sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Commerce Commission says which bank gets our savings and home loans could reveal whether there's enough bank competition

Banking / news
Commerce Commission says which bank gets our savings and home loans could reveal whether there's enough bank competition
big four bank logos

Home loans and deposits will be the key area of focus as the Commerce Commission investigates, via a market study, whether personal banking in New Zealand is competitive and offers people value and choice.

The Commission on Thursday morning released its awaited preliminary issues report outlining what it intends to dig into as it looks at whether banks’ prices and profits are “too high for too long” because of an inefficient market.

The competition regulator has 14 months to deliver a banking study, with commercial banking left out.

Commerce Commission Chairman John Small says deposit accounts and home loans are an important aspect of how banks compete for retail customers, and are held by a large proportion of New Zealanders.

“We will also consider other banking products to build a complete picture of competition between personal banking service providers.”

The paper says deposit accounts appear to be an important source of funding for banks, and the regulator’s current understanding is that deposit accounts play an important role in how banks attract customers and sell, or cross-sell, other personal banking services.

As at May 2023, deposits accounted for about 62% of registered banks’ total funding, with the combined total deposits of all registered banks $435 billion. 

About $128b was deposits in transaction accounts, $110b in savings accounts and $197b in term deposits.

Home loans are a significant cost to many New Zealanders and there's potentially limited customer switching, the Commission says.

Home loans make up about $348b in overall lending in New Zealand, of which around 86% is provided by the four largest banks. 

“We propose to focus on home loans because …. there is some anecdotal evidence suggesting potential for consumer stickiness and inertia, corresponding to subdued levels of switching.”

The paper says home loan interest rates have significant effects on household budgets. 

For those with a home loan (about 32% of households in 2021), repayments are a significant ongoing expenditure.

The preliminary issues paper says overseas studies have identified home loans as being particularly profitable portfolios for banks.

“We expect that focusing on home loans will help to identify and better understand any factors potentially affecting competition in personal banking. Our initial understanding is that competition for home loan customers is a central arena for retail banking competition more generally, and has an important role in attracting and retaining personal banking customers.”

ANZ, New Zealand's largest bank, said in an emailed statement that it was considering the Commission’s assessment of issues relevant to the market study and looked forward to the opportunity to provide insight into what can be a complex area.

"New Zealand has a highly competitive market for personal banking services with banks and service providers of all sizes and ownership structures, including a government-owned bank. We’re contributing to the market study and hope that it improves the confidence that New Zealanders have in the banking sector."

Industry group, the New Zealand Banking Association, said the Commerce Commission’s preliminary issues paper was comprehensive and shows an understanding of key issues in personal banking.

“In particular, the focus on the significant current regulatory requirements as well as those in train will provide important context to competition and barriers in the industry.”

It said the focus indicated in the issues paper would ease any concerns in the community about competition and innovation in the banking industry.

Banks are in the money

The market study will also tackle the thorny issue of profitability.

The issues paper says New Zealand banks are regarded as financially strong and stable but persistently high profits raise questions about the intensity of competition.

Small says the Commission’s initial review of existing research shows that NZ banks were more profitable than in comparable economies over the past decade, and this raised questions.

“We want to understand whether lack of competition in personal banking is a contributing factor. This is important in the context of our study as profitability can serve as an indicator of the intensity of competition.”

A Cabinet paper published in June says the profit returns made by New Zealand’s four largest banks in the past five years were above several of their international peers. 

The paper says research into the banking sector’s profitability gave evidence of high and increasing profit margins over variable costs, limited susceptibility of profits to fluctuate with higher costs, and greater lending margins and profitability with higher short-term interest rates.

“There is also an apparent lack of responsiveness of deposit interest rates to changes in the Official Cash Rate, compared to a high responsiveness (in an upwards direction) of lending interest rates to changes in the Official Cash Rate.”

The paper points to work from the Reserve Bank’s Financial Stability Report from May this year showing large New Zealand banks generated shareholder returns of on average 15%, compared to 11% for their counterparts overseas.

It also outlines a Treasury report from September 2022 which found nominal bank profits in New Zealand were the highest on record.

“But when measured by return on equity, and return on assets, profitability was near the average for the 2013 to 2022 period,” Treasury says.

The Treasury “ultimately concluded that there was no clear evidence that bank profitability constituted a windfall and did not recommend a windfall tax in the banking sector”.

However, the preliminary issues paper says Treasury’s report “recorded its observation that the four largest New Zealand banks have had persistently elevated levels of profitability compared to the rest of the banking sector on return on equity and return on assets and questioned why competition between the large New Zealand banks’, due to their relatively lower costs, had not resulted in lower interest rate margins and fees”. 

The paper says the Commission had begun by looking at three common measures for evaluating profitability in banking: net interest margins (NIM), return on equity (ROE) and return on assets (ROA). 

“We note that these measures are at a ‘whole of bank’ level and therefore include activities that do not relate to personal banking services. We will consider the extent to which we can gather more granular measures of profitability that relate to personal banking services in particular.”

Small says the Commission now wants to hear from consumers, the banking sector and other interested parties.

“There’s been significant interest in this market study, and our thinking and conclusions will be guided by the feedback and evidence we receive over the coming weeks."

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

37 Comments

While their ROE and ROA may be rather static - is that because they've been inflating their assets/equity through the generation of a bubble that just happens to keep those looking reasonable despite conflating profits?

What happens to their assets if we remove recourse on failing mortgages?

Up
4

The Australian banks have no competition, and won't have in a small market like ours; HSBC pulling stumps etc. There's only one entity big enough to make them sharpen up - the RBNZ. Not via regulation, but by competition. Give any IRD taxpayer the option to open a call account with the RBNZ and let funds flow as interest rates change. If the retail banks have to compete for necessary deposits on price, to meet their statutory capital requirements - then perhaps we'll see some change.

Up
10

The Antipodean banking complex has become an economic enigma. There is no other business like it on the planet. It's the be-all-and-end-all of economic growth and wealth through a never-ending cycle of credit creation for housing on a relatively fixed housing stock. Anywhere else in the world, this would seem impossible. But you can barely see a chink in the banks' armor and the super-profits keep rolling in. 

Realistically this should terrify the ruling elite. But it doesn't. While they won't publicly admit, they rely on it. The sheeple barely bat an eyelid, and even if it registered in any way, they would see as some kind of 'natural order.'   

Up
9

It'd be great of some MSM here could bring more to light, the risk weighting given to loan types here in NZ (as Audaxes keeps pointing out) whenever there is some discussion with politicians on our housing woes.

Could have something to do with banks being incentivized to loan money into residential mortgages above all else.

Up
1

MSM won't bite the hand that feeds them. (You can put the RE industry into that basket as well).

Up
1

Fantastic post. Nailed it

Up
1

The question being 'how do we, as the Commerce Commission, continue to get paid to do nothing meaningful?" 

Up
10

Hence why Act wants to cull public servants doing things that don't help society.

Horray!

Up
4

Depends where they spend the money. If its tax cuts for the better off and prisons for the brown 11 to 17 year olds then we are better keeping people in jobs.

I was going to add roads but they will be toll roads owner by the CCP.

Up
1

That's another myth. Don't look at the race. Start looking why people are in prison. It's not because they were stealing a packet of chips. Actually go and do some research. The police / courts do not lock people up because of their race. They lock people up for crime. Such as assault, stabbings, rape, driving dangerously etc. It's not just brown people in prison either. My area which is extremely diverse are all sick of the crime and sick of the perpetrators getting away with thuggery and drug dealing.

Up
1

All talk no action.

Up
4

I reckon ComCom should also look into the fact that these banks actively use their economists to manipulate/influence behaviour in the real estate market.

Evidently, the big banks in NZ enjoy oversized market power in being able to influence higher demand for their products.

Up
9

Great point. Just incredible, and bizarre, how much air time, status and influence some of the economists at the big banks are granted. Just wouldn’t happen in most of the world.

Up
0

Stop doing market studies.

Stop wasting money that we don't have.

Stop writing about this topic.

We all know the results.

And nothing will change or be actioned.

Please, spare us.

*face palm*

 

Up
9

So - you are wasting our money to tell us that others are stealing our money and that you cant do anything about it. Brilliant!

Up
0

What's gonna come out of these studies?

Hot air.

Tell me what happened post the petrol and grocery reports...

Nothing.

 

Up
0

The study isn't the problem. The problem is that successive governments have lacked the courage to bring rogue capitalist elements back in line.

If a "Labour"-majority government couldn't deliver on simple market reforms and were unable to shift tax burden from wages to wealth/capital gains, there is no hope for meaningful change in this country.

Up
5

CBA has annualized return of 11% since 2009. Healthy div yield around 4%. And of course, the wonders of franking credits. 

Shouldn't people just buy the stock and forget all this nonsense of upsetting the wealth machine?

The Commonwealth Bank has posted a record profit of $10.2 billion, up 5 per cent on last financial year

  • CBA reported a significant increase in its net interest margins as the key source of growing profits
  • The bank's costs increased, including its provisions for bad and doubtful debts
  • CBA analysis shows 3.4 per cent of its variable rate owner-occupier mortgage borrowers are cashflow negative at current interest rates

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-09/commonwealth-bank-annual-profits…

Up
0

Buy the stock with what? the interest payments on their mortgage have removed the disposable income required for many.

Up
1

“There is also an apparent lack of responsiveness of deposit interest rates to changes in the Official Cash Rate, compared to a high responsiveness (in an upwards direction) of lending interest rates to changes in the Official Cash Rate.”

Sounds like the same game played by Petrol Stations with the price of oil vs petrol

Up
4

What is so wrong with banks making profits?.

Is it because The NZ government let the Aussies buy them all up!

Is Kiwi bank not the same profiteering type

Is google better or worse for stealing your money and time ...  Tax free

Are we just jealous that they are smart enough to take your money, invest it and make huge returns..  unlike the Government! 

Could you imagine the Government running the banks and the banks running Government!?!!?...

 ..This country would be better off and the banks would be broke and morally Vilified!!!

The Banks operate within the environment the government sets .

Just like the police, educational institutions, hospitals...

You can't change the weather but! You can wear sun block 😁

Up
2

You raise a good question: why don't we just do it ourselves? We know the best practices of the Aussie juggernaut. 

Up
0

As a long term WBC owner, I don't know where all the profits are going because I haven't see them.

https://imgur.com/a/XkmzAaZ

Up
0

Div yield (%)

2016- ‪6.37‬

‪2017 - 5.89‬

‪2018 - 6.73‬

‪2019 - 5.87‬

‪2020 - 1.84‬

‪2021 - 4.54‬

2022 - ‪6.06‬

Up
2

Approx Ave Share price

2016 - $33

2017 - $33

2018 - $32

2019 - $30

2020 - $25

2021 - $26

2022 - $24

2023 - $24

The market doesn't see a rosy future.

Up
2

Banking is a competitive industry (far more so than supermarkets), however with interest rates rising I think government want to find a scapegoat for the housing bubble.

Up
0

The Commerce Commission are a disgrace. If they can’t sort out the construction sector mafia then they sure as sh!t won’t be able to even understand the banking sector. 

Up
1

Yes, the are proud of their small wins and allow the big corporations to spin them a line to justify their monopolies.

Taxing banks profits will just make the customers earn less and pay more.

Up
0

Customer deposits don't fund a banks lending as it's their lending which first creates these deposits and they are never lent out.

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/quarterly-bulletin/2014/q1/money-creati…

Up
0

Can someone please explain why funds in customer transactional accounts are considered to be 'bank funding'? Can the bank have recourse to them in an insolvency event? Do those customers at least have priority over customers with funds in savings accounts and term deposits?

Up
2

Might be a bit naive of me, but what is actually stopping the government injecting a very large portion of cash ( or act as guarantor)into Kiwibank, to put it into a position where it could start seriously competing with the large Australian banks?

Surely , if the government can borrow at wholesale rates and lend it out through kiwibank, they would make a margin on that?

Up
0

Surely , if the government can borrow at wholesale rates and lend it out through kiwibank, they would make a margin on that?

Banks can borrow at wholesale rates (wholesale funding). Used to be a good cash cow for the Aussie banks.  

Up
0

The government could expand Kiwi Banks capital base at no cost if it chose to as it is on the governments own balance sheet. The government could just instruct the Reserve Bank to do so as it does with all government expenditure. Borrowing has nothing to do with financing the government as it is a monetary procedure. Kiwi Bank doesn't need money to lend out anyway, what it needs is capital and liquidity. Banks create new money when they lend but they need to retain these deposits or they will loose their reserves to the other banks and then be unable to make their interbank payments to the other banks.  

Up
1

Banks should hire the same team that supermarkets did to handle ComCom.

Up
0

It’s really simple.

a) 4 banks with 85% of the market equal’s oligopoly profits. 6 to 7 banks are needed with equal market share to have perfect competition. We are so far from that, it’s a joke.

b) recourse mortgages distort bank capital allocation away from business towards home lending.

Get on with it:

a) open banking

b) ban recourse mortgages

Up
2

Nationalise the Banks.

Up
0

Take a lot at their interest rate margins. ...

Up
0