sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

PM Key says Kiwis will start spending more, but won't return to 2002-07 levels

PM Key says Kiwis will start spending more, but won't return to 2002-07 levels

Prime Minister John Key says he thinks Budget 2011 moves next year by the government will indicate it "will return to surplus a little bit quicker than people think," he told media this morning.

The government's deficit, which is expected to be over NZ$13.3 billion this year, was larger than the government would want it to be, Key said.

"Firstly there’s some timing issues around tax – no doubt about that," Key said, referring to the business tax cycle that has seen revenue from corporate tax fall considerably in recent months. "The advice we’ve had is it will flow back in, but ultimately it’s off a lower base," Key said.

"Secondly we’ve had to account in the accounts for the Christchurch earthquake, so there are a number of factors in there," he said.

"Over time we want to return the books to surplus as soon as we physically can. I think you’ll see from us next year some moves which will indicate that we will return to surplus a little bit quicker than people think," Key said.

Government is currently forecasting it will return its books to surplus in 2016.

Key and Finance Minister Bill English announced yesterday a fresh review of government spending after Treasury figures showed the budget deficit was NZ$1.9 billion bigger than expected in the four months to October, partially because of slower than expected growth retail spending and GST recepits.

Key also said he expected the economy to recover quicker next year than Treasury had forecast and GST would recover somewhat next year. See more detail here.

Asked on Tuesday morning whether there would be an aggressive economic bounce back next year, Key said, "Look I don’t know, there’s been a very funny recession and internationally you’re still seeing reverberations of it".

"But the numbers I recently saw from Treasury was slightly lower growth numbers this year, and better growth numbers next year [of 3.5%]," he said.

Kiwis will spend more

Meanwhile, Key said he expected Kiwis to start spending again, although not at levels seen between 2002 and 2007.

Asked whether GST revenue would stay low if Kiwis had rebalanced their spending, Key said it would be good over a longer period of time if people consumed less.

“Because they are by definition saving more, and therefore we have less of a reliance on foreign lenders,” he said.

“Over time things will normalise. The reality is people probably will go back to spending a bit more. That’s probably what the pattern of behaviour [will be].

“But I don’t think it will be like it was in the 2002-2007 period. In that period you saw very high house prices, you saw huge consumption of debt and people then went out and spent that money in retail markets.”

Asked whether he expected the GST take to therefore rise, he said, “over time yes”.

Can't have it both ways

Responding to criticism from the Labour Party that the government had been too passive in its economic management, Key said you can't have it both ways. "Last time I looked they were the guys screaming form the other side of the chamber that we should be spending a whole lot more money back in 2009," he said.

"Actually I thought we held our nerve well, steered the economy through, took the rough edges off the recession, and I think that was important. At a time where otherwise New Zealanders would have really suffered, we held entitlements," Key said.

A return to surplus in 2016 was the current prediction, Key said. "It’s our intention, if we can get back quicker we will. That’s the focus [and] what we’ll have to look at in Budget 2011".

Resume contributions to super?

Key said the government could not resume contributions to the Super Fund with the current debt profile. "I really can’t make any sense of Phil Goff’s speech [yesterday]. I don’t know how he squares the circle," he said.

"He’s saying he wants to put NZ$2 billion into the Super Fund, he’s got to find NZ$250 million to take GST off fresh fruit and vegetables, so he’s in the hole for NZ$2.25 billion.

"He says he’s going to repay debt faster, he says he’s going to cut taxes on middle income New Zealanders, he sounds a bit like Santa Claus but has he got any answers? I haven’t actually seen any policies indicating how he’ll do that," Key said.

"If he wants to raise taxes on high income New Zealanders he has to go and actually look how far he would have to raise them to fund those issues. I’ll tell you what, you would have personal tax rates well in excess of what Rob Muldoon had – North of 66% if you wanted to try and fund those costs," he said.

Want to take pressure of interest rates, currency

On any pending government spending cuts, Key said government was "running a deficit that is really testing what our level of comfort would be".

"I think there’s been a good reason for that. We’ve had very little option, both in terms of the extent of the global financial crisis and because of the earthquake and other factors on our accounts. But there’s no question we want to take the pressure off interest rates, and make sure it stays off, and also off, ultimately, the currency. To do that we need to make sure we’re fiscally responsible," he said.

Key said there was a balancing act of not pulling stimulus out too early.

"I think we got it pretty right. We didn’t panic in 2009, we held our ground. We spent more money but we weren’t silly about it. In 2010 again we undertook major tax reform, but actually we ran a [deficit] because this is the time to use your balance sheet, when the rest of your economy is weak. But we don’t want to be running deficits forever," Key said.

"New Zealand’s got to get back to a point where it owes less to foreigners. Now the big part of that is coming from the private sector but the government’s got a role to play," he said.

Don’t the govt books show the tax switch wasn’t neutral?

With the government's books showing a lower-than expected tax take, Key said although it was down in the short term, in the longer term the tax package implemented earlier this year would be fiscally neutral. "If you go and have a look beyond the forecast period it starts picking up. Over a reasonable period of time we are actually neutral on it," he said.

"The reason we did that was because we wanted to make New Zealanders whole and better off. For the most part we believe we’ve done that, so we had to ebb a bit of revenue to do that. We think, because of the signals that were sent through the tax system that was the right thing to do.

"Phil Goff’s talking about middle income New Zealanders, well for middle income New Zealanders we’ve delivered a personal tax rate of 17.5%. For a family with two children earning NZ$50,000 or less, they’re paying zero tax. I think we’ve done a lot to try and do our best to support them," Key said.

(updates with more on spending cuts, comments on bounce back)

No chart with that title exists.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

29 Comments

It's a "somewhat" statement....

Up
0

So; 2001 house prices, then John? ...“But I don’t think it will be like it was in the 2002-2007 period. In that period you saw very high house prices..."

Up
0

He won't want to go there NA....the string has been jerked and all comments about property have been deleted from JK's spin sheets......

Up
0

PM/ English don’t bring our economy to a still stand – in stead of importing infrastructure needs - allocate them to to NZcompanies – even allowing new sectors of industries and to guarantee full employment.

The PM says: "Over time we want to return the books to surplus as soon as we physically can.

I think we see some nasty surprises - e.g. coming from mother nature on the agriculture front PM.

Up
0

Walter...I think he intended to say..."as soon as we politically can"......how's the rain down your way?

Up
0

What infrastructure needs are we importing?

regards

Up
0

Yes - could be even a stupid question from our PM, because he propbably doesn't know either.

saluto !

Up
0

oil...

Up
0

Yes - body oil to make our too many 121 parliamentarians more slippery.

Sorry, there are 122 members - I didn’t count T. Mallard, but he's part of the furniture and needs to be - rather waxed.

Up
0

In terms of giving work to manufacturers....oil doesnt strike me as infrastructure work.....

BTW our oil is apparantly low sulphur while our refinery is setup for high sulphur, so it makes sense to export the premium priced sweet crude and import the cheaper sour (as few want it)....incidently most of the world is setup to refine sweet.....we are one of the few countries that are setup for sour....and sweet is running out faster than sour.

regards

Up
0

Start spending again – HA !

PM maybe in your sector of earnings.  NZpockets are empty – the world changed forever there is no money to spend. PM with your helpless economic policies - be prepared for riots.

Up
0

Really, John!  "....the reason that 'this time is different', is the absolute level of private debt in our economy. We've breached a maximal level and have damaged not merely the confidence of businesses and consumers to borrow, but their capacity to do so. The resulting deleveraging has begun, but it has a hell of a long way to go before the word 'recovery' will have any enduring meaning.....Given that the household and business sectors are already debt-saturated, the prospect that the credit impulse will remain positive, is slight. " (Steven Keen)


http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Debt-credit-Australian-economy-retail-GDP-pd20101206-BV3XP?OpenDocument&src=rot

Up
0

Interesting how few ppl picked that privtae debt was the real issue and still is....I think its comes from wearing politically derived blinkers while using a broken neo-classical economics model....for 20 odd years....and yet still few want to acknoledge that its broken.....they cling onto it like a life saver...

Steve keen, PKrugman and quite a few others have said again and again whats being odne is a mistake....and here we are after all the mayhem and no one is considering that their idealogical blinkers and broken models have got us here.....

regards

Up
0

Let's see:

GST is up, fuel and energy is up, and food prices are up, too.  So I guess the Prime Minister is right when he says that Kiwis will be spending more. 

Up
0

'It's been a very funny recession.'

This is the problem for Key. Something is different, but he doesn't quite believe it. He still thinks everything will go back to normal next year.

What if this deleveraging thing lasts for a longer time?

Is he ready for it?

Will he make the tough decisions?

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

funny...yes....and yet nobody's laughing.....very much a look confident and stumble on.

Up
0

Bernard asks : - What if this deleveraging thing lasts for a longer time?

The real question is :- How much leverage is still in the system ? 

Up
0

Yeah... That is the big question.!!!!

Bernard, .... I'm not sure John Key thinks that everything will go back to normal...  BUT he does know that in a political sense there is a time for the hard decisions....(NZers' would vote him out if he was doing a, Ruths' mother of all budgets.)

I think he is capable of making hard decisions...

I think he has an eye on the next election ..and if National wins we will see some hard decisions.

Maybe the budget this yr was a gentle testing of the waters.. Increase in GST was accepted by the public.....  without any protest.

It took us 40 yrs to get into this mess.....  It might take us 10- 20 yrs to get out of it...???

I like the way he ,and Bill English, ...are slowly trying to turn the Titanic..... ( maybe )

next yrs budget will tell us if that is what they are doing... or if they are just another bunch of reactive, tweaking, bandaid plastering , populist politicians.

Comparing John Keys views on controlling the exchange rate vs Phil Goffs view.... I'd say that John Key is far more pragmatic and knowledgable about economics than Phil is..... and walks the middle road between populist policies and policies that are pragmatic and economically and socially sound...  ( A difficult road to walk .. I suppose )

 

Up
0

Exactly...."go back to normal"  we have these who frankly have no clue about the real world and are mystified when the way things worked for the last 20 years no longer work hat way.....as a single person well that isnt great but his or her individual cock up wont effect the rest of us.....when its the PM who is just as clueless then the cock up he makes could severly effect the rest of us.....about all I can say is labour were no better, they stood by and did diddly to tempter the stupidity...relying on the RB to do the work with the OCR and take the negative flak for them so it didnt cost them votes....so ppl voted for key to get a change?

Now we have Goofy wanting to give the RB more powers to fix things....what he emans is let the RB become the whipping boy....hello when we vote in a Govn we expect them to take responsibility and act in our best interests.

regards

Up
0

Well it has been funny....the quality of spin coming from wgtn has left many of us in fits of laughter....but I guess JK means to say it's funny that the spin and BS about recovery hasn't brought about a recovery....how strange....He is starting to sound like a real estate agent!

Gee John...you don't think maybe the country is drowning in debt and busy feeding the banks by any chance!

Up
0

Wally...laugh in fear that you should weep....is more like it....

Up
0

John Key is brilliant at saying what his audience wants to hear. Who knows what he really thinks?... Although I suspect he knows only too well that the massive deleveraging has barely begun. He won't be saying that to the NZ public anytime soon though.

 

Up
0

What's the possibility the major banks have got Key and Bollard bluffed. Private debt is about $192 billion and a lot of that is in household mortgages. If the banks are carrying a lot of non-performing loans and mortgages - who has the whip hand? Who controls the economy? The banks can hold the gun at the head of Key and Bollard at any time and say boo. They could tip the bucket any time they choose. Foreclosures anyone?

Up
0

Hi all have updated with further comments from Key in the second half of the post.

Basically, in order to get the tax package to be neutral over the longer term, we have to hope signals sent out by govt on property etc are listened to, and GST receipts are going to have to go back to normal levels.

Key is happy that Kiwis are not spending (which means lower GST revenue for govt), because that means they are saving - and that's a good thing.

Then he's saying Kiwis will start spending more, which means more GST revenue for govt - and that's a good thing.

Can they have it both ways?

I also have a story coming up on Goff being coy about tax changes. More soon.

Cheers

Alex

Up
0

Oh yeah, and the extra savings Kiwis are putting away in the bank...what's stopping the banks just lending that out again into the property sector instead of paying off their overseas debt with it?

Govt can't force the private sector to pay back its overseas debt...

Up
0

What's needed is for Key and English to have a head knocking accident in the Beehive while rushing to be first into the tiny lift...it might help them understand that this economy will go nowhere so long as the banks are allowed to prop up the bubbles with fresh cheap credit....these two really are starting to look like Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dee.

Perhaps the best outcome would be for Beijing to display contempt for all and throttle back on growth for a decade...sending Clinton's poodle 'Kevin' back to the Queensland outback and bringing on the much needed property collapse here and across the ditch.

Meanwhile we are about to witness another Goofy moment. This could be fun.

Up
0

"there’s been a very funny recession" I take it he means wierd and doesnt understand from his perspective....obviously Key is a neo-classical sort of chap so is clueless as to what caused it and the fix.....

Look you moron of a PM, the trigger was the price of oil, why its so profound and so world wide is the level of debt....the entire business model is based on cheap energy, we are at 80~90USD a barrel thats recession territory....and its likely to stay there or go higher...

 

regards

Up
0

Are things that bad in USA? Have watched some more American Football today on Channel 34 since the Ashes test was over , and always see sell-out crowds, these games not cheap either and football is supported by your average Jo in the States. Hardly the Great Depression.

Up
0

During the Depression people flocked to ball games and movies, mainly to forget about the Depression if only for a while. Hollywood profitability never faltered in those times, and organised sport is just another facet of the entertainment industry.

The real indicator is the enormous number of people staying away from property sales and shopping malls, not to mention the phenomenal number of foreclosures. That just screams Depression.

Up
0