sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Friday's Top 10 at 10 with NZ Mint: Bernanke's fiscal nerves; Australian airline lobbying; Renminbi convertibility; Synlait's old powder; Dilbert

Friday's Top 10 at 10 with NZ Mint: Bernanke's fiscal nerves; Australian airline lobbying; Renminbi convertibility; Synlait's old powder; Dilbert

Here are my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 to 12 pm, brought to you in association with New Zealand Mint for your reading pleasure.

I welcome your additions and comments below, or please send suggestions for Monday's Top 10 at 10 via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

I'll pop any surplus suggestions I get into the comment stream

1. Even Bernanke is worried - Now even US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is worried about the ballooning US government deficit and debt.

In a fresh move for him, Helicopter Ben said in a speech overnight Americans would have to live within their means at some stage and can't rely on growth to solve the problem.

The deficit really does matter, he said.

Republicans such as Reagan and Cheney have believed for decades that growth would solve everything.

John Key seems of a similar view here.

At some stage politicians (and voters) will have to make choices.

Extend and pretend won't work for public finances either....unless you print money...and Bernanke is an expert at that.

Also in the speech he fueled speculation that the Fed will continue printing and might even expand it, even though the US economy is showing signs of recovery.

No wonder commodity prices are going through the roof.

America is an expert at one thing right now -- exporting inflation.

Here Bernanke bemoans the jobless recovery.

The economic recovery that began in the middle of 2009 appears to have strengthened in recent months, although, to date, growth has not been fast enough to bring about a significant improvement in the job market.Recent data do provide some grounds for optimism on the employment front; for example, initial claims for unemployment insurance have generally been trending down, and indicators of job openings and firms' hiring plans have improved.

Even so, with output growth likely to be moderate for awhile and with employers reportedly still reluctant to add to their payrolls, it will be several years before the unemployment rate has returned to a more normal level. Until we see a sustained period of stronger job creation, we cannot consider the recovery to be truly established.  

Bernanke also defended his money printing, saying it had been great for the stock market. Brilliant. The richest 1% have done well. Americans without jobs are no better off because those listed corporates are either hoarding more cash, investing overseas or handing cash back to those richest 1%.

But Ben's happy with his helicopter action...

A wide range of market indicators supports the view that the Federal Reserve's securities purchases have been effective at easing financial conditions. For example, since August, when we announced our policy of reinvesting maturing securities and signaled we were considering more purchases, equity prices have risen significantly, volatility in the equity market has fallen, corporate bond spreads have narrowed, and inflation compensation as measured in the market for inflation-indexed securities has risen from low to more normal levels.

Yields on 5- to 10-year Treasury securities initially declined markedly as markets priced in prospective Fed purchases; these yields subsequently rose, however, as investors became more optimistic about economic growth and as traders scaled back their expectations of future securities purchases. All of these developments are what one would expect to see when monetary policy becomes more accommodative, whether through conventional or less conventional means.

And here's his warning to the good gas guzzling, anti-taxing, pork chomping voters of America:

One way or the other, fiscal adjustments sufficient to stabilize the federal budget must occur at some point. The question is whether these adjustments will take place through a careful and deliberative process that weighs priorities and gives people adequate time to adjust to changes in government programs or tax policies, or whether the needed fiscal adjustments will be a rapid and painful response to a looming or actual fiscal crisis  

2. Australians have no shame - Qantas is unhappy with the extra competition it's been getting lately on its international routes. So its CEO is suggesting the government block new competition. Only in Australia.

CEOs in Australia have no shame in lobbying politicians for favours. There's a much less puritan approach to competition and a very healthy nationalism. Qantas is one of the worst. Just ask Air New Zealand about the Ansett Debacle. And Air NZ is trying to get in again with its purchase of a cornerstone stake in Pacific Blue.

Here's The Australian's John Durie reporting CEO Alan Joyce with his own bemoaning:

QANTAS boss Alan Joyce wants a moratorium on new international flights into Australia, claiming the flood of new airlines has crippled Qantas International. Joyce told a Melbourne Press Club luncheon yesterday:

"If we continue on our current path there will be a real question mark over the viability of Qantas International."

From 2003 to 2009, international capacity to Australia increased by 39 per cent, but inbound passengers increased by just 10 per cent. This shows the market didn't expand much. The new airlines, particularly those from the Middle East, were simply taking market share, as evidenced by Qantas's fall from 35 per cent of the international market to 20 per cent.

The Middle East airlines such as Qatar, Etihad and Emirates are in Joyce's sights.  

3. Convertibility coming - Xinhua reports China's foreign exchange regulator has announced plans to push for full capital account convertibility for the renminbi during the 12th five year plan.

This is all part of China's drive to wean itself off the global reserve currency in the the US dollar. All power to them.

What's New Zealand's five year plan for its currency?

And are we ready for the 'capital outflows' that China is keen encourage? (ie China buying assets offshore).

China will gradually make the Chinese currency convertible under capital account and make its convertibility measures in line with the needs of China's economic development, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange said in a statement on its website. Also, China will continue to improve the management of capital inflows and expand channels of capital outflows, the statement said.  

4. The problem with austerity - Nobel laureate economist Joe Stiglitz has highlighted in this Bloomberg report that Europe's austerity drive will be disastrous. He's a bit of a Keynesian. And thinks a little bit of inflation isn't a bad thing. That's one way to fix the debt problem...inflating it away. Who'd be a bond holder?

Prime Minister David Cameron’s government is implementing the largest fiscal squeeze since World War II to tackle the U.K.’s record deficit. The economy unexpectedly shrank 0.5 percent in the final three months of 2010 as the coldest December in a century hampered services and retailing, a report showed on Jan. 25.

“Whether it goes to double dip isn’t clear, but that it will be slower is very clear,” Stiglitz said.

“We’ve gone through this experiment over and over again of what will be the consequences of austerity, and it is a marked economic slowdown.”

Global inflation pressures from soaring food and commodity prices will also weigh on the economic recovery, according to Stiglitz. European economies will suffer as governments curb spending to narrow budget deficits and central banks rush to raise interest rates, he said.

“In Europe it’s going to play out worse because the budget-deficits problems are worse and the European Central Bank is much more committed to fighting inflation,” Stiglitz said. “The U.S. is a little bit more balanced in monetary policy and so they will be more willing to tolerate inflation.”

5. No worries then... - Wall St thinks the recession is over. In fact it's almost as if it never happened.

The WSJ reports investment banks paid out US$135 billion in compensation to their staff in 2010, up 5.7% from the previous year. Ben Bernanke can take some of the credit for this. Has everyone seen Inside Job yet?

One difference is that much of the pay now is deferred or in shares, rather than cash. Does this mean employees become the first creditors in line in bust caused by the employees?

"Things are shifting back to where they were before," said J. Robert Brown, a law professor at the University of Denver who studies compensation and corporate-governance issues.

Buried in the numbers, though, are signs of how Wall Street's pay culture is bending in response to pressure from regulators and shareholders. Last year, deferred compensation made up as much as half of total pay, up from about a third previously, estimates Alan Johnson, managing director of Johnson Associates Inc., a New York pay consultant.

Revenue is a major factor in compensation decisions, with the 25 companies paying out roughly one-third of total revenue. The percentage, known as compensation ratio, climbed to 32.5% last year from 31.1% in 2009. 

6. Comparing the US and Egypt - Harvard's Umair Haque is one of my favourite authors at the moment. He captures the mood of an increasingly disillusioned youth in the developed economies.

Here's his view on Egypt and the United States.

It was a society in stagnation, if not decline. Despite ostensible stability, its people — especially its young people — faced a future bleaker than the dark side of Pluto. For decades, the richest grew even richer, as national debt mounted, middle-class people tried to make ends meet, and upward mobility fell.

Government failed to address these problems, and the governed felt increasingly disenfranchised — and partisan. Mass unemployment metastasized from a temporary illness to a chronic condition. One of its major cities decided to erect a permanent tent city, for a permanently excluded, marginalized underclass. This isn't Tunisia, or Egypt — but America.

Yes, in many ways Egypt and America couldn't be more different. But the broad contours are just a little too similar for comfort. Consider a tweet that made the rounds this weekend. "Youth unemployment: #Yemen 49%, #Palestine 38%, #Morocco 35%, #Egypt 33%, #Tunisia 26%". It sounds staggering. But youth unemployment rates are 20-40% across Europe. And in the USA, estimates range from 20-50% depending on how you count, and when.

Egypt's youth unemployment crisis — which many seemed to think on Twitter was merely an Arab problem (oh, those Arabs!) is, in point of fact, a global one. What we're watching is a massive malfunctioning of the global economy.

At the root of the problem: dumb growth. Dumb growth is, in many ways, bogus — rather than reflecting enduring wealth creation, it largely reflects the transfer of wealth: from the poor to the rich, the young to the old, tomorrow to today, and human beings to corporate "people." Dumb growth is growth without prosperity. And it's far from an Egyptian problem.  

7. The problem with commodity exporting - NZHerald reports a problem that Cantabrian milk powder exporter Synlait has had with a distributor changing the expiry dates on bags of milk powder. This is one of the issues for New Zealand exporters who rely on being purely commodity exporters. It's a particular problem in the food industry where food safety punches well above its weight in the minds of consumers.

This must have been a fun email from Nigeria for Synlait to open...wonder if their spam filter stopped it...

Nigeria's National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) claimed that a local importer, Carnco Foods Nigeria, deliberately altered the actual expiry date on Synlait milk powder containers to increase the product's shelf life but Carnco said that the expiry date was changed by the manufacturer "to correct a printing error".

But Synlait Milk chief executive John Penno said that the expiry date was changed by an agent who originally bought the milk powder for distribution in China, and Synlait was not involved in the Nigerian deal. It was part of a much bigger consignment that had to be redirected out of the intended market, China. "We're aware of this transaction - we like to follow where our product goes," Penno said.

"It was redirected with our knowledge." He said the powder went to the Nigerian market with a two-year shelf life but it had been sitting on wharves in Nigeria so long that it was now past its expiry date and not fit for human consumption.  

8. The end of China's surplus - Harvard economics professor Martin Feldstein writes here that China's massive current account surplus of over 6% of GDP will eventually be whittled away by increased consumer spending. Hmmm. But here's the argument. He makes the point it will lift interest rates globally...

The policies that China will adopt as part of its new five-year plan will shrink its trade and current-account surpluses. It is possible that, before the end of the decade, China’s current-account surplus will move into deficit, as the country imports more than it exports and spends its foreign-investment income on imports rather than on foreign securities.

If that happens, China will no longer be a net buyer of US and other foreign bonds, putting upward pressure on interest rates in those countries.China’s national saving rate – including household saving and business saving – is now about 45% of its GDP, which is the highest rate in the world. But, looking ahead, the five-year plan will cause the saving rate to decline, as China seeks to increase consumer spending and therefore the standard of living of the average Chinese. The plan calls for a shift to higher real wages so that household income will rise as a share of GDP.

Moreover, state-owned enterprises will be required to pay out a larger portion of their earnings as dividends. And the government will increase its spending on consumption services like health care, education, and housing.

9. The Rich are happy - Bloomberg reports Britain's wealthy are planning to increase spending in 2011.

“It seems saving is giving way to spending for many affluent households in 2011,” Richard Brown, Head of Savings and Investments at HSBC, said in the report. “It will remain to be seen as the year progresses if this is indeed the case and the correct decision.”

The households plan to spend an average of 87,380 pounds this year compared with 81,060 pounds in 2010, HSBC said. Spending on “general home improvements” may quadruple, while expenditure on loft extensions may jump 45 percent, as wealthy Britons extend current properties instead of moving.

10. Totally irrelevant video - Jon Stewart does his think. I've included it because it has a muppet and Michael Steele. I love the muppets.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Michael Steele Pt. 1
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog</a> The Daily Show on Facebook

 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

53 Comments

#1

Well well, isn't that remarkably similar to Bollard's comments the other day. 

These bastards have known all along that it was going to hurt at some stage, now that it is getting impossible to hide they are all positioning themselves to absolve themselves of any blame.

Up
0

While that's probably got a lot of truth in it... Scarfie...it was reasonably foreseeable ....a fair reflection on all who perceive a world without limitations...as somehow normal.

As to Bolly  ....He knew there was a Fan.....He knew there was some shit lying around....He had not ...by himself....  ever speculated the resulting combination  of said components...but will include it as a remarkable observation in his next literary offering.

Up
0

#7 Why did the powder have to be redirected out of China, Mr Penno?

Up
0

Heard from a mate in Funds Management in the UK - the lastest buzz word - Farming Funds!

Even Larry Fink is talking them up.  Watch out land prices here if it gets real traction.

Up
0

"Watch out land prices here if it gets real traction."

The eternal hope of all NZ farmers!

Forget profit, forget lifstye premiums - just remember capital gains.

Up
0

Genuine farmers don't farm for capital gain Colin.  Corporates and greedy do.  I hope we don't see rising land prices - I have family members who still aspire to be farm owners one day and they won't be getting me and the MOTHs one while we are alive. :-)

Up
0

Fair enough CO - I just thought I saw in your comment a hint of excitement at the prospect of farm prices going through the roof.

Agribusiness academics have been advocating farming for capital gains for a long time.

Could you place "agribusiness" (professionals, academics, consultants) where you believe they belong in your spectrum from genuine to greedy?

Up
0

Colin, I can see how you might have thought that! :-)

Anyone who advocates farming for capital gains comes under the same heading in my book - idiots and greedy. Agribusiness don't have that on their own.

There is a farm in a certain farming area, known and laughingly referred as the 'ASB Farm'.  Two ASB rural managers decided they could buy the farm and flick it before they actually took possession of it.  Signed up unconditionally without finance approved. I spose as they were in the banking business they thought it would be a doodle to get it.  They paid over $600k deposit, went for the loan and got turned down. Lost the deposit, which the farm owner who received it, put to good use to upgrade the cowshed and get a 2nd house for the farm. No one in said farming area feels any sympathy for them.

Having said that, in any occupation there are good, bad and indifferent.  Agribusiness is no different.  I don't like tarring all participants in an industry/profession with the same brush.

Up
0

Thanks CO - I think I can read between the lines.

In my view anybody who needs to badge themselves as "agribusiness" anything starts off on the back foot regards credibility.

Up
0

The comments Ive seen are that "money" is rushing into commodities & land......what I dont get is if you over pay for land, how do you make a return unless you can get a monopoly price?.....Farmers own land now yet they often say they cant get a decent return....so what makes the "investors" any different?

So are they fools or am I missing something?

Certainly the free trade agrements to me are looking at more damaging than fruitful....anything that prevents a Govn from defending its own ppl is bad news ie banning exports or putting on huge tariffs.......on say rice to prevent hunger is bad news...IMHO.

However what I dont understand is what stops/prevents a Govn canceling the fta simply by legislating it out of law....

Im still scratching my head, because Im worried im missing something bad.........

These two pieces make me think that maybe indeed there are investors in for the long haul,  and that food will become the new gold....except of course productivity depends on cheap fossil fuels to grow and chepaish to transport....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIanDAqwjXo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9Y0pA2sEDM&feature=related

but personally from what Ive read I think most investors seem to think 20 weeks is along time let alone 20 months or 20 years.........

Indeed a Malthusian century........

On the other hand if investors take indebted farms off our banks books then the risk of a default moves away from our Govn ie no Irelend propping up the bank(s).?

regards

Up
0

food will become the new gold

This is exactly what they are counting on, Steven.  Time will tell if they are right, though farming often goes in 7/8 year cycles.  Real farmers aren't in the game just for the money - lifestyle around raising a family plays a big part.  Corporates don't have a lot of options for cutting costs so they end up affecting those things that make headlines - animal welfare etc. 

Up
0

#6 - a great lot of words and there's this quote:

And for far too many people, yesterday's economic institutions are literally not delivering the goods. Yes, the tools of capitalism have lifted entire nations out of poverty. But for decades, real prosperity has been flat. Now, at a macroeconomic level, our current economic institutions simply transfer prosperity upwards, to the richest 10% --> 1% --> 0.1% --> 0.01% and so on. This is what I call a global "ponziconomy" — a titanic, gleaming whirling, wealth transfer machine. And we can't fix it with the same tools we used to build it. That's why it's never been more vital for us — we, the people — to challenge the institutions of yesteryear. 

But then he states that he doesn't mean the US needs or will see mass protests in the streets, such as are occuring in Egypt - but rather he sees the challenge coming from some kind of intangible mindset change toward humanism - milions of tiny individuals "seeing the light", so to speak.

I disagree.  From my reading of history - all step-changes in institutional/social change come about from civil sector actions, not "thoughts".  You can't "lecture away" the immoral behaviour of those in charge of the institutions he's talking about.  He needs to get off the podium and into the streets.  All that "the common man" in the US has left to fight their current corrupt regime is the weight of numbers.

First strategy I'd suggest is that they stand in their millions in the streets surrounding the NY Stock Exchange - thus preventing traders from entering the building.  Very symbollic.

Up
0

Your 100% right Kate. It ALWAYS come down to real actions and not just good intentions via general thought. It's kind of like believing in spoon benders. I really can't believe people in the US have not burned Wall St and the US FED to the ground. I guess their lives must first become absolutely desperate like they did in France before you know what? What I want to know is what point would we act here in NZ under such (coming) circumstances?

Up
0

CO,  This is an interesting take on inflation in the EU

 

 


Ambrose

This is the morsel that got my attention.

“Eurozone retail sales have fallen for two months in a row, dropping 0.6pc in December”.

It does not sound like much does it? Less than 1% - nothing to see here, please move on.

However this 0.6% drop in B2C transactions has a multiplier effect on the supporting B2B transactions. This is a function of the ordering algorithms used by most upstream supply companies. 

Therefore a 0.6% drop in B2C transactions can result in as much as a 20 times reduction at the commodity level in a 4 stage upstream supply chain. This is commonly known as the "whiplash" effect.

Now a 12% reduction in commodity demand results in what kind of reduction in commodity prices? 

But as we know this reduction is being disguised by the excess dollar liquidity sloshing around the global system and currently parked in commodities – this is investment demand and not consumption demand. 

Nevertheless, there comes a point where real demand reductions will have their effect – and when that happens expect the bottom to drop out of commodities.

Inflation based on transitory investment demand? 

Deflation may yet come back with a vengeance.

Jonathan  


http://www.newstatesman.com/world-affairs/2008/04/haiti-food-price-comm…  

Just like the boom in house prices, commodity price inflation feeds on itself. The more prices rise, and big profits are made, the more others invest, hoping for big returns. Look at the financial websites: everyone and their mother is piling into commodities. It is the great bull market of the Noughties. The trouble is that if you are one of the 2.8 billion people, almost half the world's population, who live on less than $2 a day, you may pay for these profits with your life.

 

 

         
Up
0

Interesting comment/point of view.....but we get to watch........

There seems to be two conflicting points of view, 1) Speculation / future contracts makes no difference, or a slight difference, 2) It makes a huge difference....

To me if the likes of GS are in thee buying futures there has to be a difference....

Why did the oil supply get so high ($147USD) in july 2008?  We get/got saudi saying plenty of oil sono reason.....some sayings its in tankers...sure there was some in tankers....then we see a "panic" and a drop to $35USD....... will commodities do that again?

ugh!....

regards

 

Up
0

"pay for these profits with your life" and/or topple Govn's....and economies....

What happens if/when the blue collar types with nothing but a nice big hunting rifle cotten on to the fact that its the bankers and GOP that are ripping them off?

A few shootings? hangings?

regards

 

Up
0

Aj the thing I found kinda distasteful in my conversation with my UK friend is that they (fund chappies) seem to rubbing their hands with glee at the thought of high food inflation and for this reason it seemed to make them think food commodities was the place to be. I tried to explain that it can be quite a volatile industry to be in but then they just swamp me with economic theory.

I've been farming long enough to know that what goes up, goes down.  Things are looking good at the moment, but the prudent will be putting some away for a rainy day.

Within 5 years I expect there to be a major military (war) event.  Not the fiddles like Afghanistan but a serious event. All the stars are aligning to create this - high food prices, regressing/stagnant economies, political unrest in countries that were stable etc. 

Who said 'history never repeats'?  WWII was the 'saviour' of the 1930's Depression and I expect a similar event to happen this time round, only more devastating - we have lost the sustainability aspect in our lifestyles, hence a more resultant devastation as people are forced to readjust.

Up
0

Jeepers CO, Ive just been talking to a friend in Chile who's thinking along the same lines. He thinks Egypt is going to get worse and worse and contagious. His father spent alot of time there and he said his warnings are ringing in his ears. He thinks some in the UK will want to get bolt holes in NZ but more likely Aussie. He said our dollar is stopping many at present, some of my mates and family in the UK have some seriuos dosh, I need to ring them up and see whats going on.

  Im thinking this could be a short run up in prices unless we see wage inflation and I dont see that happening while China is still destroying jobs in the West. Even Chile has had some riots as the cost of living goes up but wages stay the same. Isnt that what is really happening, a fall in our standard of living. If countries stockpile and then shortages dont eventuate there is going be some serious downward pressure.

 Those guys pumping food will be looking for places with cheap land and low costs and economics of scale, not so much places like us, execpt we have no CG taxes. As Ive said grain land in Alberta is $1000 an acre ca. Its a lot cheaper than here but a lot dearer than South America or the old USSR. Then when prices fall we get competition were there was once none.  Cosumption has got to be falling we just dont know by how much.

Up
0

Aj, I understand that around 50 buyers were missing from the Fonterra auction in part due to the Egyptian internet being down.  So almost all the buyers in the last auction were Asian.  I wonder what would have happened if the Middle East had had a bigger presence at the auction.

I have been told by a Fonterra guru I know, that the last few rises in auction prices 'feels quite different to the last time.  It seems to have a more permanent air to it'.  This was said to me with a bit of a bewildered look. Not sure that the shortages will occur because of nature, Aj.  I think it will be more likely due to military action on a scale not seen for a long time and countires not being able to get food supplies in.   I'm hoping for one more good season as have a young'un taking on a 50/50 job.

I don't believe the spin that NZ is a high cost producer - we can be a low cost producer, but many chose to get caught up with the spin of production over profit.  NZ is seen as a reliable and safe producer of food. 

Heck let's face it even foot and mouth neednt be the the biggie they like to make out it is.  You can farm through it and many countries where it is endemic do so.  It's only the bureaucrats that make it a major.

Alberta....mmmm...... have arable farming friends in Manitoba that don't want to live in Alberta!

I agree to a point about consumption falling. IMO prices will eventually come down - not due to economic theory, but more due to military action.  When they do drop look to see who is no longer buying.  Could very well point to the flashpoint to set it all off.

Will be interested to hear what your UK mates think Aj.

Meanwhile we have a beautiful day here in 'paradise'.  The farmers in the 'place with the highest sunshine hours in NZ' have good grass supplies - much better than what I saw in the Waikato yesterday.

Up
0

"Heck let's face it even foot and mouth neednt be the the biggie they like to make out it is. You can farm through it and many countries where it is endemic do so. It's only the bureaucrats that make it a major."

Spot on CO - Foot and Mouth threats are an area where the bureaucrats can make themselves look more important and appear more deserving of bigger budgets and higher salaries. As a producer you are going to being paying for that via NAIT.

And if bureaucratic excess grows far enough out of control (local government included) NZ will end up a high cost producer even without with the spin of production over profit.

Up
0

I agree with you there Colin :-)

Up
0

It's not much of a Top Ten today Bernard................read it twice...even the John Dally was sub par...liked Kate's piece...AndrewJ's............oh damn I can't even find a good argument to involve myself with...save that Keyser Geyser gettin a might uppity over at  4000 leaving our fair shores...although we are learning to export debt.....we don't seem to have grasped the concept entirely.

Up
0

I loved the piece about banana prices in Oz . Another shining example of trade protectionism , assisting the few , punishing the many . ....Bananas grow wild all over this island , where I live . I should smuggle illicit bananas into the Sydney markets ?

....... And , as I  lived in Oz for 16 years , I found that the apples are expensive , and lacking any discernable flavour . ............. Having worked on an orchard there , I knew full well the true reason for keeping NZ apples out .

Now , if only they would lift the tarriffs that protect their car manufacturers from competition .

..........................$ 15 / kg ? ........ Suck on  that , you Aussie monkeys

Up
0

australopithecines s'il vous plaît......GBH

Slow day at the office GBH think I'll go clean out the Garage........

Up
0

Here a little link  to revile Mr Bernake....worth a look.....http://www.garynorth.com/public/1216.cfm

Up
0

It's Friday Yay..!! in lieu of the Friday smile ..I offer this little montage on quotations of Bernanke and Paulson.

 

From the annals of "How am I doing so far"

June 20th, 2007 – Bernanke: The mortgage debacle “will not affect the economy overall.'' 

July 12th, 2007 – Paulson: "This is far and away the strongest global economy I've seen in my business lifetime." 

August 1st, 2007 – Paulson: "I see the underlying economy as being very healthy," 

October 15th, 2007 – Bernanke: "It is not the responsibility of the Federal Reserve - nor would it be appropriate - to protect lenders and investors from the consequences of their financial decisions."

May 7, 2008 – Paulson: 'The worst is likely to be behind us . . . . ”

May 16th, 2008 – Paulson: "In my judgment, we are closer to the end of the market turmoil than the beginning."

July 16th, 2008 – Bernanke: On Freddie and Fannie: “They will make it through the storm”, "… in no danger of failing.","…adequately capitalized" 

Only two months later both were nationalized.

February 14th, 2008 – Paulson: (the economy) "is fundamentally strong, diverse and resilient." 

If you are going to tell a lie, make it a big one department: September 23rd, 2008 – Bernanke: "My interest is solely for the strength and recovery of the U.S. economy," 

Bernanke : “I don't think that Chinese ownership of U.S. assets is so large as to put our country at risk economically.”

11/28/08 & 3/3/09 Bernanke : “We expect to see recovery beginning in the second half of 2009.

“History proves, however, that a smart central bank can protect the economy and the financial sector from the nastier side effects of a stock market collapse. “

“A collapse in U.S. stock prices certainly would cause a lot of white knuckles on Wall Street. But what effect would it have on the broader U.S. economy? If Wall Street crashes, does Main Street follow? Not necessarily.” 

“Our understanding of the best practice in monetary policy evolved during Alan Greenspan's tenure at the Fed, and it will continue.”

But Ben was right at least once in his life: “In other words, the best way to get out of trouble is not to get into it in the first place.” Of course he speaketh with forked tongue.  

Up
0

http://peakoil.com/bussiness/robert-hirsch-on-peak-oil-2/

"A lot of ppl will be out of work"..........

Pollies wont do anything despite the risk.........in fact the reverse, "all is well" (yeah right) ....."we will rebound quickly" (no we have not) why do ppl continue trust those answers?

regards

Up
0

Petrol (oil) has increased in price in the US from USD $2.60 per US gallon to USD $3.10 per US gallon since August 2010. That's a 20% increase in just 5 months. As Powerdownkiwi states oil is the base cost/ingredient in everything we do. Americans depend on their vehicles and will put petrol in their cars first, and pay less off their mortgages.

Up
0

Talked to a friend in Europe today.

Petrol prices much higher than in New Zealand,  Petrol 95 is costing Euro 1,78  -  converts into NZ$ 3.16!!!!!!!

http://portal.wko.at/wk/format_detail.wk?angid=1&stid=147447&dstid=308&…änner,2011

Most disturbing for businesses,  Diesel in Europe same price as Petrol 91.

The tax component on the price is in Austria 55% for the government.

In NZ same  Petrol95 is NZ$ 2,07   = more than a third cheaper than in Europe.

Compare:

http://pricewatch.co.nz/default.aspx

 

Just imagine what it would do to our economy, if we would have to pay around NZ$ 3 for petrol!

Up
0

You are mistaken! You cannot simply convert the currency as FIRST you must know things like the average weekly take home pay, food prices and other costs of living like phone, gas, and electricity. Plus diesel is alot cheaper there with road user charges alot less

I lived there 7 years dude and I can tell you it's still cheaper. If you really just want to do a currency conversion to get the answer then you better convert 1200 pounds PLUS a week that i was earning eh? See the point now?  

Up
0

I think the point was the price of petrol....Uk has far more tax, yet their economy survives this price.

I lived there for 33 years....I would have said it was not. In fact looking at the typical wage there for my IT role, ....comparible to here from a converison, the money is about the same........maybe I'd earn 5~10% more.....maybe.....

So I could possibly earn more there but my mortgage would be way higher for a smaller house far further out, my commuting would then cost a fortune, my car insurance higher. Yes, some things are cheaper tools, books, cds, whiteware and there is far bigger choice in goods sure....

Throw in to get that wage I would probably have to work in or close to London, which is even more expensive to live.........

UK1200pounds is a lot...that's UK60K Sterling a year, a very good UK wage...the median in the UK is UK500pounds....so you are way over double....at the time you might have been treble the median.

There are indices that take these factors into account....I dont think they incl quality of life though.....which is why Im here.

regards

Up
0

Yes I do realize his claims on petrol which is why I highlighted his mistaken tunnel visioned formula of just converting currency to get an answer!  Man......must I explain these things all the time? Don't you think the math was just a little too simplistic? First thing someone told me when arriving the UK: "do not convert back to NZ dollars" cause it just does not work out the same. And it doesn't

 

Up
0

Tax is high on petrol in most EC countries however how valid is a streight forex transaltion to NZ dollars for comparison, only if they are exporting/importing.

Relative purchasing power matters more, i.e how does that relate to their relative disposable income. Austria like most Northern European countries have relatively high income compared to us kiwis.

Been looking at this for a investment currently, as an example an average senior accountant with five years post qualification experience in xx sub discipline earns 125k gross in NZ while in North Europe the average is 275K euros.

Up
0

Yes speckles, you are right, an accountants salary might be in this bracket.

But one also has to take into consideration income tax  (highest bracket Germany 38,6%, Belgium  56,6%  Austria a little over 50%),

I could not find a up to date accurate statistic, above figures are from 2005.

GST 20% ( 10% for food and agri products, might slightly differ in some countries),

If you are self employed, a considerable burden is also the employers contribution to Social Security Insurance of his employees (Unemployment, Health, Pension) of over 20%.

So it is difficult to compare apples with apples.

 

Up
0

The Cato Institute has released a report of a study on the US House of Representatives . From 1964 to 2008 there has been a 93 % incumbancy rate , the successful return to the house of sitting members . This has been described as creating a ruling class within US society .

........ Further , they found that " newbies " to the house ( 6 years or less ) were more fiscally prudent than old hands . Generally , the longer an individual  politician retains power , the more lavish they become with tax-payers' munny .

Any of this ring a bell with NZ ? ...Clark and Cullen were very long term politicians , and they spent alike drunken-sailors , for 9 long years ...... Effectively their government consumed the economy , growing  their spending three times faster than GDP growth .

........ And as we saw from Phil Goff's shadow cabinet re-shuffle , there's little room for newbies in his aspiring government ........  Job changes  for the incumbents was the result .

Up
0

Looks like Goofy ran out of fools to fill the spaces Gummy....labour has fallen into the minor party pot....everyone's a shadow...hahahahaha

Up
0

From what I saw there is only one newbie in Goofy's shadow cabinet ( Robertson ) , plus one second termer ( Hughes ) ............. That is hardly showing a new , rejuvenated face to the electorate . And I do believe that Labour have plenty of bright youngsters wanting to take a step up . Goofy and Klinger won't let them ........ Jobs are just for the old hands !

Up
0

Mostly I think its the same for most parties and not just Labour.....the MPs who get put in front of the voter have been chosen by that party.....this means the prospective MP is there to support those who put him/her into that place and not the voter....the voter is second place....um actually third, those in the party first, their mates second and the voter is third, if we are lucky.....with a system like that no wonder we are in the poo.

regards

Up
0

You are correct it's all just a popularity contest for ALL the suckers in society. This is where CIBR's can end such BS. You remove the put people on pedestals concept and instead you put IDEAS on pedestals!

I pay allot in taxes with very little benefit coming my way. I don't begrudge that BUT what I do begrudge is not having a real continuous say as to where it should all go as a tax paying citizen. I have NO party membership for this reason as I choose to be independent of others in their thinking AND I hold no interest in reinforcing hierarchy and elitist class systems in decision making. CIBR’s I believe would also encourage MORE voter interest and education as people would feel more engaged in the process which can only be a good thing. Yes some people have no interest and no clue but those people still hurt the economy now with ignorance and shallow views about the ‘greater good’. You still need people with good ideas to play a role but as with this website and those that comment on a regular basis you can see those people and ideas do exist and are rarely listened too via our so-called “experts and leaders”.

Up
0

Citizen? initiated? binding? referendum?

I think the case against these is good....I used to like the idea but it seems such led to mayhem in the US states that have tried it.  The problem is the voters vote for things others pay for, for instance tax cuts where the end result is the state has to borrow un-sustainably.....these voters are in for a shock when the society effectively collapses...I watch Colarado Springs with Interest.

Also how is the vote carried out? via a computer? TV?  some ppl dont have access, I for one dont for instance have a TV.......

 

Up
0

How about Swizerland Steven? It's STILL about education at the end of the day. Eventually people vote the right way once the repercussions of their actions are realized (sometimes way too late) This is also part of the education process. Having the potential of making mistakes is no reason not to have/implement REAL democracy? Look at our current system? Are our so-called global political experts doing any better? We have a WORLD financial crisis

We have the technology to vote many time over (mobile's or land line). Trivia would not be voted on unless at local level and major voting would occur every 3 months on a max of 10 national issues say. The legislation pass rate would have to be a CLEAR majority (60%) or no action is taken for atleast one year on the issue again. No contentious outcomes then. Less MP's and NO political grandstanding!

Have a serious think about.

Up
0

Vote for capable NZpeople not for rotten parties is the key and in a few years we will see the political system is acceptable at least.

Hardly anyone in this country makes NZpoliticians accountable for their actions respectively inactions. Hardly anyone in this country asks tough and serious questions. Parliamentarians/ ministers should be grilled by the media and publicly on weekly bases. We must know more about our policymakers and representatives and their jobs.

Of some reasons “The NZMale Excuse Syndrome” is paramount. Sacking a minister because of underperformance is almost excluded. This shouldn’t be accepted by the media/ public.

By the way we do need more women in policies anyway.

 

Up
0

At last

Memo Messrs Chaston, Hickey, Vaughan & co
Every now and then a genuine piece of brilliance pops up in your columns that deserves not to be lost in the smoke of the 24/7 news media cycle. Justice has got it. Instead of the populace waiting for a visionary messiah with courage to appear, it would be better to have a "Star Chamber" who finds out what the people want and does it. It's called consensus decision making. Some might call it democracy. The present system of government based on the populace choosing a  "political party" based on "candy floss" manifestos isn't delivering solutions.

Justice: please continue with the thought, expand, submit a full article on your thinking. Government by the people, Government for the people. Yes, the technology exists now to do mass surveys. Google has it and has used it for global sampling of ideas. Having thought about this for a long time, in another place, in another arena, I agree with you 100%.

New Zealand led the world in the 1890's with Social Security, then again with womens suffrage, and again giving women the vote. Why stop there? New Zealand has the ability to do things others won't.

Up
0

Wasn't that idea floated many years ago on " Yes Minister " ........ create a massive number of groupings of 100 or so households , each with a spokesman .......... each spokesman being an independent  and with full knowledge of their constituents agenda .....

....... Kind of alike  the  Baranguay system , we operate here in the Philippines . Sadly , even this system is corruptible by families who build themselves up , and collude with one another , to create an inter-generational elite ....... And they always start at the next level up , at the local council . There is where the corruption and largesse  begins .

From there on up , there is an exponential increase in poo upon the political-power-ladder , all the way up to el Presidente'

Up
0

Thanks steven , I have been wondering what Justice's CIBR stood for ....... Gummy's not firing on all synapses , over-indulged in the Tanduay Rhum ........... So C.I.B.R. isn't Central illinois Bragging Rights ? ...... Hmmm , should've guessed that ....... crunted idiot blogging  rabidly  !

Up
0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy

I'm not sure we're civilised enough...

Up
0

Bollard exposed by Ms Barker!

 

"Bank of England attempting inflation 'confidence trick', says former MPC member Kate Barker
Keeping inflation under control is a "confidence trick" that the Bank of England may fail to pull off, Kate Barker, one of its former rate-setters, has warned.
 
'If you believe inflation is going to come back to 2pc, you are going to behave as if that's going to happen when you're setting wages and setting prices'  Ms Barker, who served nine years on the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), said rising prices may have already damaged the Bank's credibility and threaten a "more profound" loss of faith among the public.

A loss of credibility is dangerous as people begin to assume inflation will remain over target and so put up wages and prices accordingly, resulting in a self-perpetuating spiral of rising prices.

"If you believe inflation is going to come back to 2pc, you are going to behave as if that's going to happen when you're setting wages and setting prices," said Ms Barker.

"Once you start to think this monetary policy isn't all that it's cracked up to be, and things need to be changed in some way, then things inevitably become more difficult."

She added: "It's like a confidence trick."

 

 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/8304054/Bank-of-England-attempting-inflation-confidence-trick-says-former-MPC-member-Kate-Barker.html

Up
0

we all know this, first time I've seen it in print!!!!

Up
0

Giordano Bruno in the Neithercorp Press:

THE GREAT GLOBAL DEBT PRISON

http://neithercorp.us/npress/2011/02/the-great-global-debt-prison

"....to break the circle...

two very important steps are required, the realization that debt is not the only way, and the realization that debt is the worst way. Prosperity is not achieved at the expense of the future. The society that finally takes this fact to heart, will accomplish incredible things indeed...."

Up
0

A great read, Gertraud T ! "...it took the U.S. over 200 years to reach its first trillion dollars of debt. Now, we are looking at the accumulation of at least a trillion every year. This is unsustainable. "

Up
0

BH asks  in the herald.....". "Is there a politician brave enough to broach the subject?"

Silence is golden....not a peep could be heard from the ranks...

Sorry Bernard...........

Up
0

Bernard  admitted that even in Norway , the scheme is controversial ...... .. Tadge understating the issue I'd have thought , having your  financial affairs open to public view .

The Bernard Whimps of the world would love it , as would real estate agents , and finance companies , plus the Harris gang .........

..And all in the name of assisting the tax-man to pick your pocket for the government !

....... Yeah , great idea  Hickey  , full and open public disclosure of one's personal balance sheet ........ You go first buddy , show us how it's done ......

Up
0