sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Winston Peters says NZ First will ‘substantially reduce non-essential immigration and restore the principle that immigration is a privilege, not a right,’ as Labour says immigration should be planned around what NZ needs

Public Policy / news
Winston Peters says NZ First will ‘substantially reduce non-essential immigration and restore the principle that immigration is a privilege, not a right,’ as Labour says immigration should be planned around what NZ needs
Winston Peters speaks to reporters.
Winston Peters speaks to reporters. Image source: Dan Brunskill

New Zealand First says it's "imperative" a NZ First Minister has the immigration portfolio in the next coalition government to "ensure the oversight, control and reform of the immigration system."

The party announced a suite of immigration policies on Friday ahead of November's election.

“This set of policies is about taking back control of the future of our country and valuing our unique citizenship the way it should be - just like the vast majority of other countries do around the world, NZ First leader Winston Peters says.

NZ First is proposing that: 
- The birthright citizenship requirements get updated so only children of citizens will automatically be entitled to NZ citizenship at birth
- Changes to the asylum seeker system be made. These include making protected person status temporary by design, ensuring that any person seeking asylum while in NZ on a working-class visa will be ineligible to do so and making sure that asylum claimants are not able to use temporary work rights granted during the assessment period as “a stepping stone” to another visa
- The required period to qualify for citizenship will be doubled from five years to a minimum of 10 years and for permanent residence, this will change from two years to five years
- The cost of applying for citizenship and permanent residence will increase “to reflect its value and to better fund the wider immigration system”
- There is a 10-year stand-down period for welfare, which means all non-citizens will be ineligible for jobseeker, the accommodation supplement or any other benefits during their first 10 years in NZ
- The criteria for deportation widens to cover any offence for which imprisonment is available as a sentence - with automatic deportation for those found guilty of violent or sexual crimes, found guilty of fraud, participating in an organised criminal group, money laundering, aiding and abetting under the Immigration Act, or migrant exploitation
- A referendum is held on the introduction of a legislated annual cap on the number of resident visas issued each year
- Social housing be made to available to citizens first and foremost
- A 24-month amnesty for overstayers to self-deport with no restrictions on applications to return. The party would allow for a 24-month clemency period to facility any Pacific overstayer to remain in NZ on a valid visa (this will apply only to overstayers of Pacific origin)
- Any overstayer found past the clemency period has lapsed will be deported and permanently ineligible to apply for any visa in the future
- Ensure student visa holders intending to transition to another visa will be required to leave before reapplying for another visa from abroad
- Remove the automatic work rights for international students and make it mandatory for any international student who wants to work in New Zealand while they study to apply under strict conditions to work.

“For too long, governments have relied on immigration to drive headline economic growth and cheap labour. The result has been greater pressure on housing, infrastructure and public services, increased competition for entry-level jobs, and declining confidence that immigration is being managed in the national interest," NZ First leader Winston Peters says.

“New Zealand First will substantially reduce non-essential immigration and restore the principle that immigration is a privilege, not a right,” Peters says.

“New Zealand is more than an economy. It is a nation with its own history, institutions and way of life," he says.

“Immigration policy should strengthen social cohesion and encourage integration into a shared national community.”

Peters says the country needs to start viewing citizenship as a privilege that comes with special and unique rights and identity, like they do in most countries around the world.

“This does not take away from the ability for migrants looking to move here, contribute, and help build our country from showing total commitment and patriotism for New Zealand by becoming a citizen.”

‘Immigration should be planned around what New Zealand needs’

Separately on Friday, Labour immigration spokesperson Phil Twyford released a statement saying immigration should be planned around what NZ needs, and be managed in a way "that's fair to everyone here and everyone who comes.”

“Getting immigration right is fundamental to New Zealand’s future. We need an immigration system that attracts the skills and talent our country needs, protects migrants from exploitation, and gives people the confidence to build a future here," Twyford said.

Labour says its will: 
- Plan immigration around New Zealand’s capacity by setting goals through a Government Policy Statement on immigration that reflects our workforce demographic, housing and infrastructure needs
- "Encourage migrants to put down roots" by extending the period migrants must live here before becoming eligible for permanent residence from two years to four alongside having a programme of NZ orientation and civic education delivered by community education providers to strengthen social cohesion
- Protect migrants from exploitation by enabling migrants to move between accredited employers after three months, strengthening the Accredited Employer Work Visa scheme, and improving access to community support
- Protect humanitarian appeals against deportation, setting up a citizenship pathway for children born in New Zealand, and reviewing parent visa, health, and English-language rules

“Migrants bring skills, energy, and enterprise to New Zealand. A Labour government will back people to build their lives and careers here, while ensuring immigration supports the long-term interests of New Zealand,” Twyford says. 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

19 Comments

The guy who wants to hand out endless perks to old people doesn't want any young people around to pay for it. I guess he and his mates will be dead by the time the debt collector comes. 

Up
3

NZ needs to address its aging population problem by increasing birth rate not via immigration.

Though apparently that is not so easy to do. According to the 'experts' government incentives don't work. They always use France as an example. France started throwing money at it's citizens to have more children, which worked for a few years, but since then their birth rate declined again. 

Up
1

Show me a country where policy has successfully worked to meaningfully increase fertility rates in a developed country, and I might agree. 

There are none. 

There's a small number, e.g. Scandinavian countries that have had some success in slowing down the decline by spending LARGE on child friendly policies. I don't see Winston (or anyone else for that matter) opening the purse for that when the alternative of opening the border is so much more cost effective. 

Up
1

Getting into the tail wagging the dog season.  We need to do this MMP stuff better somehow.  Too many, rule in, rule outs for meaningful good faith bargaining.  It devalues votes and is not a true democractic process.  Remind me why we need a party vote?  Parliament is an assembly of elected members.  Too many of them are not elected! 

Up
4

Aye all the brouhaha before the election likely will only be exceeded by all the bickering after the election.

Up
3

Going full Nazi here, Winston.

Up
1

Hardly. 

Up
2

Shit...hes 81 years old, is it really so important to him that he remains relevant?

Up
3

Every election Peters takes every stand that will attract disaffected or bigoted voters. All he needs is 5%. But there is nothing to do with principles; nothing to do with values; nothing to do with a better NZ. It's all about Winnie being in control of the country by any means possible. I seem to remember him saying that NZ First was the "hand brake." But as a country his influence could more realistically be described as "break."

 

Up
4

He says the same shit every election and the same fools fall for it, then once he's in power he does the opposite. 

Up
5

Therefore by the fact that WP is still alive and kicking in parliament, surviving and running entirely on his own merits since he formed NZF thirty odd years ago, must be considered as an indictment on a longstanding and significant segment of the New Zealand electorate if your, let’s say critique, is valid. Personally I would suggest that his longevity is mostly due to disenchantment, lack of confidence and rejection of the traditional platforms of both National and Labour by the electorate. 

Up
4

Not 30 odd  years ago...almost 50 years ago. The man hasnt lived in the real world for over half of his life  and more years than most who vote.

Up
3

2026 minus 1993 equals 33?

Up
0

"Peters first entered the New Zealand House of Representatives for the National Party in the 1978 general election, taking office in 1979 after a high court ruling initially nullified his victory."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winston_Peters

Up
3

NZ First founded 33 years ago.

Peters first elected as National MP 47 years ago.

I think the comment was about him surviving outside of the National machine for 30 years

 

Up
2

You are correct...having reread, that is the claim. 30 (odd) years of NZ First.

Up
1

Winston First

Up
1

As a NZ immigrant of 30 years, I really don't get this anti immigration stance. My kids, and certainly their kids, are and will be kiwi as. Why should they feel more kiwi than the guy who's parents arrived 15 years ago. 

We're all immigrants in a country full of immigrants. We should be grateful and celebrating that we've found ourselves a place on this planet that we can call home where we can celebrate the diversity of humanity and live together in reasonable peace.

Up
1

While I agree that we need a population policy, WP is probably the last person I would want to see implementing it.

Up
1