Chlöe Swarbrick standing for Green Party co-leadership, as James Shaws replacement

On what policy matter is she "partially sane"? 

Only viable option really. Can think on her feet and had evidenced admirable doggedness in getting to the rub of issues that officialdom would prefer to remain unexplored. Problem for the Greens is after nigh on thirty years in parliament they have remained out of cabinet in any government and some of them seem to prefer to seethe about that instead of asking why. That is a counterproductive and negative base that Mr Shaw had to contend with and likely it will only get worse for any new co-leader because they have deservedly earned suspicion going on derision from the electorate.

She is the only one at least partially sane in a complete nuthouse. Like her or not, at least she is capable, articulate and not afraid to work, contrarily to Marama Davidson. There is no other realistic option for the Greens, really. 

Capable of what? A steady line of patter? 

Has she actually done anything in her life beyond University Club and the political machine she inhabits? People were praising Chloe for posting Tweets during the floods. As if she were single handedly taking charge. She wasn't doing anything except relaying messages from those actually doing something. But her fan club were gushing with praise over such great leadership.   

What is wokeism? It's constantly used on this site but no one has yet explained what it means. 

...channelling Morticia Addams

Yep well not surprising she looks dressed to the nines as it sounds like she doesn't bother to pay for her clothes :P

If you watched her announcement followed up by questions, she really is a good politician.

She is articulate. However, when she doesn't have a quick-fire response, she puts on the furrowed brow, gets agitated, and descends into emotional claptrap. 

Never minces her words and usually is actually quite thought provoking and well researched.

No. She will cherry pick a piece of research that she can remember and rattle off during an interview or something. The interviewer or the person she is debating does not know what research she is referencing nor do they know of its validity / weaknesses. Neither does the audience. That is not 'well researched'. That is propaganda tactics. 

Dunno about that. First thing she did is tell a lie, just like Jacinda. Remember Jacinda said she would never lie, she didn't need to you see. So Chloe comes up with an absolute Clanger and tells us that she will lead the biggest green movement ever, and will lead a Green-government. What a joke. I doubt the first one, and the second one, well, if she believes that maybe she also believes in Santa. Greens have had their high water mark last election as a result of a protest vote against Labour. There will be movement back to Labour from the Greens and so the 'biggest' green movement is already shrinking and will continue to so. James Offshore is now gone, and although useless, he was the most sensible of the lot of them and he alone attracted many more moderate Greens who will now look elsewhere when considering the shambles that remains. Look for the greens to get between 5-7% next election. Chloe is a dreamer.

"young, disenfranchised voters from Labour"

You mean generation-whatever who think that them enjoying life, doing a little bit of work from home, and generally complaining that they can't have whatever they want now, without paying, or committing to any hard work. They are not disenfranchised, they are generally just lazy and entitled, so would be well suited to the Greens yes, you are right.

She reeks of "Let's rise up against the teachers and get rid of school uniforms!", and then force everyone to wear maoist gear