sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

As the RBNZ mulls developing a central bank digital currency, the NZ Bankers' Association queries what public policy problem one would address

Banking / news
As the RBNZ mulls developing a central bank digital currency, the NZ Bankers' Association queries what public policy problem one would address
c

Bank lobby group the New Zealand Bankers' Association (NZBA) says that, as the Reserve Bank considers developing a central bank digital currency (CBDC), it's important to probe what public policy problem a CBDC would address.

In a future of money issues paper released last year, the Reserve Bank said a CBDC would be a useful development for central bank money, supporting both the value anchor role of central bank money, and the ability of central bank money to act as a fair and equal way to pay and save.

A CBDC is a virtual currency issued by a state that has official legal tender status. A CBDC would allow households and businesses to directly make electronic payments using money issued by the central bank, which in New Zealand is the Reserve Bank. It could see an electronic record or digital token used as the virtual form of a country's fiat currency, which in NZ's case is the NZ dollar. This is against the backdrop of a world awash with cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin, and the development of stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency backed by a reserve asset, such as fiat currency or gold.

In a submission on the Reserve Bank's issues paper, NZBA says it supports the Reserve Bank undertaking further work in relation to cryptocurrencies and a potential CBDC for NZ. NZBA says it would welcome the opportunity to work with the Reserve Bank on emerging issues in this area, especially because of the potential impact on payments systems and banking.

However, NZBA's submission questions whether a CBDC could be a problem looking for a solution.

"It is important to understand what public policy 'problem' a CBDC would address, and any related discussions should include the potential for that problem to be resolved more efficiently through other means. We note that some central banks, most notably the Federal Reserve, have suggested that CBDC’s may be a 'solution looking for a problem,' and that even where there are problems in the payment system, there are more effective means to resolve them than a CBDC," NZBA said.

In a speech last week Governor Adrian Orr noted the Reserve Bank is conscious of the challenges potentially posed by a CBDC.

"A CBDC is likely to affect the banking sector’s current business model. By how much would depend both on the design of the CBDC and how the public used it," Orr said.

"A CBDC must be, by design, operationally resilient to outages and cyber security risks and comply with all relevant legislation and regulation. A CBDC should act as a catalyst for innovation and competition in a wider money and payment ecosystem that supports, rather than crowds out private innovation," Orr added.

He went on to say a CBDC would take many years to design and implement.

"Future consultation will get down to specifics of design and implementation assuming the case continues to be assessed positively...We will soon be commencing proof-of-concept design and testing for a CBDC as part of our assessment of the case for a CBDC in New Zealand," Orr said.

Last year credit rating agency Fitch warned about the potential of disintermediation, or loss of business and relevance, for banks from the introduction of CBDCs.

"We believe the introduction of CBDCs will inevitably involve households and businesses converting some of their commercial bank deposits into CBDCs. All other things being equal, this would require banks to shrink their balance sheets – a process known as disintermediation," Fitch said.

"A potentially significant risk posed by the broader introduction of CBDCs is that disintermediation could occur at a destabilising rate, for example by triggering a sharp contraction in bank lending. The potential for bank runs could even increase in stress scenarios."

Meanwhile, NZBA said it agrees a CBDC may be considered as important for the sovereignty of the NZ dollar, and without a NZ dollar CBDC the currency may be negatively impacted if, for example, online payments such as peer-to-peer start using other digital currencies that become mainstream through online platforms.

"We agree that the ability to manipulate the economy through use of monetary policy could be vastly reduced if the majority of money trade is not with the NZ dollar. A CBDC could be a useful tool in mitigating this risk," NZBA said.

"CBDC should be considered as part of New Zealand’s strategy planning to address the decline in cash usage. It could be designed to be more inclusive than other means of payment and stored value tools."

"Some of the perceived benefits of the CBDC in the consultation document are based on current state of the systems, for example peer-to-peer capability. It’s worth noting as these new systems are in a lot of cases under development and may impact the way in which CBDC may benefit the financial system in the future," said NZBA.

The lobby group provides a list of questions it says need to be worked through to determine the value and potential success of a CBDC. These include:

a) what need/problem a CBDC would address;
b) what form would it take;
c) how would it be distributed and used;
d) what infrastructure would be needed; and
e) how would this be funded.

"These issues require a detailed understanding of both the current and developing payments systems, technologies, operational processes and business models, making it even more important that the Reserve Bank works closely with banks and other payments services providers as it develops potential policy approaches," NZBA said.

*This article was first published in our email for paying subscribers. See here for more details and how to subscribe.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

17 Comments

The relationship between bank size and the propensity to lend to small firms: New empirical evidence from a large sample

Small and medium-sized enterprises, in aggregate, are the biggest employer in most countries, accounting for about two thirds of all employment in the UK, and an even greater proportion in Germany and Japan. Small firms are largely dependent on bank credit for external funding. This paper examines the question whether there is a significant relationship between bank size and customer size and whether bigger or smaller banks are more likely to be helpful to small and very small businesses in terms of providing loans. Using data on over 14,000 active and inactive U.S. banks of all sizes, from 1994 to 2013, utilising over 178,000 observations, we conduct hitherto the largest empirical examination of this question, applying a new and superior methodology that resolves prior controversies. The results are robust and indicate an inverse relationship between bank size and the propensity of banks to lend to small businesses. We thus contribute towards settling a long-standing debate about the influence of bank size on bank finance for small firms. Policy implications are discussed, such as the importance of a diverse and decentralised banking sector that includes a large number of small banks, such as exists in the US (but not in the UK), in order to help overcome growth constraints on small and micro businesses.

Up
1

Audaxes,

Looking at the banking system in say, the UK, the US and here, it is hard/very hard/impossible? to see any sign that their commercial banks are in any way being squeezed by the central banks. Indeed, when one considers the many many misdeeds of these banks-think of HSBC, Barclays, the Swiss and German banks and lots of others, some more control might serve us well.

Here is a quote from The Finance Curse, by Nicholas Shaxon; " Overall, the US government has become the world's most recent example of 'bank capture', a dubious status usually associated with wealthy parasitic monocultures like Switzerland, Luxembourg, Singapore, Dubai, or the City of London". That was said by the American offshore and financial crimes expert James Henry. 

 

Up
1

Well said Link. The banks are a problem, but only because Governments fail/refuse to properly regulate them and limit their power. There needs to be some significant regulation of them to ensure they serve us, not the other way around. 

Up
1

TLDR summary: legacy banking group not keen on being disintermediated by digital money. 

The world will not accept spy coins and CBDCs, as the alternative, censorship-resistant option of Bitcoin is much more preferable. It is truely global, and gives 8 billion people a bank in cyberspace, all from a mobile phone. USD stable coins from FDIC regulated institutions will be stored on mobile wallets, and move via the lightning network. 

Canada is today, showing the world why censorship money is needed. 

https://twitter.com/gladstein/status/1493360837850980359?s=21

 

 

Up
7

NZBA patch protection. 

Up
0

No need to fix something that's not broken. My VISA card worked perfectly fine in Countdown today. Much bigger things to worry about really for the vast majority of New Zealanders.

Up
2

It’s not broken until it’s obsolete. Keep using your fax machine by all means. 

Up
3

Most people can send and receive enormous amount of data worldwide instantly at zero cost.  Yet...

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/422639/merchant-fees-to-drop-busine…

Up
2

Just remember, banks don’t need your money. They need you to borrow their money (which is actually govt money, which is actually your money). 

Up
3

i havent got any money 

Up
2

..launch a crypto.  Some digits on a screen and convince a few to exchange it for real money.

Up
1

There is already enough of those in circulation Rastus and the buyers don't even know it.

Up
0

One coin to rule them all. Ultimate power: centralization, surveillance and control. 

Perhaps they are preparing for when the debt bomb explodes and banks collapse? 

Up
6

I expect the USA to become the first mover. Basically they are bankrupt but will not admit it. At some point it will crash and burn over there and the second they look like losing the worlds reserve currency status they will be forced to move on it.

Up
2

CBDC enables a social credit system.. No thank you. We would have to be nuts. 

Up
5

There's really no reason for banks to exist in the modern era, they're dead weight costing our economy billions. Central banks should manage money supply and your account can be linked to your identity. There's still plenty of alternatives, like crypto and precious metals. Banks could still compete although I don't know what their advantage is in a crypto future? We're overdue for a citizen's dividend system. Inflation should be managed through money supply half issued directly to citizens, the other half through government spending. To prevent cost of living from spiralling we need to shift taxes off GST and incomes and back onto land.

Up
1