This article has been supplied by the University of Auckland Business School*
Mark Keating, a tax law specialist at the University of Auckland Business School, is not convinced that the process is inherently wrong.
"Certainly, there is no hint that Thiel's citizenship was granted improperly in return for bribes to the officials responsible, or to their political masters. At worst, he appears to have got it in return for donating funds to a public charity," says Keating.
What appears to have been overlooked amid the media attention, he says, is that we already have a form of residency for sale under the Investor Visa programme. This is a concessionary category of immigration for investors with more than $1.5 million in funds and an additional $1 million in assets – or $10 million in the case of the less restrictive Investor Plus Visa.
"So, as a country we are obviously not above making special visa arrangements for the wealthy. But the profits generated by those businesses belong to the individual immigrants. At least Thiel's money went to charity," says Keating.
He points out that as a nation we have a history of selling residency for cash. Under the Chinese Immigration Act of 1881 New Zealand imposed a poll tax on all Chinese immigrants which, at its peak, was £100 per person (the equivalent of about $17,000 today).
"Obviously, targeting the poll tax on racial grounds is indefensible. It was eventually scrapped in 1944, and the New Zealand Government rightly apologised for it to the Chinese community in 2002," he says.
"But shorn of its racial overtones, what is wrong with taxing all would-be immigrants for the right to move here? New Zealand is a desirable country with excellent infrastructure and public services. New immigrants automatically get to share in all those benefits without having contributed anything toward them."
Keating has a solution. Using a company law analogy, he suggests that government sells the right to a share in New Zealand Inc at a price reflecting the country's underlying value.
"This makes more sense than at present when, as current shareholders in New Zealand Inc, we are simply giving away new shares to immigrants."
Obviously, says Keating, there must be exceptions for other immigrant categories such as refugees or those with highly desirable skills.
"In 2015, the Government reintroduced arrival taxes on non-residents of $22 per person to help fund tourism infrastructure and the Green Party continues to advocate a larger fee to pay for environmental projects," he says.
"So, imposing a tax on most migrants in return for their right to share in everything New Zealand has built up since it was first settled does not seem unreasonable."
This article was first published in the March 2017 issue of UABS Insights, and is reproduced with the permission of the University of Auckland Business School.
29 Comments
No! I absolutely do not like the idea that someone can buy their way in, I almost do not care who they are, they can all come here for much the same reason, because they want to be a PART of NZ, no other reason is really good enough and in that I include the investor category, most especially the bit where residential real estate can be included. We will end up like Hawaii, a rich man's paradise where locals are completely shut out.
They ARE coming to NZ to be part of NZ - particularly the isolation part - far away from the "troubles" of the Northern Hemisphere they have so kindly created - and now seek to abandon that sinking ship and bring their desires and aspirations with them - they want the lot without the risks - regardless of what we want
Do you remember the days of the A&P shows, the biggest show in town, candy floss, sideshows, cows as far as africa. Things have changed.
We now have a high value niche in the world and it is time we recognised the value.
No free entry, no free rides, think Switzerland.
No citizenship for anybody unless they pay the true value, for two generations, after that they may be an asset.
Plenty of precedents, US, China.....
Phewww, and its only Saturday.
had a chat about that the other day as was told " I paid a lot to come study here and become a resident " when as my nature I questioned how that was you coming here to study then becoming a residents a benefit to nz
I was told " all the money I paid" my answer that was to owners of the companies not NZ got that money
you will find many students already think they are buying there way In
We are so gullible
We should all be disturbed at the gullibility of New Zealanders at the highest level
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=118…
A foreign multi-billionaire buys into an NZ company and needs an NZ government loan to pay for the purchase at below market interest rates and then the government agrees to a special buyout clause - even though the Government was warned against it but still went ahead with it - shades of William Yan - don't do it - but "we" did it anyway in spite of the Interpol red flag and 4 passports and multiple identities
New Zealand which is (supposedly) the least corrupt is the most gullible
Oh FFS. They can't really be this gullible. They can't. It just isn't possible. Corrupt, bought and paid for, that's plausible. Actually, why not both. Anyone with a few bucks butters them up and they'll crawl all over him and delude themselves that they're players.
Well you are able to demonstrate your ability or potential to successfully settle in New Zealand. Essay Help
I have a great idea – the government could auction the kidneys of our newborn children to wealthy foreigners. If the children earn enough money in the future they can buy back their kidneys for some inflated price. It’s a win win situation for both the government and foreign buyers.
We cant let Tonga have all the fun. We have missed out on some potentially great citizens due to our lack of selling our sovereignty http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/south-pacific/9875602/Crisis-looms-after-T…
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.