This Top 5 comes from interest.co.nz's Gareth Vaughan.
As always, we welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to david.chaston@interest.co.nz. And if you're interested in contributing the occasional Top 5 yourself, contact gareth.vaughan@interest.co.nz.
Back in the day there was a regular interest.co.nz commenter named "Wolly." It was rare for a story to be published without the addition of a comment from Wolly. One of the things Wolly took a particular interest in was copper. I was reminded of this during the week when listening to an episode of Bloomberg's Odd Lots Podcast.
The headline on the epidsode is; Why Copper May Be One of the Tightest Markets The World Has Ever Seen. Bloomberg's Tracy Alloway and Joe Weisenthal talk with Goldman Sachs metals strategist Nick Snowdon about copper. Wolly would love it.
Snowdon paints the picture of a perfect storm for the copper market. The story he sets out is a classic case of a world that's looking to combat climate change and decarbonise, needing dirty old, water intensive mining to help achieve this.
There's essentially no decarbonisation without copper. It's an integral raw material for the key green technologies, EVs, EV charging infrastructure, renewables. We see the demand from decarbonisation efforts over the course of this decade generating as much of an uplift for demand as China did in the 2000s.
That's coming up in an environment where we hit peak copper supply within the next two years, and there's a complete absence of fresh investment coming into the sector. And so after that peak supply is trending into an open ended contraction. So you have this clear tightening tension between the boom in demand tied to the green transition, and really that complete lack of growth coming from the supply side.
The green transition as Snowdon puts it, requires a lot of copper.
If you look at the global copper market today, demand in 2022 will come in at around 24 million tonnes. Green versus non-green demand: Today the world is dominated by non-green demand. That's copper going into construction, wiring in your house, wiring in electronics, in cars, in the grid. Out of that 24 million tonnes this year will make up about 22.5m tonnes.
Green demand, which we categorise as electric vehicles, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and then the green power sector [such as] wind and solar, that only amounts to about 1.5 million tonnes of copper demand today. But if you look at what's going to play out over the next five to 10 years, that balance between green and non-green demand is going to switch quite sharply. By 2025 green demand will have doubled, gone to closer to three million tonnes. And by the end of the decade that number will have risen to between six to seven million tonnes. So green demand will go from today only being about 5% of the global demand to closer to 20%.
Whilst he doesn't see a shortage of copper per se, getting to it isn't simple.
There isn't a shortage of copper in the earth's crust. There are a lot of potential mineable options out there, but we're just not seeing capital flowing into those projects.
Over the last two years even though the copper price has doubled, there hasn't been a single new copper mine approved...The reasons for that are similar to some of the issues facing broader commodity extraction industries. The number one constraint is the last cycle, the near death experience in 2013-14, [the] overbuild. There's now a much more conservative mentality in management teams.
If you want to build a copper mine today, even before you break ground, you will spend two to three years waiting to get the right permits to actually move forward with construction. Twenty years ago that same process took six, maybe 12 months maximum. [There are now] much, much higher hurdles from an environmental and social perspective.
Nonetheless Snowdon argues copper is way better at what it does than its competitors.
One thing we've got to recognise about copper is it is not a raw material where it has close competitors in its key role as a conductor. Because it's such a good conductor it really has a primacy over its key roles in the grid, in cars. It's not to say there aren't other conductors. But things like aluminium require a lot more aluminium to achieve the same level of conductivity as copper. So it's just not practical for uses when you have a small amount of space. There isn't a competitor to copper for the majority of its key roles. It's not to say there couldn't be some substitutions towards other raw materials in less space confined use.
Necessity is the mother invention. And if copper prices go to the levels we expect, if not higher, then will that incentivise much greater efforts in trying to find alternatives? Or perhaps more reasonably will dilution of the the level of copper used in some of these areas?... You may well see slightly less copper used in an EV in five to 10 years time partly because of the high prices and partly because it's technology that's new, that's developing and over time they'll find efficiencies.
Semi-precious metals
Select chart tabs
2) Victims of a not so stable stablecoin.
The recent collapse of the TerraUSD (UST) cryptocurrency stablecoin, promoted as being pegged one-to-one with the US dollar, left victims all around the world. Here Rest of World, which describes itself as a global non-profit publication covering technology beyond the Western bubble, details some of them. They come from Argentina, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq, and Nigeria. They include Valeria from Argentina.
Valeria had spent months learning about UST before starting to invest in various protocols about four months ago. In mid-May, the stablecoin lost its peg, meaning that its value diverged from that of the dollar, and its price plunged to mere cents. Valeria watched her savings dwindle to zero, unable to remove the money from the protocols, which had blocked withdrawals. “I invested in a stablecoin that today is worth $0.08,” she told Rest of World. “I feel sickened and helpless.”
The apparent security of stablecoins has made them attractive to people in countries that experience high inflation or currency devaluations, such as Argentina, Iran, and Nigeria. The UST crash, which has hit other crypto assets, shattered that illusion. Valeria is one of more than a dozen people Rest of World spoke with, from countries including Argentina, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq, and Nigeria, who invested in UST — the third-largest stablecoin — and its accompanying Luna token, and who said they have now lost tens of thousands of dollars in savings.
“They scammed [me],” Mudasir, a UST holder from Pakistan, told Rest of World. “I have nothing left, not even a penny.”
There are certainly sad stories here. And you do wonder how many people tipping their money into UST actually understood it.
But while users were flocking to UST for its perceived stability, according to Sabbatella, few understood that it still had inherent risks. Unlike other stablecoin providers that claim to hold reserves tied to the underlying asset they track, such as Tether, UST wasn’t backed by actual U.S. dollars but rather a complex algorithmic system that maintained the peg through a network of traders in underlying cryptocurrency Luna. In what some experts suggest may have been a coordinated maneuver, a massive push to buy UST caused the stablecoin to lose its peg, resulting in a bank run — and ensuing death spiral — where holders rushed to sell.
The Washington Post has the story of Molly White, a software engineer who has become something of a watchdog over the world of cryptocurrency mania. As a sector in its infancy, the crypto world makes all sorts of promises to investors or speculators, but contains may scams. White is looking for, and documenting, them.
A 28-year-old software engineer who writes Wikipedia articles for fun, White is an odd figure to make the crypto industry cower. On her website, “Web3 is Going Just Great,” White documents case after case of crypto malfeasance: investments that turn out to be scams, poorly-run projects that collapse under mismanagement and hacks that drain supporters’ money.
As much of the financial and tech elite has rallied around crypto, White has led a small but scrappy group of skeptics pushing the other way whose warnings have seemed vindicated by the cratering in recent weeks of cryptocurrency prices.
“Most of my disdain is reserved for the big players who are marketing this to a mainstream audience as though it’s an investment, often promising to be a ticket out of a really tough financial spot for people who don’t have many options,” White said. “It’s very predatory.”
To White and her fellow critics, crypto company founders and the venture capitalists backing them are presiding over a massive, unregulated attempt to rid regular people of their money by exaggerating the potential of crypto technology. Years spent online, researching esoteric Internet cultures have made White a rare figure who can maneuver the technically complex, meme-filled world of crypto, translating it into digestible prose.
4) The practicalities of getting grain out of war ravaged Ukraine.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine has caused turmoil for global food supplies. Ukraine is a major supplier of wheat, corn, barley and sunflower-oil. New routes and methods are being devised, as the United Nations accuses Russia of waging war on global food security. Options include reviving a Soviet-era railway line where about a quarter of the 20-kilometre line is missing.
Bloomberg has the story.
The railway line from Reni to Galati via Moldova would be a relatively small piece of the jigsaw, but it illustrates the enormity of the challenge.
TTS, a Romanian company that operates on the Danube and in the port of Constanta, has been working on clearing bushes and small trees to open up the route. “We are a logistics company and we’ve done many things in this life that defy geography,” Ion Stanciu, TTS’s deputy chief executive officer, said in an interview on May 20. “And now we’re starting from the same principle.”
Romania is keen to upgrade Galati to ease congestion at Constanta on the Black Sea. Galati is connected by the broad-gauge railway that’s compatible with the Ukrainian system and may facilitate the quicker rerouting of grains. The government wants to fast-track the construction of the missing section of 4.6 kilometers and the work will take three months, Prime Minister Nicolae Ciuca said last month.
Yet it’s still unclear who will do it, according to TTS, which has spent two months testing logistic options via railway or trucks. The route involves three countries and three different railway operators. Romania’s transport minister said he hopes to find a company to build the missing portion of track this week and may visit Galati with his Ukrainian counterpart.
“Ukraine was exporting 20 million tons of metals per year and even more grains only on water, so to think that it would be possible to completely replace these capacities is a dream,” said Petru Stefanut, TTS’s CEO. “What we’re all trying to do, is to help them as much as we can. But we can’t compare what they had and what they’ve lost.”
5) The global food shock could last years.
Credit rating agency S&P Global Ratings issued a report this week entitled The Global Food Shock Will Last Years, Not Months. It contains a bleak outlook, and some bleak charts.
International markets appear to be viewing the fallout of the war in Ukraine on food prices as a single-year shock. In contrast, we believe the shock to food supply will last through 2024 and beyond, with negative implications for emerging market countries, affecting GDP growth, fiscal performance and social stability.
The potential impact of such developments on sovereign credit ratings will depend upon, among other things, the extent and severity of the food shock, the ability of governments to minimize the social and economic costs, and international efforts to help the affected countries. Although many of the sovereigns most exposed to this risk already have very low credit ratings, the negative economic or political fallout of the food shock could contribute to the rating downgrades.
We see four key reasons why the food shock could drag on into next year and likely longer:
° The war in Ukraine is lasting longer than most expected;
° The disruption to the harvests of key producers this year is jeopardizing the 2023 crop. In Ukraine, in particular the key sowing season of April-May was missed in much of the country, owing to labour and other input shortages, including of harvest machinery;
° Surging prices of fertilizers, machinery, and other inputs are placing additional costs on production for future years' crops; and
° Fertilizer and food exporters, in particular major producers such as Russia, are increasingly imposing export controls.
We expect that these factors will culminate in increasing competition for key inputs in 2022 and 2023. Food supply out of the conflict zones is unlikely to ramp up meaningfully enough to offset the ongoing disruptions. This will mean higher prices, and hence another round of food inflation through 2024 by our reckoning.
Ukraine and Russia are agricultural heavyweights, and the outbreak of war between the two has sent importers scrambling to find alternative sources. The countries (both or individually) rank among the top three global exporters of wheat, maize, rapeseed, sunflower seeds, and sunflower oil. Together they account for 12% of all food calories traded. Russia and Belarus were the first and sixth largest exporters of fertilizers globally in 2020. Prices of ammonia, a byproduct of gas production, have soared since the invasion of Ukraine.
Food inflation and food shortages are central to demonstrators' frustrations in many regions of the world. Last month, Peru was rocked by an extended period of protests and strikes, with food, fertilizers and fuel at the center of protestors' concerns. In Sri Lanka, ongoing protests over rising food prices and fuel shortages, although mired in broader economic malaise, have brought down the prime minister, with calls for the president to go too. These events are early political fallouts of the war in Ukraine, in our view.
46 Comments
People like Molly White are so valuable to the crypto and digital asset spaces given that it is so speculative and crawling with scams. In fact, with all the hype surronding the metaverse and the associations with crptocurrencies, it reminds me of 2016 when a couple of people were promoting the emergence of crypto within Second Life to foreigners in Japan. Many of the IT, cosci and tech related people stayed away. The game developer community used to get together for drinks in Osaka and Bitcoin was being used as a payment solution as early as 2012 amongst this set, some of whom will be extremely wealthy now. This is kind of ironic given that many of this community were being exploited by middlemen in the Japan gaming industry by then taking a huge cut on their incomes for Japanese companies. The developers were aware of the extent to which they were being exploited but experience within the space is necessary and a dog eat dog life exists for new entrants.
Every major inflationary episode of the last 50 years has been driven by increasing energy prices, which are an input cost to pretty much everything including food (fertiliser, transport etc). If you chart oil prices against US inflation, the cause and effect is obvious. The end of every major inflationary episode has resulted from negotiated reductions in energy prices (OPEC), or increases in productive capacity (e.g. US shale). Monetary policy shamelessly and falsely took the credit for the end of inflation in early 80s - but that's another story.
This episode is different to the 70s though - supply chains are being re-routed, inventories are being built, expanded bufferstocks of key goods are being planned by some countries, energy and food security is back on the agenda, climate change means staples need to be grown in different places, developing countries are introducing environmental regulations that add cost (e.g. Chilean mines)... At some point, we have to accept that the cheap food, energy and raw materials that we have relied on ain't going to be cheap no more. To put it another way, if the *real* costs of production and delivery increase (labour, time, energy etc) then the price of imported things relative to our earnings is going to go up. We need to adjust to this new reality and think strategically about what it means for NZ. Thankfully we have abundant clean water, lots of energy options, and fertile lands. However, our potential is nothing without a plan that realises it.
The slow death of the West and the rise of China/Russia/Africa/India who don't give a fig about emissions or other Western indulgences. We should not lecture them either, we had our industrial revolution so if the thought of even higher co2 emission triggers you, look away now.
The slow death of the West and the rise of China/Russia/Africa/India who don't give a fig about emissions or other Western indulgences. We should not lecture them either, we had our industrial revolution so if the thought of even higher co2 emission triggers you, look away now.
I've long thought about this. Imposing a Western agenda on these countries has already been ripe. That being said, I don't think China is adopting renewables and clean energy more pragmatically if they believe it's in their self interest.
I don't think the West has been slowly dying. It has been transforming into a place where individuals, with all their foibles, can be free. No one really wants to live in non-Western countries because in the other countries the authorities, religious fanatics or gangsters are in your face all the time.
If China could Westernise and open up which basically means become free and provide fertile ground for individuals to express themselves we would likely accept a degree of hegemony. They would probably become immensely wealthy at the same time as well.
As it is the West has to stay united and strong because humanity cannot currently trust handing the reins over to anyone else.
I don't think the West has been slowly dying. It has been transforming into a place where individuals, with all their foibles, can be free. No one really wants to live in non-Western countries because in the other countries the authorities, religious fanatics or gangsters are in your face all the time.
That's what growthism does. More rules around who gets a declining share of resources. OTOH, “democracy is the worst form of government – except for all the others that have been tried.” WC
Well I'm a fan of democracy. But let's look at the state of infrastructure in Korea, Japan, S'pore, and even China. It's far more developed than in countries like NZ. And I will say that part of the reason why is because of their less democratic societies. Things like infrastructure (which represents 'freedom' to some extent) get done in some authoritarian countries.
As Churchill said 'the best argument against democracy is a 5 minute conversation with the average voter'. Having listened to late night talk back radio and the comments sections on our media outlets and the likes of the property investor FB pages, I tend to agree.
How do you ever get anything meaningful done within a society via democracy when a large part of the society have lost their minds?
Yes I agree....many of the people I met from the countries that ZS mentions/infers I find to actually be happier than those people in the west who many are financially repressed, are highly stressed, many depressed and quite a few simply surviving day to day by swallowing anti-depressants.
Hardly a happy and prosperous society that we think we should have the right to push upon the others that we like to do down upon as being inferior to us.
No way. We have it made.
Did you know.. Our smartest businessman is also the richest guy in the world now. What a role model. He sleeps at his factories, lauds his chinese workers who regularly work until 3am and is ready to fire anyone in the qest who dares continue to work remotely... like their family and mental health are as important as money.
We should look down on those fools in undeveloped nations who live in shacks by the beach spend spend their days catch fishing growing veggies and lounging around drinking home made beer with their other foolish mates. They dont have the latest smartphones to answer emails every waking hour, nor smart electric cars to sit in traffic for hours.. and what the hell do they have to get anxious about.
Of course our way is best.
Free Zachary? You mean like the HSBC banker suspended for saying he didn't think Climate Change was going to be as bad as scientists were saying? I agree, of course the West has greater freedom, that wasn't what I was referring to. More that it's run it's course, debt laden and almost certainly technology will hollow out the economy and employment.
https://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/banker-busted-for-say…
That's a very we of the west are right perspective. International development support has been about imposing western capitalism. Which asserts me over us in the socio economic system.
I'm reminded of the anecdote of a western company lamenting that they couldn't convince asian populations that normal body odour was bad. If they'd been successful, their market would have grown exponentially.
The western approach of invent/reinvent something, then convince consumers that they need it is not really a sustainable system.
Agree, a big chunk of inflation is driven by oil companies profits, engineered by opec. Saudi Aramco is on a tear. Not to mention the profits of the big shipping companies who saw an opportunity in covid & continue to profit. Who or what else are profiting enormously from inflation?
Maersk 35% net profit last quarter.
Exactly - it is the same story for many commodities. Capital is not flowing into the development of new production capacity because prices are high. Investors / shareholders are taking big profits from high prices whilst they can. This is obviously the opposite of what economists think happens when prices are high. But then the real world is very different to the models they built with their reckons.
I was reading this article earlier which states expansionary monetary policy has a part in the current inflation as indicated by nGDP and rGDP.
https://marcusnunes.substack.com/p/a-definitive-breakdown-of-inflation?…
In July 21, monetary policy became expansionary, raising NGDP above trend. Note that both RGDP and inflation rise. That´s indicative of a demand shock. After October 21, the rise in NGDP “relents” (see the kink in the NGDP line). RGDP drops below trend and inflation “decelerates”.
From the charts, we can infer that if NGDP had remained on trend after mid-21, inflation would have remained higher until the supply constraints wore off. By increasing NGDP, the Fed “added” a demand shock to the prevailing supply constraints, introducing, as predicted by the Dynamic AS/AD model, some instability.
4. Russia is bound to impede the export of grain whether by land or sea. They'll want to keep a tight grip on supply.
5. Food isn't expensive, it's insanely cheap. Here is a USDA chart showing inflation adjusted food commodity prices back one hundred years. Food has crushed inflation for decades.
This article fails to connect two of these topics - the critical use of copper in animal feed and the ability to produce food - esp poultry and swine. As the global food shock settles in for the long term high food prices cannot be called a shock but rather a long term reality.
Consumers haven't yet clicked that far beyond what we see today, there are have some huge food price increases coming at us over the next 6 months.
Terra had been called out quite regularly as beig a scam. It works on the way up when prices are going up, but on the flip side, once it starts going down it also perpetually works, driving it to zero. I am glad that blew as quickly as it did rather than dragging it out and attacting even more money first. There is no such thing as a free lunch, an offering 20% yields def came with a catch.
Stable coins are one actual use case for the "crypto" ecosystem. Having the stability of the USD while also the storage and transmittability attributes of a crytpocurrency is a revolution for anyone that doesnt live in a stable or free economy. Everyone wants USD.
Most other cryptos are crap, not to mention that the lightning network obseletes most of their use cases. Bitcoin not crypto.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.