sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Chang-Tai Hsieh thinks Taiwan's eagerness for diplomatic recognition is undermining its security

Public Policy / opinion
Chang-Tai Hsieh thinks Taiwan's eagerness for diplomatic recognition is undermining its security
Taiwan diplomatic relations

In the same week that Taiwanese took to the streets to repudiate Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Taiwan’s leaders rolled out the red carpet for a visit by former US President Donald Trump’s secretary of state, Mike Pompeo. This is the same man who, together with Trump, withheld military aid from Ukraine to pressure its government to initiate a bogus investigation into Joe Biden’s son, and who then fired the US ambassador to Ukraine when she refused to go along with the extortion attempt.

The jarring juxtaposition of these two events – the Taiwanese people supporting a fellow democracy while their leaders lavished praise on the man who undermined that democracy’s security – reflects a reckless willingness to embrace any foreign politician who will “stand with Taiwan.” Taiwanese leaders are focused so intently on gaining international recognition that they ignore the key threat Taiwan faces: an invasion by China similar to what Russia has done in Ukraine.

Taiwan’s development over the past few decades has been truly miraculous, even in a region with some of the most successful countries in the world. Within the span of a generation, Taiwan has grown from a poor, primarily agrarian society with an authoritarian regime into a vibrant democracy boasting some of the world’s most important companies, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). Even more remarkably, this transformation occurred in the absence of formal diplomatic ties or participation in international organizations such as the United Nations.

But Taiwan has continued to push for formal diplomatic recognition and participation in international forums. If that requires embracing figures like Pompeo – who used his latest visit to declare that the United States should extend formal diplomatic recognition to Taiwan – so be it.

Taiwan’s poor choice of friends is not limited to American politicians. When multilateral lenders cut off Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega’s corrupt regime following its brutal crackdown on protesters, Taiwan stepped in with a $100 million loan to the dictator. And in November 2021, Taiwan hosted then-Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández, even though it was widely known that Hernández was involved in drug trafficking (in March 2022, he was indicted on federal drug charges in the US). Both Nicaragua and Honduras belong to the small minority of UN member states that formally recognize Taiwan as a sovereign country.

Obviously, Taiwan cannot be both a beacon of democracy and a financier of “white terror” operations in other countries. It cannot claim to stand with the world’s democracies if it is also going out of its way to support US politicians who have threatened and undermined democratic regimes both abroad and at home. Such behavior not only betrays the democratic ideals that Taiwan stands for; it also ignores the threat that Taiwan faces from China.

That threat outweighs all others. The central goal of Taiwan’s foreign policy, therefore, should be to deter China from pursuing the kind of reckless aggression that Russian President Vladimir Putin has launched in Ukraine.

For Taiwan, effective deterrence has two components. First, China must be made to understand that it would pay a high price – militarily, economically, and diplomatically – were it to invade. Taiwan and the rest of the world’s democracies must make it absolutely clear that the day China invades Taiwan would also be the day China gives up on Deng Xiaoping’s program of “reform and opening up.” Second, Taiwan must avoid actions that would put Chinese leaders in an impossible situation. Specifically, it must not formally declare its independence or seek to secure membership in the UN.

Deterrence has been effective so far, but it now faces two major challenges. First, America’s own strategic disengagement from China may eventually lead Chinese leaders to conclude that they have little to lose – at least in terms of China’s ties to the rest of the world – by taking Taiwan by force. Although there is not much that Taiwan can do about the battle between the two superpowers, it should think twice before embracing US politicians whose only interest in Taiwan is to use it as a cudgel against China.

The second challenge comes from Taiwan’s push for formal recognition. A critical part of deterrence is to avoid actions that would give China an excuse to attack. UN membership or formal diplomatic recognition by the US would be viewed as a step on the path to formal independence. That could force China’s hand, because no Chinese leader could survive if he did nothing in response to such a step.

Pompeo’s statement of support for formal diplomatic ties between the US and Taiwan is thus extremely reckless, as is the Taiwan leadership’s decision to give him a platform to disseminate that message. The strong ties between Taiwan and the US would not be made any stronger if Taiwan’s representative office in Washington, DC, were to change its name to “Embassy of Taiwan.” On the contrary, formal diplomatic recognition would leave China no choice but to sever ties with the US, an outcome that would ultimately endanger Taiwan.

Taiwan’s most important international relationships are with Japan and the US, neither of which has formal diplomatic ties with the island. The strength of these relationships is rooted in trade, business ties, and millions of people-to-people exchanges. These are what matter – not UN speeches or 21-gun salutes during formal state visits. Taiwan must not confuse the trappings of nationhood with the reality of nationhood. It should focus on strengthening a status quo that has enabled it to prosper, and it should politely decline future overtures from craven opportunists and authoritarians.


Chang-Tai Hsieh is Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2022, published here with permission.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

16 Comments

https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2022/4/4/how-difficult-would-it-be-f…

Taiwan has been a breakaway region for some time, it will not be easy for China to take it back without destroying the very prize they seek, and the loss of hundreds of thousands of troops and civilians.     Taiwan would be much harder to invade than Ukraine. 

Xi willingness to lockdown China because of Covid19 does not seem to align with the loss of life an invasion would cause?

China has no experience in modern Naval battle.....     and it's a long swim.

A biological war may yield different results.

Up
1

China has developed technically and economically with astonishing speed even if they remain well behind Taiwan on a per capita basis.  Who knows what it will manage militarily in the future. Maybe a few years from now China will invade with ease.  However the problem would remains - how can you morally justify physically forcing people into a nation they don't want to be in.

Up
1

War is hell , yesterday, today and tomorrow, that you can be certain of.    

Up
1

Violence as a means of resolving problems - indefensible.  But the circles of hell do vary in degree - some distant past wars were between small armies and the majority of the population were peasants who never noticed a violent change of ruler. The Anglo-Zanzibar War lasted under an hour, killed 500 and hastened the emancipation of slaves. The Mongols destruction of Baghdad was an inner circle of hell.

Up
0

This is sort of like the same victim blaming we see regarding Ukraine's desires to sever ties with Russia.

If the CCP want to believe Taiwan is theirs then eventually they're going to do something about it. The more Taiwan can shore up support for its independence the better.

Up
1

The CCP's attitude to Taiwan is like that of a husband threatening his estranged wife with violence if she does not love him. Sad.

Up
1

I'm afraid I have to disagree with your analogy. Taiwan has never been part of the People's Republic of China; they are not in an ex-marriage-ish relationship. As an ethnic Chinese, I see the Taiwanese as different people. Yes, we share a lot in culture, and most of us can understand each other without a translator, but that is it. Just like the Kiwis will not call themselves British despite the cultural link.

Up
3

Taiwan has always been part of China and a province of China. The relationship is Son  and Mother.

 

Any Taiwan people claiming not Chinese will either change their mind or change where they live. 

Up
0

Adult mothers let their children grow up and leave home.

Up
3

In the case of Taiwan - exports to China are up almost 50% since Dec. 2019 and amount to 36% of its GDP, about the same ratio as for Vietnam.

Up
0

道德经·夫兵者,不祥之器

兵器啊,是不祥的东西,人们都厌恶它,所以有“道”的人不使用它。君子平时居处就以左边为贵而用兵打仗时就以右边为贵。兵器这个不祥的东西,不是君子所使用的东西,万不得已而使用它,最好淡然处之,胜利了也不要自鸣得意,如果自以为了不起,那就是喜欢杀人。凡是喜欢杀人的人,就不可能得志于天下。吉庆的事情以左边为上,凶丧的事情以右方为上,偏将军居于左边,上将军居于右边,这就是说要以丧礼仪式来处理用兵打仗的事情。战争中杀人众多,要用哀痛的心情参加,打了胜仗,也要以丧礼的仪式去对待战死的人。

Up
0

I will translate…..

”All authoritarian states will eventually fail.

The west just needs to contain them until they rot from the centre due to how they treat their own people.”

 

Up
6

Brilliant

Up
2

Although, strangely, only about 20% of the world's population is ruled by proper, decent, democracies so we are rather in the minority.

Up
1

Many pretend to be democracies ruled by the will of the people. Louis XIV was an absolute monarch who ruled by the will of God and so were most of his contemporaries.  Both China and the EU have parliaments for the sake of show.  An improvement.  I'm still waiting for a true democracy not our representational democracy.

Up
0

Not a lot of people know that through the 1950s Taiwan used to regularly fly sorties over mainland China and even dropped a bomb or two on Shanghai. This did provide good training for the nascent PLA air force however. The raids dropped off after the Chinese, with the help of the Soviets, gained enough skills to successfully engage and shoot down Taiwanese and USAF jets.

At least once American warships landed nationalist troops on the mainland who caused a bit of havoc hoping to get some local support although that didn't eventuate and they had to pull out.

Up
1