sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Here’s how ‘microgrids’ are empowering regional and remote communities across Australia

Economy / analysis
Here’s how ‘microgrids’ are empowering regional and remote communities across Australia
solar
Photo by Michael Förtsch on Unsplash.

By Simon Wright*

Small collections of electricity generators, or “microgrids”, have long been used in disaster recovery, when network supply falters during bushfires or cyclones.

But now the technology is being used to provide secure, 24-7 supplies of clean energy in Australian communities where connection to the main electricity grid is but a pipedream.

Sometimes owned by local communities, renewable energy microgrids are slowly replacing dirty diesel generators. Solar energy is by far the most common source of generation for these microgrids, which usually also entail energy storage such as batteries, pumped hydro or hydrogen.

New research by my colleagues and I investigated 20 microgrid feasibility projects across Australia. Our findings demonstrate the crucial role microgrids can play in the energy transition, when backed by all levels of government.

What is a microgrid?

A national survey of microgrids

In Australia and around the world, many communities are attracted to renewable energy microgrids. The benefits include energy security, reliability, equity, autonomy and emissions reduction.

Above all, microgrids offer a viable alternative to the national electricity grid. They enable communities to take control of their own energy destiny through local generation and ownership.

The projects we investigated were funded by the federal government through the A$50.4 million Regional and Remote Communities Reliability Fund.

Some were on the fringe of the grid, in places experiencing constant supply outages, while others were entirely off-grid. Most communities wanted to protect themselves from grid outages, access cheaper power and avoid being cut off for long periods after natural disasters.

Remote Indigenous communities sought to reduce dependence on dirty, antiquated and unreliable diesel generators. They were also concerned about the hazards of storing large amounts of fuel in the community.

Intermittent electricity supply severely limits not only cooking, cooling and refrigeration, but also the pumping and heating of water for sanitation purposes.

Through a series of semi-structured interviews, we explored each project’s drivers, barriers and opportunities.

Locations of microgrid projects surveyed
We investigated 20 microgrid feasibility projects in regional and remote locations across Australia. Wright, S., et al (2024) Energy Research & Social Science, CC BY-ND.

The Marlinja microgrid is a shining example

About 60 people live in the remote Marlinja community, 700 kilometres south of Darwin in the Northern Territory. This is the traditional lands of the Mudburra and Jingili people.

In the past, especially during the wet season, the community suffered repeated power outages from the grid. These could take days to be repaired by the electricity network service provider.

Pre-paid meters exacerbated the situation, stifling access to power and water for residents due to the high kilowatt cost of electricity purchased using access cards.

Today, Marlinja is home to a grid-connected 100-kilowatt solar array and a 136Kwh battery, sufficient to meet the daytime and nighttime energy needs of most residents.

The grid connection ensures continuity of supply, particularly at night if the battery reserves are exhausted.

Marlinja’s Solar-Powered Community Centre (Original Power)

Marlinja is the first Indigenous community-owned microgrid in Australia.

The community-focused Indigenous energy organisation Original Power developed an innovative community benefit sharing scheme, with support from NT government-owned retailer Jacana Energy.

Clean energy communities coordinator Lauren Mellor helped the community raise $750,000 from Original Power’s philanthropic networks, with some seed funding from government. She says the microgrid will reduce energy costs in the community:

When the battery runs out, then residents will flip back onto the grid, so residents will be saving at least 70% on their power bills.

Importantly, these savings flow directly back to residents. This ensures the benefits of the scheme are shared across the community. The NT government also saves money by burning less diesel.

However, despite strong demand for electricity from the neighbouring school and cattle stations, NT regulations currently prevent the Marlinja community from selling surplus electricity back to the grid. This is partly due to grid instability, a situation that should improve when additional battery capacity comes online.

Common obstacles to rapid rollout

The experience of the Marlinja community reflects feedback from other microgrid projects. The main obstacles were:

  • outdated regulations designed for centralised rather than distributed power generation
  • the need for more government investment, to achieve critical mass and economies of scale
  • the social change required, to allow communities to develop new business models and approaches to benefit sharing and ownership.

This last element ensures more of the value generated by the microgrid remains in the host communities, rather than going to distant shareholders in Australia or overseas.

This perhaps is the most exciting aspect of Marlinja. By generating a model of investment and ownership for Marlinja, Original Energy and other fellow collaborators have opened the door for other regional and remote communities.

Rather than continuing to rely on intermittent and expensive fossil fuels, they can embrace electricity generation that supports local economic development and investment, through community ownership and empowerment.

Marlinja residents welcome solar power having struggled with blackouts for years. AAP Image/Supplied by Original Power, Rachel Mounsey.

Regional communities with different motivations

Other regional communities have embraced microgrids to address different challenges.

The 2019 bushfires devastated coastal communities in southern New South Wales. Consequently, Cobargo wants solar and storage to provide energy security and maintain essential services in the event of future unanticipated grid outages.

Yackandandah in northeast Victoria has been pursuing a similar path for more than a decade. The community wants to reduce energy costs and emissions while building greater network resilience.

The town has long been home to three community microgrids. These are collections of houses generating, storing and even sharing electricity between dwellings using solar, batteries and smart metering.

The longer term vision of this deeply engaged community is to construct a whole-of-town grid, supported by the two community-scale batteries already in place.

Bring on the benefits

The rapid transition to renewable energy brings many opportunities and challenges. Much of the media coverage has focused on community concerns about the construction of energy infrastructure. Yet, the opportunity that renewables pose, to stimulate economic development and bring greater autonomy to regional and remote communities, barely rates a mention.

Microgrids provide one exciting example of where clean energy technology can deliver economic, environmental and social benefits to these communities.The Conversation


*Simon Wright, Senior Research Fellow, Energy & Circularity, Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

9 Comments

This is cool, would like to see more of this in NZ

 

Up
3

Sadly NZ is more likely to make grants and benefits for housing investors & wealthy shareholders  (especially the last govt and main 4 political parties) then consider scale solutions for whole communities especially those who cannot even afford power, or electricity generation themselves. In NZ even though the option for renewable microgrids for lower socioeconomic & cut off communities has been around for decades NZ still does not put policy towards this and the NZ climate commission actually discriminates against poor & lower socioeconomic communities and causes them severely increased power costs in a big way.

Until the people in those consultant & policy positions who are self serving and incredibly discriminatory are kicked out there is incredibly small likelihood of basic simple initiatives like this rising to the fore. It is like NZ emission reduction policy analysts tipped the point from hanlon's razor back over to be actively malicious & harmful against much of NZ communities. So instead we paid hundreds of millions & billions in initiatives that only serve the top 10% of the most wealthy (and plan to add to that again) while significantly increasing our emissions. In many ways NZ practices more harmful and unsustainable initiatives to lower emissions and often it only ends up costing us a lot more in the long run and does not actually reduce emissions or improve air quality much at all (often it results in increases in emissions overall and billions in environmental and social damage). If we had anyone with more honesty and ethics on these depts, political parties and consultant orgs we could have had significant amounts of microgrids available back in 2000s. But nah lets give grants to big investor buddies and "green" private interests eh. Its not like they are milking the public and then using most the cash for their own self aggrandizing marketing & investment portfolio. 

Consider NZ the backwards stepchild of Australia who ends up burning the house down while doing spots. Whereas Australia is a country with a far worse public image and less "green" branding then us can still lead us by decades on significant aspects of social & environmentally beneficial policies, services and initiatives. Its like we intentionally are trying to cripple our tech and engineering sectors, harm more of the environment & public socially for vapid ideological marketing and self serving wealth initiatives. Come what may more of NZ will migrate oveseas from key sectors and social goals will be missed so be very careful where you plan to retire and pray they have a functioning health system (which even 3rd world countries can do better then NZ).

Even Papua New Guinea had renewable microgrids for many villages decades ago, was working with the people who set up many and presented significant engineering techniques & lessons from such projects. NZ does not have the intelligence to have policy suggestions even around this now in our depts & parties, let alone the engineering and functional planning for it in in many areas. Hence if you want actual green & sustainable policies look to Australia... also better healthy & safety initiatives for the infrastructure & construction industries, better transport initiatives... even the US is decades ahead of NZ and that is an actual mess that is getting worse. We care more for branding then real sustainability initiatives and will waste billions of public debt that will cripple future generations and cause even more austerity measures in future. Go team.

Up
3

Yes, the Luxury Beliefs of the do gooders are always paid by someone else poorer. Johnny Virtue Signaler sticks some solar panels on his roof and expects the rental class to pay for the grid upgrade.

Up
0

Good piece. 

Thanks Interest.co 

 

Up
3

Rainbow Power Company had a microgrid power system back in the 90's. It utilised ex telecom

dc -dc converters off around 110 volts d.c.  This made it an extra low voltage system,

which meant no electrician or certification

It meant a community or group of neighbours could share a limited amount of power, which was lall most systems were producing in those days anyway..  

The system featured here has about 1600 watts of solar per person .Enough for lights fridge etc , a limited amount of cooking . What is unclear to me is how they determine who gets the free power before its all gone , and they go back to paying for grid power??? 

Up
1

Another puff piece that ignores the cost of providing grid stability for the micro grid hobby club when their batteries run out. Have a micro grid by all means but don't expect to bludge off the grid when the sun sets or you need a hospital.

 

Up
1

Read it again. 

Up
3

Pacifica routinely makes big-leap assumptions to back what seems like a religious need to be correct. 

1600 watts? Luxury, I tell 'ee. I get by on 300 - and live well. Don't cook on it, though. 

Up
0

There are microgrids serving small communities in New Zealand, and there have been for over 100 years. Best example is Haast. But being a hydro and having no storage problems, it is a lot more reliable and cheaper than any in Oz.

Up
1