sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Tony Morgan introduces the fundaments of portfolio diversification and why it depends on your investment strategy

Personal Finance / opinion
Tony Morgan introduces the fundaments of portfolio diversification and why it depends on your investment strategy
Diversification

Diversification is a very hard subject to cover in quick time.

Go to a financial advisor and they’ll go through their structured process of investing your monies, with the general steps being quasi scientifically determined as follows,

  1. Define the Investment Strategy (short, long term, capital preservation or growth, risk profile),
  2. Determine your asset allocation,
  3. which proceeds to the individual investment Decisions to be made.

From then on the endless monitoring, meetings to discuss your investments and guiding you as required. And taking their fee at the end of the day.

Leaning upon a paid advisor will be a wise decision, where expertise is justified in your opinion. Because there is so much regulation around financial advice, the advisor industry likes clients to fill out many forms to quantify the above three steps and thus saving their bottoms, especially in times of difficulty, i.e. when markets are down or a specific investment flops. At these stress points advisors, will go back to those documents to test your metal (they will refer to those lovely documents you signed off) and as levers to keep you on track, not to capitulate. Lovely.

But as we know you can do all this yourself and be as formal or informal as you like.  Just like our four Amigos from last week. Make up your own mind.

Investment Strategy

This will generally be dictated wherever your starting point is. Let’s quickly recap our Amigos.

Stud, 26, good income, but no free cash flow for investments yet (but getting close to investing…that’s the word from the horse’s mouth). Theoretically he should target 100% growth investments, i.e. some mix of shares.

Shepherd, 35, with an increasingly good salary, great free cash flow to apply to investments, portfolio already $250,000, almost 100% international shares including ETFs. His portfolio is high growth (thus risk is everywhere, a volatile portfolio in real time) orientated with no foreseen requirement for the funds within five to ten years.

Silver Fox, 45 (one year younger than my initial guess, my apologies SF), has $500,000 plus invested 100% in international equities, split about 75% core portfolio and 25% trading portfolio. He has a very good income stream thus has no immediate cash requirements. His growing girls are more than well fed!

And yours truly, in his 56th year is ably hobbling around planting natives to save the world (ha ha). On the investment front line, he is still a willing capital growth oriented animal, but biasing more and more towards income generating assets especially stocks that can pay respectable dividends. The investment portfolio is mainly NZ stocks, however 75% is in one particular stock (non-dividend paying at this stage), the other 25% in mostly dividend paying stocks.  A good wallop of cash is held outside the portfolio to provide for living expenses (how long that lasts is a good question, given the faster rising living costs recently.

Asset Allocation

The key point above that we can be quite clear on, is that both the Shepherd and Silver Fox do not require an immediate income stream from their investments. They are seeking growth investments, willing to primarily target stock ideas as they see best.

Whereas our family is relying on our portfolio to provide the potential for both income and capital growth. A large cap stock like Pfizer, the most well know Covid-19 stock (had your jab?), pays 3.5% per annum, actually has paid over 330 quarterly dividends in a row!, is a good example of a potential candidate to include in the portfolio. We are long … and will talk further the reasons why (in detail) next month.

When Stud begins investing he will allocate 100% of his non-living cash requirements to equity ideas. He already favours the idea of investing in ETFs.

Most investors will allocate some funds to fixed interest and or bonds and listed real estate investments to provide some income. Those asset classes are also generally more secure and less volatile than most other asset classes especially pure-play companies, i.e. shares.

Some of you may have crypto currency. This emerging class of currency is beyond this author's scope of comprehension, thus sorry no further discussion (please bear in mind Silver has some in his trading account. He just thinks he likes the demand supply equation!?).

The Investment decisions

Here the diversification within asset classes will take place.

Theory will state that the asset allocation decision is the #1 overall precursor to long term returns.

I will not try to disagree.

However, when it comes to the actual specific investment decisions within shares in particular, returns from this class can vary dramatically from one portfolio to another depending on the picking of investments (and diversification within) and the longer-term decisions around holding, selling and buying. Very important to remember this.

So, what could we say is an optimal diversification strategy in shares?

It comes down to your willingness to be involved. The research, the understanding of the individual investment.

What ignites your willingness to invest directly?  This is where it gets interesting after we quickly examine the no-idea bias…

If you have no idea, then you will as I said above, seek advice and or use exchange traded funds (ETFs) to cover your bases, i.e. cover as much of the worlds stocks on a kind of industrialised basis. That is really what ETFs are for - low cost, efficient vehicles for Mr., Mrs., Miss, and Master Jobs who has an atheistic approach to investing, whereby the herd noise suggests virtually no one can outperform. So why try.

This is a pragmatic, but somewhat dull view on the idea of investing, but nevertheless fills the hearts of many and is a massive industry. There are more ETFs being marketed than the stock universe - enough said.

Back to the DIY team (Amigos included).

Now there are more questions to front up too.

What size company do you want to invest in? Does it matter?

What industry do you like the look of and will this help the overall risk, reward returns of your portfolio? Industry sectors are very, very broad, some categorisations being technology (hardware, software), health, food, retail, pharmaceutical, industrial, automotive, leisure, service, energy, communications, the list goes on and on.

Here is where the detail is, where the percentage allocation within your portfolio makes sense or not.

Next week we will get into the nitty gritty, examine the detail a bit further on the stock picking decision-making process (this will be a very long running theme, being open, transparent and most importantly real time to awaken your material neurons!).

I will talk about why the number seven is my favourite together with thinking about the pipeline and their roles in diversification. And of course, the Amigos will be back.


Tony Morgan has run a portfolio management business and an equity brokerage, both of which were purchased by Craig Investment Partners. He now runs a small family office that invests globally. Other articles in this series can be found here. And the profiles of all the NZX50 companies can be found here.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

40 Comments

Nice article.

Up
0

Are you truely diversified if all your investments are all fiat derivatives? In an inflationary environment with rampant monetary expansion, most investments are going backwards, or treading water at least. The S&P should be the benchmark hurdle rate. Bonds are dead. 

Up
3

Agree Paccy. This advice is awful IMO. Boomer investment paradigm. Things have changed entirely as to how they think the world works. Furthermore, the understand of how young people think and behave is radically different to the old farts. 

Up
5

Laughing so hard at "Boomer investment paradigm". You're not wrong J.C.

Up
3

It's laughable but it's also serious. The investment establishment would have us exposed to Chinese property if the commissions were good enough. 

Up
3

Mary Holm. Boomer investment paradigm. 

Up
0

15 years ago, I thought I'd go and see what 'the professionals' were up to. Things had to have changed since I was advising clients. So a quick trip to a Private Banker, and my questions about "Diversification" and "Risk Mitigation" were met with a blank stare and a reply of, "Look. We'll  lend you $X to go with your free cashflow and what you do is you go and buy Y number of houses with the gross funds" That was all the advice there was, aside from the traditional points re tax and leverage. Was it wrong? It should have been. And why would it be any different today? (NB: Every indicator, even just 15 years ago, was screaming "The Property Party is over "- just like they are today)

Up
2

Shitcoins. All in on meme garbage. It's only slightly more embarrassing than admitting you're a real estate agent. 

Up
4

Plenty to be made out of shitcoins if you understand psychology and behaviour. Not my cup of tea but the investment advisor community doesn't understand any of it. 

Up
2

At 76, I find myself becoming increasingly risk averse. Where I once ran my profits and cut my losses, I am now happy to take some of the profits and bank them. A case in point is Skellerup, which has had a wonderful run and more than doubled over the past year. I have been happy to take some profit from it.

My portfolio now looks like this; Shares 48%, Rental 27%, TDs 14% and Bonds( mostly government) 11%.

I understand the share market and am perfectly happy to let others play with cryptos.I wish them well.

Up
1

Crypto looks the same as playing the stock market to me. Its just hit another peak and is on the way down again. Looks like its even more predictable than stocks its a plain old rollercoaster ride of buy low sell high with the possibility of doubling your money in a very short timeframe of a few months. The problem of late however unless your actively buying and selling your not making much money with it if your a recent arrival to the Ponzi.

Up
1

Plenty of legs left in this run, aiming for a mid-late December peak in Bitcoin (>$100k USD), altcoins peaking a few weeks after that. Then sell and get out. Definitely not too late too the ponzi.

Up
2

I'll take your BTC at the end of Dec VTHO. Want to give me your sell bid now? How about USD17k? 

Up
2

It appears you're missing a zero on the end J.C. :D

Up
2

Oh. So when you talk about 'crash', you mean 100%+ gain. We use words differently. 

Up
1

We are on the cusp of a parabolic rise, peaking mid to late December, as stated. The crash comes after this of course, you'd be mad to sell right now. Doubt we ever see 17k ever again, maybe briefly in the depths of the next bear market.

Up
0

Oh. So you're one of the ultra-orthodox who believe that the price of BTC and alt-coins follows a 4-year pattern. So if your price is $170K, does that mean it will head over $1 mio within the next 6 weeks before correction? 

Up
0

I don't understand what you are trying to say sorry.

Of course it follows a ~4 year cycle, why would this time be any different.

And it won't go anywhere near $1 million this cycle, that why I took a stab and said $170k.

You seem pro crypto and then this post I can't quite figure you out. Perhaps I misunderstand.

Up
1

Of course it follows a ~4 year cycle, why would this time be any different.

Explain your rationale. If the price does indeed follow this pattern, you should be able to explain the dynamics behind it. There are others, like Dan Morehead, who says that the past does not represent now and the idea of the '4-year cycle' is possibly little more than myth.

Up
0

Sure. It is all mathematics. The market is driven by thousands of different entities, people and bots (software) who determine the price of a token at any given time. The price is determined within a construct that is created by said entities bouncing the price around using trend lines, fibs, averages etc. Price follows clear patterns on the high time frame and you can use this to predict the cycles and how they play out. The more time you spend understanding it, the clearer it becomes. Now there are endless resources around this but I will link you to one in particular that I quite like and who explains it in simple charts.

An account that goes by the name TechDev_52 on twitter, he posts some serious alpha: https://twitter.com/TechDev_52

4 year cycle with a simple fib: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FD34zUiXsAEpfdM?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

Better: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDylPlpWEAESVUg?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

Even better: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDtuRnCWQAAZum7?format=jpg&name=large

Vortex Indicator: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDv6SslWYAASGY-?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

These are a few examples of clear 4 year cycles based on math, from one person. There are thousands more. I used to dismiss it too, now I don't. It works and has made me a fortune.

Up
0

OK. Technically that is not particularly sophisticated. It's based around RSI as an independent variable. 

Up
0

Indeed. The beauty is in its simplicity. No need to over complicate things, TechDev is good at that. Lets revisit after this cycles tops and see how it played out!

Up
1

There's still a problem with all this. Between now and Dec 31, the cycle theorists believe that there will be a flood of FOMO and then a collapse. So essentially you're making the assumption that people will behave while knowing this. It's making the assumption that Bitcoin buyers and sellers are like Pavlov's rats.  

Up
0

Thing is, most people don't know it. General retail has zero idea, even the general enthusiast has little idea. You're giving them too much credit, that is why they are the dumb money They see the media hype etc and pile in at the end, exactly like 2017. The "educated" ones on cycle theory are not the majority and the ones buying now are definitely retail buyers who start to pile in on the media hype. The assumption that all people buying now knowing of the cycle theory is incorrect in my opinion, because they don't know it about it at all.

Up
0

There are apps that make investing in foreign markets very easy, scuh as Stake or Hatch. I'd be interested to hear more about tax implications for investing in foreign shares. Eg. after NZD60K in US shares, a capital gains tax applies. Is it worth it?

Up
0

Short answer, yes. An example being, tax free dividends. 

 

 

Up
0

Diversification is a meme if you want to create wealth. Diversification is for RETAINING wealth.

Concentrated bets are for creating wealth.

99% Crypto for the past few years. Soon to be 0% when I sell into this bull run.

Aiming for 8 figures, lets see how we go. Thanks for playing.

Up
3

Yeah I would be selling the lot right now as well. Bitcoin looks to me to have a bit of a "Glass ceiling" and as soon at it gets just shy of $70K it gets dumped as people panic sell and cash in.

Up
1

Just replied to your other comment Carlos. Still got a way to go yet, on wave 3 of the Elliot wave. All over by early-mid January for sure!

Up
0

Nah.  Crypto has not reached peak stupid for this cycle.

Up
3

Nope, just regular leverage flush outs. The on-chain data supports continued migration from weak hands to strong hands. LTHs keep accumulating. 

Up
2

Done pretty well out of leverage longing the flushes. Take profit, keep as USD, repeat. Good side game for sure.

Up
0

Seem to remember you saying something similar not too long ago? 

Up
0

What happens if young people don't want the assets at the prices that the boomers need them to buy at? What happens then?  

This is why the investment and the super industries need young people to buy the story. But let's have a look at the reality (hat tip to Raoul Pal):

-- 86 million millennials got financialized in the US last year. They hit their prime investing ages of their 30's. They have debts, no savings, no hope from the grind. They are more poor than any 30 year old in the last 70 years.

-- Unlike their parents in their 30's, they didnt get gifted equities with a P/E of 7, bond yields at 13% or real estate at the lows versus income. They got the opposite. Their opportunity set was an expected negative future returns. They didn't want any part of the boomer financial system. 

-- They had occupied Wall St and no one gave a shit. Now they don't give a shit about how you or I think you should invest or run markets. We let them down. Why the fk should they care? They were sacrificed to the altar of debts, leverage and greed.

-- Millennials and Zoomers had nothing to lose. They had nothing. Then the pandemic hit and everything changed. We gave them free money and they collective said "fk it" lets take risk because their stake was free. If we were given a free stake at the casino, we would do the same. But they didnt buy our precious gold miners, or our discounted value businesses. Why? Because they don't care about 10% returns. The only way to level the playing field was to take MASSIVE risk.

Up
7

Great post J.C.

Up
2

Yes. The idea that these young people should share the 1950s-90s mindset about investing is plain wrong-headed. Only if they behave like sheeple will the boomers and the finance industry get what it wants. 

Up
0

I've only ever done property that I rescue from scrapheaps and renovate to rent out. What's a good first solid foray into other assets? 

Up
0

nktokyo I started in residential which I have retained but have since moved into commercial property , kiwifruit partnerships, vineyard partnerships, personally managed share portfolio, and now considering purchase of an apple orchard. Some of the horticultural managed partnerships give a good solid return and capital appreciation. It is a long journey it does not happen overnight but worth the effort.

Up
1

Keep em coming Tony i read all of them. 

 

Up
1

Mostly waffle.

Up
0