sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Ross Stitt reports Australia enters 2025 in 'reasonable economic shape', but facing a world that 2024 shaped with uniquely high risks. Australia is both an opportunity and a risk for New Zealand

Public Policy / opinion
Ross Stitt reports Australia enters 2025 in 'reasonable economic shape', but facing a world that 2024 shaped with uniquely high risks. Australia is both an opportunity and a risk for New Zealand
Sydney and Auckland

Australia is both a blessing and a curse for New Zealand.

On the plus side, it’s an important security partner, a favourite sporting rival, and the second largest market for kiwi exports.

Those crucial exports have held up in recent times thanks to the relative strength of the Australian economy. However, that economic strength is a double-edged sword for NZ. Australia’s higher wages, lower unemployment, and faster growth are currently acting as a magnet for thousands of kiwi workers.

Of course, this is not a new problem. NZ has been exporting citizens to Australia for decades. The kiwi-born population in Australia is now around 700,000, many of them trained at the expense of the NZ taxpayer.

 

image.png

Source: Stats NZ https://www.stats.govt.nz/news/net-migration-loss-to-australia-in-2023/

Unsurprisingly, the movement west is cyclical. That cycle is driven to a significant extent by economic factors like wage levels, unemployment, and the cost of housing.

Net migration from NZ to Australia has been rising steadily since 2020. What happens in Australia in 2025 will obviously have a major impact on the direction from here.

It’s difficult to predict the future in any year, but this year looks particularly uncertain for Australia. Three issues stand out – the federal election due before May, the imminent return of Donald Trump to the White House, and the sluggish state of the Chinese economy.

It’s generally accepted that the upcoming election is too close to call. The incumbent Labor government is in its first term and might normally expect to make a second term. However, these are not normal times.

Incumbency proved a heavy burden in elections around the world in 2024. This was often a result of voters, rightly or wrongly, blaming governments for cost-of-living pressures. There’s no reason to believe Australian voters in 2025 will be any more forgiving.

The cost of living is the biggest concern for Australians. And it incorporates many issues that are electorally bad news for the centre-left Labor government, including the housing ‘crisis’, stubbornly high interest rates, and elevated levels of immigration that the government seems unable to control.

Housing is a policy nightmare. Many young Australians struggling to rent a house (let alone buy one) want lower rents and lower house prices. But many policies that might achieve such outcomes are anathema to existing homeowners and landlords. It’s a lose/lose situation for the government.

Part of the problem is the wave of immigrants, both permanent and temporary, who have poured into Australia post-Covid. This has placed enormous pressure on the housing market, particularly in the inner suburbs of Sydney and Melbourne. However, these immigrants, many of them highly skilled, are needed to fill labour shortages.

Many mortgaged home buyers are being crushed by the recent rapid rise in interest rates. The government is desperate for the Reserve Bank to provide relief through lower interest rates. If that relief doesn’t come before the election, the government will suffer.    

Cultural issues are another problem for Labor. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese burnt significant political capital on the unsuccessful referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

He also has problems arising from the Israel/Palestine conflict. On the one hand, many Muslim voters in key marginal seats argue that his government has been too soft on Israel and has not done enough to fight Islamophobia in Australia. On the other hand, many Jewish voters contend he has been too supportive of the Palestinian cause and has allowed antisemitism to go unchecked.

Labor’s greatest electoral asset is the weakness of the opposition. The Liberal/National Coalition is bereft of both new ideas and appealing politicians. Their leader Peter Dutton is not an easy sell. Nor is their signature policy of introducing nuclear power, particularly in the electorates where the nuclear reactors might be located.

An unpopular government versus an unappealing opposition? The result may well be a rise in the number of seats won by independent candidates, including the so-called ‘teal’ candidates (economically centrist but socially progressive).

If that happens, Australia will probably end up with a minority government. That would mean greater economic uncertainty and a government with limited ability to undertake the major reforms required to move Australia forward.

And then there’s the factors beyond Australia’s control – Trump and China.

No one knows what Trump will do when he takes office. However, from what he’s said to date, two risks stand out for Australia. The first is his policy on trade. Australia is a trading nation and would lose out from any US steps that reduced international trade. More specifically, if Trump imposed tariffs on US imports from China, that would damage China’s export business which in turn would lead to reduced Australian exports to China of iron ore and coal.

The US is the key to Australia’s security arrangements – via ANZUS, the Quad, AUKUS, and the presence of US troops on Australian soil. What would happen, and how would Australians and their politicians react, if Trump pursued an isolationist foreign policy? Or if he adopted a much stronger pro-Israel strategy in the Middle East?

China is the other great unknown. It faces numerous economic challenges going into 2025, including debt problems, an ageing population, and weak consumer demand.

Much of Australia’s economic success over the last three decades is attributable to the exponential growth of China. That country now takes a third of Australia’s exports. That’s a boon for Australia but it also represents an exposure. Those exports generate tens of billions of dollars of government revenue. The federal budget is very sensitive to changes in both the volume of coal and iron ore exported to China and the prices achieved for those commodities. A major downturn would spell economic and political trouble.        

A federal election, a new US president, and an uncertain Chinese economy. Not to mention an ongoing war in eastern Europe, an increasingly hostile Middle East, and a US share market at dizzying heights.

And those are just the risks we know about. The only certainty is that other risks will emerge as the year proceeds.

Australia enters the new year in reasonable economic shape. Debt levels are high from a historical perspective but manageable compared to many other capitalist democracies. Importantly, unemployment is still only 4% and the economy is growing (just).

That’s good news for kiwi exporters. However, it also suggests Australia may continue to attract kiwi workers. The level of attraction may ultimately depend on what happens in New Zealand in 2025.


*Ross Stitt is a freelance writer with a PhD in political science. He is a New Zealander based in Sydney. His articles are part of our 'Understanding Australia' series.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

91 Comments

Ross forgot to say Australia is important to us because they are the most like us.  

Up
9

Australia is much like New Zealand except the weather is better, the people are happier and everything is in proper English.

Up
12

Old man yells at cloud.

Up
17

Australia weather

Heatwave descends on south-east Australia with temperatures forecast to exceed 40C

Bureau of Meteorology says Melbourne’s hot weather will peak at 38C on Saturday while Penrith will reach 39C on Sunday and 40C on Monday

Keep hydrated Broocky

Up
6

Better weather - but could do without the forest fires, + snakes/crocs……..

Great place overall…….

Up
2

It’s 38C for a day. Calm down. I’ll take that over our crap summer.

Up
2

You first..I'm off for a swim...

Up
0

Don’t let the SW blow you to Samoa

Up
0

Perfect for Foiling old man..

Up
2

Right, I should have known you meant foiling when you said swimming. I’m in my 30s btw

Up
2

Baywatch dusting off the inferiority complex talking points.

It's a lovely 28 degrees and the pool is about the same up here in paradise.

Do margaritas count as hydration?

Up
4

Just spent a few weeks there. If you like either needing to sit inside in Aircon all day, or still in a lukewarm pool, it's paradise.

As for the people being happier, I thought Kiwis were whingers, the Aussies seem to have made it a professional sport.

But whatever floats everyone's boat.

Up
3

A pleasant warmth can sometimes be confronting for those that are not acclimatised, but there are very few days where aircon is strictly necessary.

That said, with first world housing you set and forget the constant temperature that you desire indoors and then get on with more important things in your life.

Whoever was whinging around you was probably doing so to help a kiwi visitor feel more at home.

Up
2

A pleasant warmth is one you can easily escape from by seeking shade.

If your dwelling requires the height of technology to be comfortable, it's not a good climate.

The whinging was in earshot more than direct conversation. Wailing about migrants, cost of living, and housing are in full effect.

But, whatever story you need to validate your choices.

Up
1

Indeed. In the shade right now and it's very pleasant.

Where is this magical place that you live where dwellings are comfortable all year without any active heating or cooling?

You should have stuck up a conversation with them and let them know they should be thankful as these issues are vastly worse in your homeland.

Kiwis are voting with their feet.  The wisdom of the masses.

Up
2

I chose to live in an area with a temperate climate and higher than average sunshine hours. There's a good half dozen of them in NZ (well, more still but they're not suitable for most people's habitation).

Also nice to take a barefoot piss outside at night.

The only people I've known to have a considerable reversal of fortunes migrating were ones that fundamentally addressed parts of their lives that weren't serving them at the same time. Most of the rest have just moved their same problems a few thousand ks, and can't afford to come home.

Up
8

In other words your dwelling needs heating in winter.  Well, it doesn't sound like a good climate if you need technology to be comfortable.

"Pissing outside barefoot" does not come across as first world behavior.  It's also normal to pay attention to where you are walking.

Can't really comment on the social circles you keep but ok.

Up
0

""In other words your dwelling needs heating in winter"

Make no mistake, Most Australian dwellings need heating in winter too. 

Up
5

In other words your dwelling needs heating in winter. Well, it doesn't sound like a good climate if you need technology to be comfortable.

You can put more clothes on, or light a fire. The house I stayed in in unbearably hot straya, also had a fireplace. In one scenario, I need to modify my climate most of the year, in another, a couple months, maybe. One climate, clearly more tolerable than the other.

"Pissing outside barefoot" does not come across as first world behavior. It's also normal to pay attention to where you are walking.

Well, it's harder to see in the dark, and maybe I'm not super enamoured with first world behaviour.

Can't really comment on the social circles you keep but ok.

It's not even limited by my social circles, there's only a single percentage point difference in home ownership rates between the two countries. And given contributing aspects like familial guarantorship, work history, etc a kiwis chances of home ownership are lower migrating, not higher.

Up
1

You seem to be quite a fan of developing world solutions for your developing world dwellings.  Perhaps contemplate some more appropriate clothing or having a drink of water when it's warmer during the day?  Would using an indoor bathroom and electric lighting be a step too far for you?

A heat source is required at least 3-4 months of the year in NZ and the costs of that are horrific because solar energy is not available during the times its needed.

As I mentioned, Australia and New Zealand are very similar, including many of the same malaises.  Housing became very much more expensive over here the past few years while the NZ market crashed and burned those who did not heed the warnings of the prophet. 

But that's just a side note to the weather being better, the people generally happier and proper English being spoken.

Up
1

Brooky will fit in well

Up
0

Guy on the chairlift had lived in both Dunedin in winter and Sydney in Summer.  He thought they were much the same.

Come the afternoon you are sitting inside, watching telly, with curtains drawn protecting yourself from the weather.

One with the heatpump on full, the other with the AC on full.

 

Up
1

At least there are no sharks in ya pool....no driving the Commodore today Brooky in ya Flip flops and speedos...

Up
0

The Australian term for "japanese sandals" is "thongs".  The term "flip-flops" is Anglo-American.

This makes whatever you were doing there even more dumb.

Up
0

Flip flops can often be interchanged with "slides" also. 

Nothing like some Sunday afternoon open-toed footwear banter.

Up
2

You remind of that guy in that movie ... Priscilla or something 😂

Up
0

Haven't seen it.  What's it about?

Up
0

Can’t be that great if your preferred activity is ranting on an NZ website 

Up
4

Don't really have time for rants. Visiting in the near future will be interesting to see what's improved or not.

Up
0

The deciding factor will be down to your mood before you step off the plane.

Up
2

Manifestation is popular in spiritual communities but it is not grounded in scientific reality.

Up
0

Can’t be that great if your preferred activity is ranting on an NZ website 

If I left, and the new place was that much better, I'd spend my time enjoying that betterness, instead of telling everyone.

Up
1

So, is the 'old man' correct or incorrect? 

Reasons please.  Given the several thumbs up, shouldn't be hard to find.

Up
0

Lots of thumbs up is merely a sign that the comment resonates with the sheeple.

Up
0

Also -  council rates are a third of what they are in NZ, they havent put speed humps on all the roads and turned them into 30kmph de facto cycleways, criminals are sent to jail so they cant keep reoffending, and they dont divide the country up into ethnic groups and then allocate things like healthcare and education based on race. Overall, just a vastly more pleasant place to live in.

Up
10

Sounds like you need to do some research into racism in healthcare and education, it has been around since the crown took control of social services. Allowing maori to govern a portion of it is to reduce insitutional racism, it's ironic that some see it as racist policy.

Up
3

If you have two systems with one controlled by one category and the other by those excluded from the first group then there are two possibilities: (1) both systems behave identically in which case why have them especially with the extra cost of two admins (2) they perform differently in which case there will be strong complaints about say different cancer survival rates or hospital bed availability. The latter will lead to accusations of discrimination. If the defining category is race then obviously it will encourage racism.

Up
9

Its difficult to find fault with this.

Up
1

Neither system is exclusionary though, if you are non-maori you are still welcome to access maori health services. Does that assumption come from the historic exclusion of maori from crown services? Maori don't want to treat people how they have been treated.

Up
2

You assume Maori all want the same thing.    Which is racist thinking.

There are more than two groups of people in New Zealand.  And in healthcare you need to think of it as five million folk who want a health service in five million different ways.  And that is what they should have.

Up
2

Yep i am out of here this year. You have nailed my reasoning almost exactly - NZ isnt where i want my kids to grow up anymore.

Up
3

"Australia is much like New Zealand except the weather is better"

It is if you like heat. I am in Melbourne right now and gosh it's uncomfortable (and this is the southernmost city in mainland Aus!)

Up
0

Lately - We are being pushed out of our homeland due to opportunities evaporating, the majority of these have been deliberately led initiatives.

Up
12

You generally need to expose yourself to opportunity, the rarely fall on your lap.

Up
3

Met up with a mate the other day that works in the public sector. He said most the cuts in his department were front line, and now they are really understaffed. Morale is low and people aren’t prepared to work extra hard to make up for understaffing. All to pay for a fraction of a small tax cut. No wonder people are leaving. 

Up
6

What public servant job cuts would that be?

"...the EFT staff total in the public service at September 2024 is only 296 less than in June 2023."

https://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2024/12/huge_savings_on_consultants.html

Not to forget that in 6 years Labour increased the public service by ~18000 / ~40% with no significant improvement in public services, including several '000s in the 6m prior to the 2023 election.

Up
9

I’m just relaying what he told me. He didn’t seem to have any reason to lie. Pay rises are also very low or none. 

Up
1

If they have only cut 300 then they haven’t done very well. Weren’t they elected to cut billions of supposed wasted spending?

Seems crazy to create all this negativity just to save 300 salaries!!

Up
1

correct there are thousands of cuts next year

Up
1

It’ll be interesting to see what the explosion of third world immigrant numbers has on Sydney and Melbourne. 

Up
3

Better food options for a start...my mistake years ago was to buy an Ozi pie ..nearly choked.

Up
1

Here's one take on the effects:

'Less migration is likely to flow through to a further easing in rental demand, and, over the medium term, reduced demand for home purchasing,' CoreLogic said. 

How an immigration slowdown will make houses more affordable

Up
2

"less unaffordable" would be more apt.

Up
5

Unsurprisingly, the movement west is cyclical. That cycle is driven to a significant extent by economic factors like wage levels, unemployment, and the cost of housing.

Right, so not really Australia being a curse when the significant factors identified are largely under NZ's own control.

Join the dots people, ironically as the author manages to do when discussing Australia's current situation.  Less immigration will mean higher wages, lower unemployment and lower house prices/rents. 

Oh, but also less takeaway options I hear someone say.  My apologies, best bring in another 100k immigrants in 2025, nothing is more important than takeaway options for those that already own a home in NZ.

Up
6

You also forgot to add a higher average age without immigration. At current childbirth rates we may end up with half the country on NZ super. 

Up
0

Ayup. People seem to be fixated on the total number, rather than it's constitution. More migrants means both wage pressure and taxation alleviation. What's not apparent is a net benefit or detriment of one scenario or another.

Up
2

When the Minister is removing what weak quality controls are in place (eg median wage requirement) then that doesn't bode well for the 'constitution' in my view.  But yes, NZ per capita would be better off if the total number was zero since we've demonstrated a complete inability to identify quality.  Indeed, we gave the decision-making to private 'employers' who just charge for jobs.  I say let INZ charge 50k for a 12mth visa instead of this flowing to private individuals while the rest of us have to put up with lower wages and training but more expensive accommodation.

More migrants means both wage pressure and taxation alleviation.

Only because we tax PAYE and not capital, specifically land.  And I'm the one being accused of not having a broad enough mind...  Also, I'm fine with higher real wages for workers - ie one of the reasons the article identifies for the migration west.  Of course, they wouldn't need an increase at all if land was sufficiently taxed.  PAYE taxes could be reduced...bank loan books shrunk...ie 'getting ahead' by owning the same houses for less would make a nice change from the last few decades.

Up
4

We tax many things.

Alcohol and cigarettes

Fuel

Income

Retail purchases

And so on, and such forth. 

Thinking a landtax with make up for the shortfall in revenue from consuming employees is fairly wishfull. And at the same time, the aged population mandates increasing spend in areas like healthcare and social welfare.

Up
1

Great thanks Pa1nter!

My logic must have been pretty much bang on if your critique relies on the introduction of unwarranted assumptions and enduring entitlements going forward.

Up
4

Once there is centrally imposed residential land use on councils wrt site coverage and boundary restrictions then I'd agree to a land tax. Remove the 40% site coverage and increase to 60%, remove the 3m building limit from road boundaries, change to 1.5m, remove the 2 dwelling limit per residential section. Increase the height restrictions lower than 10m up to 10m.

Too many commentators proposing a land tax without thinking of the implications. Also the Rating valuation Act needs to be changed as it will surely be used for the valuation on which a land tax will be based.

Up
0

A land tax looks through those things you suggest should be 'preconditions' of an LVT.

Even if they are 'good ideas' and may alter a given piece of lands value, they're mutually exclusive. 

Why?  Because the effectiveness of a land tax to raise revenue (hopefully offset against PAYE), lower the cost of shelter and encourage building/productive use of land isn't changed one way or another by those things you mention - it will always do its job irrespective of whatever other rules apply.

Up
2

I didn't forget to add it JJ, I intentionally didn't mention it because it isn't relevant to my point.  But I agree a higher average age is likely.

So what if half the country is on NZ super?  Tax land and let them pay for it themselves, if they want it so badly.  Some of us have already started caring for our elderly that even 10 years ago we wouldn't have considered spending time doing.  We can adapt.

BTW, if wages were higher, housing more affordable and jobs more readily available then I'd expect more births as a result to help your average age anyway.  Not enough to grow the population, but then I'm fine with a decline in population.  We could export just as much with 3 million as we are with 5 million nowadays.

Up
1

Not only would we have a huge population too old to work, they would also need healthcare. So half the country on super, the other half need to be doctors / nurses / caregivers, no one producing anything.

Not saying immigration is a good solution, but I’m not sure we have any other option. I think they should only allow either skilled or youth though. 

Up
2

So half the country on super, the other half need to be doctors / nurses / caregivers, no one producing anything.

This is just extreme hyperbole.  The reality is there aren't enough 'productive' jobs today, most just shuffle paper around.  Immigration today is about dividing what we have differently (e.g. employers wealth increases due to cash for jobs and lower wages, the immigrant's wealth increases with higher wages/PR compared to home country, all other existing non-home owning New Zealanders wealth decreases due to lower wages/less jobs/higher housing costs).

If we cannot afford ourselves today, bringing in more people won't change that.  If you think it can, then when do we stop bringing in more people to 'solve' this aging problem?  How many will be enough?

Not saying immigration is a good solution, but I’m not sure we have any other option. I think they should only allow either skilled or youth though.

Hmm, then why so quick to dismiss alternative solutions, such as mine which would also involve giving the 100,000's of under/unemployed in NZ a chance?

Up
4

We are good at farming but Labour and regulations trying to kill it as best they could

We are world leaders at selling houses to each other

We are now taking our medicine, if you have made lots of money you will be ok, as you will have diversified investment into international assets.

the rest are probably screwed so going offshore to try and make a base

 

Up
5

Agreed.

Up
1

I’m not sure your solution will work. Why does a younger NZer stay here with all these taxes to pay for our very old population when Australia would have a much younger population and lower taxes. 
Raising the age of super is probably the best solution, but seems impossible. 

Up
2

Why does a younger NZer stay here with all these taxes to pay for our very old population

They wouldn't, which is exactly why my solution proposes:

A) changing taxation burden from PAYE to Land (so it largely wouldn't be the young paying for it and it would lower the cost of shelter)

and B) not assuming existing entitlements are going to persist. 

You've literally just given one example of B) yourself, that of raising the age of super.  If we get our cost of shelter sorted or even just become more efficient by simplifying everyday life, then many more alternatives would become available with the freed-up time.

Up
1

Reinstatement of the superannuation surcharges should be done before any change to the age of entitlement, but there is no reason why we shouldn't do both.

Up
2

My preferred solution is this:

  • Raise NZ super age to 70
  • Keep KiwiSaver age at 65
  • But if you take KiwiSaver before 70, the government takes enough to give you NZ super payments until you are 70 (so you can’t blow all your KiwiSaver and then expect state support). 
  • If you don’t have KiwiSaver or don’t have enough saved for the NZ super payment, then keep working or go on disability benefit. 
  • Keep raising super age as people continue to live longer. 
Up
1

why not make kiwisaver compulsary?

 

Up
1

Yes could do that. And/or increase to 5% employer match from 3%. 
But at the moment KiwiSaver does not decrease the states NZ super payments. Making it the method of early retirement gives it more purpose, significantly decreases the NZ super problem, while still keeping a fair universal super system. 

Up
1

People would be more inclined to have families if they weren't being squeezed into dog boxes by mass immigration.

Up
8

I don’t think that’s true. Plenty of countries with low immigration also have low birth rates. NZ is above the OECD average fertility rate. 

Up
0

You think it's not true that not being able to afford a family home has no impact on the size of families people are having?

Ok then.

Up
8

I can’t find any stats to support that. For example we keep hearing how much more affordable Australia is, yet it has a lower fertility rate than NZ. The US has the same fertility rate as NZ despite much cheaper housing and much higher income. But stick to your reckons if you prefer. 
Rewind 70 odd years and many big families lived in a small 2 bed state house with a small bathroom and kitchen.

Up
1

Tbh, I thought it was more not being able to afford a deposit for a family home meant people were putting off having children to later; and then having less children due to less viable childbearing time and less disposable income due to high debt servicing costs.

But surely there's no statistics to back that narrative up, so I must be making it up.

Up
1

I'm part of a multi-ethnic immigrant family. I'm retired; my wife retires next year and our oldest child in 25 years. There are more fun ways of reducing the average age of Kiwis. [I don't mean killing the old ones.]

Up
2

We are the lucky ones - depending on every individuals / families needs, we can oscillate between the two nations. That's a privilege. My (non NZ Citizen) work colleagues in Australia all express envy at our special Visa status. 

Up
2

if you have enough NZ assets you can rent in Europe for a year here and there.

 

Up
1

New Zealand could entice Kiwis to move back from Australia any time, all it would need to do is lower the cost-of-living to make the country comparatively more attractive for workers. It's amazing how much effort we put into not solving a problem.

Up
10

One way is to match or better the Aussies in tax. Removing GST on food and excise on fuel would make NZ more cost competitive. But would need to increase other taxes to make up for it. 
Personally I don’t like either of those options, but food and fuel are the two big costs that are higher in NZ and in both cases it’s due to tax. 

Up
1

Anyone working full time will likely pay more income tax.

Up
1

Yes but many people aren’t particularly clever. As long as things seem cheap they’ll be happy even if it all works out the same. 

Up
0

Ozi offered my teacher wife double her NZ salary. Her degree and 8 years experience also qualified her for full registration immediately (whereas I've detailed before how TEC make that devilishly hard because they want more post-graduate students in polytechs rather than teachers in classrooms).

If NZ were to offer my wife double her current salary along with full registration - she'd still say no. The weather is simply better here, and she loves the school she works at, and our children have a stable future there.

Up
4

Australia's economy has been so hollowed out by the Ponzi prices, high migration from South Asia, and govt-funded employment economy, that there is really isn't much else (ex-resources).

This is arguably why the ruling elite refuse to pursue different strategies and policies.

It keels over otherwise.

Up
0

Jim Chalmers & Albo are proud of their “Care Economy.” Sounds like Ardern and the kindness stuff. But what is the vision for the future?

Aussie to be one big nursing home paying people $100k a year (plus benefits) and bureaucrats to send emails to each other?

Up
2

Buy some Gold and BTC J.C. and be happy.

Up
3

Lord Orr thinks otherwise and I suspect the RBA, Albo, Jim Chalmers would have no comment or at least lean towards Orr.

These are our leaders after all. And we're supposed to accept the wisdom of our institutions. 

Up
0

buying either means a 30-40 to 1 deleverage of banks balance sheets

I wonder why they think this way?

 

Up
1

Australia & NZ are joined at the hip. Yes, they're richer than us because they employ big diggers almost anywhere they can, but it's both hard & hot to earn the big money. They have been in the top two for having creamed the great Chinese wave over the past 30 years. We've done okay out of that as well, but we are not the other nation in that top two. I'm surprised there were very few politically driven posts, as they have got the goblins in power right now whilst we have asked them to please leave the building. Thank you.

And Albo & co are almost as bad as ours were, & with the first nations issues now starting to pop up here & there, they will not be far behind us I'm afraid.

I live in NZ because this is home. I visit Australia regularly, especially when it's a bit nippy here & 20 something over there. I have lived there as well & can vouch that it is not much fun working when the temp hits the 40s but that was a long time ago. The great southern states of North America have been a big driver of America's recent wealth growth curve over the past 40 years, with air conditioning a large contributing factor in that & the same logic applies to Australia today.

Both counties have a lot to offer the hard working folk who choose to live here. There are many other countries which would love to have what we have.

Up
2