sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Early setback for ASB in 'Yen Transaction' fight over $153 mln of potential tax plus interest and penalties with IRD

Business
Early setback for ASB in 'Yen Transaction' fight over $153 mln of potential tax plus interest and penalties with IRD
<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/">Image sourced from Shutterstock.com</a>

By Gareth Vaughan

ASB has lost an early legal skirmish with the Inland Revenue Department in a dispute over potentially $153 million worth of tax plus interest and penalties.

The skirmish is in a case where ASB has taken IRD to court after the taxman moved to block the bank from claiming deductions on $499.4 million of foreign exchange losses in its 2008 and 2009 income tax returns. Interest.co.nz first reported full details of the case, relating to the so-called "Yen Transaction," in November 2013 in our subscriber only email.

ASB acknowledges a potential tax liability of $153 million plus interest and shortfall penalties. The bank says it has made "adequate provision" for the dispute based on its assessment of the merits of the arguments and independent advice received. However, ASB has also said if the provision proves inadequate, "those proceedings may have a material adverse effect on the financial performance of the bank for the relevant financial year."

This is an abridged version of this article. The full version was published in our email for paying subscribers. See here for more details and how to subscribe.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

2 Comments

"claiming deductions on $499.4 million of foreign exchange losses in its 2008 and 2009 income tax returns."

No good was made, just how on what is esentially gambling can they get tax reductions?

 

Up
0

you are assuming there was an underlying commercial or cash loss. 

gambling, are you sure?

 

Up
0