Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has put Fletcher Building’s 95% market share in the plasterboard market on notice over its failure to supply builders with enough GIB to keep the housing supply growing.
Some shareholders and large builders are calling for Fletcher’s control of various building material sectors to be broken up to improve competition, security of supply and to reduce inflation. The Commerce Commission is currently doing a market study of the sector. Its draft report from its market study of supermarkets recommended a breakup of the supermarkets duopoly of Foodstuffs and Woolworths’ Countdown, which the Government is now considering.
Ardern said she spoken to new Building and Construction Minister Megan Woods on Monday about the GIB crisis and expected Woods to make an announcement later in the week.
“We've already indicated some time ago that we’re concerned around the issue of building supplies in New Zealand. That's something that is already on our agenda, but looking specifically at the question of GIB and access to it, yes, I am concerned,” Ardern said late on Monday.
“Obviously, we have a focus as a government on building more houses given that we have been tackling a housing crisis, and anything in terms of building supplies that stands in the way of that, yes, we are of a mind to make sure that we play our role in addressing it where it is viable,” she said.
“I was just discussing this with Minister Woods today. I imagine she'll have more say on it this week.”
Ardern’s comments at this week’s post-cabinet news conference came as anger grows at Fletcher Building’s Winstone Wallboards’ unit failure to keep up with orders for its GIB product, which has been a factor in over 90 small building firms collapsing under the weight of unfinished homes.
Last week Simplicity Living, which is building 550 build-to-rent apartments in Auckland, cancelled its orders for GIB and said it was importing container loads of plasterboard from Thailand. Parallel importer Container Door also said Sunday it was bringing in dozens of containers of plasterboard from Thailand.
Simplicity CEO Sam Stubbs and NZ Shareholders' Association CEO Oliver Mander met with Fletcher Building CEO Ross Taylor on Friday to air their criticism of how Winstone Wallboards had failed to keep up with demand. They said immediately after the meeting they remained concerned and had been surprised with Fletcher’s lack of humility over the situation.
Mander and Stubbs sent a letter to Fletcher’s board Monday calling for the resignation of Chairman Bruce Hassall, for all of the directors to put themselves up for re-election at the next shareholders’ meeting, and for independent reviews of the company’s culture and risk practices.
In the letter they said:
“Following the meeting, we observe that the culture of the business remains internally focused, likely as a result of the company having been in a privileged position and as a dominant player for a long time.
• We have yet to see any ”mea culpa”, or substantial admittance of fault for FBU’s role in the current plasterboard supply crisis.
• Your refusal to acknowledge the existence and depth of stakeholder dissatisfaction speaks to a corporate culture based more on hubris than humility.
• There has been poor risk management and business decision-making, exemplified by the management of the current GIB supply crisis provides evidence. At our meeting last week, there was no evidence provided to support the quality of your risk & assurance processes.
• The company does not appear to have learnt the lessons from the past in terms of effective risk management.“
Last week Simplicity Living Managing Director Shane Brealey called for Government intervention.
“It is time for the Government to step in and ensure we have a normal competitive market just like everywhere else in the world,” Brealey said.
“They should be making a level competitive playing field which clearly we don’t have at the moment. You can’t have a company that has 95% market share in a really basic material like plasterboard,” he said.
“There's a cost of building crisis in New Zealand, and the hubris of Fletcher Building is only making it worse.”
Fletcher Building is building a new plasterboard plant near Tauranga and was forced earlier in March to stop taking new orders directly until the end of June. It implemented a rationing system for smaller clients. Meanwhile, it continued with long-term supply arrangements with its own distribution chain, Placemakers, and some large clients, including its own Fletcher Living residential development arm. It was also criticised after stockpiles of GIB were discovered at a Fletcher Living site early last week.
After weeks of criticism from the industry and growing concerns about living costs, which are partly being fuelled by construction costs rising at double-digit rates, Fletcher announced last week it would import 1m square metres of plasterboard to help its clients with shortages.
Simplicity Living was critical of Fletcher’s forecasting and supply arrangements.
"By looking at building consents, Fletchers must have known there would be a shortage of plasterboard at least 12 months ago. So why aren’t they doing what we’ve just done?,” Brealey said.
“Without adequate supplies of plasterboard, it is effectively impossible to finish many homes. We welcome the Commerce Commission enquiry into building suppliers. Something has to happen, because the status quo is so bad.”
The Shareholders' Association was also critical of Fletcher Building’s underperformance as an investment in the last five years. Its total returns have fallen 20% at a time when the rest of the market has risen 40%, despite a building boom for much of that time.
Mander and Stubbs concluded in their letter:
“Fletcher Building has, and must maintain, a social license to operate. It has an obligation to customers and stakeholders to maintain supply and competitive pricing to ensure the overall health of the building sector. It is failing in this, and we question the sustainability of the business model to deliver long-term performance for the company.
“We believe the conduct of the company has now created significant regulatory risk and a possible customer revolt. This crisis has highlighted what we see as systemic failures within the company which are ultimately the responsibility of the Fletcher Building Board.”
Officials have been scrambling for weeks to break the regulatory logjams stopping builders from using other products, particularly those imported from overseas. MBIE and Auckland Council reassured ministers and the public last week that the largest consenter had begun approving non-Gib plasterboard.
45 Comments
Too simple. Four working groups needed at minimum:
- Setting terms of reference for any enquiry.
- Overseas junket, scratch that, Research to see what peer industry configurations exist and what can be gleaned from them.
- Consultation and Narrative shaping to ensure a wide catchment of views.
- Last but not least, facility and catering arrangements for all of the above.
A budget of, oh, $30m or so might be just enough to get this rolling.
My god I have been around a while but I cannot remember any prior identity that could match this PM of ours for talking around and around in circles of meaningless mealy mouthed waffle. Sure this monopoly does not have its birth in this government but if the PM does not realise how entrenched and impregnable it is, she must be on another planet. Hell Winstons have cemented themselves into Branz, local body regulations, consents and on. No other board than theirs has the “requisite” bracing specs. We are working on the work of announcing an announcement. There you go that solves it. This is about as useless and infantile as assessing the housing market apropos the house across the street going on sale. Fast becoming more than an embarrassment.
ps. If you have got nothing to say best then to do it by keeping your mouth closed!
Can home builders not get their designer to specify other forms of bracing that means that gib is not required for bracing? It seems ludicrous to me that any type of plaster board can be considered for bracing at all? It wouldn't need a government decree to take a sensible step in your build process or am I woefully misinformed here?
It's been an issue for as long as the Commerce Commission, the unelected Government agency responsible for overseeing competition/dealing with monopolies in our economy, has been sitting idle on their hands while taking a handsome pay packet.
When was the last time they did something meaningful? Back in 2006 when nerds were outraged that their "linux distros" were only downloading at 128kbit with a 10 gig cap (unless they dialed into the Jetstream Games realm or went to a LAN party).
Yes, this is the real issue, has only a little bit to do with the government.
We have a watchdog literally set up to prevent monopolistic behaviour. They have simply been absent regarding the building industry for decades. One would almost suggest there has been some kickbacks going on, considering the lack of competition.
At the same time, governments have been warned about it for a decade or more (I remember in the mid 2000s a major news story about anti competitive behaviour or monopolies in the building industry). Wouldn't expect National to do anything, I expect Labour will talk about doing something and never actually do anything. Would be happily surprised though.
The current crisis though has little to do with competition and more to do with us building a hell of a lot of houses, more than our current suppliers could support. Why they are only now looking to import Gib though (considering they know about a year away the ramp up in demand), should be up for discussion. But it also touches on lean manufacturing practices and just in time processes which were also exposed during COVID.
Hickey should be researching why this is happening.
Because it isn't food duopolies, any more than it's gib monopolies, or Putin, or, or, or.
I put all this under his nose, half a lifetime ago.
Research on energy, resources and the Limits to Growth from Bernard since?
I'll withdraw and apologise if anyone can point me to anything, but I've seen nothing. And this piece was reporting, not journalism. Just sayin'
Sorry he was focussed on myriad of other issues and govt failings than just PDK’s reckons. No one’s perfect but Hickey beats all other journo’s by a mile easily. No clickbait, well researched and always asks the tough questions at press conf. Question the rest of the ‘reporters’ not him.
This has all the makings of a huge rubber band effect.
There has been an undersupply, but what's coming
Supply side - Fletcher raising production, plus importing, plus lots of others starting to import
Demand side - We're coming out of a building boom and it's about to fall through the floor, plus those who had stockpiled have piles to burn through.
3 months from now the stories will be about over-supply.
I listened to an architect complain about their attempt to use a material from Canada in one of their builds. A major building supplies company told them "if you use that, good luck because we're not going to supply you with any other materials across your builds". Needless to say the architect absolutely despises that supplier now.
Again? The first time I heard Comcom looking at GIB plasterboard was 2014 and they where satisfied nothing was untoward: https://www.afr.com/companies/infrastructure/probe-clears-fletcher-buil…
We can't just keep relitigating the same issues again and again for years. Clearly we have a monopoly/oligopoly problem in New Zealand and need new legislation. So, you know, "Let's do this!"
The back bench right wing may need to look inwards for the root of this problem.
The problem stems back to last century and the National government who created the leaky home problem by allowing developers to use cheaper less suitable building products like untreated pine. Also our GIB has bracing properties which is why architects specify it by name. and councils don't like substitutions.
You can read it here.
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/gib-and-the-competitive-problems-of-plasterb…
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.