Prime Minister Christopher Luxon dismissed his first ministers on Wednesday, taking the media portfolio away from Melissa Lee and disabilities portfolio off Penny Simmonds.
Both dismissals come after high profile problems in these ministers' respective areas.
Lee has been struggling to respond to the impending closure of Newshub, and Simmonds faced problems after a sudden pause in some Whaikaha funding.
Luxon said the reshuffle's happening because issues in these portfolios had become more prominent and needed more senior ministers to handle them.
“It has become clear in recent months that there are significant challenges in the media sector. Similarly, we have discovered major financial issues with programmes run by the Ministry of Disabled People,” he said in a statement.
Paul Goldsmith will take the media and communications portfolio, replacing Melissa Lee who will drop out of Cabinet.
She will retain her ethnic communities, economic development, and ACC portfolios.
Luxon said there were “significant synergies” between the media portfolio and arts, culture and heritage which was already held by Goldsmith.
However, he warned there were “limited levers” the Government could pull, but Goldsmith would complete work already underway to ensure regulatory settings were appropriate.
Louise Upston will take responsibility for disabilities issues, as it is already a departmental agency that sits within the Ministry of Social Development.
Simmonds will continue with her environment and tertiary education portfolios.
The big winner of this reshuffle will be Simon Watts, the Minister for Climate Change and Revenue, who will now take Lee’s seat at the Cabinet table.
Luxon said he wanted to ensure the right people were in the right jobs and he would be willing to shift responsibilities as issues changed throughout the term in government.
He said it was disappointing for Lee, and that she he had said that to him, but he retained full confidence in her and Simmonds in their remaining portfolios.
96 Comments
Actually managing performance!!?? Luxton really has no idea how government works. Incompetence is ALWAYS excused in the first instance and if (as it usually does) it becomes pressed you hold a working party with interested stakeholders that will produce a report (probably). If you are REALLY pressed then you have to upscale to a commission of inquiry that will product a report (sometime).
Don't they give new PM's an on-boarding handout these days?
She may well be. Hasn't made herself look good over the years though, unfortunately. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/13603/pm-stands-by-lee-after-'silly…
No need to attack the source. This was widely covered and the statements from Melissa Lee and John Key spoke for themselves.
In particular, what part of the content in this RNZ article do you claim to be biased and not reporting facts?
FYI, perceptions of bias in media are inversely correlated with depth of engagement with the actual content: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8153466/
I got thought that the story about when she could not answer questions from the media re her paper to the select committee was that she appeared to get bounced By Winston Peters because he claimed that he had not received a copy before the meeting. Subsequently she was able show that his office had been sent a copy. The fact that he had not read it was not her fault. She was required to be the fall guy to save embarrassing Peters. Yes I feel sorry for her too. I get the impression that this government could disintegrate. Internal National politics plus inter party rivalry.
I have an element of sympathy. She did seem a bit "deer in the headlights" but then again what exactly is a media minister meant to do in the context of legacy media being stuck in a terminal decline for a variety of different reasons.
At the end of the day, if consumers don't want to consume that media, and advertisers are less willing to pay, then that's "all she wrote". A bit crap for those whose livelihoods are affected, but I don't see the likes of Newshub closing down as being any more of a big deal than any other business closure.
Journalists typically have an over-inflated sense of their value to society ... but if nobody is buying, then that tells us something.
I support a singular, funded and free from advertiser influencer, multi-platform government broadcaster - aside from that what else should the government really be doing anyway with respect to the media?
TVNZ is expected to make a profit for the government. If the government paid for TVNZ so it didn't need advertising, like the ABC or BBC, then there would probably still be enough advertising money for a private competitor to stay in business.
Whether or not that would help in the long term is debatable I guess.
I've never seen the point in trying to make TVNZ 'for profit'. As stated, I'd be in favour of having one "government news outfit" that can distribute news across multiple platforms (radio, TV, web, social media) with both national and regional focus. Fund it properly, try to make it as impartial as possible with a focus on fact-heavy reporting (as opposed to editorial content) and national/local interest stories that don't have commercial viability otherwise. This should be the only activity, with private media organisations left to sink or swim on their own merit and accord.
Legacy business models are undergoing a huge challenge and local community journalism is a useful service to society.
So we likely receive societal benefit from some interim help with maintaining local journalism.
This is a very worthwhile read on it: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/new-york-times-publishe…
Not suggesting we always pay journalists.
Exactly. Private media companies are no different to any other private company. The tax payer does not owe them a living. Although from some of the recent reactions by employees of such you would think they consider themselves to be exempt from redundancy. That’s for lesser beings isn’t it?
There's no shortage of news, last time I checked ... just that the 'production & distribution mechanism' is undergoing serious structural change (based on consumer preferences, the willingness of advertisers to pay, and the increasing ease with which anybody distribute news content online).
My life is more impacted by the cafe down the road closing the other day, than it is by Newshub shutting up shop.
I agree with a multi-platform government broadcaster but when the majority of our media identify themselves as left leaning that is not going to pan out.
I think the fact that the buying audience has moved onto mobile platforms for their media means that traditional media ether had to move with their audience or disappear.
"Melissa Lee was a deer in the headlights."
She lost her script.
It said, "When faced with uncomfortable questions you can not answer, commiserate and empathize with the questioner(s), point out "this is complex issue with far reaching considerations", and tell them you and your team are working hard in resolving it but the issue is commercially sensitive and you have no further comment at this time."
Less than six months operational as government. Luxon took over the appearance of a squabbling, disgruntled and disjointed brat pack and shaped them up sufficiently to restore discipline and credibility and gain the greatest number of seats in parliament. All this in less than a year.This move relatively early in the term signals that there will be no reverting to such nonsense and within that, that means inferior performance. As such, the PM’s call, totally, emphatically.
agnost. Yeah, agree with your point that Luxon should have bolted home. I sat only metres away from him at a pre election lunch presentation where I studied him closely. I came away unconvinced and no closer to getting a handle on him. I feared he was just another high IQ slick corporate snake oil shyster, a familiar type to me from a long corporate career. But always in the back of my mind was his high level success in a volume consumer business in one of the worlds most brutal markets. I'm still on the fence but this ruthless type of action keeps alive glimmers of hope that he might have what it takes to reverse the slide in NZs fortunes.
Rather unusual six years. National in 2017 were without a viable coalition partner, had become complacent & conceited. This the electorate considered and delivered a Labour led government with WP/NZF inserted as a safety brake, the Greens sidelined. 2020 the electorate rewarded the government’s handling of covid but took out its displeasure at some aspects by ditching WP/NZF but at the same time used the mechanisms of MMP to keep the Greens sidelined. In other words they used MMP to defeat the principles of MMP and in essence returned a FPP government. Come 2023 Labour was in about as much disarray as National post 2017 so the electorate went back to the drawing board and reinstated WP/NZF again a safety brake you might well say. Personally I was skeptical of the merits of WP/NZF returning but on form so far are actually now somewhat relieved by the presence in government.
Haha, reverse NZs fortunes. Good one.
Giving property investors back their deductions just put the slide into full gear. The only thing that will arrest the slide is cheaper house prices and pushing money away from residential housing.
I'm still waiting for one positive thing from them.
Good to see his business acumen coming through...bad news,redundancies,re-structuring...always release bad news on a Friday afternoon,or even better still,before a public holiday that is likely to be extended by most to 4 days...business 101 ,Merry Christmas,oh and good luck seeking new employment.
It's yesterdays news by the time Monday comes around.
Chippie in shouty big boy pants mode suggests labour would crack down even harder on under performing ministers. Short memory - he was part of the cabinet that decided David Clark shouldn't be sacked for multiple breaches of the covid lockdown rules because 'we can't afford the disruption'.
Given the last AUT survey that says the decline in trust in news media seems to be accelerating, why would anyone support something that is failing in so many areas, in it's current form?
The media have to evolve to regain that public trust, but there seems to be a lot of virtue signalling, posturing and self-promotional noise - with very little introspection and change.
Got to say that it's refreshing to see accountability for not getting the job done. Very much at odds with the usual strategy of deny, deflect, maneuver and hang on to the job like grim death.
Bit more to it than "they're not telling me what I want to hear so they're failing": https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/new-york-times-publishe…
I have some knowledge of the disability sector.
1. The new Ministry for Disabilities is financially disfunctional. Not Penny Simmonds fault, but maybe she was having trouble dealing to them. But also there is not much there to build upon.
2. There has been outrage from the disability sector over changes in some rules. Quite ridiculous outrage in fact. The carer support funding is subject to massive fraud, mostly ignored. Short of fraud there are very odd uses of those funds.
But they know outrage works because politically you are always on a loser if you argue back. It’s politics.
Changing this takes years of hard work, which the ministries are not competent to accomplish
Examples.
Taking the money and not taking the break.
False $ claims - ie somebody claiming they were the alternative carer, but did not actually do it. Splitting the money with the actual carer.
And. You provide misinformation when you say "The inability for those funds to be used for respite for carers". Actually there are vast sums paid for respite. It continues.
And. Your last sentence is an example of what I explained. You are on a loser trying to argued with the disabled. Plain politics. (even when they are wrong)
There's no comparison at all. David Clark personally repeatedly broke Covid rules Labour was telling everyone else in the country to follow & eventually resigned. He was given repeated chances by Jacinda who was weak & irresponsible not sacking him the first time - "to encourage the others".
NZ now being led through a pandemic by a lame duck health minister | interest.co.nz
David Clark resigns as Health Minister: 'It's best for me to step aside' | RNZ News
'Unhelpful distraction': Health Minister David Clark resigns - NZ Herald
kiwis. Agree Clark's high handed arrogance is not equivalent to Lees performance ineffectiveness but the triggering principle is the same, ie fail to deliver and perish. The difference is style; Luxon's ruthless response sends a clear message of expectation right through the executive and public service.
True. MMP finally delivers NZ an actual format of the type of government MMP is structured to produce. That is a coalition rather than, as up until now, a traditional major party with a lackey, and immediately those favouring the defeated traditional major party, decry the working of a true MMP government. So it would seems to them that democracy under MMP is totally misrepresented simply because it did not produce an agreeable result. Suggestion then. Go and live somewhere else, say between Moscow and Beijing, and see how you enjoy that version of democracy.
The NZ public has low and declining (relative to other countries) trust in the Media. David Seymour says, this should be a cause for reflection for the Media. Instead, Melissa Lee sacrificed because media control the story in their own interests.
Meanwhile, Willie Jackson who butchered the media portfolio gets in free hits courtesy of Newshub and TVNZ. Bias anyone?
for his credit he cannot do anything about his partners and their ministers running amuck and causing all sorts of problems, so he picked the two weaker performing ministers and used them to show he is a strong leader, ironically they were both better than the ACT and NZF cabinet ministers than are going to end up losing him the next election.
Maybe it is being run like a business, well a corporate. If you've every worked for a Multi-National corporate, they can be great at own goaling themselves during hard times by rolling out redundancies in operations, starving them of capital to replenish inventory and maintain plant etc, all to preserve the CEO/Board/Shareholder's entitlement to a certain level of return.
Yeah,and it's always someone else's fault.the other day he said he would hold dept heads to account , if their shit policy causes unpopular results. You have to cut, if you can't cut jobs without causing unrest, your out. Doesn't matter as long as there is someone to blame and fire
Typical corporate bull.
National needs to work out whether the cost of aligning with NZF is worth the stench of corruption and sleeze that will hang around them for the foreseeable future. Tobacco was the first indication this administration was heading towards corruption, these sort of stories are going to keep coming.
Sacking 2 nobody ministers is not going to keep the public distracted enough for 3 years...
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/quarry-connected-to-55000-donati…
If Luxon wants to show he is on top of "govt" he needs to sort out the allocation of portfolio's and rationalise them and Ministers. Its a pretty weird mix between ministers and way more portfolio's than necessary - especially in the social welfare arena. This is a set up for poor policy, delay and excessive cost over and above the salaries of the civil servants involved
Not sure why people get excited about Simon Watts - seems to be another minister that actually doesnt have a good understanding of his portfolio which is of concern given the implications for everybody of getting it wrong
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.