sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

RBNZ's Funding for Lending Programme staying because commitment to it 'is important to ensure the tool remains credible for future use if required'

Banking / news
RBNZ's Funding for Lending Programme staying because commitment to it 'is important to ensure the tool remains credible for future use if required'
m

The Reserve Bank (RBNZ) says its Funding for Lending Programme (FLP) is working largely as planned and it'll be staying in place until its scheduled end in December.

The controversial FLP was launched by the RBNZ in December 2020 to provide additional monetary stimulus to the economy to help the central bank meet its consumer price inflation and employment monetary policy remits by reducing banks’ funding costs and lowering their borrowers' interest rates. As of July 25, banks had borrowed $12.660 billion of three year money priced at the Official Cash Rate (OCR) through the FLP, led by ASB with $3.8 billion.

Interest.co.nz asked the RBNZ a series of questions about the FLP. This included whether, given it was introduced as a tool to stimulate an economy that's now running its highest inflation in 32 years at 7.3%, it could be ended early.

"The FLP is scheduled to end in December 2022. The commitment to the FLP is important to ensure this tool remains credible for future use if required," an RBNZ spokesman told interest.co.nz.

"The drawdown window for the initial allocation of the FLP closed in June 2022. This allocation was roughly two-thirds utilised and any unutilised portion is no longer available. The additional allocation remains open until December 2022."

The RBNZ spokesman says the FLP has worked broadly as intended and as expected.

"We can best observe this by considering the spread between household/business lending rates and wholesale interest rates, i.e. swap rates. Household and business lending rates have been increasing recently, consistent with the tightening of monetary policy, however the spread between these rates and wholesale interest rates is still low, relative to most of the post-Global Financial Crisis period. This is partially, but not entirely, due to FLP. Ample domestic and global liquidity, as a consequence of monetary and fiscal stimulus measures in New Zealand and abroad has also provided a mostly accommodative funding environment for banks, and other users of capital markets, in the past 18 months," the RBNZ spokesman says.

In one of its Bulletin articles in August 2021, the RBNZ said one and two-year mortgage rates dropped between when the FLP was signalled and early 2021, despite swap rates rising substantially, which normally would increase banks’ funding costs, over the corresponding period.

"This development suggests the FLP has been effective at holding down banks’ funding costs. An important feature of the FLP is that it was effective at reducing bank funding costs and retail rates even before banks drew down on FLP funding. This is due to the relative strength of the FLP’s indirect influence on bank funding costs. The indirect influence reduced funding costs for all deposit takers, not just the banks eligible to drawdown on the FLP," the RBNZ said last August.

FLP funding is structured as floating rate repurchase transactions priced at the OCR for a term of three years. Bank participants can access the funding at the equivalent of up to 6% of their total outstanding loans. Eligible securities banks can pledge as collateral for FLP money include Residential Mortgage Backed Securities, New Zealand Government Securities, and Kauri debt issues.

Banks' initial potential allocation was 4% of eligible loans as of 31 October 2020, able to be drawn down between 7 December 2020 and 6 June 2022.  An additional allocation may be drawn down equal to 50 cents for every dollar of net growth in eligible loans from 1 November 2020 up to a maximum of 2% of eligible loans as at 31 October 2020.

"The length of the drawdown windows for the FLP, of 18 months, plus an additional six months for the additional allocation, were chosen to minimise the risk of a refinancing cliff for the New Zealand banking system when this funding matures – in line with our principles for monetary policy tools, in particular effectiveness, efficiency, and financial system soundness," the RBNZ spokesman says.

The interest rate to borrow from the FLP increases as the OCR does. The OCR was 0.25% when the FLP launched and is now 2.5%. The RBNZ describes the FLP as a small part of total bank funding, at a maximum of 6%.

"It is also considered in the [RBNZ] Monetary Policy Committee’s decision as to the overall stance of monetary policy, which is calibrated using the OCR. In other words, the small amount of stimulus being provided by the FLP can be counteracted by the OCR. This might mean that the OCR is marginally higher than it otherwise would be, but is not a barrier to the Monetary Policy Committee influencing overall financial conditions in pursuit of its remit," the RBNZ spokesman says.

"The continued existence of the FLP does not mean that household and business borrowing rates are higher or lower than they otherwise would be. In the absence of the FLP, in the current environment, we might expect to see marginally lower wholesale interest rates – but higher spreads between wholesale and retail interest rates. In other words, financial conditions for households and businesses would be essentially the same. The effects of the FLP are expected to wane as the drawdown window comes to a close."

The RBNZ spokesman adds that, for monetary policy purposes, the OCR is the primary tool for adjusting the policy stance, and it's working as expected, "flowing on through wholesale markets to retail lending rates." 

Meanwhile the $12.660 billion utilisation of the FLP to date is "broadly in line with a range of expectations, in the context of the global funding environment of the last 18 months," the RBNZ spokesman says.

"The Funding for Lending Programme is included as part of a full review and assessment of the formulation and implementation of monetary policy, which is being undertaken in conjunction with the Monetary Policy Remit Review. The outcome of this review and assessment will be published later this year. We note that funding and liquidity concerns have subsided considerably since the inception of FLP – in part due to the programme." 

*This article was first published in our email for paying subscribers. See here for more details and how to subscribe.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

38 Comments

Why does the RBNZ believe that lending cheap money to the banks will mean that those institutions will pass any savings to the customer? It's naive to think that commercial entities such as these won't just use the opportunity to widen margins and make more money?

Up
22

Orr is mimicking Cindy, Robertson and co in showing a dismissive attitude towards own mistakes.

Up
28

Exactly right. We are in the hands of a bunch of unrepentant clowns. 

Up
14

they can stand strong and confident that nobody is going to charge them with robbing the bank if they were following orders.

Up
4

RBNZ showing they have learned nothing from recent criticisms of over stimulating the economy, in simple terms, just dumb. Orr does not seem to take constructive criticism well, somewhat stubborn.

Up
19

basically means they have to increase the OCR higher to get the same effect.

Tightening with one hand while loosening with the other, just doesnt make sense

Up
8

Bankers are gods.

Up
1

I think banks are passing on the savings to consumers/mortgage holders. They do this because A: If they kept the profits and charged higher interest to their mortgage holders, a mass of home owners unable to pay their mortgage would land them in a world of hurt, and B: They know what they and the reserve bank are doing is wrong, and could possibly have severe repercussions down the line, so they'd want to tread as lightly as they can.

I think that's the reason most senior members of RBNZ quit en masse late last year, because they were disgusted at the plan.

Up
0

Cantillon effect in action. 

Up
6

See my comment below 

Up
0

A very interesting man I'd never heard of, thanks for that.

Up
1

The fact the FLP program was put in place initially should have put to bed the widely circulated idea that the RBNZ's QE/money printing program had left the banks "flush with cash available for lending".

Of course, the compensation the banks received from selling bonds to the RBNZ were credits to their settlement account at the RBNZ, and those circa $45 billion deposits are for inter-bank settlements only; they are not available for "lending" to bank customers......

So the RBNZ QE program had no impact on bank lending; hence the need for the FLP program.

Up
4

Imagine how much more credible their tools would appear if they weren't proudly infused with stone age superstitions.

Up
16

What are you on about now? 

Up
0

Upvoted.

Up
7

https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/w8y1rt/criticism_of_reserv…

Smart play from RBNZ. Throw out the "that's racist" card whenever they take legitimate criticism.

Up
10

Te Ao Maori is as relevant to RBNZ's core principles as maintaining price stability should be to the Ministry for Ethnic Communities. And yes, such a ministry exists with its $4.2 million annual opex funding for ethnic communities that, I guess, aren't served by Te Puni Kokiri and Ministry for Pacific Peoples.

Up
10

I am all for criticising the RBNZ for their policy failures but your comment shows you seem to be forgetting how inherently racist New Zealand is to anyone who isn’t white. 
As a multi cultural society, there are many ethnicities that are not represented by TPK or MPP but still need advocates in public policy creation. Take your narrow and close minded drivel elsewhere. 

Up
7

hold my beer while I wade into them then......

Up
1

Let's call a spade a spade. BL's comment appears to be a dig at attempts by RBNZ to incorporate a wider Te Ao Māori worldview.

FWIW BL, whether one values a group's history, lore and language need not be a barrier to recognising that a financial system is dependent upon the trust that comes from a functional social system, which in turn is dependent on resource and energy availability.

Māori have ways of describing those relationships and the interactions between financial and other forms of capital: social, cultural, natural etc.

It might be uncomfortable, but in many ways it gives a more holistic view and provides a way to value things and ways of being that make life richer and are price resistant because they are priceless.

As finance is a means to an end, how does RBNZ understand societal ends, and play a role as steward of the financial nexus?

Up
0

All well and good, but why does it mean we literally need an idol of Tane Mahuta in the lobby of the RBNZ?

Up
2

Just a good video about the current political climate in NZ 

 

https://youtu.be/koI9hfY2xK4

Up
2

It Highlights where Mr Orr and his team stands.

Raising OCR as are forced but must be crying each time they have to raise the OCR.

Now just waiting for an excuse to not only stop but if possible to start deopping OCR.

Are they not the reason that we are in this mess - Inflated ego and it comes from Power that Governor has and literally no accountability.

Up
8

Raising OCR as are forced but must be crying each time they have to raise the OCR.

Now just waiting for an excuse to not only stop but if possible to start deopping OCR.

They don't have to be forced to raise the OCR because "inflation is high". Not at all. If demand is falling off a cliff and the employment parameters are met, that is enough. Notice that the Angloshpere central banks are very quick to cut the OCR, but very reluctant to raise the OCR. 

Up
0

"This is partially, but not entirely, due to FLP. Ample domestic and global liquidity, as a consequence of monetary and fiscal stimulus measures in New Zealand and abroad has also provided a mostly accommodative funding environment for banks, and other users of capital markets, in the past 18 months,"

I would be very careful about accepting this. According to Jeff Snider, the funding environment is actually quite tight globally at the moment. Snider also says that the central banks' actions have been largely irrelevant in ensuring liquidity flows. Sure, some people are making out like bandits, but they're a small proportion. 

Up
2

The FLP is just another example of the RBNZ not taking inflation seriously. The cost will be a further hollowing out of the NZ economy AND decline of the NZD.

Labour has literally spent BILLIONS on consultants, as such the consulting-class has had the ability to buy up real estate and other asset classes, where as producers and 'blue-collar-workers' are left out in the cold.

Take from 'blue-collar-workers' and give to politicians and consultants:
Obviously this is a pathetic way to run an economy, especially when the consultants achieve nothing at best and elevated harm at worse.

Wages could double tomorrow and there would still be worker shortages - asset prices are so out-of-whack as to be unavailable to young people and the aforementioned workers. Not taking inflation seriously will likely render NZ a 2nd world economy/country.

The FLP, like MASS government-bond-purchases is an assault on the NZD and adds to the hollowing out of NZ.

Council rates are the perfect example of how ridiculous NZ monetary and fiscal policy has become. For over 3 decades our cities have had their infrastructure rundown, hence Wellington's watermains constantly busting and the 400km of broken pipes here in Christchurch.

Yet the mantra has been; "increasing council rates hurts mortgage holders". So to maximize capital gains [keep rates low] infrastructure has been left to rot, crumble and burst. Any improvement costs have been past alone to renters and soon to blue-collar-workers via 3 Waters. And guess what, a SMALL group of Maori elite are raking in consultancy fees - you can't make this stuff up!

For Christmas should we all chip in and get Orr 5 foreign slaves and a whip?

haha Zack Brando made a funny, yet I'm also serious! By propping up ridiculous houses prices Orr and Labour will continue the crumbling of NZ and growth in neo-slave numbers.

Up
11

wow - good rant!

Adding to the problem is this government actually believe they are clever, but it is glaringly obvious, they don't know sh*t!

The arrogance and lack of ability to seek new information and learn, leaves them blinkered and floundering from crisis to crisis.

We are reaching peak stupid and Adern is leading the charge with her bumbling fools blindly following...

They seem to copy and paste whatever the US does, but if you havnt noticed the US administration is the most incompetent we've ever seen, and that is saying something!!!

Up
6

Great rant. Some perspectives here are truly enlightening. 

Up
0

BS ITS CALLED THE ITM fishing show for a reason 

Up
0

Good article, I'm not convinced by the RBNZ's response. Credit spreads have more than doubled in the last 6 months (Itrax Main out from 50bp to 120bp). It seems to me that while borrowers have to stomach the OCR rises, the big banks are protected from credit spreads widening. I don't buy the constant spread to swap, they can choose any retail rate they want to support that conclusion. Very disingenuous. This money is going straight to the bottom line while everyone else eats the **** sandwich.

Bank directorships incoming in 4,3,2,1....

Up
2

To be fair the Asb lend lower to sustainable lending anz for evs look into before passing comment 

Up
0

How large is the FLP v ANZ's EV lending??? Like I said, you can choose any rate you want.

Up
1

I think we'll see the Banks go quiet on drawing down any further FLP funding - they have reputation risk to consider. It isn't going to be a good look announcing multi-billion dollar profits while drawing down on cheap funding subsidised by the taxpayer.  

Up
0

Why would they care what the punters think? Most people have no interest in how commercial banks are enabled or how they create credit. 

Up
0

If they had a scintilla of public duty they would have stopped already.

Up
2

Love me some corporate welfare handouts 

Up
2

FLP has clearly not worked for New Zealanders.

The only ones benefitting are the banks & their outrageous profits.

NZ needs a public inquiry into this fiasco.

 

 

Up
3

I find the RBNZ's argument for persisting with FLP ridiculous, arrogant and offensive.

Imagine if Pharmac took the view that it would keep buying a discredited drug on the grounds that it didn't want to upset the international drug companies.  We would all be outraged but this is the same sort of thing.

I am sure that the RBNZ could have backed away from FLP without too much egg on its face.  Hard to believe the banks think FLP remains necessary even if it represents a nice little subsidy for them. I think they would have understood ...

Up
3