Sales were a bit softer at the country's largest real estate agency in March, while selling prices were more mixed.
Harcourts sold 2170 residential properties throughout the country in March, down 7.5% compared to March last year.
March is traditionally the busiest month of the year for residential real estate and is an important indicator of how buoyant the market is.
Harcourt's sales were down in all regions compared to a year earlier, led by Wellington and lower North Island -10.7%, and followed by the South Island excluding Christchurch -8.6%, Auckland -7.5%, Christchurch -5.1% and central North Island (which includes Waikato and Bay of Plenty) -1.0%.
While sales were down 7.5% overall for the month, there was an even bigger decline in new listings received by Harcourts, which were down 13.3% across the whole country in March compared to year earlier.
The biggest decline in new listings was in Auckland where they dropped 22.1% compared to a year earlier, followed by central regions -10.5%, Christchurch -9.1%, Wellington and Lower North Island -8.2% and South Island excluding Christchurch -5.0%.
However even with the decline in new listings, the decline in the total number of homes the agency has on its books was modest, falling to 6964 at the end of March, down just 2.6% compared to a year earlier.
Selling prices were a mixed bag, with the average price of all homes sold throughout the country by Harcourts in March coming in at $616,721, almost unchanged from a year earlier.
In Auckland the average selling price was down 1.64% and in Christchurch it was down 7%.
In the central North Island regions the average selling price was up 10%, and in Wellington and the lower North Island it was up 8%. The average price in the South Island excluding Christchurch was also up 8%.
Harcourts' chief executive Chris Kennedy said it was great to see steady activity and price increases in the regions.
"There is always such a lot of focus on Auckland and Christchurch, which were indeed a little quieter than last year in March, but when you look at the country as a whole, there is still plenty of activity from both buyers and sellers," he said.
You can receive all of our property articles automatically by subscribing to our free email Property Newsletter. This will deliver all of our property-related articles, including auction results and interest rate updates, directly to your in-box 3-5 times a week. We don't share your details with third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time. To subscribe just click on this link, scroll down to "Property email newsletter" and enter your email address.
42 Comments
Approximately that is 175 lesser residential property sales.
In trademe and realestate, new listings are rising or at least consistent with the volume. I'm wondering why it's not the case for Harcourts?
With all the news related to the properties nowadays, a commonly used word is "DOWN"
"There is always such a lot of focus on Auckland and Christchurch, which were indeed a little quieter than last year in March, but when you look at the country as a whole, there is still plenty of activity from both buyers and sellers,"
When Auckland isn't doing so well lets just ignore it........
"March is traditionally the busiest month of the year for residential real estate". For any agents/agency's on life support, this does not bode well.
Agencies and banks best spin is calling a decline, one wonders what the truth really is at the coal face. The 3% (insert tui) that has stopped spending really looks like it was the artificial element that skyrocketed pricing (#nosurprise) with speculators leveraging up like grinning madmen for the free ride up (great while it lasts). At what point do tax paying kiwi wallets open to cushion the current state of decline and at what point to the banks start making margin calls on the over leveraged?
"There is always such a lot of focus on Auckland and Christchurch, which were indeed a little quieter than last year in March, but when you look at the country as a whole, there is still plenty of activity from both buyers and sellers,"
hahaha now even RE folks are giving up on Auckland and moving focus on higher yielding areas..
"market fatigue"? I don't think i've heard that in regular parlance since 2009 and now i'm hearing it everywhere again (although more often in reference to shares).
Still, i'm not sure I agree with Corelogic that "market fatigue" has much to do with the current stance in the NZ housing market, I think the slight cooling is more of a credit cycle issue IMO. And unless purchased very, very recently, I wouldn't expect anyone to be making any losses on their house purchase and even then, only if they were in Auckland and paid silly money for something. Could be a different story by Q4 though.
Really, this item from Greg gets some of you excited because the real estate market is sluggish?
Many have been going on for years saying that house prices were going to drop by 40 % or more!
What happened the market went up hugely and many who listened and sat on the sidelines by not buying, now find that they will never be able to own their own home!
The market is the market, most economic analysts are wrong most of the time and the ones that use theie foresight and actually invest wisely are the winners!
You can wish for what ever you want but at the end of the day the winners are the ones who act and the ones not so fortunate are the negatives!
Geez, if Chch prices are sluggish it is an advantage for investors as property yields are better!
If first home buyers get into the market then prices will rise again so it doesn’t worry us whatsoever RP!
When your rental yields average around 10%per cent on purchase price, nothing is a worry and we don’t sell either. So all is good!
To quote St John the Key, "at the end of the day it is what it is" and I don't think any of us really has an idea of what's going to happen. What we do know is that Kiwis currently have record housing debt and interest rates are at a record low.
And China has stemmed capital outflows for the moment. And we're at the end of an unprecedented effort in QE to stave off the natural down part of economic cycles, something many suggest hasn't and cannot ultimately work.
Much like Seinfeld Medical School's "tube coming down from the mouth... into the circle area", that's pretty much all we know.
(And the item from Greg gets us excited because Greg's just a lovely guy.)
To quote St John the Key, "at the end of the day it is what it is" and I don't think any of us really has an idea of what's going to happen.
Did he really say that? What kind of vision did the guy have for NZ then? A speculative market driven by asset prices combined with groundbreaking tech industries and raw commodities? That sounds quite similar to what Australia is hoping for. Is it really achievable?
The winners are the ones who bought in Auckland, the Bay of Plenty , Hawkes Bay and The Lakes. At a stretch Nelson and Dunedin. Poor old Christchurch. The boomers who held there are going backwards. They were lucky at one stage in time but there was a time to sell and diversify. I bet some of them wished they had a crystal ball.
Gordon, you can say what you want to bait “The Man”
Reality is that on paper we have made millions on capital gain from purchase to current valuation!
Truth is that we don’t need to sell and when out returns are positive we never will!
All,tenanted and rents holding up well!
That offer is still on the table though Gordon, but we all know that you haven’t got the fortitude to take it up!
I am forever hopeful that you will take it up though!
"on paper" = "unbanked". Boasting one's own financial vulnerabilities is a weakness of the undiversified. This Pony knows no other trick. Anyway, even if you were to liquidate with gain, under the IRD can consider the "initial intention provision" the Coalition would certainly welcome your reluctant contribution ;-)
Property speculator/Landlords such as yourself and Echo Bird have become reluctant investors. With the evolution of Government policy, its now dictating to you what Landlord behavior should be. It's also disincentivize many from liquidating, temporarily accentuating the affordable housing shortage. Note: temporarily.
'And we're at the end of an unprecedented effort in QE to stave off the natural down part of economic cycles, something many suggest hasn't and cannot ultimately work' - this is the big one in my view. It matters not a jot what happens here locally if, and that's a huge IF, QE and the unprecedented deleveraging entailed, is a little more precarious than some might have anticipated. To my understanding the only historical reference even conservatively close to what is potentially awaiting us, was the Great Depression. Given the breathtaking credit excesses and at the same time declining economic growth through much of my life something has to give. This is not scaremongering, just simple rational logic. The wheels that will ultimately drive us to whatever end is in store began turning a long time ago but things have, in more recent times, accelerated, surpassing even the most dramatic of expectations as to how high the cliff will be when we fall from it.
I agree but it still amazes me how the doomers still manage to pull what they see out of the stats and call this a crash. Property is going to plateau if your in an average house in a reasonable suburb. If you live in the Bronx its going to go down a bit if you live in a top area its still going to go up. If you no longer have a mortgage you really don't care anyway, if you sell cheaper you also buy cheaper in the same market
Hi Carlos 67,
You're spot on with your analysis. I agree with what you say.
It's interesting, isn't it, that some well-known DGM here are now trying to distance themselves from that group......
They're no longer talking of a crash - but rather a plateauing of house prices. Finally, it's dawned upon them that a crash is a most unlikely event. The worst cases are those particular DGM who are now denying that they ever predicted a crash. That's blatantly dishonest.
TTP
Nobody has called it a crash. The most basic factors tell you the downside risk particularly in Auckland is massive. If you are geared up on a low yielding Auckland rental right now you should be very worried. There will be a considerable correction over the next few years whether that is fast or slow nobody knows but the deleveraging is starting to pan out.
Agree Carlos67. I bought my flats during 2005 & 2006, at total price of $1.050M with rental income of $60K. Now have CV's worth $2.55M with income of $150K. I know about property/credit cycles and how that works. In 2020 property values will take off again, maybe not as much as the last cycle but still growth. However, rental income will go up hugely over the next two years even if they do turn the immigration tap off now. The BS that is written by some commentators on this website is laughable. Unless there is some exogenous factor impacting on NZ like a war or a huge geological catastrophe, the cycle will continue on.
Good question. Do wages have to rise? Based on the Herald figures, renting one bedroom in an Avondale flat costs 22% of income. If it was a DINK couple taking the whole house then it would be 34% of the combined income. How much would a leveraged house owner pay out of their income to live in the same house? I'd say a lot more than the renter ipso facto the tenant can pay more without a wage increase, they just dont have to, right now.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11650103
http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2017/07/nz-s-homelessness-the-wo…
Yep, theres plenty of spare money to pay increased rent. No problems at all. If rents go up, many will simply downsize, pushing those at the bottom of the heap out the bottom of the market. More overcrowded rentals and more tax increase to raise money for more accomodation supplements. And more reason for young Kiwis to leave NZ and take their taxpayer funded education to other countries.
Yep, and that's really the crux of the matter that National and its speculators and banks buddies overlooked, or just didn't care about.
The stupid house prices are forcing our educated youth overseas (how big is the student loan hole again). We can continue to let a flood of other cultures (mainly Asian and Indian) in to fill the gap, but then the nimby gene in the older property owners are complaining about a lack of kiwi trained nurses and doctors are, and that they have to fly to Aussie to visit grandchildren. Go figure.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.