The Commerce Commission has reviewed motor vehicle financing and add-on products, releasing a report which finds some players may not be holding up their legal obligations to assist consumers to make informed purchasing decisions.
Add on-products, for the purposes of the review, are extras added to the total when a vehicle deal requires a loan.
They include mechanical breakdown insurance, loan shortfall cover for insurance write-offs, loan protection insurance for circumstances such as illness and redundancy and even waivers in some circumstances.
During the review, data was collected from 15 lenders and 62 consumers were interviewed.
The review was prioritised by the Commission because a vehicle is often the second largest purchase a consumer will make and it regularly receives complaints about the motor vehicle industry.
While most consumers did not raise concerns, some reported not understanding the add-on they had purchased, believed it to be a compulsory pre-requisite for finance approval when this was not the case, or were not even aware that the add-on had been rung up at checkout time.
The report states that while it is generally the lender’s job to assess the affordability of finance or add-on packages, they generally rely on dealers or brokers to walk the consumer through the terms and conditions, to reach an informed decision.
They may also receive kickbacks in the form of commission.
“Lenders must have adequate processes in place to ensure that dealers perform their delegated duties appropriately, and do not prioritise sales above the performance of those duties,” said Commission Chair Anna Rawlings.
The process of obtaining vehicle finance is challenging for some consumers as they wrestle with the complexity of the paperwork and as such, they are vulnerable to pitfalls.
If lenders and dealers are not actively transparent, the implications of signing up for add-ons may be overlooked by the consumer.
The Commerce Commission's role as an independent Crown entity includes responsibility for enforcing and promoting compliance with a range of consumer laws.
It has indicated that follow-up steps will be taken.
“We will be meeting with lenders and insurers who participated in the review to discuss our observations and where necessary, we will issue advice about compliance with the relevant laws, including changes to the CCCF Act which come into force on 1 December 2021. We are also meeting with key industry stakeholders and the consumer advisory sector to share the information we have gathered about add-on products and how they are sold,” said Rawlings.
2 Comments
CHRIS-M
How many times must you be told the housing problem is the fault of previous governments, especially the Key National Goverment who encouraged overseas buyers to buy up NZ houses.
I'm not making this up; the evidence is all around me: I'm looking out the window now and I see the townhouse in front of me is owned and rented out by an absentee overseas owner, as are the two townhouses to its left. To its right are two townhouses owned and rented out by that other prominent Asian group. These five homes alone have effectively deprived 5 NZ families of owning their own home.
A similar situation prevails across the road.....more NZ families missing out! And I'm observing this from my chair. I'm just one person in one specific location reporting what I see, but this very situation obtains all over Auckland. The situation is now set in stone...it is a fait accompli.
Fake news purveyors like yourself seem to ignore the real evidence in much the same way as the anti-vaxxers.
The Ardern Government has at least tried to stop overseas investors buying NZ houses.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.