Soaring rates of net immigration in New Zealand might pose a risk of 'reigniting' the housing market and putting pressure on inflation, according to an economist.
Deutsche Bank NZ chief economist Darren Gibbs said the Reserve Bank's estimates of New Zealand's growth in net migration this year were now likely to prove "too conservative".
Statistics New Zealand said there was a seasonally adjusted net gain (more arrivals than departures) of 3500 migrants in February 2014, which was the highest monthly gain since April 2003 when there were also around 3500.
On a non-seasonally-adjusted basis the actual net gain of migrants in February was 5777, which is the highest actual monthly figure since February 2003. In terms of the composition of that figure, there was a net loss of 1015 New Zealand citizens in the month and a net gain of 6792 non-New Zealand citizens.
The big rise in net migration that's occurring - and strengthening - is due mainly to fewer Kiwis leaving, particularly for Australia, but also due to more people arriving too.
For the year to February there was a net gain of migrants of just under 30,000.
If you take the last three months-worth of seasonally-adjusted figures, however, the net rate of inbound migration is currently running at an annualised 38,000, which is getting close to all-time highs. That annualised figure has been rising in recent months. In each of the past three months the seasonally-adjusted number of net migrants has been higher than the month before.
The highest net inflow ever recorded was 42,500 in the May 2003 year. The highest net outflow was 43,600 in the July 1979 year. Over the last 20 years (December 1994–2013 years), New Zealand's annual net inflow of migrants has averaged 11,700.
The rising numbers of migrants, with a large proportion of them settling in Auckland, are seen as likely putting more pressure on the housing market.
Deutsche Bank's Gibbs said based on the annualised rate of increase of 38,000 in the past three months this would be sufficient to drive 0.8% annual population growth even before growth through natural increase.
"It is worth recalling that the [Reserve Bank's] March MPS [Monetary Policy Statement] projections assumed that annual net migrant inflows peak in Q3 this year at just under 30,000.
"Even if we were to assume that migrant inflows have peaked in February it seems likely that the RBNZ’s assumption will prove too conservative.
"Stronger-than-expected migrant flows risk reigniting the housing market and thus remain a key source of upside risk to the RBNZ’s growth and domestic inflation forecasts," Gibbs said.
ASB economist Daniel Smith said strong net migration inflows would likely continue while the NZ economy and labour market outperform Australia.
"Additional workers will help meet strong demand in the Canterbury construction sector, but stronger population growth overall is likely to add to domestic demand and exacerbate housing market pressures," he said.
"Indeed, strong inwards migration has seemingly been one of the reasons for the [Reserve Bank] adopting an increasingly hawkish stance over the last year or so.
Forecasts may need raising
"If migration continues at the pace seen in February (or even strengthens further) over the rest of the year, both us [ASB] and the RBNZ would need to revise up our migration forecasts slightly.
"Strong inwards migration will continue to add to domestic demand and housing market pressures, and is one of the reasons why interest rates will rise over the next couple of years. We continue to expect the OCR will rise by 25bps in April, July and December this year, with another 100bps of hikes over 2015 taking the OCR to a peak of 4.5%."
The seasonally adjusted net loss of 600 migrants to Australia in February 2014 was below the average net loss of 1000 over the last six months. This average was well down from the recent high of 3700 recorded in September 2011.
In the February 2014 year, migrant arrivals numbered 96,900, and migrant departures numbered 67,800, resulting in a net gain of 29,000 migrants. This compares with a net migration gain of 1200 in the February 2013 year. The latest net gain was the highest annual gain since the February 2004 year (30,100).
In the latest year, New Zealand had a net loss of 15,000 migrants to Australia, well down from 36,700 a year earlier. Net gains were recorded from most other countries, led by China (6100), India, and the United Kingdom (each 5800).
Chinese migrants exceed those from UK
The net gain of migrants from China has surpassed that from the United Kingdom for the first time in a decade, Stats NZ said.
The net gain of migrants from China was higher than the United Kingdom's from the March 1996 year to the January 2004 year.
"In the latest year, migrants arriving from China were a more diverse group than in 2004, when the net gain was driven by international student arrivals. Compared with 10 years ago, the February 2014 year had a smaller proportion of Chinese migrants in the 15–24-year age group, and a larger percentage of Chinese migrants in the 50-years-and-older age group."
In the year, nine of New Zealand's 16 regions had net gains of migrants, led by Auckland (13,700), Canterbury (5100), Otago (600), and Wellington (400). The biggest net gains, by occupation, were professionals for Auckland and Wellington, technicians and trades workers for Canterbury, and community and personal service workers for Otago.
Net long term migration
Select chart tabs
27 Comments
...have a quiet word with a health professional in your local hospital. You wil find there is dismay at the increasing numbers of sick and aging migrants who are enjoying the fruits of our health system. Some very ill people due to lack of treatment for progressive illnesses that have remained untreated for a life time. Very expensive stuff. But hey...the kids have migrated so lets bring the extended family too.
Marvellous .....just marvellous news !!
More fodder to keep wages down and property prices up ...... just bliss for the international banker, say what ol' boy
Just think of all that moolah coming in with them, pumping up the economy and providing me with an even greater pool of cash buyers and tenants ......I don't care, it's all income to me... ...and I don't even live there......haw haw !
But it makes for a cracking great read and good for one's soul on a balmy, trade wind filled Thursday afternoon here on the shores of beautiful Kaanapali Beach.... :)
A fine job ol' boy (and boyesses to be politically correct) ..... I'll buy the next round of single malts at the Northern Club when I am down that way....say what.
Toodle pip for now and enjoy your weekend in mortgage and rental serfdom......haw haw
We need quality migrants. With unemployment at 6% and trending down, there is a good percentage of these who are unemployable. Migration needs to be managed so that the points system makes people migrate to the provinces and not just settle in Auckland. We need young migrants to pay for our fast inflating demographic time-bomb.
I don't think all the people that became unemployed since 2008 (when unemployment was 3.5%) can legimately be described as unemployable as they clearly had jobs then. There is also still a big amount of slack in the number of people in full time jobs, which I think is a better measure of amount of potential work capacity going in the country.
These immigration numbers really are poor. The government needs to take action swiftly and make access easier for people to achieve.
I think the government could do more to advertise New Zealand to the rest of the world too.
How about some ads placed in various media, all around the world? The merits of New Zealand could be highlighted and potential immigrants blatantly told "New Zealand wants you... apply now."
It works for Australia.
Why are these numbers really poor YL ?
Speaking from an Auckland point of view, there is not the infrastructure to cater for them at the moment ....ever driven on the Southern motorway on a weekday around 4pm ???
Also when they compare the business opportunities, cost of living, salaries (if they can get a job in their profession here ....too many taxi drivers already) and the cost of housing etc here ....as compared with the USA , I know where they will choose and it ain't Blockhouse Bay......more like Brooklyn or Brentwood !
Probably from where you stand it's all good for you, as it just props up the property market ....but until this government realises all this housing investment is just stifling growth and productivity here in Aotearoa.... as it has been said on here before ....WE ARE STUFFED.
YL,
20 million? Rubbish.
Yet another unsubstantuated statement.
Take Australia for example. They have already virtually run out of water for their cities. That is just one reason for them to stop.
In NZ the capital requirements for services are huge and presumably YL would do it on money borrowed from offshore, yet again adding to our pressures.
As noted above, we are already at the point where natural increase is as much as we can deal with. If we have to have any more they should voluntarily go to the South Island and stay there for five years or leave again.
New Zealanders and New Zealand is largely considered a joke but most Asian people I have met in Aisa.
They simply cannot believe that once into New Zealand that you get FREE healthcare and A PENSION, even though you have not contributed to NZ society in any way. Hey NZ will even PAY YOU if you can’t be bothered getting a job.
Is sounds like heaven, and that’s because it is. No other country offers this. And what’s the effect on the NZer’s? Well for a start we cannot afford the average house on the average wage, in the only places where there are jobs. We are becoming renters in our own country.
By the time “dumb-ass” NZ wakes up to find they are bankrupt for these idiotic policys, it will be too late. And If you think what I have said above is racist, then try living in an Asian city sometime, and find out what you are entitled to as a “citizen" or "permanent resident”.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.