sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Key on holiday; Labour proposes 1,200 IT apprenticeships, NZ CTO, 'Garage Grants'; Shearer slams 'dumb' power meters; Your view

Key on holiday; Labour proposes 1,200 IT apprenticeships, NZ CTO, 'Garage Grants'; Shearer slams 'dumb' power meters; Your view

By Bernard Hickey

With 70 days left until the September 20 election, here's my daily round-up of the political and governmental news from in and around Wellington on Friday July 11, including news Murray McCully has launched a full ministerial Inquiry into the Malaysian immunity waiver debacle.

John Key is on holiday in Hawaii, Labour has released its IT policy and Labour's David Shearer has criticised the electricity industry's 'dumb' smart meters.

The political pace has eased somewhat this week with Parliament in a two week holiday recess that lasts until July 22 and John Key on holiday this week in Hawaii.

Early on Friday afternoon Foreign Minister Murray McCully announced a full public inquiry into the botched handling of a request for Malaysia to waive immunity in a sexual assualt case. The woman involved called on McCully to resign this week and criticised Prime Minister John Key's sincerity.

“A thorough and transparent Inquiry is important, as those managing diplomatic immunity issues for the government need to enjoy the full, unfettered confidence of the New Zealand public,” McCully said.

The Inquiry would be led by former Treasury Secretary John Whitehead and focus on the appropriateness and robustness of procedures for seeking an immunity waiver and the events that took place around the Malaysian diplomat case.

“The Inquiry report will recommend ways to rectify shortcomings and strengthen processes for the future management of diplomatic immunity cases. These events have had a serious impact on a young woman and have quite rightly undermined public confidence in the ability of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade," he said.

McCully declined further comment citing the ongoing judicial process around the case. Here are the Terms of Reference.

Inquiry terms slammed

Labour Foreign Affairs spokesman David Shearer said the terms of reference suggested the Inquiry would investigate everthing but the actions of McCully and Key.

"The terms of reference have been deliberately crafted in a narrow way to avoid any examination of Murray McCully's role in this debacle," Shearer said.

"The Government is using this inquiry to play for time. It's about getting Mr McCully off the hook and the issue out of the news agenda as we head into the heat of the election campaign. New Zealanders expect the buck to stop at the top. Sadly the outcome is predictable. It is likely to find a low-level official to blame and recommend changes to protocols," he said.

The Inquiry is also a missed opportunity to take a deeper look at the dysfunction created within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs by Murray McCully's heavy-handed restructuring, Shearer said.

"This has had a serious impact on morale and has clearly damaged the lines of communication within the Ministry and to the Minister and Prime Minister at the very top."

Green Co-Leader Metiria Turei said the terms of reference failed to hold McCully to account.

“These terms of reference must be upgraded to cover all the actions, or more to the point inactions, taken by Mr McCully. Mr McCully has been known as a micro-manager throughout his career," Turei said.

“Now, the New Zealand public is being asked to believe that Mr McCully allowed a New Zealand citizen to be denied justice and a major diplomatic fiasco to evolve, while he sat on his hands," she said.

New Zealand First Leader and former Foreign Minister Winston Peters said the Inquiry had all the hallmarks of an "in-house snow job."

Peters said the information from court documents in Malaysia pointed to MFAT officials not acting in isolation from the Government.

“The bail conditions (on May 10), included surrendering his passport in the Wellington District Court within two days, that is, by May 12. So, why didn’t he surrender his passport? Three days later on May 15  ‘at the request of police’ bail conditions were removed which begs the question, who authorised the police to change their stance?," Peters asked.

“To suggest that a middling MFAT official authorised a change in police actions does not make sense from either a law enforcement position or MFAT decision," he said.

“The Minister of Foreign Affairs was briefed on the May 10, the Prime Minister was briefed on May 12, so the government needs to explain why the passport wasn’t surrendered and why the police changed their position."

Labour's IT policy

This morning at Nethui in Auckland, David Cunliffe announced a Labour Government would establish 1,200 digital industry apprenticeships at a cost of NZ$2.1 million in the first year and support first-time entrepreneurs with 'Garage Grants' at a cost of NZ$3.2 million over 4 years.

He also previewed a further policy announcement "on digital infrastructure and connectivity."

Labour would also appoint a Chief Technology Officer to deliver an annual ‘Digital Technology Roadmap’ and a ‘National Digital Architecture’. Here's the full policy document.

Repeating an earlier policy, Labour said it would allow tax deferrals for accelerated depreciation for IT manufacturers and R&D tax incentives.

Labour would also review the skills shortage points system and create a government-backed app store. It would also instruct government agencies to use a 'whole of government' approach to open source software.

"Labour’s Digital Economic Upgrade requires a hands-on government that knows what it takes to get us there and which isn’t afraid to lead, take risks, and enable people,” Cunliffe said.

Joyce responds

Science and Innovation Minister Steven Joyce dismissed Labour's ideas as out of date and poorly thought through.

"They propose grants and accelerated depreciation for start-ups and don't seem to know that those are already happening. They propose a Chief Technology Officer when the Government already has a Chief Information Officer performing a similar role," Joyce said.

Xero CEO Rod Drury, who has proposed the Government appoint a CTO, criticised Joyce in a tweet that read: "@stevenljoyce love your work but a CIO is an internal IT role. CTO is commercial drive forward role. Very different."

Joyce responded: "I just don't think u need another taxpayer-funded busybody telling industry how 2 develop. U seem 2 have done well w/out Govt CTO."

Drury's response followed: "200k will unlock millions of investment. Will blow your hair back with the force of my argument next time I see you :)"

Joyce replied: "hmmm as you know my hair already blown back a bit :) I look forward to it."

Joyce said demand for workers in IT was primarily for graduate-level software designers and programmers, not in the trades, which was why the Government was spending NZ$30 million on ICT grad schools for final year undergraduate and postgraduate training.

"And the party that has spent the last couple of months saying they need to tighten up on migration is now saying they want to encourage more migration in ICT. They need to make up their minds.  Do they want to encourage skilled migrants or not?"

Joyce said a Government app store was off the planet. Who do they think will shop at the Government app store? New Zealanders are more than capable of competing and winning in the international app marketplace, and for that matter finding great Kiwi apps online, without this sort of 'support'," he said.

'Dumb' Smart meters

Elsewhere, David Shearer criticised the electricity industry for rolling out 'dumb' meters that did not include a NZ$20 chip that would allow consumers to better control their electricity usage.

He said a Labour Government would set a minimum standard forcing 'smart' meter installers to include the chip.

(Updated with Drury vs Joyce tweet exchange, McCully Inquiry announcement, Reaction)

I'll keep updating this through the day.

See all my previous election diaries here.

See the index for Interest.co.nz's special election policy comparison pages here.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

12 Comments

FYI Updated with Drury response to Joyce

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

Dumb Smart Meters

 

David Shearer says
Countries, such as Australia set minimum standards for smart meters.
A Labour led Government will set the standard for smart meters so that Kiwis get the benefit
.

 

Humbug

 

Michael West 24 December 2012
http://www.smh.com.au/business/smart-meters-but-at-whose-expense-201212…
Interesting read - some of the names that pop-up - including Doug Meyers

Up
0

A smart(er) meter is actually extremely cheap when you are replacing the existing meter anyway.   So if you put in electronics adding a wee bit of extra ram and a prom would probably add $5 maybe $10 the the actual cost of the meter, negligable really.

Yes it looks like someone got ripped off in OZes case.

regards

 

 

 

Up
0

Updated with McCully's announcement of a ministerial inquiry into the Malaysian case

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

Smart Meters and Disruptive Technology

 

The gymnastics of the power generators is about to bite them on the bum

With the introduction of smart meters, power companies also introduced time-of-use charging where the peak-use tariffs were increased to 35c kwh and off-peak tarifs reduced to 10c kwh

 

This week listened to a guy being interviewed who has gone the whole hog, PV's and deep-cycle batteries

 

What jumped out was his comment that he was going to install 3 banks of batteries next year

His Solar PV will send power to the house, then the batteries, then out to the grid

When the sun doesn't shine he will draw on the batteries during the day

And re-charge them over-night from the grid at off-peak rates

 

He intends to arrange his system so he will probably abandon the PV and simply use the batteries so he is only paying 10c kwh at all times by re-charging overnight and using during the day.

If everyone does that and only pays the off-peak 10c kwh, what future for the power generators business model

 

So, who wants clever smart meters?

Up
0

Iconoclast, you are talking about Australia?  What state?  In QLD, they have abolished the solar feed-in tariff of 8c (used to be 44c !!!) and it's up to consumers to negogiate a deal with their supplier.  

I was looking at Solar Panel and battery storage but's still in the 30K+ mark, not sure if it worth it.

Up
0

Interview was on ABC 730 Tues or Wed night. Guy is in QLD. You can watch it on iView

Up
0

Seems to me that you would need to be using alot of power at peak time for this to pay off, batteries have a limited life and your charger inverter cant be expected to live forever. If everyone takes up the idea, there will no longer be a off peak time and the investment is pointless. In the end the casino always wins.

Up
0

If you're looking at battery technology consider splitting the circuits in your house.  Put some on one inverter, with panels and batteries just for that run.   Once you start assessing _where_ your power is consumed, you'll be much better informed about whether you can go full swap.

Load smoothing is something that is worth understanding.  Will not being able to boil a kettle while running a microwave disrupt your lifestyle?  If so, much of the off-grid bonus will impact your quality of life.  If that's the kind of eco-lifestyle you're happy with, then swapping over lights and electronics isn't a bad move, although for computers you might want to do a PDK and go for a laptop, rather than one like mine which can chew 12kWh a day just for the computer.

I'd be really sure before you converted your last cooking source or your fridge/freezer.  All your economies of saving will disappear with just one freezer failure!

Up
0

I dont have much data on the cost of battery setups but basically its looking like about 17cents per KWH.  So if he takes it off the grid over night and uses batteries the true cost = 10+17=27cents per kwh, about the normal retail of the day, seems pointless.

Future model? just read whats happening to Germany's peak loads and now Queensland's, basically solar panels are destroying the utilities pricing structure.

Roll on the Green's I say put your own unit in and save.......

regards

Up
0

batteries around $500-700 per kWh.  bit more for the housing (got to be frost free, vented, and in a place where a battery explosion isn't going to be catastropic)

Don't know what "$20 chip" they were talking about.  $20 is a fair bit for a single chip...
And the more "smarts" the more points of failure.

Why do the power boards want people doing load control anyway?  Most of the public can't even read their own meter, let alone get load control correct. 
Doing it on time base isn't any bonus to the power company, so why would Shearer be expecting the power companies (which now partially privatised) to install such devices as routine?   Apart from Shearer being a Labour moron who thinks he should micromanage everybody elses' lfie.

Perhaps the power companies could be encouraged to offer the "smarter" meters as an upgrade for customers willing to take on the expense.   Considering there are still spinning disk meters out there, demanding a smart(er) meter upgrade for free to everyone is looney tunes.

They'll just end up with dozens of different types and models throughout the country and the power companies jacking up the prices even more, just to recover the extra cost.

If they're talking load control at the power company end (load shedding via ripple control), then if there's room it's better handled by a separate unit for reliability purposes.
 
Personally they're going to put in smarter meters, I want Wifi or Bluetooth that will take 15 channel control from an app.  But hey at least I'm willing to pay my way, unlike that theif Shear-er

Up
0

Instead of an inquiry into how Diplomats were being ambiguous they need to have an inquiry into how Diplomats can be more truthful. 

http://www.academia.edu/846865/Diplomatic_ambiguity_Language_power_law

 

Foreign Affairs Minister Murray McCully has just confirmed that John Whitehead, Secretary to the Treasury from 2003 to 2011, will  head the inquiry into how "ambiguity" was created about New Zealand's position on the fate of Muhammad Rizalman bin Ismail.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10256614/Malaysian-diplomat-case-inquiry-head-named

If  this inquiry does not have the right focus then all that will happen is that diplomats will get more training in how to say two contradictory things at the same time(being duplicitous) without getting caught and embarrassing their political masters.

Up
0