![](/sites/default/files/styles/full_width/public/feature_images/mountainyogi.jpg?itok=NWNxIsI8)
By Amanda Morrall
1) Hidden value
Financial advisors will rejoice over this report from the Financial Post in Canada. According to new research from the Centre for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organisations households working with financial advisors accumulate 58% more assets over a period of four to six years than those without. The longer the relationship, the greater the wealth accumulation, writes Jason Heath.
Those working with an advisor for seven to 14 years accumulate 99% more, and after 15 years with a financial advisor, an investor accumulates 173% more assets than an otherwise “non-advised” household, according to the findings.
2) Book worms are richer
It stands to reason that those who invest more time learning about how to manage their money will be better off as a result. However, Jeffrey Steele, blogging for fivecentnickle.com takes this logic one step further arguing that book worms frequenting libraries are the best money managers by far because they're really embracing the spirit of thrift by not paying for the knowledge. Not sure about that but I'm all for public libraries, the best use of our tax dollars as far as I'm concerned. Of course, don't let that hold you back from buying my book next year. Please.
3) Hard reset
Feeling a bit stuck? Press the reset button and remember these four simple truths, suggests Tiffany Raiford.
- Action makes the difference (not how smart you are)
- Success and happiness are not the same thing
- Mistakes are not always bad
- Emotional decisions are rarely good.
4) How to do what you love
If you follow this column regularly, you'll know the "do what you love" theme well. There is a conflicting school of thought on passion pursuits. Here's another philosophical piece on the subject from Paul Graham.
5)Now what?
A perplexing thing about humans is that we are seldom satisfied. It seems no matter how good we have it there's always a gap that just can't be filled. Gene Jennings, a guest blogger writing for seanogle.com, shares the journey to finding his dream job and the shifting goal posts once you reach the top of the mountain.
To read other Take Fives by Amanda Morrall click here. You can also follow Amanda on Twitter @amandamorrall
20 Comments
#5 I read a fascinating bit of research Amanda while I was doing some psych at uni, which has always stuck with me...
if you survey people and ask them what is the minimum amount of money over and above what they are getting now that would make them feel satisfied, they invariably answer around 15% more than they are currently earning.
This is right across the spectrum of incomes excuding the mega-poor and the mega-rich. Once you have enough to provide the basics of life, and until you get to the point where you have so much money you can't spend it all, you are always about 15% short of the ideal amount you think you need to be satisfied.
The reason for this? - we always live right up to our means and that lifestyle becomes the norm, and our human questing for more leads us to want that bit more than we have now, no matter how much we are currently on.
Of course the simple thing to do is realise that if you try to find happiness through wealth that goalpost will constantly shift - it's like the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. Wealth <> happiness.
Stanley..... my man with an eye for bad hair days, my first response to that would have been . it don't satisfy me, more , less, more again , less again.....fact of being self employed.
Now when your sitting out the back at sunup or sundown at say Piha...and that face is getting up all glassy like, almost barreling.....that truly satisfies me...not a dime in my shorts, not a care in the world.
I could do with 15%more of that..yessindeedy I could.
yeah funny how all those years chasing waves with nary a dime to my name and an unreliable old car and yet I was arguably happier then than I am now, despite having much less.
I decided rather early on that given a limited income where you have to constantly decide between having things or doing things (i.e. do I buy that mid-life-crisis car or do I go on holiday for 3 months) that I'd rather do things than have more/better stuff.
I'm happy with no car and an older house and loads of great experiences to look back on and look forward to, but our society is geared towards making you dissatisfied with what you have so you keep buying more - I think that's why most people are never happy - as soon as they move up in the world they fall victim to the pressure to keep up with the Jones.
Fortunately I don't know any Jones so I don't care what they have.
If you're living in Auckland I'm gonna say post.
Here's some background on the Princeton sweetspot research that adds some context.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2019628,00.html
two things leap out at me from reading that article. The first...
In other words, the more people make above $75,000, the more they feel their life is working out on the whole
Interesting that people evaluate their life 'performance' by this more than say, how well their relationships are going, or even how much fun they are having. But the telling bit for me is...
it's not absolute wealth that's linked with happiness, but relative wealth or status — that is, how much more money you have than your neighbors
So it just goes to show how shallow and insecure most people are - it's not the actual money, it's about feeling superior among their peer group. Perhaps if you could show people that if they are earning around $75k then out of 7 billion people on the planet that puts them well into the top 5% richest people alive, they may be more content.
Also I'm deeply sceptical of that 85% of respondents who say they were happy yesterday - studies show over and over again that people from supposedly poor or even 3rd world nations are generally happier than their much richer western counterparts, who are necking anti-depressents and anti-anxiety pills in record numbers. A prescription of SSRI's anyone?
Excellent point Mr Stan.
And the greek word for *all* used could be translated as *every kind* of evil; rather than the idea of there being no other root for evil than money. Which makes more sense in the light of pride, lust, jealousy and so forth.
Furthermore it also suggests those who are seduced by money in this manner "pierce themselves with many griefs". And this is also true in my observation.
Good morning David...I really think you and your team should take more than a leaf out of Hollande's book on 'Governing for dummies'....I see great things for Labour NZ...don't be shy about stealing other pollies policies...it's just like taking taxes off people...follow the link David...
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.co.nz/2012/10/president-of-france-wants-to-ban.html
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.