New Zealand has veered towards a potential electricity shortage 11 times so far this year.
That is a worry to managers at Transpower because winter has really only just got underway.
The 11 incidents so far in 2023 compare with 12 incidents for all of 2022.
One of this year’s events was a near miss. After all the lights, heaters and TV sets were turned on, New Zealand had just 50 megawatts of spare generating capacity left in the bank to provide a buffer.
This information was among a raft of detail provided by Transpower during a briefing for stakeholders in Wellington.
This meeting updated a public warning issued via media statement on May 23.
On that occasion, Transpower’s chief executive, Alison Andrew, warned of a tight supply of electricity this winter which could result in people having their power turned off.
“If we face a situation where there isn’t enough electricity to meet demand for any reason, we will need to work quickly with lines companies to disconnect some consumers for a short time,” Andrew said then.
“This will be a last resort ……and will prevent the risk of grid collapse, which would result in widespread uncontrolled outages that would last significantly longer.”
The cause of this problem is rising demand for electricity, coupled with intermittent supply from generating equipment such as wind turbines.
“Higher volumes of renewable but intermittent generation like wind have left the electricity system susceptible to equipment faults,” Andrew said in the May statement.
Her comments reflect a long-standing problem with New Zealand’s electricity system. It has spare capacity lying idle for most times of the day. But it can be stretched to the limit at 6pm on a freezing night in winter.
This problem matters to Transpower because it does not just administer the national grid. It has another role – as the so-called system operator. This gives it ultimate responsibility for the technical and economic operation of the electricity system hour by hour.
That means it must do something if things go wrong. And in a background briefing, Transpower managers indicate things are going wrong this winter, and they are going right at the same time.
The right part is that heavy rainfall has left the hydro lakes brimming with water. That means plenty of electricity is available, it is renewable and it is cheap.
But the wrong part is that plentiful hydro power means thermal power plants are used less, so their fixed costs go high relative to their actual earnings.
In addition, 55% of all thermal plants are slow to get started, and in some cases can take 36 hours to move from inert to fully functional.
This is way too slow when the supply of electricity can rise and fall quickly, due to intermittent generation from wind turbines. And when the supply of electricity drops suddenly, it can cause a loss of frequency that can damage sensitive equipment.
The 11 incidents so far this year are known as low residual customer advice notices. They warn customers of Transpower such as local lines companies and large-scale industry that unused, residual power supplies are running low.
The safety margin is officially 200 megawatts.
Sometimes, Transpower’s problem can graduate from low residual notice to a grid emergency.
One of these happened in June last year when a fast-reacting gas turbine in Taranaki failed to start, wind generation slipped to a third of capacity and one of the thermal plants at Huntly had to reduce production.
Another grid emergency happened when Cyclone Gabrielle damaged electricity equipment, blacking out some parts of Hawke's Bay and Gisborne.
There were five grid emergencies during 2021 and 2022, when equipment failures exacerbated tight supply situations.
The way grid emergencies are managed is that lines companies are asked to reduce electricity usage by using ripple control, which turns off people’s hot water cylinders from a distance for a few hours at a time.
An alternative message is to make use of demand management techniques such as paying industries to shift their production to unsociable hours when the demand for electricity is low.
According to Transpower officials, New Zealand has ample generation capacity, but some of it is slow-to-start thermal generators, powered by coal or gas.
Sometimes the proprietors of this generating equipment are reluctant to produce electricity for the market even though it could turn out later to be badly needed.
The reason is that it can be uneconomic to offer thermal electricity when hydro lakes are full and wind turbines are spinning fast.
But the wind can suddenly drop, leaving electricity in short supply while the lumbering thermal plants are forced to slowly gather pace.
If the wind starts up again, the thermal plant operators can find they have spent tens of thousands of dollars getting going, which they will not earn back, because their electricity will be too expensive compared with power from the newly revived windfarms.
Andrew thinks the long-term answer is to have more so-called peaking plants, which are powered by natural gas and can be turned on and off quickly.
She says these exist already but New Zealand needs more of them.
In the meantime, a senior Transpower executive, Stephen Jay, says his team are constantly on the alert to keep the supply of power assured.
This involves working with lines companies and large industrial users to prevent a low residual notice from becoming a grid emergency, or worse still, a system collapse.
This problem is being made worse by climate change. Although this induces global warming on average, the process is erratic, and it can be accompanied by unexpected spells of extreme cold.
69 Comments
The grid emergencies will get more and more frequent as the level of generation will not keep up with the level of demand, and they say EV's will be the future? At least when the power cuts out you can keep war with a wood fire and be able to get somewhere with an ICE car. Seems to be another clash between ideology and practicality
Another hot take from a someone that has zero understanding of EVs. When the power goes out, the EV will still have whatever is stored in its battery, likely more than enough for 2-3 days of normal running if its not a crappy old leaf.
And with several of the newer EVs, you can throw an extension cord out the window, and use the EV to power the heater.
That's right, if you have vehicle-to-load capability (which many have) you can draw off the battery to run a multiple power outlet in your house.
Even smarter, if you had vehicle-to-grid capability the power company could pay you to draw down off the battery during peak demand and return the electricity later in the evening.
EV's aren't the problem (they're almost never charged during peak) but they certainly could be part of the solution.
Most power retailers offer generous discounts on off-peak EV charging. Smart chargers can be programmed through apps to charge vehicles only at those times of the night (or middle of the day).
This way, the transmission network spreads demand out evenly, generators have to invest less on peaking and car users get a faster payback on their EVs - an all-round win.
The technology is still starting up. Like all new tech, it's expensive to start with, but rapid price drops will start appearing especially as battery tech improves. For instance sodium batteries are in the works, once they start coming online, we are likely to see electric cars being produced cheaper than their equivalent ICE ones. And with significantly less maintenance overheads (less moving parts, simpler, more robust engines etc).
They are only for looks anyways. Show the world you care - with your second/third car. Thanks tradies!
"We combine billions of hourly electricity meter measurements with address-level EV registration records from California households. The average EV increases overall household load by 2.9 kilowatt-hours per day, less than half the amount assumed by state regulators. Our results imply that EVs travel 5,300 miles per year, under half of the US fleet average."
Its a question of the generation mix and capacity vs energy. All in the article.
The right part is that heavy rainfall has left the hydro lakes brimming with water. That means plenty of electricity is available, it is renewable and it is cheap.
But the wrong part is that plentiful hydro power means thermal power plants are used less, so their fixed costs go high relative to their actual earnings.
In addition, 55% of all thermal plants are slow to get started, and in some cases can take 36 hours to move from inert to fully functional.
This is way too slow when the supply of electricity can rise and fall quickly, due to intermittent generation from wind turbines. And when the supply of electricity drops suddenly, it can cause a loss of frequency that can damage sensitive equipment.
I understand how it happens.
But why have we had 11 of these events already this year vs 12 for all of last year, when as this article says, winter has barely even begun?
From the Transpower linked statement,
“Hot water systems are regularly switched on and off by lines companies to manage peak demand, and people will not notice this. We may also ask New Zealanders to help by switching off power in rooms they are not using and doing washing and charging devices and electric vehicles outside of peak times.”
Last year was a coming off a dry year, we were still running lots fossil fuel because of low hydro levels. This year is the opposite, hydro lakes brimming, so offpeak prices are far to low to run fossil fuel plants much. This is reflected in Wholesale electricity prices being half what they were last year.
So the grid + generation mix really isn't fit for purpose then? Or rather, wet year = probably good for retailers (neutral to good for consumers depending on which retailer you are with), but in the current configuration a bit of a nightmare for the grid operator?
I see you failed to comprehend the article. Its about the short period that is peak hours, its not worth it for some of the fossil fueled generators getting up to temp to only be able to charge high prices for a few hours before the prices dropping away as the demand is swamped by the huge amounts of cheap hydro generation available.
EVs aren't the problem, almost all off them charge overnight on cheap rates. And most of them have the timing function for this built into the car, so you plug in as soon as you get home, but the car doesn't start charging till the cheap rate kicks in, or alternatively times its charging so it finishes charging just before you leave the next morning. Both of these spread the load peaks out, which is a good thing.
Honestly most of these people saying these sorts of things are just repeating facebook meme's as a valuable source of information, mostly because they don't like the idea of having to step out of their ICE cars (which are hugely inefficient, most are lucky to use 20% of the energy contained in the fuel they put in, let alone the upstream costs of even getting the energy in the first place). We will look back on them in a few years as complete dinosaurs who were determined to stop positive change for idiotic reasons, at which point they will be onto their next technology to spout nonsense about.
I have a few in my family and they are hilariously unable to separate fact from fiction.
Why would EV owners charge at peak times when the cost is around double the off peak tariff? Even the long running Leaf has the basic ability to set charging times to take advantage of cheaper night time electricity. Yes owners will plug in when they get home, but the car only starts to charge later that night and if charging equipment is suitable you'll have a fully charged battery in the morning as most off peak tariffs run for 8 hours!
Good planning but a cold winter plus low hydro levels still requires generation and a windless week or two and the current 50MW of spare capacity will go nowhere as more EV hit the road and we continue to use more electrical appliances , my wood burner/BBQ and Solar with battery will help me for a short time but even that may mean going to bed with the electric blanket may be the best solution.
What low hydro levels? We are at ~100% of controlled storage (sp_nz_mayket_update_may_23_fig_10.png (905×458) (smartpower.co.nz))
And again, EVs do not generally charge in peak hours, when the 50MW margin issue is happening. You may as well try to blame it on the govt healthy homes programs, all those renters that have thrown out their LPG heaters because the landlord was forced to install a heatpump.
Blame the idiots that privatised the electricity market.
Instead of a system optimised solution run by a SOE we have the absurdity of nowhere near perfect competition in a tiny market.
NZ could have minimised electricity prices for NZ Inc and added supply and resilience when needed increasing our productivity and competitiveness- instead we have an absolute shambles.
Imagine if instead of politicians deciding electricity generation should be sold off we'd kept it owned by everyone and tasked with ensuring a plentiful supply of reasonably priced renewable energy to support businesses and households.
We'd be in a far better situation now.
This is the point that underpins everything electricity in NZ. No matter your ideology or view of the future its going to be difficult to get 26 local network owners, transpower, and the generators all on the same page with anything. So for now no harmonised system wide solution is viable in my view. The problems referenced in the article have more to do with NZ's absolutely garbage housing stock (sorry it's true) that necessitates a mitre 10 plug in wall heater sale every winter and a plug in fan sale every summer. It's the compounded effect of houses that simply can't provide comfort on 20 nights a year without every room having a space heater.
NZ will require 200 MW of additional gas-fired generation capacity by 2030 and perhaps another 120 MW by 2035 under a high demand scenario (figures from an EnergyLink study).
The study also recommends locating these plants close to our geothermal power stations, so that CO2 from gas-fired stations can be reinjected into geothermal reservoirs. A pilot successfully running for over a year now has found neither the performance of the geothermal station nor its natural or built environment is affected by this reinjection of carbon.
That is misinformation. The government has stopped issuing new permits for offshore O&G exploration and MBIE is currently working on a plan to transition from natural gas to "renewable gas". Until this is achieved, the Cabinet has agreed that "fossil gas continues to support security of energy supply until it is no longer required".
The concern is more around the uncertain investment climate in the O&G sector due to policy changes. This damage can be undone to an extent if the broader industry can provide solutions like the one I mentioned in my previous comment to reduce the emission profile from gas-fired generation.
What is "renewable gas"?
Hopefully that doesn't mean "green hydrogen", because hydrogen leaking into the atmosphere is 12x worse as a greenhouse gas than CO2 because it inhibits the breakdown of methane which is a potent greenhouse gas. Hydrogen is notoriously difficult/expensive to store because it is the smallest of all elements and leaks out of most containment vessels.
Unfortunately, green hydrogen is a part of the potential mix. It will never have a business case unless we gold plate the inside walls of everything holding or carrying H2 on an industrial scale.
As they say in my industry, hydrogen is the chemical engineer's solution and the mechanical engineer's problem!
As someone with experience in the industry I don't see the lack of new permits as the issue, (You are the one who raised this)
The issue is the lack of gas. Our fields are mature and in the final stages of production. Most attempts at prolonging/increasing supply are achieving well-below forecasted results. Further, there does not appear to be any new finds of commercial significance anywhere.
New Gas is not something that the govt can just magic up. Unless of course this "Renewable" Gas is coming out of their various orifices?
Incorrect.
The Key government spent taxpayers money mapping everywhere - desperate to sell, they were. Short-term selfishness, it was (and the joke is Stephen Joyce with his snout in the public trough even now). It was a twin-engnied plane, and it gridded the whole country. We paid, the info was given to the Companies for free.
It's called theft - maybe it qualifies as fraud. And some of us will ensure the books are written.
But the prior poster is right - depleting stocks are depleting stocks; check out the North Sea...
Teslas, MGs, Leafs, BYDs, Opels, Seats.. All EVs. And they aren't the problem, they are overwhelming charged at night, when power is cheap, and the grid is not constrained. (unless the owner has solar and charges during the day for free).
You could have left your post at just the last three words.
Contact is positioning their 3 hour of free power every night plan to EV users. [Good Nights Plan | Contact Energy]
This peak demand problem has nothing to do with “more renewables” - it has been caused by “just in time” investment in new generation by the gentailers (ie. too little, too late) and the fact that our natural gas supply is dwindling and unreliable.
Huntly and Stratford both exist to provide for peak demand (they are the definition of “peakers”), but they can’t do it - we learn they are too slow to ramp up and we know that Huntly is reduced to only a couple of boilers.
On the way - will be over a year until the first one is in place though. I believe Meridian have another in the pipeline and Contact have been looking at it too.
https://www.meridianenergy.co.nz/news-and-events/meridian-to-build-ruak…
If a few households get a 1 hr power cut at 6PM once in a blue moon is it really the end of the world? If it happens say twice a year and they cut off 100,000 households and they share it around evenly, we would get one power cut per household every 10 years or so.
Tell James Shaw and the Green f...wits this. Bring back fires with wet backs you can heat your house heat your water and cook dinner on it if need. So that's three things going for it. Yet if no electricity how does the heat pump work. All well and good wanting these EVs etc but ain't no good if you can't charge them up.
In Urban areas , air quality standards make it hard to design a woodfire that can have a decent size wetback. This is because the wetback takes to much heat out of the fire , causing it to burn inefficiently. The restriction does not apply to properties over 2.5ha , from memory.
Wether the Greens are responsible for this legislation , I don't remember. they would certainly support cleaner air standards.
I wonder if some of these sort of biofuel generators can be located so they can sequester carbon back into geothermal fields?
https://theconversation.com/how-nz-could-become-a-world-leader-in-decar…
I charged my EV last night - 11pm to 7am on a timer - same as I always do - as it is half the price of charging at peak hours
Is everyone sure you do have the capability to charge at half price - you have to have the "thrifty night" connection which we enjoy in the old Counties Power network. Otherwise it may not be the case. One of those urban myths.
I'm new to this but aren't these problems already solved? Two solutions come to mind. Install some Tesla Megapacks like Australia and use the off peak hydro to charge them. The other solution is to close Tiwai Point which we are all paying for now due to inept government.
It is fairly evident that many commentators do not know how the grid works on aspects like merit order or reserves, nor do some seem to know the difference between power and energy. At present the grid cannot operate without significant thermal generation, in either power over the peaks or energy over the day. In dry years, we have a even bigger shortfall of energy.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.