This Top 5 COVID-19 Alert Level 1 special comes from interest.co.nz's Gareth Vaughan.
As always, we welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to david.chaston@interest.co.nz. And if you're interested in contributing the occasional Top 5 yourself, contact gareth.vaughan@interest.co.nz.
1) Michael Cullen's key moment in our history.
Former Finance Minister Michael Cullen has written a think piece for think tank the McGuinness Institute looking at where New Zealand could, or should, head to from here. He has some interesting things to say and includes the type of one liner he was famous for when in parliament, describing NZ during lockdown as "a kind of Garden of Eden with wi-fi."
We need to develop a new high trust partnership model where government is seen as the facilitator, not the barrier, to progress and sustainable development. Many of the private, voluntary, and other sector lead organisations need to move out of their trenches and start to think about how they, in a partnership model, can contribute to New Zealand’s wellbeing.
A good place to begin this recovery would be the tourism sector. Its leadership during the crisis has done a fair impersonation of a wailing wall. It needs to sit down with government and others and start discussing what a realistic, viable future looks like for the sector and how to get there. Government needs to loosen the reins while sector organisations need to act more like grown-up citizens of New Zealand, and less like importunate teenagers, ever wanting more attention and more money.
Hopefully, looking ten years down the track, we could see a leaner, more agile, more interactive bureaucracy working with many different partners towards shared goals. At the moment we have a team of five million where part of the team wants to keep the ball all the time and the rest run around in circles.
Cullen concludes by saying the COVID-19 crisis will be looked back on in the future as a key moment in our history.
Whether it will be seen as a disaster or the beginning of a better age will depend on the honesty, courage, and unity we, as a nation, can show over the next couple of years. It is time to move beyond self-congratulation on what we did during the crisis. It is time to reckon with the much harder task of fulfilling the promise inherent in that time for our children and grandchildren.
2) How Asia’s densest slum chased the virus.
Bloomberg has the story of how Mumbai's Dharavi, India’s most crowded slum, has moved from coronavirus hotspot to potential success story, with lessons for developing nations battling to contain COVID-19. Authorities have apparently knocked on 47,500 doors since April to measure temperatures and oxygen levels, have screened nearly 700,000 people and set up fever clinics. Bloomberg says officials also realised the need to isolate people in a place where up to 80 share a toilet, with schools and sports clubs converted to quarantine centres.
Fresh daily infections are now down to a third compared with early May, half the sick are recovering, and the number of deaths plummeted this month.
The numbers are in stark contrast to the rest of India, whose daily tally of new infected cases has quadrupled since early May. Located near Mumbai’s financial district, Dharavi’s dogged approach to “chase the virus” borrows ideas from clusters such as those in China’s Wuhan or South Korea, and could be a template for emerging markets across the world, from the favelas of Brazil to shanty towns in South Africa.
“It was next to impossible to follow social distancing,” said Kiran Dighavkar, assistant commissioner at Mumbai’s municipality, who is in charge of leading the fight in Dharavi. “The only option then was to chase the virus rather than wait for the cases to come. To work proactively, rather than reactively.”
The Dharavi slums. Photographer: Indranil Mukherjee/AFP via Getty Images.
3) Hertz the a pandemic zombie.
In my last Top 5 I included a Bloomberg story about people buying shares in bankrupt companies such as Hertz. Writing for Vanity Fair, William D Cohan delves into this issue further.
Cohan points out the pandemic and its economic consequences have led to a number of counterintuitive events in financial markets. But he argues what's happening at car rental agency Hertz is in a class of absurdity by itself.
Between May 26 and June 8, Hertz’s stock—still trading on the New York Stock Exchange during bankruptcy although destined for delisting—exploded in price. During those two weeks the Hertz stock increased to $5.53 per share, from 56 cents per share, a ridiculous and inexplicable rise of nearly 10 times. Sometimes these kinds of crazy things happen to the publicly traded stock of bankrupt companies, where woefully uninformed retail investors—you and me—buy up the stock hoping other fools will too. And sometimes, as in this case, the speculators can make money. The stocks of other newly or near-bankrupt companies—J.C. Penney, Chesapeake Energy—have also rallied in recent weeks. It is all pure gambling. There is no circumstance—zero—where Hertz shareholders will ever get a recovery once a plan of reorganization with creditors is agreed upon, probably months from now.
How do I know? Part of the reason is because I understand corporate restructuring. For nearly five years at Lazard, in the early 1990s, I worked on several of the biggest bankruptcies of the day, among them Revco Drug Stores and Federated Department Stores. What happens 99.9% of the time is that existing shareholders get wiped out and the creditors, most of which won’t get their money back, divide up what’s left of the carcass. It’s often a Darwinian battle of epic proportions, with creditors fighting over every scrap of value. What happens time and time again is that unless and until every creditor gets back every penny it is owed plus accrued interest, there will be no recovery for the shareholders. As in zero.
That’s what is going to happen to Hertz, too, and I know that because the Hertz bonds are trading at a severe discount.
4) Could the US be headed for civil war?
Time has the story of Peter Turchin, a researcher who teaches cultural evolution at the University of Connecticut. In 2010 Turchin predicted the US would suffer a period of major social upheaval beginning around 2020. This has certainly come to fruition.
After spending the last 20 years studying crises in America and the structural defects that helped cause them, Turchin says many signs showed the U.S. was spiraling toward upheaval in this decade.
The nation, he says, has experienced stretches of turmoil about every 50 years between 1870, during heightened tensions of the Reconstruction Era, and 1970, in the aftermath of Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination when women and many minority groups were fighting for equality amid protests against the ongoing Vietnam War.
Turchin looked at data analyzing peaceful and violent anti-government demonstrations that involved at least 100 people between 1780 and 2010. Using a computer model, he also factored in economic patterns—including declining wages, wealth inequality, exploding national debt and other social pressures that affect national stability—from the same time period. The model showed social and economic turmoil in the U.S. would come to a boiling point in the years around 2020, Turchin wrote in his 2010 paper.
And Turchin suggests the worst may still be to come.
On top of that, Turchin says the COVID-19 pandemic has further worsened the wellbeing of large swaths of the American population—a leading driver of national instability—and could make the public less likely to trust government institutions. As millions of Americans remain jobless, Turchin says there will be other triggers after this. He worries tensions “may escalate all the way to a civil war.”
“Unfortunately,” he says, “things are not as bad as they can be.”
The impact COVID-19 is having on aviation is well known. In an earlier Top 5 I included an article on how Anchorage Airport, an air cargo hub, had become the world's busiest airport. Auckland International Airport issued a traffic update on Wednesday. Not surprisingly it reported total passenger volumes dropped by 97.5% in April year-on-year. International passengers, excluding transits, were down 96.5%, transit passengers were down 98.5% and domestic passengers were down by 98.6%. Even though more domestic flights have resumed since then, here in Auckland the skies remain noticeably quieter than pre COVID-19.
The ABC looks in-depth at a very quiet Sydney Airport, complete with a series of eerie pictures and the tale of a young Spanish couple's efforts to get home.
Australia’s busiest airport normally handles around 1,000 flights daily.
“We’re now doing 10 flights a day, 20 if we’re lucky,” Sydney Airport CEO Geoff Culbert says.
“150,000 people were coming through the airport every day, we’re now seeing 100, 200 people a day.”
Parcels that are normally packed into the cargo holds of commercial flights are now being loaded in the cabins of empty aircraft, the ABC says. Quoted is Nigel Coghlan, the airfield operations supervisor.
Mr Coghlan’s worked at the airport for 21 years, through events including 9/11 and the collapse of Ansett.
He’s never seen so many planes parked on the runways and taxiways.
Qantas, Jetstar and Virgin aircraft sit idle, their wheels wrapped in plastic, their engines covered.
Meanwhile the Spanish couple's "revised" itinerary is below.
A 12-hour drive from Keith, South Australia to Sydney.
Arriving at an empty Sydney Airport only to find another flight cancelled.
A night at an airport hotel, then back to the departures hall for a long wait.
From here, they hope to take a 14-hour flight to Doha and then a seven-hour flight to Madrid.
Then they’ll navigate the local COVID-19 restrictions in Spain and take a five-hour bus ride to Valencia.
At least, that’s the current plan.
63 Comments
Just been listening on RNZ tales of widespread incompetence by the MOH in running our quarantine system. It will be a miracle if the virus is not already loose again and the billions we have spent has been for nothing.
Jacinda needs to take her rolling pin down to David Clarks office and go nuts.
Totally agree about the quarantine shambles, and Clark. Incompetent and unacceptable.
But, even if there is now a case at a petrol station in Turangi, this hopefully only puts us where the aussies are -- a small number of cases. Not where we should have been, but much better than where we would have been without lockdown at all.
As pointed out on RNZ, a significant portion of the Aussie cases testing positive each day are people in quarantine. But in NZ we went for a couple of weeks with zero new cases despite thousands of people coming in from overseas. Why were we at zero?...because people weren't tested leaving quarantine! And people in their final days in quarantine were using the same common areas and mixing with new arrivals. Do we need to IQ test those in charge?
I don't think you see the issue clearly Kate. Its not a state vs state issue. Nor a state vs union issue.
Its a capital asset owner vs non asset owner issue. Its a class war, not an interstate war. Blacks in US remind me of the Serfs in Europe and the peasants revolt.
It's a potential culture war. It's a loose collective of groups with the shared immediate goal of dismantling the western power structures the the cultural values that support them. It's a combination of white, black and others and privileged elites and poor on both sides. The riots would have been stopped in the first week if it was opposed by white democrats but together with BLM and violent rioters they have found our they are powerful political force.
The groups all have different motives and actions for attacking functioning society and they may eventually find they have very different end goals but by then things will be complete mess. I believe that any changes coming from violence and intimidation of the mob can only be regressive to society. Everyone can make up there own mind if the the one positive incremental change of the cops being charged (and maybe convicted) with murder can be partially attributed to rioting or not.
No, it wasn't sarcasm. And I'm not saying it's great that lots of people were being sent to the guillotine. I'm saying that the French Revolution caused a lot of changes which weren't regressive, which seems to be a counterexample to your claim that any changes that come from violent revolutions are regressive.
I never asserted the revolutions could not bring about progressive or positive changes just that mobs (or just the current ones in the USA) could not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Revolution
Was there a time in the revolution where the mob was a shining beacon of virtue? or did they just destroy enough to leave a power vacuum were fortunately someone took over restored order? This someone proceeded to conquer the rest of Europe forcing the entire continent to fight a few wars.
Democratic nations should not need the mob to bring about revolution. If the majority support revolutionary change it can happen with less destruction. They could achieve their goals at the upcoming election.
If the mob succeeds, it will eventually burn it self out and then a rebuild will occur but the mob will be impeding this not leading it. If things go well, a great many improvements may come in the rebuild but the citizens will be at the mercy of the re-builders.
This is not workers or peasants mob, it will suppress anything that looks western or has traditional idea of rule of law and will give a group with Marxist inspired ideas first go at rebuilding.
I'm not a history expert but the enlightenment appeared to occur around the time that serfdom ended. Many of the good things we have in our society came from the enlightenment period. Even if there was initial violence breaking down the social hierarchy that had existed for hundreds of years, for good or bad. Not all violence is bad, if you considered the non-violent suffering that many go through living in a broken system. Hows your mental health - what about other people in our society? Is there suffering? Yes. Why? Because the system isn't working well. What may change that? Revolt and revolution. Remove the stresses and pressures that are causing parts of society to suffer so much compared to other parts.
I meant violence and intimidation as the main tools of a mob not all violence. If the mob does succeed in breaking down enough society, there will be a power vacuum that in a western country will likely be filled by someone with a liberal agenda and in 20 to 40 years we cross the tipping point into a net benefit on some metrics but its us who have suffer though the middle.
Have a read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment i don't think there a causal link between the mob and Enlightenment.
Thanks - yes have been to Florence a number of times and understand the general concepts of the renaissnace and enlightenment.
Society could always regress, I recall Elon Musk talking about it in one of his interviews. You think about the Egyptians and the Romans. They had fantastic technology, democracy, systems, philosphy etc. But that was all lost to the mobs of the dark ages - literally for over a 1,000 years.
There's no reason why the society we now know, regresses in a similar fashion. The state system we now understand is very young. We could be back to tribes before you know it - which is concerning when you look at the trabalism that is going on with respect to politics in the US - and here to some extent.
It's not a race war. Americans are race obsessed (particularly Democrats) but it is a class war. There is nothing unique about black experiences financially. Countless white, Hispanic, Asian people are structurally hurt in the US. The race fixation is to lure people away from what is actually happening. The photos of senior CEO's enthusiastically kneeling to support people's neighborhoods getting burned down is a clue here.
no it can’t be a civil war as one might normally classify it. Perhaps then an urban type of warfare that pitches communities against one another, for reason of ethnicity, inequality, territorial and sheer desperation. There is just so much heavy fire power stashed in people’s homes. The prospect reminds me somewhat of reading about the range wars way back in the 19th century, Lincoln County for instance
Cullen's not too far off the mark in many respects. Especially given the appearances of Queenstown mayor, Jim Boult, on numerous programmes:
A good place to begin this recovery would be the tourism sector. Its leadership during the crisis has done a fair impersonation of a wailing wall.... sector organisations need to act more like grown-up citizens of New Zealand, and less like importunate teenagers, ever wanting more attention and more money.
At the moment we have a team of five million, where part of the team wants to keep the ball all the time and (have) the rest run around in circles.
Well doesn't that sum up Cullen in a nutshell:
"Many of the private, voluntary, and other sector lead organisations need to move out of their trenches and start to think about how they, in a partnership model, can contribute to New Zealand’s wellbeing."
Private organisations are 'in their trenches' because they are fighting for survival. There is no guaranteed paycheque regardless of hours worked our output. I'm not sure why they should be compelled to drive a more agreeable or effective public sector - there's nothing stopping them from making those changes if they actually wanted to.
Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic advisor at Allianz, says the stock market is in a "win-win" mindset as the Federal Reserve provides continued stimulus. He warns of distorted "zombie markets" and explains how some sectors will benefit while others will miss out during the economic recovery.
Beware not just of “zombie” companies but of “zombie markets” as asset prices become distorted and detached from fundamentals, warned Allianz chief economic advisor Mohamed El-Erian.
“I think we’ve got to be careful about zombie markets,” he said. “We’re not there yet, but we’re starting to get close.”
“Zombie” companies continue to operate by borrowing money, even though they are unable to pay off their debts. Record low-interest rates have contributed to a growing number of such firms over the past decade.
“They eat away at the dynamism of an economy, they misallocate resources and they eat away at productivity,” El-Erian said. “So you may be keeping them alive today, but it comes at a cost.”
El-Erian said “zombie markets” might occur when central banks like the Federal Reserve continue to prop up assets, destroying the market’s ability to allocate capital efficiently.
“Zombie markets are markets that are completely mispriced, they’re completely distorted,” El-Erian said. “Why? Because there is a policy view that you need to subsidize everything in markets for now.”
The Fed has taken extraordinary steps, including pledging to buy corporate debt and unlimited amounts of Treasurys, to keep the financial system running smoothly during the coronavirus recession. On Monday, the central bank said it would expand its purchases in the credit market to include individual corporate bonds.
The Fed’s aggressive actions have helped stocks recover from big losses earlier this year when the coronavirus pandemic started to spread across the U.S. The S&P 500 has surged nearly 40% since March 23, when the Fed first announced it would buy corporate bonds, even as parts of the economy came to a standstill and unemployment surged.
El-Erian said the Fed’s actions have created a “win-win” mentality in the stock market, as many traders expect the central bank will continue to buy assets including equities in order to prevent a financial crisis.
“The mentality of the market is if they’re willing to do high yield, they’re willing to do equities, because after all, the last thing the Fed wants is a financial crisis to make the economy worse,” he said. “The market feels very strongly that it basically is holding the Fed hostage.”
It was inevitable that someone was going to do this - https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12340862
Finn didn't first wander lost on Aucklands motorways and his car wasn't driven to the quarantine hotel first. Anyone who has driven in a sparsely populated foreign country where you have already got lost will know that you NEVER risk running out of gas and arriving with only a few drops left. You ALWAYS make sure you have a safety margin reserve. Bloomfield is displaying his gullibility by accepting the travellers no pitstop story at face value and also the obvious fiction that in a C19 world you would not be acutely conscious that even a hug is a dangerous activity.
Cullen is right , only up to a point .
Tourism is going to be in for a hard -long slog
We need diversification ...........milking cows , picking strawberries , flipping steaks and washing foreign tourists dirty bedclothes will never make us a high -income OECD economy .
We need new -tech and value - add industries .
But why do we need to be a high income economy?
Would you rather watch someone else surfing great waves or skiing fresh tracks on your 8ft 10k HDR 3d tv with immersive sound in your multimedia room or be out there doing it yourself?
Would you rather be eating some fancy pants take on surf'n'turn from a 13 star michelin restaurant, or be able to go catch a fish and a crayfish and have a bbq on a quiet piece of coastline with some friends and family?
I blame marketing for many of the woes of today.
It's a bit hard to compare relative happiness Hamish. People are products of their time. I'm a boomer, and it is clear that younger generations do not understand the times when i grew up (they are blaming us for perceived unfair advantages), but I suggest that it is probably unreasonable to expect them to. What is unreasonable, and I suppose is the root of your question, is that people look outside their time frames and develop 'greenfields' envy, without a full understanding of the times in comparison to their own. Their expectations of a better deal, rightly or not are not being met. This is what i suggest is at the root of MH statistics today, and i also suggest that technology today makes equity differences much more visible than they were when i was growing up. We were, by today's standards, poor but we did not know that. We were very dependent on quite strong social structures, and at the same time self sufficient and resilient.
The big question our Government(s) face is how to move forward, avoiding the mistakes of the past?
Great points.
I admit I'm extrapolating from a sample size of n=1 (me).
Life seemed simpler when I was younger, but then again, I had less responsibilities.
And now that I've cut back on my hours to 0.6FTE and the paycut that comes with it, I find myself a lot happier than I was. I think of what I could do with the extra cash again, but the tradeoff just doesn't feel worth it.
"We were poor... but we did not know that ". I agree, and will add that if we couldn't afford to buy it we either went without or made do ourselves. When did you last see a new home owner spend his Saturday mornings hand mixing the concrete for his new driveway? or same new home owner digging over by hand his soon to be new lawn and planting it in spuds? spending two week annual holiday painting his roof? I could go on but you get the picture, most of the well off baby boomers got their start by putting in the hard yards when the opportunity presented itself.
Yes and the next generation are waiting for their opportunity, but future generations keep putting it further out of reach. 'We'll just cut interest rates one more time...house prices won't get much more expensive..we promise. Oh how about that RWT on your savings account paying 1% going for your house deposit? Oh yes our rental made a loss this year so no tax to pay...isn't the world wonderful'.
RE HERTZ............ this same scenario , albeit in non-bankrupt Companies , is playing out everywhere , including a stock market near you .
How on earth can a Company like Z Energy , listed on the NZX and loaded to the gunnels with DEBT have seen a rise where shareholders who bough at under $2 in March / April/ May have made over 100% .
If you delve into who the buyers are its not institutional buyers ( like NZ Super ) , they know better .
Or Auckland Airports rights offer , which was priced higher than the ruling price and was according to some sources "OVER-SUBSCRIBED" . I dont believe it was oversubscribed , more likely a Merchant Bank underwrote the offer
If there are no further cases this latest lapse will cost the countries billions. It broke the magic. The whole country have pulled together under Jacinda and Ashley's leadership in a way that was just fantastic and we justifiably felt so proud. I think it was the people of NZ that deserve the credit in stamping out the Virus in-spite the incompetence of the various government departments. (PPE, boarder control, hospital management, poor contact tracing (arguably still poor), still no effective electronic contact tracing system (nobody is using the very ineffective system that they have rolled out), Lousy boarder isolation etc, etc)
The magic and pride that we had, that was leading our economy to quickly recover has been destroyed. People will close down and turn inwards again. Spending will drop and never recover to where it would have been otherwise. People are so disheartened that they may never make the same effort again should this out break grow to something larger.
Despite their inspiring leadership, our leaders have not done their part in backing up the huge effort that the country made.
The bitter truth is that the MOH has been so badly resourced for so long, I'm looking at you National Party, that the capacity to function during normal conditions is greatly undermined, in these unprecedented times its at breaking point. I have freinds and family working in the MOH and they are exhausted, give them a break! If you want to go after anyone for these lapses its the previous govt, they starved the MOH and undermined its resiliance in order to do really important things like build defective 4 lane highways and give SERCO lucrative contracts to run fight clubs in our prison system...
It's not just the last (National) government, but the labour one before that, and then the National one before that. Every Government has its agenda, and some important but basic requirements generally get neglected in the process. Hence the state of our health care, roads, rail network etc, etc, ad infinitum
If the MoH has been under funded under National's administration the present administration has had nine years to pin point the issue and two and a half years to do something about it. The saying about monkeys and peanuts comes to mind, but if you raise the pay scale all you end up with is overpaid monkeys.
Chris-M: Do not be discouraged by the lack of accountability from our public services. It has always been there. True, it has got worse over the past 30-40 years but that is in direct relation to our ever decreasing measures of & within our failing education systems. If you dumb it down in the classrooms & lecture halls then there is little hope for our work places. As for the under funding of the MOH, this is a global issue as we all get older, we do not suffer this on our own. It's not that the parties in power have done a bad job, it's just that they are all incompetent to begin with.
I really wish it wasn't so, but it is.
Isn't that the point though?
It wasn't Chris Bishop that erred, or Jacinda Ardern or Ashely Bloomfield or David Clark - they all relied on the troops in the field to do as they were tasked.
I can tell you from experience, there's nothing more galling that putting a System in place; ask if it's been followed ( "Yep. Sure is!") and then to be asked, "Is what you put in place working?"; to check it is, again and reply "Sure is!" and then to be confronted with the evidence that it isn't.
People at The Top can only do so much, and failure down the line is both frustrating and inevitable to some degree.
There's a difference between being an opposition electorate MP and being a Minister overseeing a Ministry that can't even keep track of the fumbles it's making during a global pandemic. There used to be a thing called 'ministerial accountability' but this has been eroded over the last decade and recently to the point where Bloomfield is the one accepting responsibility and the Minister of Health is just....well I don't know what he's doing. Does anyone? Does he?
'Tis a bit silly, however.
Given the complete unlikelihood that New Zealand had the resources, infrastructure and processes in place to manage all manner of exceptions flawlessly it would've behooved any sensible New Zealander to not blindly rant and rave for exceptions to isolation, assuming all would work our fine. Just a little bit of sense would've been good...coping with a global pandemic after years of under resourcing is not necessarily all going to be easy.
How hard would it have been to just cope with isolation and not demand exceptions for Tom, Dick and Harry...not to mention Thelma & Disease on their jaunt to see friends across the countryside.
Let's face it, all those upstarts driving their kids to school in shiny SUVs and living in comparative luxury with their i-phones, mod-cons and coffees wouldn't be where they are today without Labour's Michael Joseph Savage, Peter Fraser, Walter Nash and Michael Cullen clearing the way for them despite the best efforts of the National Party to undermine their achievements over the years; most of us would still be downtrodden peasants working for the few who had managed to secure capital.
Most of the above-mentioned upstarts, through incredible ignorance of NZ's political and social history, show ingratitude to the party that secured them their relative affluence whenever they vote for National.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.