The Auckland apartment market is still operating at two speeds. Larger apartments that appeal more to owner-occupiers are generally selling well, while the smaller CBD apartments that are often owned by investors and rented to students or as short stay visitor accommodation, are often having a hard slog.
However outcomes can be uncertain for vendors of both types of apartments.
At the latest City Sales auction five apartments were on offer, four of which could have appealed to owner-occupiers and one that was more likely to be investor fare.
- First up was a 66 square metre, two bedroom unit with a car park in the art deco Westminster building near the High Court. The apartment had been refurbished to a high standard but retained its character features, giving it considerable appeal. It had a rating valuation of $980,000 and although there was only one bidder for the property it sold under the hammer for $900,000.
- A modern, two bedroom/two bathroom unit with two car parks in a low rise block near St Lukes shopping mall in Morningside attracted multiple bids. It had a rating valuation of $570,000 and sold under the hammer for $600,000.
- A modern 64 square metre, two bedroom apartment with a car park in The Statesman building which is also near the High Court, had a rating valuation of $770,000, which was also the opening bid. However there was only one bidder and although they increased their bid to $800,000, it wasn't enough to get it across the line and it was passed in.
- A 60 square metre, two bedroom unit in the Sugartree Altro building on Nelson St had a rating valuation of $770,000. This is a reasonably new complex and many of the original purchasers were investors who bought off the plans. Since the building was completed there have been a number of resales, with mixed results. This unit attracted just a single bidder and it was passed in at $550,000.
- A 39 square metre apartment with two bathrooms, in the Tetra building on Wakefield St, had a rating valuation of $370,000. It sold under the hammer for $295,000.
Ray White City Apartments also had a good level of interest at their latest auction where eight apartments were on offer.
- There were multiple bidders for a 51 square metre, one bedroom plus study unit with a car park in the Connect building on Anzac Ave. It had a rating valuation of $700,000. Although there were multiple bidders, it was passed in at $725,000.
- A refurbished 91 square metre terrace house above shops, with two bedrooms and a car park, situated opposite the container terminal in Quay St attracted multiple bids. This was a leasehold unit with current ground rent of $17,344 plus body corp fees of $4540 and rates of $1827. It sold under the hammer for $79,000. According to PropertyValue.co.nz the unit was last sold for $225,000 in 2007.
- Another leasehold unit in the Sebel building on Customs St, attracted multiple bids. It was a 38 square metre studio and was offered fully furnished and sold under the hammer for $120,000 plus GST (if any).
- A two bedroom/two bathroom unit in the Park Residences building on Swanson St attracted multiple bids. This was a dual key unit, meaning it could be split into two self contained units, an arrangement that's popular with investors operating in the short stay visitor market. It was passed in with a top bid $700,000 which was the same as its rating valuation.
- There was spirited bidding for an 89 square metre terrace house in Grafton (off Symonds St), which had two bedrooms, two bathrooms, two car parks and a large deck. It had a rating valuation of $820,000 and sold under the hammer for $930,000.
- A 62 square metre, two bedroom apartment with an eight square metre balcony in the Queens Residence complex on Airedale St had a rating valuation of $770,000 but attracted just a single bid of $650,000 and was passed in.
- A 62 square metre, two bedroom unit in the Q Central building in Liverpool St was a leasehold unit with ground rent of $10,273. It attracted a single bid of $95,000 and was passed in.
At the same Ray White auction a ground floor, 100 square metre retail unit in The Docks complex on Quay St was offered with vacant possession. It was a leasehold property with ground rent of $10,273 and sold under the hammer for $112,000 plus GST.
The comment stream on this story is now closed.
Details of all of the properties offered at the residential auctions monitored by interest.co.nz are available on our Residential Auction Results page, while details of the commercial property sales collated by interest.co.nz are available on our Commercial Property Sales page.
11 Comments
It seems like auctions may not be the way to go to sell an apartment.
There's no good way to sell an apartment, especially a leasehold one.
There's always the very very very cheap way.
Slightly off subject - But we all know the RBNZ + Governement want inflation (NZ wages etc higher) this is supposedly driving low interest rates.
Well, talk about contradicting oneself. We have a shortage of fruit pickers, so let natural market forces fix it i.e increase wages to attract NZ pickers. But no, the Government turns to globalisation and imports cheap labour from the Islands. More Nuts!
Apartments in Auckland have a long history of being way volatile in value and horror stories..surprised word has not got around and there is a market at all for them..still show an affordable roof is available if you seek it in Auckland, just treat it as a consumable, just structure it so you can walkaway.
ps import cheap labour..in this case the talk is how they are going to be guarantee the "living wage' for the imports but not the locals..figure that one out.
Do we allow college students at 15-17 years take on this work after school and at weekends? My kids both had jobs at that age - one delivering milk and the other as a janitor at the college he went to. Now, the only thing available for school students is a paper run - and talk about low wages! But our grandson has been doing one for three years, just because there is nothing else and he likes having his own money.
Small apartments in Auckland are a dead duck.....
Avoid them like the plague - unless you fancy a case of the bolthole blues.
And leasehold is even worse.
TTP
It's an interesting market to watch. Wellington apartment ads are beginning to state insurance premiums in addition to body corp and rates costs.
Wow some transparency, that's unusual.
Most body corp fees include the insurance premium for larger apartment complexes - I assume smaller ones that might of had issues getting insurance or an agreement for all to have insurance might have separated this out - Welly apartment market still extremely strong from what I've seen, not a lot of auctions, deadline tenders, surprising prices still paid with a Bob Jones mentality taken to earthquake risks eg exaggerated scare mongering citing brick Courtney place buildings with yellow stickers since 2011 defying engineer reports by not falling down in 2016... He makes a good point. No one wants to be liable if they're wrong so super conservative estimates across the board from engineers.
Yes, I think you're right, and it's EQ related. The recent risk-priced premium rises might have seen some body corps unable to fully insure - as the ads specify things like 'body corp fees include x% of insurance costs). So I assume they have to disclose to the purchaser that they accept a write-off of the balance in a total loss to EQ if they can't self-insure to 100%?
Here's an example;
This apartment, being only one of two, is any urbanites dream home. Low body corporate fees (40% of the insurance), a single off-street & covered car park and all within a hop and a skip of Newtown, Wellington Hospital, Countdown supermarket, public transport and the basin reserve.
https://www.realestate.co.nz/3901391/residential/sale/14-ahanson-street…
And here's another where they split it out from the BC levy;
https://www.realestate.co.nz/3879219/residential/sale/7215-victoria-st-…
Leasehold land is a mistake.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.