By Jesse Kearse & Nicolas Barth*
One of the world’s most anticipated earthquakes is the next major surface rupture of the Alpine Fault in the South Island of New Zealand.
With a 75% chance of it happening within the next 50 years, there is justified interest in the likely magnitude, extent and intensity of ground shaking and impacts on the landscape, infrastructure and buildings.
A key – and so far unanswered – question is which direction the fault rupture will take.
Our new research reveals for the first time that the Alpine Fault ruptured from south to north in the great magnitude 8+ earthquake of 1717.
We developed our technique to determine rupture direction based on the Kekerengu Fault after the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake. But our method is globally applicable for use in realistic earthquake scenarios and thus can contribute to better societal preparedness.
In an Alpine Fault earthquake, there’s no direction that’s good news for the West Coast of the South Island. But a north-to-south rupture would send excess seismic energy into the relatively unpopulated region of Fiordland and the Tasman Sea.
A south-to-north rupture on the other hand is forecast to cause higher intensity shaking in the populated regions of Canterbury, Marlborough, Tasman and the northern West Coast.
In the Kaikōura earthquake, Wellingtonians experienced this influence of rupture direction on shaking intensity. The south-to-north rupture meant more seismic energy was focused towards the capital city than, for example, Christchurch.
So, while rupture direction has been observed to make a big difference in modern earthquakes, it is not something geologists have been able to directly determine for past earthquakes.
Markings in the rock face
The Kaikōura earthquake was well documented by seismographs. We know it started near Waiau in the south and travelled northwards to Cook Strait over a period of two minutes.
We observed markings that were scratched onto the fault plane. Like coarse sandpaper against wood, these scratches, or “slickenlines”, record movement as rock faces slipped past each other during the earthquake. Some of these markings were curved, and our method can tell us the direction the earthquake rupture was travelling.
Using computer models to simulate how the earthquake unfolded moment by moment, we were able to replicate the curved slickenlines observed in the field and relate them to rupture direction. This gave us the framework we needed to investigate rupture direction for past earthquakes on the Alpine Fault.
The Alpine Fault hasn’t had a major surface rupture since 1717. During field work, we visited three sites along the fault and examined natural outcrops, carefully exposing the fault plane using hand tools. We found 146 slickenlines, 30 of which were curved.
The curved geometry of slickenlines from the Alpine Fault’s most recent earthquake indicated it had travelled from the south towards the north. We also found evidence for rupturing in the opposite direction, suggesting that earthquakes can start both north and south.
On one outcrop, we found evidence of slickenlines from multiple earthquakes – a rare and tantalising find suggesting development of a longer history of rupture direction may be possible.
The technique we’ve applied is a novel, on-fault observational method for determining past rupture directions. Its full potential is yet to be tested, but already it’s applicable to faults worldwide.
Our research shows that the last Alpine Fault rupture was from the south, and that both directions are possible. New information about past earthquakes like this helps the scientific community produce realistic scenarios for the next major earthquake.
We now have direct evidence from the fault itself that we need to prepare for the scenario of very strong to severe shaking for the northern West Coast, Tasman, Marlborough and Canterbury regions in the next major Alpine Fault earthquake.
*Jesse Kearse, Postdoctoral Researcher in Seismology, Kyoto University and Nicolas Barth, Assistant Professor of Geology, University of California, Riverside.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
9 Comments
How are our hospital and medical facilities and staffings looking? Do we have fat in these systems to cope with the massive earthquakes that will one day hit some of our larger cities? Did we learn lessons from the pandemic? (There will be more)
obviously rhetorical questions
With all due respect to the people of ChCh, earthquakes of much greater severity could hit a number of urban centres.
The systems I work on, which were urgently overhauled and upgraded to meet pandemic needs, have already reverted to prioritizing short-term goals despite their stated commitment to be long-term pandemic-ready. They don’t directly touch health, but if another pandemic comes tomorrow, our pants are already 80% of the way back down to our ankles.
Its the road network and road bridges on the northern West Coast that need consideration. these will allow (with repair) emergency services and evacuation activities.
Its impossible to build the required resilience into the more southern locations access roads with current budgets.
Its going to be a big thing, you probably need food and water for a month, a months worth of medicines etc if you are in areas mentioned, and genset and fuel etc.
latest cyclone showed Hawkes bay residents left to fend for themselves for weeks, it will be way worse with possibly thousands dead and major impacts to power and cities further north.
I expect my power to possibly be on off here in Auckland for weeks. Thus I have enough fuel to run genset for 6 hpours a day for 1 month on hand, I cycle the 30L tanks and use to fill vehicles so its constanly fresh, its a major consideration for me that I should run enough solar to run fridges and freezers most days
What we found through Gabrielle was that the further out we went the better prepared the farmers were physically, it was the mental side that was harder to support. We had more than a few "hard men" crying in front of us, and with us. We helped out where we could for a number of months, the most frustrating part of the whole crisis was the sheer number of urban folk who did nothing if they personally were ok. Drive through Havelock North 4 days after the cyclone and all you'd notice is a few trees damaged and a light pole on an angle, unless you went down Joll Road or Plassey Street and saw the piles of ruined belongings on the street and drying mud. Shout out to the folk who showed up to help those areas in the immediate aftermath.
Hastings was pretty much untouched, and a few places like churches and marae opened their doors to those who needed help but we very rarely came across anyone else who was actively out in places like Twyford offering supplies and support. It seemed like everyone assumed someone else would do something, and few took any action on their own initiative.
I'd say after a major quake the urban areas will be warzones (looting in and near urban areas was rife post-cyclone) while the rural folk will struggle with isolation more than physical needs.
We do the same as you for fuel, although ideally we'd store more, and we still need to get onto a solar setup and improve water storage.
Journalists have been MIA fo aa long time. It comes of peddling a lie (that economic growth is perpetually a: possible and b: desirable).
The problem is that we are passing the Limits to Growth, so things are getting harder to maintain; and balls already in the air ae competing, let alone new ones.
So the immediate takes precedence, anything longer gets shelved. In macro terms, that's what we voted for; short termism. We don't realise this, because?
Journalism is MIA.
There's a hole in my bucket, dear Liza....
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.