When the Covid-19 pandemic began back in March 2020, most people did not expect it to trigger a boom in Australian house prices. It’s certainly not what the banks were predicting at the time.
But a boom there has been. By the start of this year, house prices were 25% above where they were when the pandemic struck. The total value of housing stock hit AU$10 trillion.
There are plenty of explanations – Australians offshore suddenly recognised the benefit of living in the lucky country and so bought a piece of it; Australians onshore couldn’t spend their money on travel and so invested in real estate and, for many, ‘working from home’ brought a new perspective to housing.
Of course, the primary reason was that, in response to the pandemic, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) quickly slashed the cash rate from 0.75% to just 0.10%. Significantly, the bank said that it did not expect to start raising rates until 2024. Mortgage rates hit historical lows and the housing market took off.
But like all booms, it had to end. And once again it’s the RBA driving the action. May and June saw back-to-back rate hikes, first 0.25% then 0.50%. They were the first increases since 2010.
In a speech on Tuesday, RBA Governor Philip Lowe said that the bank “is committed to doing what is necessary to ensure that inflation returns to the 2 to 3 percent target range”. Given that the most recent inflation figure was 5.1% and the RBA expects it to peak at 7% in December, more interest rate rises are a certainty.
Financial markets expect another 0.50% hike next month and a cash rate of 2.75% or more by the end of the year.
The upward trajectory of house prices started to look fragile at the beginning of the year as it became clear that interest rates would inevitably be heading up. According to data from Corelogic, back in February Sydney was the first market to start falling. It was soon followed by Melbourne, and then Canberra. Some locations are still rising but in most places the momentum is slowing.
Overall, Corelogic’s national Home Value Index declined in May, the first decline in nearly two years. It was only 0.1% but more, and steeper, declines are now expected.
All the telltale signs of trouble in the housing market are emerging in the worst affected capital cities. Sales volumes are falling, and it is taking longer for houses to sell. Auction clearance rates are steadily dropping. According to Corelogic, last week’s clearance rate of just 54.8% was the lowest since July 2020.
Mortgage lending is also in decline. The most recent figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics show that new loan commitments for housing fell 6.4% in April.
The buyer/seller dynamic has changed dramatically in just a few months. In many locations, buyers desperate to get into a rising market have been replaced by buyers cautious about paying too much.
A great deal has been made of the plight of first home buyers during the housing boom. House prices were rising much faster than many could save for a deposit. So at least first home buyers looking now will benefit from the current downturn? Maybe not. According to Moody’s Investors Service, the decline in house prices will not outweigh the increase in mortgage rates such that housing affordability will not improve this year.
Of course, the big losers are likely to be those who bought within the last 12 months, particularly once they are exposed to market interest rates. That exposure will occur as initial fixed interest rate periods expire, and floating interest rates kick in. This is ominously referred to as the ‘fixed-rate mortgage cliff’.
According to RateCity, about 38% of home loans currently incur fixed interest rates. More than a hundred billion dollars of these will move to floating rates in the second half of 2023. The uplift will be significant.
For many recent purchasers, the dream of home ownership will transform into the nightmare of negative equity.
How bad could it get?
There are plenty of predictions out there and as the months tick by many are becoming increasingly pessimistic.
In May, ANZ Bank was forecasting a fall nationally of 3% in 2022 and 8% in 2023. A month later and the bank has revised that to a 5% fall this year and 10% next year. In Sydney, the total fall by the end of next year is predicted to be 20%.
CBA, Australia’s biggest bank, also expects a fall nationally of 15% by the end of 2023.
National Australia Bank expects “prices to decline by around 15-20% as mortgage rates rise and affordability constraints become increasingly binding.”
Investment Bank Jardens also puts its money on a decline of 15-20% nationally. However, Chief Economist Carlos Cacho is reported as saying that “falls in Sydney and Melbourne are likely to be larger and faster”.
Larger than 20%. That could get ugly.
Is there any good news for house prices?
Unemployment is low and looks likely to remain that way given the chronic labour shortage that is afflicting many parts of the economy. That also means wages are going up.
With the nation’s borders open again, immigrants and students are returning in numbers. That should boost demand for housing. Indeed, the rental market turned up earlier this year as Covid restrictions eased. Rents continue to rise. Corelogic’s rental index increased 1% in May and 3% for the quarter. Corelogic says that “the annual change in rents is now tracking at 8.8% across the combined capital cities and 10.8% across the combined regions”.
State and federal governments continue to do what they always do in the housing market – stoke demand. This is done by throwing incentives at first home buyers in the form of cash grants, stamp duty concessions, deposit support arrangements, and ‘shared equity’ schemes.
The new Labor government included a shared equity scheme in its bundle of election promises. Just this week, the New South Wales state government announced one to assist single parents, older singles, teachers, nurses, and police to purchase a first home. It enables a qualifying participant to purchase a house with a deposit as low as 2%.
Government incentivising financially struggling people into a housing market predicted to fall 15-20%. What could possibly go wrong?
Ross Stitt is a freelance writer and tax lawyer with a PhD in political science. He is a New Zealander based in Sydney. His articles are part of our 'Understanding Australia' series.
50 Comments
The planning changes will destroy Labour’s Auckland support as well. Even though they were a bilateral arrangement with the Nats, the government will incur much of the blame.
some thought it was a crafty move by Labour, perhaps it was a crafty swansong from Judith???
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/06/23/economy/china-bank-runs-protests-int… China is going to make our property crash look like play school.....
Perfect article except the illustration is wrong. It implies the borrower is sucked under by falling house prices. The borrower is ultimately not. The banks are. Watch as the black hole of falling house prices causes another headache for the RBA and RBNZ combined. To quote Billy Joel's Goodnight Saigon "and we will all go down together"
Basically reserve banks were the culprit for promoting housing boom and they say that they do not have a role in housing market.
So many reasons were offered justifying the housing boom and not to forget the Supply / demand excuse. Forgetting the live example of toilet roll that people were fighting to get hold despite ......only because of FOMO.
In a ponzi, herd mentaility takes over and logic / fundamental fail....logical thinking is thrown out of the window and reserve bank and government, by their statement and policies.only added fuel to fire.
Has Mr Orr came out and apologised for immitating fed by parroting transitory inflation ( immitated as it suited their narrative) . USA may still come out of it with its diversified and big economy but a tiny economy like NZ may have to face a bigger brunt, specially where bulk is dependent on housing.
Agree. The FED were either completely incompetent or lying to all all as they reiterated a year ago "Inflation is transitory and % rates wont go up till 2024" NZ parroting this is equally indefensible! And they all pumped and pumped the balloon bigger and set the highly inflammably charged landmine......that is now hidden in the grass for the indebted to jump onto, as our mortgages reset.
The USA will raise rates hard, yet with many Americans are on the common 30year fixed mortgages (2.5 to 4% in recent years) they wont feel the immediate reset pain (but will by the deep recession). In the US only the new buyers will feel the pain as rates are set to clock past 6% in good ole US and A.
This is good feature of the long dated mortgage market in the US. This leaves NZ much more exposed, with no such long date set % stability.
NZ has the perfect setup for a cluster of all crashes and resets, with our common home loans taken in the short 1 to 2 years range - we will have many, many more people jumping on the much higher reset rates (Landmines) than most markets.
Unlike NZ, Aussie has not allowed their Super savings to be pillaged and put into the housing market.
Aussie might be stupid enough to allow this to happen to prop up the market for a bit longer, but hopefully have the sense not to.
But as it stands, come the crash, at least they will have their super savings to fall back on, unlike many Kiwis.
So they don't let you raid your super in Aussie to buy a house, but they do if there's an economic downturn?
Edit: actually it looks like they do let FHBs use their super to buy a house in Aussie. In fact, they're increasing the thresholds.
You can currently apply to have a maximum of $15,000 of your voluntary contributions from any one financial year included in your eligible contributions to be released under the FHSS scheme, up to a total of $30,000 contributions across all years. You will also receive an amount of earnings that relate to those contributions.
From 1 July 2022, the amount of eligible contributions that can count towards your maximum releasable amount across all years will increase from $30,000 to $50,000.
I think Oz only started allowing FHBs to use their super in the past month or two. Here's an article published just over a month ago explaining the changes and how this new policy is expected to be petrol on the house price fire:
We're in a bit of a difficult spot, because we have a bunch of term deposit holders courtesy of mortgaged up first home buyers, who were once championing the lowering of interest rates which saw rampant house price inflation. Now they're complaining that returns on term deposits are far too low, but the risks to the economy when you whack the rates in reverse are far more damaging.
It just shows the politicians can't help themselves. But at least it is allowing people to gamble with their own money, rather than be subsidized by everyone else.
But the whole point of super was to put aside money so no matter what happens in life, you got through to retirement with enough money to have a good retirement without Govt support or as little top-up as possible. That's why you should not touch KiwiSaver unless it is a crisis.
The moment Govt. gave permission to do this, they were admitting there was a crisis, although they would not say it.
It's not meant to be limited to those two choices. The idea is to have a house and a nest egg.
And you are making it sound like it was their decision on making the trade-off. If you are having to dip into your retirement savings, you obviously have missed out on having a house and nest egg, and that should raise the red flag of a failing system.
For the last seventy years the building industries crash every economic cycle as do house prices. Then they eventually rise again.
Its just like the tide... except this time the tide came in for way longer than usual (we tried to make the boom last longer than is natural so we cant predict the length or depth of the fall from historical norms)
Housing boom and bust cycles only happened for the last 70 years during relative global stability. Personally i think the ship has sailed now.. once the house prices and economy slumps it wont come back the same way.
Prices are definitely going to come back 20% (or more) in the short term because the fundamentals don't support the massive increases of the last year. We'll come back to normal range and people can get on with their lives...
Did anyone see this Bloomberg article on property KPIs that came out last week?
Will be very interesting to see how a NZ property pull back affects the Aussie banks over the next two years. The two could play off to reduce liquidity but will be interesting to know by how much...
With Aussie developers and building companies dropping like flies now (is happening in NZ- just not widely reported as yet) and both housing markets now have significant house price drops, that are accelerating ......... without an end in current sight!
These "safe as" Aussie/NZ banks should be shissing bricks, as they will be left holding the baby when bankrupt homeowners cannot pay the current $1000.00 a week mortgages (on a down market, Auck ratbox) that currently take 50% of the already inflation stressed households earnings.
This Ponzi setup, could not have been better engineered for major Debt implosion.
Hard hats and watch out above!
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.