartoon-2.jpg?itok=mpKE6Onf)
The US faces a significant uphill battle if it wants to get back into the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, an international trade expert says.
Reports from The Washington Post suggest US President Donald Trump is exploring options for the US to join the The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), telling a top US trade representative to “take a look at getting us back into that agreement, on our terms of course.”
This is despite Trump’s attempts to discredit the trade deal during his election campaign and his first executive order as President being to officially pull the US out of negotiations.
But the US joining the agreement now would be “extremely difficult,” according to Jacobi Consulting managing director and international trade expert Stephen Jacobi.
In November, after negotiations, the TPP 11 became the CPTPP.
“The new agreement is quite a different agreement from the previous one in some key respects – particularly related to intellectual property," says Jacobi.
This was a key area of concern for US lawmakers when trying to get the deal through Congress in 2016.
“The Obama administration couldn’t get TPP through Congress because the intellectual property provisions were not high enough – those provisions have now been watered down in the new agreement,” Jacobi says, adding that this would be a significant obstacle.
The US deciding to opt back into the deal is something New Zealand officials under the former iteration of the deal had been preparing for.
Before the election, then Prime Minister Bill English said one of the major reasons the deal was still going ahead without major changes was so the US “could slot back in on the terms that it negotiated.”
“Part of the motivation is, if its up and running, then the US will see benefits in re-joining, which would be a big benefit to the Asia Pacific region.”
But it is now no longer that simple, Jacobi says.
Another major issue is the CPTPP agreement still contains investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) clauses – an area of the agreement Trump was particularly opposed to.
Jacobi says it would take a lot of work from the US perspective to join the deal, and is made even more difficult by the fact Congressional elections are later this year.
Meanwhile, the 11 CPTPP countries are all in the process of ratifying the agreement.
“The worst thing from our perspective is that somehow that gets delayed while we try and work out how to get the US in. That would be disastrous,” Jacobi says.
8 Comments
This is an opportunity, that all CPTPP members should start negotiations with the United States of America as soon as possible.
New Zealand and some other CPTPP members have been trying to get a Free Trade Agreement with the United States for many years, we almost achieved this under the Obama Administration.
I hope this present Labour Govenment will pursue this, it will open markets in the USA that were once closed to us.
New Zealand may never get another opportunity like this again for many years , it would a triumph for Jacinda during her term in office to achieve this, as no other previous NZ government has managed to do this
In reply to "Here is the CPTPP, take it or leave it", The CPTPP members must have an open mind and move forward on this.
Hopefully a successful agreement that would benefit everybody, could be reached between the United States and CPTPP, Its a market that is to big and important to ignore.
.
here's the text on the main page of https://itsourfuture.org.nz/
The Labour-led government has back-pedalled on its pre-election rhetoric and now plans to sign the TPPA-11 (now rebranded the “CPTPP”) on 8 March 2018.
The text of the TPPA-11 is the same as the original TPPA, with a small number of provisions until the United States rejoins. The negotiations are still secret, and the threats to the regulatory sovereignty of the New Zealand Government remain the same.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.