sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

NZ First leader Winston Peters says an increase to the minimum wage could be on the table next year, as Cabinet approves second effective cut

Economy / news
NZ First leader Winston Peters says an increase to the minimum wage could be on the table next year, as Cabinet approves second effective cut
Winston Peters

Cabinet may need to approve a larger increase to the minimum wage next year in order to fulfill a coalition agreement promise struck between National and New Zealand First. 

The Act Party's Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden announced on Tuesday the adult minimum wage rate would increase by just 1.5% to $23.50 in April 2025, less than the rate of inflation. 

In April 2024, she lifted the adult rate by 2% when annual inflation was still 4%. Taken together, these two decisions have reduced the real minimum wage by roughly 2.5%.

The exact calculations vary based on which time periods are compared. Van Velden has previously compared the increase to the forecast calendar year inflation rate. Using that comparison, the effective reduction in the minimum wage shrinks to 1%. 

But the purchasing power of the minimum wage has been reduced in each of these two years, however the numbers are cut. This arguably breaches the NZ First–National Party coalition agreement which commits to “moderate increases to the minimum wage every year”.

Asked about this, NZ First leader Winston Peters said the minimum wage had increased considerably over the past seven years and these two years shouldn't be taken in isolation. 

However, the coalition agreement—signed in 2023 in the context of increased minimum wages—requires further increases “every year” not in aggregate.

When pushed on this further, Peters said cryptically: "What's more important is next year … we’ll have turned the economy around by then”. 

The party leader wouldn’t promise an increase above the rate of inflation, but said the Cabinet would be “looking at the issue next year” and reporters would have to wait until then.

Van Velden said there was no breach to the coalition agreements as all three parties had signed off on the below-inflation increase during Cabinet discussions.

“If you look at the seven years before I became a minister, the minimum wage went up by 50% when CPI [the Consumers Price Index] went up by around 25%, so if you take all of those years together … people are still better off than in years prior,” she said.

When asked about Peters’ suggestion that next year could see a larger increase, she said she couldn’t speak to what future decisions Cabinet might make. 

Labour leader Chris Hipkins said Peters had either been duped by his coalition partners or was only ever pretending to support workers. 

“These are real terms cuts and so either Winston Peters was naive in signing up to something that involves cutting the minimum wage, or he himself was being very cynical," Hipkins said.

Camilla Belich, Labour’s workplace relations spokesperson, said she would have increased minimum wage at the rate of inflation, considering it was lifted in the previous two terms.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

11 Comments

"What's more important is next year … we’ll have turned the economy around by then”. 

Ok, Boomer. 

Up
5

And as Winston expects the economy will not be turned around and he will head into an election campaign blaming his coalition partners now that he is no longer deputy PM....the game is a waste of space.

Up
1

We have our own Millennial Jacinda to thank...

"In Question Time, Willis blamed Labour for the economic outlook of the country, saying that in the past five years the last Labour Government added more than $100 billion to NZ'as debt.

She said the current Government is now saddled with the task of bending that debt curve. "

Up
0

how does that effect the economic performance in the last year?

 

Up
3

It takes years to turn around as it took years to destroy

Up
2

Then why have the forecasts being getting worse since this government was elected? 

Are you saying everything Jacinda did was in secret and this government and the treasury and all the economists and all the banks didn't know what they were doing and has only finally realised what has happened?

Up
5

Might as well have been in secret, given our current Finance Minister didn't read the PREFU.  It's possible she got it confused with the much shorter Fiscal Strategy Report.  

Up
2

If you look at some African States after independence the economic destruction took anything from a year to 20 years. Most have not recovered. Much easier to destroy but much longer time to rebuild.

Up
1

So you would vote them back in next election we take it?

Up
0

Hah so, to turn the economy next year, they're going to spend up large?

Up
3

Winston aligning his party to the middle.

Up
1