sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

The scale of fraud against seniors is huge, and still growing; Annie Lecompte explains why

Technology / analysis
The scale of fraud against seniors is huge, and still growing; Annie Lecompte explains why
Senior fraud abuse is on the rise, thanks to new technologies such as artificial intelligence. (Shutterstock)
Senior fraud abuse is on the rise, thanks to new technologies such as artificial intelligence. (Shutterstock)

By Annie Lecompte*

With technology evolving rapidly, the amount of fraud against seniors is increasing at an alarming rate. Fraud is now the leading crime committed against seniors in Canada.

Today’s scammers are taking advantage of new technological tools that make their schemes both more credible, and harder to detect. From fraudulent phone calls using voice simulation systems, to sophisticated online hustling, scams are becoming increasingly complex. Despite alerts and warnings, fraud continues to flourish in the age of technology.

As an expert in the field of technological fraud, I will try to provide some answers to the following question: Why is fraud against seniors on the rise when it is so highly publicised? And how can seniors protect themselves?

Technological fraud against grandparents

While fraud affects different segments of the population, some specifically targets seniors because of their vulnerability. For example, grandparent fraud, where a fraudster pretends to be a loved one in difficulty, exploits seniors’ trust and encourages them to send money in a hurry. The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre (CAFC) has identified 2,494 victims of these schemes, for a total loss of $9.4 million.

Romance scam is another common trap. These fraudsters establish an online relationship over an extended period in order to extract money from victims under the pretext of being in financial difficulty, or experiencing a personal emergency. This type of fraud has intensified with modern technology. In 2023 it was responsible for the third-largest financial loss to Canadians, according to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. In 2022, Canadians lost more than $59 million to this type of fraud, according to CAFC.

Stolen photos and fake identities

Fraudsters also use dating platforms and social networks to create convincing profiles of fictitious identities using stolen photos. Artificial intelligence and image manipulation software are then employed to make these scams all the more realistic, boosting victims’ confidence and making fraud harder to detect.

Recent warnings have been issued to alert the Canadian public to romance scams where scammers manipulate their victims into investing in fraudulent cryptocurrencies.

Phishing, which has also become more sophisticated thanks to new technologies, is another common fraud technique used against seniors, with the CAFC listing losses for Canadians at around $58 million in 2022.

An elderly woman, bewildered in front of her computer
One of the reasons for seniors’ increased vulnerability to fraud is their discomfort with new information technologies. (Shutterstock).

Scammers send e-mails or text messages pretending to be companies or financial institutions and prompt recipients to click on fraudulent links, or divulge personal information. Artificial intelligence and automated systems allow fraudsters to target victims on a massive scale and create a sense of urgency that pushes seniors to act without thinking twice.

Why fraud targeting seniors is on the rise

Fraud targeting seniors is on the rise for a number of reasons. Because seniors often have more free time and are more socially isolated, they are more inclined to respond to calls, e-mails or text messages from strangers. Their solitude also makes fraudulent interactions more credible, while their accessible savings make them attractive targets.

Although many seniors use the internet, a large majority are not comfortable with technology. This makes them more vulnerable to online scams. According to one study, while 67 per cent of seniors surf the internet regularly, only 26 per cent feel very confident using computers and smartphones.

Seniors continue to fall into these traps despite numerous awareness campaigns, since fraudsters skilfully exploit seniors’ lack of familiarity with digital technologies and constantly adapt their methods to circumvent warnings. What’s more, the emotional impact of a well-crafted scam can override caution, making warnings less effective in these situations.

Protection strategies

To protect themselves from fraud, there are a number of essential behaviours seniors must adopt. They should never share personal information, such as PINs or passwords, by telephone, e-mail or text message. It’s also important not to respond to any unsolicited offers whether they are received by e-mail, text or telephone.

If a specific case requires action, it’s best to type the financial institution’s web address, rather than click on a link provided. Seniors should never make hasty decisions. If a child or grandchild claims to be in an emergency and is asking for financial assistance, seniors should ask them personal questions to verify their identity. Finally, trusting one’s intuition remains essential: if something seems suspicious, it’s best to heed your gut and take extra precautions.

An elderly woman giving her credit card details over the phone
You should never share personal data, nor respond to unsolicited offers. (Shutterstock).

At a time when technology is advancing rapidly, fraudsters have never been better equipped to target the elderly. Although seniors are increasingly connected, being less familiar with digital tools makes them all the more vulnerable. Scams — whether romantic scams, phishing or telephone fraud — exploit their trust and isolation. Because of this threat, it’s crucial to inform and educate seniors so they can protect themselves against these increasingly sophisticated scams.

Collective awareness

But prevention is not enough: collective awareness is also necessary. By supporting our seniors, we can help reduce fraud and better protect this vulnerable population. Collective awareness means making sure the community is committed to monitoring, alerting and protecting those who are most at risk.

This can be achieved through concrete actions carried out on a regular basis to raise awareness among seniors, but also by encouraging seniors’ loved ones to be alert to signs of potential fraud.

It would also be a good idea to involve local players, such as financial institutions or community centres, to offer ongoing training and reminders about common frauds.

In the long run, it is only by combining prevention, education and solidarity that we will be able to truly limit the impact of this fraud, and offer seniors the protection they deserve in an increasingly digital world.The Conversation


*Annie Lecompte, Associate professor, Département des sciences comptables, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM).

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

8 Comments

In a shocking twist, it seems our own dear David Chaston has fallen victim to the latest scam preying on tech-challenged seniors: the "Premium Comment Paywall Scheme." Convinced by smooth-talking “consultants” that restricting comments to subscribers would “skyrocket revenue,” poor David now faces his website, Interest, becoming a subscriber-only echo chamber.

Sources say the perpetrators slyly preyed on his advanced years and fondness for “fancy internet upgrades.” As one source close to the matter shared, “He thought it’d be like the gold rush of ‘79 — everyone’d flock to get in the comments!” Instead, traffic has tanked, and the once-thriving comments section now resembles a dusty, tumbleweed-laden ghost town.

Here’s hoping David can get his subscription back to reality before it’s too late.

Up
0

:) Interesting assumptions there. But none I recognise (advancing years?). But time will tell. There is four months to go before the change happens. In the meantime 500,000 unique readers show up every month, at least once. Overall average read time is rising. About 200 of them comment - and most of them are already supporters.

Up
8

David could you consider making comments viewable optional - ie a setting which blocks comments altogether. (out of sight (site) out of mind  :-) )

Up
0

200 comment ..? Yep the same readers , repeatedly,  who have nothing else to do with their lives but sit on Interest. Co all day , particularly on the property section , professing their “I reckons” , and having inane conversations with one another 😊

Up
0

I regularly sent my elderly dad warnings re scams including info circulated by the IT dept at my work. Even though Dad kept saying “I know I know” there was no downside to keeping on reminding him so he really did not mind.

Up
1

I look after several seniors phone and computers at my wife's  sports  club.

These are people in the 65 to 80 group, and all have used computers during their working lives from around 40 years onwards.  And they have  used smart phones for 15 plus years.

But no matter how many times I tell them, they do stupid things 

They refuse to use unique passwords because it is too hard. Several use their email passwords on banking and other services  I've shown everyone how to use a password manager,; they know how to do it but won't. When their computer has an upgrade, they don't read the screen and untick the option boxes so end up with all sorts of unwanted programs in their computers.

They won't check that the sender of an email  is actually the  sender of the  email  not fron  the likes of nzcontdown@abcdef.com.  They can't resist opening spam SMS messages.

They definitely won't pay for a secure email service such as Proton

I have a list of things they must  do and things they must never do for both their phone and laptop..But they put it to one side and don't refer to it.

If someone unknown  walked up to their front door and asked for credit card number , CSV and pin,  they wouldn't give it to them. But if someone unknown phones or emails, they probably would.

I've convinced most to get rid of their landline which eliminates most calls from fake banks and fake Microsoft support. But when they get a spam.medssge on WhatsApp or SMS they forget to block the number 

They are shockers om Facebook; click on every advt for free campervans, the excess stock laptops and iPhones that Harvey Norman is giving away.  Facebook is disgraceful, and  difficult for everyone , not just seniors, with the continual app updates and the ongoing changes to how and where you change  privacy settings. 

I don't know what else to do; they all have the capability and intelligence  to manage their devices and are fully aware of the dangers of scams.  But just don't seem very interested in ensuring they  protect themselves.

As someone once said, it's impossible to legislate against stupidity.

 

Up
4

I've posted before about on several occasions in one supermarket being in line behind a senior who is telling and asking the checkout operator their PIN to punch in as they don't like using the keypad. It's this level of naivety that I find scary.

I think there's a case for dedicated devices that are locked down to only provide for example banking apps / websites. Nothing else to be downloaded on them. A system whereby certified apps are available.

For family members I wonder if something along the lines of having EPA might allow a 3rd authentication on banking transactions over a certain limit? All very intrusive I know. But there are so many stories these days where the senior is being scammed, and even though their bank is engaging on some level, they senior is still authorising these transactions that are being questioned by the bank. Maybe if a family member or somebody with EPA could be added as an extra authorising step over a certain transaction limit, or combined limit within 1 week / 1 month some of these horror stories might disappear.

Up
2

Just... wow. The patience of a saint and all that.

Up
0