sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Reserve Bank deputy governor Christian Hawkesby says financial inclusion will be considered when overseeing incoming deposit takers legislation

Banking / news
Reserve Bank deputy governor Christian Hawkesby says financial inclusion will be considered when overseeing incoming deposit takers legislation

Financial inclusion can contribute to financial stability and will be a consideration when applying new deposit takers regulation, the deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) says. 

In a speech to the Institute of Directors in Canterbury on Friday, RBNZ deputy governor Christian Hawkesby said inclusion and stability were interconnected.

“A well functioning financial system with low probability of insurers and deposit-takers getting into trouble increases the likelihood that people can access, and have trust in, the products and services they rely on,” he said.

Credit access and the range of options available to customers would be limited if financial firms were to collapse in an unstable environment. 

The flipside of the same coin was that more inclusion could also make the sector more stable. 

“Providing financial services to a larger customer base can promote a higher share of customer deposit funding, contributing to stability,” he said.

Encouraging entities to do different types of lending, such as to smaller firms, could help to diversify asset portfolios and reduce the relative size of any single borrower. 

The Reserve Bank said a review of 2,600 banks in 86 countries found a higher level of inclusion contributes to greater bank stability. 

Stable inclusion 

The speech was based on an excerpt from the central bank’s May Financial Stability Report which was pre-released ahead of its May 3 full release.

In the excerpt, the RBNZ noted there was “ambiguity” about the strength of the relationship between inclusion and stability.

“There are instances where increasing inclusion can negatively impact stability, for example, extending access to credit for marginal borrowers could result in financial institutions taking on a greater degree of risk as seen during the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States.”

It also used the collapse of finance companies, such as South Canterbury Finance, to highlight how inclusivity can pose a risk to stability if lending standards were not strong enough. 

This is relevant to the Deposit Takers Bill, which includes a deposit insurance scheme that's currently before Parliament, which will expand the Reserve Bank’s regulatory tools.

A select committee report recently recommended the bill be amended to protect the diversity of financial entities and require the RBNZ to consider softer lending standards for some firms.

 The Reserve Bank said there were three important factors for optimizing inclusion and stability: the types of products and services affected, the size and scale of affected groups, and whether inclusion efforts could lead to a reduction in lending standards.

“Under the new upcoming Deposit-Takers legislation, we will think carefully about creating rules that are appropriate to the characteristics and soundness of deposit-taking entities.”

The pre-released excerpt suggested there would be further discussion of this issue in Chapter 3 of the May Financial Stability report. 

Hawkesby’s speech also discussed work that was underway to improve Māori access to capital. The central bank released an issues paper in 2022 which highlighted barriers that Māori firms face when seeking finance. 

It was now working with retail banks to develop ways to lend against communally-owned Māori land and to collect more data related to Māori access to capital. 

Pause for suspense 

While the speech mostly steered clear of monetary policy, there was arguably a dovish tone to the few remarks he did make. 

Hawkesby repeated a line from the Monetary Policy Review, saying that both domestic and global inflation was “too high and persistent,” and reiterated three key points from the review. 

First, that the full impact of tighter policy hadn’t yet been fully felt. Secondly, there were signs that economic growth was beginning to slow. And finally, the extent of this slowdown would determine “the direction of future monetary policy.”  

None of these remarks were a departure from what was said in the April review, but were among the lines that raised the possibility the central bank could forgo a final interest rate increase in May. 

In the context of the below-forecast inflation data release on Thursday, it could be interpreted as a slightly softer take on future policy. 

Financial markets and most economists believe the Official Cash Rate will be lifted 25 basis points to 5.50% in the May Monetary Policy Statement.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

19 Comments

If we can get through the next 12-18 months without losing any of our so-called banks we'll be doing very well.

Up
4

Especially if they start following this inclusive nonsense. NZ is so f##ked! I vow never to vote labour again……numpties!

Up
2

Financial inclusion refers to different types of New Zealanders being able to access financial services... such as ensuring bank branches are available for elderly people who aren't able to use online banking, making sure regulation doesn't crush smaller/specialist finance companies that are willing to lend to farmers, or help extended families go in together to buy a home.

You call this... nonsense?  

 

Up
4

Yes I do, why should a bank keep branches open (bearing in mind the cost of the branch) for a small section of society who are not prepared to adapt to technological change. Opening up housing to people who can’t afford it is plain stupid aka financial crisis. However anything that helps business is well needed. I’m sure the intentions are right but let’s face it not everyone can or should be a home owner, as not everyone could run a business. 

Up
0

You call this... nonsense?  

I do. From experience. Locked out of NZ during Covid. Couldn't get a bank token sent overseas so caused all kinds of issues with online banking. Took ASB 12 months find a workaround fix. Anyone with reasonable tech nouse could have found a solution reasonably easy.

NZ banks are full of numpties. The only "inclusion" is superficial nonsense.  

Up
0

Odd that you say this against a background of multiple bank closures around the country. And this presumably acceptable to an 'inclusive govt'?

 

Up
0

"It was now working with retail banks to develop ways to lend against communally-owned Māori land"..

 

Lending against land means the land can be forfeited if it all goes wrong. Matauri Bay has shown it would be a very brave/foolish lender to think they can always just sell the land to recoup their money. 

Up
7

Let’s guess….a government guarantee…….I bet I’m right!

Up
0

"It was now working with retail banks to develop ways to lend against communally-owned Māori land"..

NZ banks don't give a rats about Māori economic sovereignty. 

Up
1

Nor should they. They run a business. These reverse racism policies being introduced everywhere need to stop.

Up
2

Self determination and economic sovereignty have nothing to do with reverse rscism. 

Up
0

But special rules that are granted based on race does. 

Up
2

A couple of big assumptions in this statement " the central bank could forgo a final interest rate increase in May.  " The biggest one being that any increase to the OCR in May will be the final one.

Up
6

I agree, there is indeed lots of wishful thinking in this statement.

Up
3

First, that the full impact of tighter policy hadn’t yet been fully felt.

RB is the last to come to that conclusion

Secondly, there were signs that economic growth was beginning to slow

Perhaps the Dec negative gdp result helped to build that view

Up
0

This may be the most important article written on this platform in the last 5 years.

Access to finance is critical to wealth creation. Non-conforming borrowers are largely locked out and pay a heavy price, renting instead of buying for example. Our banks are so profitable because they take very little credit risk, was it ASB who had their first mortgagee sale in many years recently? There are non-bank lenders however they are small with higher cost of funding.

Regulators need to encourage banks to extend finance to less traditional borrowers, that is the path to a fairer society.

Up
0

I can see the argument, and understand where you are coming from however how would you calculate risk. A bank could be forced to lend to someone who has a bad credit rating for instance, but surely the interest rate would have to increase to compensate the lender…..otherwise who wears the cost. Also what impact does this have on financial stability, the banks could potentially be exposed to a large number of defaults. In the case of Māori land being used as security, fair enough however in the event of default it needs to be sold off. That means that the collective could lose out to the individual in the iwi.

Up
0

An old coot tries to figure out what this is really all about. Presume its more just then just preparation for opening the floodgates to lending against Maori land... (thought this was already in the pipeline & fair enough too). 

 

Up
0

This is just woke spoke from CH.

Up
0