sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

David Mahon says the tightropes that New Zealand prime ministers have walked between the West and China in the past were wider and lower to the ground than the thin, highwires they now traverse - and will traverse in the future

Business / opinion
David Mahon says the tightropes that New Zealand prime ministers have walked between the West and China in the past were wider and lower to the ground than the thin, highwires they now traverse - and will traverse in the future
tightrope walker
Source: 123rf.com Copyright: zhukovvvlad

By David Mahon*

It is getting harder each year for New Zealand to maintain equilibrium in its relationships with Western nations, who are increasingly against China, and its relationship with Beijing. The United States is making the South Pacific a new arena in which to curtail China’s development.

New Zealand’s best policy would be to say and do little to pick sides unless a principle of international law is breached. A sense of neutrality and pursuing New Zealand’s own interests would reinforce the country’s sometimes shaky but overall consistent non-allied status of the last 40 years. The Pacific Ocean is twice the size of the Atlantic Ocean. It is no-one’s back yard.

New Zealand’s non-allied foreign policy will continue to win few political points with the West, but it will help to avoid the erosion of New Zealand’s sovereignty in the manner Australia has had its own eroded by becoming Washington’s regional, military proxy. Pressure from New Zealand’s Five Eyes partners to diversify away from China commercially and condemn it politically has been mounting recently, but to little avail.

Risk management

There are always good arguments for trade diversification, but for a small, narrow economy like New Zealand’s, the first concern is its own stability and common wealth, not imaginary alliances with those who have little to offer but flattery and coercion to join their strategic endeavours.

China has become the New Zealand dairy industry’s domestic market as we produce far more than we could ever consume at home, and we have good access. We have been told for years by the government that free trade agreements with India, the US and Europe were imminent, but they haven’t emerged. Even when they are completed, the terms are unlikely to be competitive with what we have with China.

Fonterra stakeholder

Some New Zealand firms will diversify to other markets through growth over time, but currently there is a conflict between the good logic of wanting greater diversification and the practicality of many firms doing so, having built up long-standing relationships of trust and value in China.

Despite strategic setbacks in the past, Fonterra is now a highly successful company in China, selling over NZ$4 billion of products and ingredients in 2021. Zespri will sell close to NZ$1 billion of kiwifruit by the end of 2023, holding its rare position as a premium fruit brand, despite Chinese competition from stolen New Zealand SunGold vines. Zespri can best counter this competition and secure its brand’s endurance when it builds its own presence in the Chinese industry. The company is currently constrained by some in the industry who fear, mistakenly, that if Zespri were to work with orchardists in China their proprietary technology and know-how would be lost. Chinese farmers have been growing fruit successfully for thousands of years. New Zealand kiwifruit growers would be better to partner with Chinese orchardists such as those in Sichuan to create and protect value for Zespri together.

New Zealand enjoys strong market niches, mostly in food and nutritional products, while there is promising growth in services and technology. But companies need to do more to protect and expand their markets. New Zealand companies must also be careful not to underestimate the sophistication of the Chinese consumer and the dynamism of the local competition.

Exporters selling to China without investing in and forming strong local partnerships risk losing their position in the case of a political disagreement between Wellington and Beijing. Despite seven years of Washington placing tariffs on Chinese goods, and China retaliating in kind, American companies and products in China have not been targeted by Beijing. The prime reason is that so many US firms are invested in China, employing local people and exporting goods from China-based factories.

Another more benign reason for New Zealand exporters to invest in China is that increasingly patriotic Chinese consumers favour those who not only sell to, but also demonstrate their respect and participation in the Chinese domestic market. Les Mills China’s Shanghai-based team, despite the service sector stalling due to COVID lockdowns in recent months, have managed to do this in the local fitness sector.

Consumer confidence

Chinese consumers have confidence in New Zealand’s food and product safety, recently enhanced by the manner in which the country managed COVID. Once, consumers considered Switzerland as the most reliable foreign country; that place is now held by New Zealand.

It has not been lost on Chinese consumers that New Zealand differs from other Western nations in that it judges China less harshly, despite the anomaly of being a party to the Five Eyes alliance. Consumers sense that New Zealand has not aligned itself with the US and its allies in trying to contain China. But this perception could change rapidly.

Jacinda Ardern’s meeting with President Biden resulted in a sharp communique from Beijing and American media coverage condemning China’s initiatives in the South Pacific, despite the fact the language of Wellington’s own summary did not mention China in the same way. There has nevertheless been a slightly more hawkish tone from Wellington regarding regional security since the announcement by China of a security deal with the Solomon Islands. It may not appear to reflect a fundamental change in policy, but New Zealand needs to be careful to ensure that perceptions in the region, not just in Beijing, reflects its true intentions. New Zealand is no nation’s suzerain, not the US or China’s.

Cracked Chinese whispers

China’s statements and conduct of its regional affairs do not always help itself or its friends. It has been a generous and relatively uncoercive supporter of Pacific nations for over a decade, a period during which Australia decreased aid to the region, and the US barely paid it any attention. Now China is increasing its interactions with the Pacific further, Washington and Canberra are striving to counter them. China would be wise to stop giving them grounds to challenge its aid and investment efforts. It is unnecessary to sign security agreements and seek the right to deploy Chinese police forces to Pacific states now.

The timing of Minister Wang Yi’s recent tour of the Pacific was perhaps unfortunate, as it brought these tiny, tenaciously independent nations under intense pressure from Washington and Canberra to take sides in their conflict with China. This is something Pacific states, much in need of foreign investment and aid to deal with global warming from anywhere they can get it, cannot afford to do. As skilled a diplomat as Minister Wang Yi is, he failed to secure a regional security and economic co-operation agreement, perhaps underestimating the depth of local sensitivities and inter-island rivalries.

New Zealand has been a steady and reasonable friend to China, and Beijing is still confident that this relationship will continue. Wellington cannot rely on the legacy of this relationship alone, but must find new initiatives and stronger ties with Beijing commercially, politically, and culturally.

Although so much larger than its Polynesian neighbours, New Zealand is also a remote Pacific nation, and it must stand by any principle that reinforces its independence. Its relationship with China is a metaphor for New Zealand’s wider interests.

The tightropes that New Zealand prime ministers have walked between the West and China in the past were wider and lower to the ground than the thin, highwires they now traverse and will traverse in the future.


*David Mahon is the Executive Chairman of Beijing-based Mahon China Investment Management Limited, which was founded in 1985. This article is here with permission.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

15 Comments

very good assessment. not a single ideology bxxxsxxx in this article but with only facts.

Up
2

Chinese middle class consumers like to eat quality clean proteins,so nz primary produce will continue to be in demand. Ideology of the stomach will beat ideology of politics,everytime...

Up
1

you know that both dairy and meat products from NZ are easily substituted by same products from South American countries.

Up
2

Sure, in the same way Swiss chocolate can be easily swapped out for Polish chocolate, or a Great Wall ute can easily stand in for a Toyota Hilux.

Up
6

NZ Dairy is not that special. Plenty of other countries can produce at least an equal product. 

NZ arrogance......

Up
3

No tightrope required. I use xingmowang as a role model, he is on this forum criticising New Zealand’s domestic and foreign policy every chance he/she gets. Therefore the crown should feel free to criticise the hell out of China for its appalling political system, human rights abuses, corruption, disregard for international law.

Thank you xing for being a guiding light!

Up
11

When we debate that our greed should trump peoples freedoms and human  rights ... we are on a slippery slope.

A spade is a spade, a dictator is a dictator and due to their disregard for international law, and by continually committing human rights abuses they should be experiencing appropriqte consquences.. we  should take a stand and lead the way in cutting off china in favor of countries that have similar values to us.

Right now germany is paying the price for building a close relationship with russia and relying on them for energy. And everyone is saying how obvious it was and they should have diversified.

Our dairy industry is in the same position now with china and will needs to get off its bum and  find other markets.

 

Its our kids futures we are playing with and for sure they will rather have less money and their freedoms.

 

Up
5

More pro-China propaganda from Mr Mahon, even if it’s subtler than what comes straight from the CCP.

Up
8

Yeah, you only need to know that he lives in China. That tells you he is unable to make any critical comment without getting a swift boot out the door.

Up
8

It’s quite fascinating reading his pieces, how he walks that tightrope between not saying something to piss off the CCP, and offering something with a modicum of critical thinking…

Up
5

I too, am not that thrilled with the Chinese military focus down towards our part of town. I get that the Island nations are grumpy that we haven't been able to support them as they feel we should have, but everyone's struggling for money at the moment & it appears our own need (greed?) is a higher priority than theirs.

In saying that, however, we do need to keep things in balance. There is only one China - market wise - & we've worked pretty hard to date to get where we are today & it would be a shame to lose access to it.

I'd also like to think we could be the perfect middleman between the two super powers - the negotiator perhaps. We've done it before, although not quite to that scale, but where there's an opportunity there is hope.

 

Up
1

Given China's population will half in the next 45 years I don't think we can avoid diversification away from that market. This isn't a tightrope or strategic choice of East or West, it's a demographic reality that's substantially baked in already. With the rise of China completed we now move to the difficult second act, the fall of China.

Up
10

The population of the world exceeds the renewable resources required for a pleasant (non-starving) lifestyle. Logically countries will try to reduce their populations by restricting population growth by being very selective with immigration, educating and employing women and ensuring elderly people without children receive pensions. The productivity of a modern nation depends on machines not peasants. Agriculture in all developed countries has reduced employment drastically and increased productivity; now it is the turn of AI replacing office jobs. China is wise.

Up
0

Somehow the thought of Ardern, constantly on the hunt for the next fix of international adulation, balancing on one end of a pole on that highwire, with Mahuta, constantly on the hunt for more koha for the whanau on the other end of the pole, fails to inspire confidence in our foreign policy......highwires are no place for amateurs.

Up
1

mm? Interest.co is suppose to support independent journalism right?

 

Up
0